Daily Digest 8/2/2024 (Net Neutrality)

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
Table of Contents

Net Neutrality

Net neutrality is on ice  |  Read below  |  Lauren Feiner  |  Vox
Chairwoman Rosenworcel on Sixth Circuit Stay of Net Neutrality Rules  |  Federal Communications Commission
Benton Foundation Benton Institute Statement on Sixth Circuit Stay of Net Neutrality Rules  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
Net neutrality déjà vu: The fight to regulate broadband providers just won’t die  |  Read below  |  Issie Lapowsky  |  Fast Company

Broadband Funding

Biden-Harris Administration Approves Montana, Oklahoma, and Vermont's Initial BEAD Proposals  |  Read below  |  Press Release  |  National Telecommunications and Information Administration
Benton Foundation
When Will Nevada Implement Its Digital Equity Plan?  |  Read below  |  Grace Tepper  |  Analysis  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society
It’s time to prepare your Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program applications!  |  Read below  |  Shauna Edson  |  Analysis  |  National Digital Inclusion Alliance
Ciena eyes the treasure trove of BEAD money, gets into access business  |  Read below  |  Linda Hardesty  |  Fierce

Competition

Public Interest Groups Urge FCC To Lower Broadband Costs, Increase Consumer Choice for Apartment Residents  |  Read below  |  Letter  |  Public Knowledge

Wireless

Private 5G takes the gold in the Paris Olympics  |  Fierce

Privacy

Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile Appeal FCC Fines Over Location Privacy  |  Read below  |  Wendy Davis  |  MediaPost
House Won't Vote On the Kids Online Safety Act  |  MediaPost

Platforms/Social Media/AI

Where Does Trump Stand on Section 230 Now?  |  Read below  |  Adam Kovacevich  |  Letter  |  Chamber of Progress
Bipartisan pressure in Congress emerges for OpenAI to prove it is developing its AI safely  |  Washington Post
OpenAI Says ‘Dedicated’ to Safety in Letter to US Lawmakers  |  OpenAI
Sens Welch, Luján Introduce Bill to Support Research of Emerging AI-Enabled Green Technologies  |  US Senate
Google announces steps to combat nonconsensual explicit deepfakes  |  NBC
Don Lemon sues Elon Musk and X over terminated talkshow deal  |  Guardian, The
Paris gives first glimpse at AI's Olympic future  |  Axios

Journalism

Media Ecosystem Observatory study: Canadian news engagement down significantly one year after Meta's ban  |  Canadian Press
Amazon Cautions That When the News Gets Nutty, People Shop Less  |  New York Times
Making Money From News Aimed at Gen Z Is Easier Said Than Done  |  New York Times

Kids & Media

Giving parents more choice with School time  |  Google

Policymakers

FCC Announces DAC Renewal and Solicits Membership Nominations  |  Read below  |  Public Notice  |  Federal Communications Commission
CISA Names First Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer  |  Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency

Company News

Altice USA Reports Second Quarter 2024 Results  |  Read below  |  Press Release  |  Altice USA
Apple reports third quarter results  |  Apple
Today's Top Stories

Net neutrality is on ice

Lauren Feiner  |  Vox

Net neutrality is officially on hold after the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the rule from taking effect. The court granted a stay, extending an earlier temporary pause. This time, net neutrality will be blocked until the court says otherwise after reviewing the petitions from broadband providers who opposed the rule. Those internet service providers (ISPs) successfully showed they would likely succeed on the merits of their challenge, the panel of judges wrote. While restoring net neutrality was always going to be contentious, its fate looked even bleaker after the Supreme Court gutted Chevron deference, a legal standard where courts deferred to expert agencies in many cases about regulation. Experts predicted net neutrality would be ripe for disruption after Chevron’s downfall, and the judges’ opinion notes that prior courts that upheld net neutrality relied on Chevron. In a concurring opinion, Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton writes that the FCC’s flip-flopping on net neutrality between administrations makes it difficult to even apply the lower standard of Skidmore deference, thought to potentially be a fallback now that agencies can no longer rely on Chevron deference. Citing Skidmore, Judge Sutton writes, “An agency’s power to persuade turns on the thoroughness of its reasoning, its technical expertise, and its ‘consistency with earlier and later pronouncements,’” especially those contemporaneous with the statute’s enactment,” he writes. “The problem is, we do not know which group of experts to respect.” He adds, “The consistency query makes matters worse. The Commission’s ‘intention to reverse course for yet a fourth time’ suggests that its reasoning has more to do with changing presidential administrations than with arriving at the true and durable ‘meaning of the law.’”

Net neutrality déjà vu: The fight to regulate broadband providers just won’t die

Issie Lapowsky  |  Fast Company

In February of 2017, Tom Rutledge, then-CEO of Charter, was asked how changes in Washington were about to impact the company. At the time, analysts were curious about what would happen if the newly inaugurated Trump administration overturned the net neutrality rules that the Obama administration had put in place. “It didn’t really affect us,” Rutledge, who is now Charter’s chairman, said, “but it had the potential of affecting us.” To net neutrality advocates, that comment—along with similar ones made by top executives at companies including AT&T and Comcast—was seen as a smoking gun. When the Trump administration did, in fact, repeal the net neutrality rules in late 2017, Rutledge’s remarks were held up as evidence that when the rules were in place, even broadband head honchos said business was unaffected. It’s been seven years since then, but the debate over net neutrality’s impact on businesses—and consumers—is now as relevant as ever.

Biden-Harris Administration Approves Montana, Oklahoma, and Vermont's Initial BEAD Proposals

The Department of Commerce’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has approved Montana, Oklahoma, and Vermont's Initial Proposals for the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program.  This approval enables Montana, Oklahoma, and Vermont to request access to funding and begin implementation of the BEAD program—a major step towards closing the digital divide and meeting the President’s goal of connecting everyone in America with affordable, reliable, high-speed Internet service. One year from Initial Proposal approval, states must submit a Final Proposal that details, among other things, the outcome of the subgrantee selection process and how the state will ensure universal coverage. Today’s action allows states to request:  

  • Montana: Over $628 Million
  • Oklahoma: Over $797 Million
  • Vermont: Over $228 Million

When Will Nevada Implement Its Digital Equity Plan?

Grace Tepper  |  Analysis  |  Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

On June 26, 2024, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) awarded the Nevada Governor's Office of Science, Innovation and Technology (OSIT) over $9 million to implement the state's Digital Equity Plan, the first state to receive funding under the Digital Equity Capacity Grant program. As NTIA continuously awards the states funding to get started on their digital equity goals, we are taking a broad look at each state's implementation timeline as well as some highlights from each of their plans.

It’s time to prepare your Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program applications!

Shauna Edson  |  Analysis  |  National Digital Inclusion Alliance

On July 24, 2024, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration published the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the Competitive Grant Program. The Competitive Grant Program is the third (and final) set of funds available from the Digital Equity Act (DEA) authorized by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) of 2021. This article summarizes information about the NOFO, provides application strategies, and provides our best guesses for things NTIA will look for in your application. That said, you, your partners, subgrantees and anyone in your organization who will take part in submitting your application should read the NOFO as it is the best source of information about the grant program. For the first time, DEA funds are open to organizations other than state governments! Eligible entities (see list below) and US Territories may apply for funds to join this historic digital equity movement. The Competitive Grant Program will create lasting and meaningful change by focusing on covered populations, measurable implementation strategies, and stakeholder engagement.

Ciena eyes the treasure trove of BEAD money, gets into access business

Linda Hardesty  |  Fierce

Ciena is well known in the telecommunications space as an optical transport vendor, but when the company saw all the money becoming available from the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment (BEAD) program, it wanted to get in on that action. About two years ago, the company made the decision to get into the fiber access business to homes and businesses. Recently Ciena CEO Gary Smith said that investments in fiber broadband access, fueled by "massive public funding around the world," are projected to grow the 10G and above PON market by a 55% CAGR to approximately $7 billion by 2027. To that end, Ciena was at the Fiber Broadband Association’s Fiber Connect conference, where the excitement around BEAD was high. Ciena has been supporting middle-mile and long-haul networks for many years, and Kevin Sheehan, Ciena’s CTO of the Americas, said access was “a natural extension” and “complementary to everything else Ciena does.” The company’s access offerings include optical network terminals (ONTs), optical line terminals (OLTs), routers and switches. 

Public Interest Groups Urge FCC To Lower Broadband Costs, Increase Consumer Choice for Apartment Residents

Letter  |  Public Knowledge

The Federal Communications Commission may propose rules and seek public comment on how to best lower costs and address the lack of choice for broadband services available to households in apartments, condos, public housing, and other multi-tenant buildings. Thirty-one organizations wrote to the FCC to express their support for opt-out of bulk billing arrangements. As they exist now, bulk billing arrangements sacrifice consumer choice to preserve in-building monopolies at the expense of tenants. For the many tenants trapped with high-cost or less-capable internet that does not meet their needs, an opt out option provides a vital escape. This is especially true for those eligible for low-income plans or Lifeline subsidy, which by definition are not available in a bulk billing arrangement. It also introduces competitive pressure to ensure that landlords and ISPs do not enter sweetheart deals at the expense of tenants—particularly low-income tenants. The best way to determine whether bulk billing does more harm or more good, whether providers genuinely need 100% sign up to make service viable, or other questions as to whether allowing opt out better serves the public by offering more competition, is to move forward with a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. The FCC can add questions that have emerged as a result of the recent barrage of presentations, and receive broad public input to address these questions.

Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile Appeal FCC Fines Over Location Privacy

Wendy Davis  |  MediaPost

In 2024, the Federal Communications Commission ordered Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile to pay nearly $200 million total for sharing customers' location data. The FCC fined AT&T around $57 million, Verizon around $47 million, and T-Mobile $92 million (including $12 million for Sprint, which merged with T-Mobile in 2020). The companies, which paid the fines under protest, now want appellate courts to reverse the FCC's ruling. “The Commission’s forfeiture order is unconstitutional, inconsistent with the limitations of the Communications Act, and arbitrary and capricious,” AT&T writes in papers filed with the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Where Does Trump Stand on Section 230 Now?

Adam Kovacevich  |  Letter  |  Chamber of Progress

The Chamber of Progress wrote to Donald trump asking him to clarify his position on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as voters and donors assess the candidates in this year’s general election. Section 230 is the legal bedrock for online speech. People deserve to know whether Trump still plans to repeal the law that’s enabled online platforms to host user posts, or whether he plans to rewrite the rules for speech online. Republicans often rail against Section 230, but it’s a key tool in enabling free expression online.

FCC Announces DAC Renewal and Solicits Membership Nominations

Public Notice  |  Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission intends to recharter the Disability Advisory Committee for a period of two years. The FCC is seeking nominations for membership. The mission of the Committee is to make recommendations to the FCC regarding disability issues specified by the Commission.  Such disability issues may include advanced communications services and equipment, access to 911, hearing aid compatibility, the National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program, telecommunications relay services, telecommunications services and equipment, access to televised emergency information, accessible user interfaces on video programming apparatus and access to program guides and menus provided by navigation devices, audio description, and closed captioning.  The DAC will provide recommendations to the FCC  on those disability access issues specified by the Commission after reviewing relevant data and information and performing those analyses that are necessary to respond to the questions or matters before it. Nominations for membership must be submitted to the FCC no later than Monday, September 30, 2024. 

Altice USA Reports Second Quarter 2024 Results

Press Release  |  Altice USA

Altice USA reported results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2024. Fiber customer growth continued in Q2 2024 with 40k fiber net additions, driven by migrations of existing customers and fiber gross additions. Penetration of the fiber network reached 15.3% at the end of Q2 2024, up from 9.4% at the end of Q2 2023. Optimum Mobile line net additions of 33k in Q2 2024, compared to 16k in Q2 2023. Mobile customer penetration of the broadband base was 5.8% at the end of Q2 2024, up from 3.8% at the end of Q2 2023. Broadband net losses were 51k in Q2 2024, compared to 37k in Q2 2023. Broadband subscriber net losses in the quarter were principally driven by seasonal university disconnects, continued competitive and macro pressures, and less activity in the low-income segment which is partially attributable to the impact of the Affordable Connectivity Program sunsetting.

Submit a Story

Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.


© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2024. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org


Kevin Taglang

Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org

Share this edition:

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society Benton Institute for Broadband & Society Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

Benton Institute for Broadband & Society

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024