Thursday, August 15, 2024
Headlines Daily Digest
Today: Digital Equity Competitive Application Webinar: Project Narrative
Don't Miss:
Sen Cruz requests information on BEAD Program
ISPs worry that killing FCC net neutrality rules will come back to haunt them
Connecticut Working to Ensure Universal Broadband Availability, Affordability, and Accessibility
Broadband Funding
Data & Mapping
State/Local
Net Neutrality
Antitrust
Kids & Media
Elections 2024
Consumer Protections
Labor
AI
Government & Communications
Government Coordination
Journalism
Education
Health
Content
TV
A Look Back
Stories From Abroad
I write to request a detailed update on the major administrative delays in the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program that have resulted from unlawful red tape imposed by your agency [the National Telecommunications and Information Administration]. Despite the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s (NTIA) three-year-old clear statutory mandate to bring the internet to the unserved, your agency has failed to connect a single American. What NTIA has done with the money so far is create a nearly billion-dollar slush fund to “administer” the program. Specifically, NTIA has withheld $849 million in BEAD funding for its own budget. This appears to have enabled NTIA to impose excessive administrative burdens and pursue the Biden-Harris administration’s extreme left-wing social policies, without legal authority. NTIA has sought to misuse its BEAD authorities to impose rate regulation, unionized labor requirements, climate change regulations, technology mandates, and other extralegal policies on the States. This has continued despite Congress repeatedly reminding NTIA that Congress gave it no statutory authority to use BEAD for any of these social goals. I seek the following information concerning the administrative functioning of the BEAD program. Please provide this information by August 27, 2024.
- A breakdown of administrative funding allocated and utilized by the NTIA, including for staffing (both state-based, and Washington, D.C.-based), operational costs, costs paid to the National Institute for Standards and Technology, costs paid for contract work outside of the federal government, and any other relevant expenditures.
- A list of each BEAD proposal submitted by a state to NTIA. In identifying each proposal, please provide:
a. The date on which the state submitted the proposal to NTIA;
b. Whether NTIA approved the proposal;
c. Whether NTIA requested changes to be made to the proposal;
d. For those proposals where NTIA requested changes to be made, the date NTIA requested those changes;
e. For those proposals NTIA requested changes to be made, indicate which of the following categories those changes concerned and provide a detailed description of the requested changes: i. Labor Standards; ii. Utilization of Minority Business Enterprises/Women’s Business; Enterprises/Labor Surplus Area Firms; iii. Equitable Workforce Development; iv. Climate Assessment; v. Low-Cost Broadband Service Plan; vi. Middle Class Affordability Plan; vii. Open Access Prioritization; viii. Participation by Public Sector Providers; ix. Extremely High Cost Location Threshold; x. Other (please indicate the reason).
f. For those proposals NTIA approved, the date on which NTIA approved the proposal;
g. For those proposals NTIA approved 90 or more days after NTIA received the proposal, the specific key factors that prevented NTIA from approving the proposal as originally submitted; and
h. For those proposals NTIA has not approved, the reason(s) why NTIA has not approved the proposal.
Fiber provider FiberLight has been selected to build a 10 Gbps fiber network for the Region 16 Education Services Center (ESC) in the Panhandle area of Texas. The project is part of the Federal Communications Commission’s E-rate program, which gives discounts to eligible schools and libraries to make internet access and telecommunications services more affordable to eligible schools and libraries. For this E-rate project, FiberLight will provide technical assets and expertise to the region, which will generate $10 million as part of its 22% of the E-Rate program. It will fund this through grants, local dollars, and philanthropy. FiberLight operates about 19,000 route miles and 230,000 pre-qualified near-net buildings. It provides telecommunications services to more than 430 cities with a focus on Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Texas, Virginia, and Washington (DC).
The number of unserved and underserved locations in Connecticut is estimated to be just under 8,000 (0.57% of all locations in the state). The northwestern corner, as well as rural areas in the east of the state, still have significant concentrations of unserved locations. In addition to access, there are significant challenges the state faces in achieving its universal broadband goals. Across the state, there is a need for greater competition and variation of services so that residents and businesses alike can choose the service that is most suited to their needs while pricing becomes more affordable. According to data collected by the Connecticut Office of Policy and Management (OPM), 86.7 percent of all eligible locations in the state have a broadband Internet subscription. Undersubscription is concentrated in 1) rural areas in the Northwest Corner and east of the state and 2) more primarily in large cities with higher-than-average poverty levels. These geographic trends point to the relationship between access to high-quality service and adoption and the importance of affordability in increasing broadband adoption. Among Connecticut households that do not subscribe to internet service of any kind, an estimated 18 percent report that a primary reason they do not pay for an internet service at home is an inability to afford service. Poverty is among the strongest correlations with low levels of Internet subscribership in Connecticut and around the country. The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection's (DEEP) Office of Telecommunications and Broadband works to ensure the universal availability, affordability, and accessibility of high quality, telecommunications services to all residents and businesses in the state. DEEP wrote the state's Initial Proposal for the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program which will provide $144 million to enhance broadband in the state.
Internet service providers (ISPs) asked the US Supreme Court to strike down a New York law that requires broadband providers to offer $15-per-month service to people with low incomes. Although ISPs were recently able to block the Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rules, this petition shows the firms are worried about states stepping into the regulatory vacuum with various kinds of laws targeting broadband prices and practices. A broadband-industry victory over federal regulation could bolster the authority of New York and other states to regulate broadband. To prevent that, ISPs said the Supreme Court should strike down both the New York law and the FCC's broadband regulation, although the rulings would have to be made in two different cases. The fate of the New York law is tied in part to the Federal Communications Commission's April 2024 decision to revive net neutrality rules and regulate ISPs as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act. When New York enacted its affordability law, the FCC was not regulating ISPs under Title II. The lack of federal regulation gave states more leeway to implement their own laws.
A bid to break up Alphabet Inc.’s Google is one of the options being considered by the Justice Department after a landmark court ruling found that the company monopolized the online search market. The move would be Washington’s first push to dismantle a company for illegal monopolization since unsuccessful efforts to break up Microsoft Corp. two decades ago. Less severe options include forcing Google to share more data with competitors and measures to prevent it from gaining an unfair advantage in AI products. Regardless, the government will likely seek a ban on the type of exclusive contracts that were at the center of its case against Google. If the Justice Department pushes ahead with a breakup plan, the most likely units for divestment are the Android operating system and Google’s web browser Chrome. Officials are also looking at trying to force a possible sale of AdWords, the platform the company uses to sell text advertising.
A recent San Francisco fundraiser for Vice President Kamala Harris (D-CA), which raised more than $12 million, was the latest in the Harris campaign’s outreach to tech Democrats and an extension of a relationship with Silicon Valley elites that goes back more than a decade. Harris has extensive ties to some of the tech industry’s most influential players and prolific donors, in part due to her time as California’s attorney general and later, senator. While her campaign has yet to release detailed policy positions on issues such as tech regulation, Harris’s track record has led tech executives to speculate whether she could take a friendlier approach to the industry than President Joe Biden has. As state attorney general and then senator for California between 2010 and 2020, Harris was in office during a crucial period in the ascendance of Silicon Valley’s biggest social networks such as Facebook. Her record on legislation and litigation around tech has over the years alternatingly drawn applause from some regulation and privacy advocates and at times criticism from others that Harris didn’t attempt to rein in companies as they amassed monopolies.
Meta has been bombarded by academics, researchers, politicians and regulators about a tool called CrowdTangle, which most people probably haven’t heard of. It’s been used to investigate the spread of violence, political disinformation and false narratives on Facebook and Instagram. On August 14, less than three months before the U.S. election, Meta is shutting CrowdTangle down. More than 50,000 people have signed letters and petitions urging Meta to halt its plans, or at least wait six months, according to the Mozilla Foundation. Regulators, including the European Commission and a bipartisan group of U.S. senators and Congress members, say shuttering CrowdTangle now could be risky—given how useful it’s been to help researchers identify security threats and misinformation, especially around elections.
President Biden and Vice President Harris are launching “Time Is Money,” a new governmentwide effort to crack down on all the ways that corporations—through excessive paperwork, hold times, and general aggravation—add unnecessary headaches and hassles to people’s days and degrade their quality of life. Today and in the coming months, the Biden-Harris Administration will take wide-ranging action to crack down on unfair practices and save Americans time and money. Key actions include:
- Making it easier to cancel subscriptions and memberships.
- Ending airline runarounds by requiring automatic cash refunds.
- Allowing you to submit health claims online.
- Cracking down on customer service “doom loops.”
- Ensuring accountability for companies that provide bad service.
- Taking on the limitations and shortcomings of customer service chatbots.
- Helping streamline parent communication with schools.
A group of archivists—a coalition from government, academia and nonprofits—has begun capturing the Biden administration’s digital footprint. The monthslong undertaking is called the End of Term Archive, and it has occurred every four years since the George W. Bush administration. Archivists first amass a sprawling list of public government URLs. They then catalog all of those websites (and the websites within those websites) and a snapshot of their content. In the end, it’s as much as 300 terabytes worth of material. The End of Term Archive is preparing for its initial “crawl” of government websites next month, and will then do another around the inauguration in January. A digital copy of those websites will be available almost immediately to the public via the Wayback Machine.
A public dispute between Elon Musk and the European Union has sharpened concerns in Europe about its ability to wield power over the sprawling social media platform X at a time when disinformation and deepfakes have helped to fuel political discord and an outbreak of UK rioting. Europe has taken a tougher approach to regulating digital platforms than the US, but Musk’s acquisition of X, then called Twitter, almost two years ago has brought the issue into greater focus after he slashed its moderators, restored previously banned accounts and increased his own outspoken posts. The EU’s internal market commissioner Thierry Breton posted a letter on X hours before Musk interviewed US presidential candidate Donald Trump on the platform, threatening the “full use” of sanctions under the Digital Services Act (DSA) if Musk failed to curb “illegal content”. It increased tensions that had been building since X in December became the first platform to face an investigation under the DSA over claims it failed to be transparent about advertising and allowed the dissemination of content deemed illegal in the EU.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2024. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024