Friday, September 20, 2024
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program: FAQs 4.0
Broadband Funding
Digital Inclusion
State and Local
Platforms/Social Media
AI
Policymakers
Industry News
Broadband Funding
The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) released Version 4.0 of the Competitive Grant Program Frequently Asked Questions and Answers. The FAQs provide an overview of the program in general. It also clarifies the differences between the three programs created by the Digital Equity Act:
- The State Digital Equity Planning Grant Program
- The State Digital Equity Capacity Grant Program
- The Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program
One looming question in telecom land is what happens to President Joe Biden’s mammoth $42.45 billion internet expansion effort — known as the Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program — if former President Donald Trump wins the White House in November 2024. The big-ticket broadband program is at an inflection point. While the Biden administration has signed off spending plans from most states and territories, it will be many months before any internet construction projects begin — the first groundbreaking won’t start until 2025, under the next president. And the administration’s various grant requirements have sparked partisan tussles throughout the last year, especially over the implementation of broadband affordability provisions and other requirements around climate resiliency and the use of union labor. Those squabbles have led to delayed approval in some cases, even as they stoked simmering rancor in Washington (DC). Republicans — backed in some cases by the broadband lobby — have led the charge against Biden’s BEAD requirements. And many believe a Trump administration may revisit these policy cuts.
To connect more Americans, Congress designated a slice of the $1.2 trillion 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), as well as a portion of the $350 billion 2021 American Rescue Plan Act that passed to provide financial relief during the COVID pandemic to fund projects that would cross this digital divide. All told, the bills provide around $90 billion in funding for connectivity spread across a plethora of initiatives. But the question remains: Will this colossal sum be enough to bridge the digital divide? If it doesn't connect every American, how many will be left out of the modern digital world?
Lawmakers Say “Broadband Czar” Harris Must Be Held Accountable for Mismanagement of Federal Initiatives
Sen John Thune (R-SD) and several of his colleagues in sent a letter to Vice President Kamala Harris regarding her "egregious mismanagement of federal broadband initiatives." In particular, the Senators criticized the delayed rollout of the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program, saying, "Instead of focusing on delivering broadband services to unserved areas, your administration has used the BEAD program to add partisan, extralegal requirements that were never envisioned by Congress and have obstructed broadband deployment. By imposing burdensome climate change mandates on infrastructure projects, prioritizing government-owned networks over private investment, mandating the use of unionized labor in states, and seeking to regulate broadband rates, your administration has caused unnecessary delays leaving millions of Americans unconnected."
Organizations representing rural wireline internet providers have stated their preference for continuing to favor federal funding for fiber-based broadband construction. However, many participating in a recent National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) comment round said the agency is correct in opening the door to greater funding of alternative technologies, including unlicensed fixed wireless and low Earth orbiting (LEO) satellite systems. NTIA proposed updated guidelines for funding those technologies through Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) in an August draft policy statement. “‘Internet for All’ is the guiding principle for NTIA’s broadband programs, and the wireless industry is proud of the significant and widespread role we play in bringing affordable, robust, resilient, and secure broadband to all communities, including rural, Tribal, and low-income urban areas,” CTIA–The Wireless Association in its comments about alternative technologies for BEAD funding.
Digital Inclusion
End of the Affordable Connectivity Program means the end of critical broadband access for Black families
The Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), a federally funded program providing discounted internet service to economically disadvantaged households, officially ended on June 1, 2024, due to lack of funding from Congress. With no more federal financial support, millions of households are left to reap the consequences. More than 23 million households nationwide were enrolled in ACP, with nearly one million homes in New York City. For Black residents of New York, internet access is vital for survival in a world that becomes more internet-dependent each day. Though the end of ACP leaves a significant blow to these households, the fight for equitable broadband access continues.
The lack of broadband in many rural and Tribal communities in the U.S. is widely recognized, but there are also claims of a lack of broadband availability in predominantly minority and urban communities, sometimes labeled digital redlining or digital discrimination. Motivated by such claims, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 includes a provision addressing digital discrimination and directing the Federal Communications Commission to write rules implementing the statutory provision. The FCC's rules adopt two legal discrimination standards including intentional discrimination (differential treatment) and disparate impact (differential effect). Using data from the FCC's new broadband fabric data, we test for differences in broadband availability between predominantly minority and majority neighborhoods (measured as census block groups) and find no evidence of digital discrimination against minorities.
Vermont Community Broadband Board (VCBB) is proud to announce the start of a new Fiber Optic Apprenticeship Program in Vermont. The program puts participants to work right away, allowing them to learn on the job and earn a paycheck from the start. The Fiber Optic Apprenticeship Program is part of the Telecommunications Industry Registered Apprenticeship Program (TIRAP), a Department of Labor-registered apprenticeship program. VCBB is partnering with Wireless Infrastructure Association (WIA), TIRAP’s national sponsor, to bring the program to Vermont. It’s now officially underway with its first Vermont employer, Sertex Broadband Solutions, signing on to participate.
Vermont Public Service Department Encourages Vermonters to Participate in the 2024 Mobile Wireless Drive Test Public Input Survey
The Public Service Department (PSD) announces the 2024 Mobile Wireless Drive Test: Public Input Survey. This survey allows Vermonters to highlight areas they know where Mobile Wireless Coverage is limited or unavailable, as they are the people who live, work, and drive in these areas every day. The survey includes the ability to enter a specific address or highlight a roadway with limited or unavailable service. The data collected from this survey will assist the Department in mapping the route for the upcoming 2024 Mobile Wireless Drive Test.
In the creation of its Initial Proposals Volume 1 and Volume 2 for Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program funding, the Missouri Office of Broadband and Development (OBD) laid out three goals. In its first goal, OBD recognizes the need for high-quality, affordable broadband for all residents in the state. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are over 687,000 Missouri households (28% of all households) with income less than $35,000 per year. Missouri's Digital Opportunity Plan further reports that cost is the primary reason why Missourians do not have broadband Internet access. Below, we take a look at how Missouri's BEAD Initial Proposals plan to ensure low-cost broadband service for all Missourians.
North Carolinians without access to high-speed internet at home tend to face worse health, employment and educational outcomes than those with access. This “digital divide” was exacerbated after the pandemic brought so many essential services online. North Carolina leads the southeast in terms of internet access and subscription rates, according to Nate Denny, deputy secretary for broadband and digital equity for the NC Department of Information Technology (NC DIT). Still, 15 percent of North Carolinians do not have a subscription to high-speed internet. Progress is being made in terms of infrastructure: in July, the state announced an additional $112 million for their Completing Access to Broadband program, connecting 25,903 households and businesses across 19 counties. However, recent economic and legislative setbacks have set officials on edge.
Richmond (VA) City Council recently adopted a resolution to declare high-speed internet a public necessity for all Richmond residents. Approximately 9.7 percent of Richmond residents do not have an internet subscription, according to the 2023 American Community Survey one-year estimates. Low-income communities are among those affected, unable to access important telehealth, education and workplace opportunities, according to City Council. Part of the Council’s vision is to have a faster, fiber network throughout the city. Broadband allows users to connect to the internet, and different services offer varying speeds.
One of the oddest areas of law under the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission is 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Section 230). This is the law that shields internet service providers and social media platforms from liability for content created by users. Section 230 is very much in the political news these days. There were 25 bills introduced in Congress over the last two sessions to modify Section 230 language. The bills look at a range of different topics. One set of proposed regulations would provide more protection for children online. The Senate recently passed the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) which would create a duty of care for online platforms to take steps to protect young users. If passed by the House, this would be the most significant online safety statute since the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act in 2000. Other proposed laws deal with content moderation by online platforms. To anybody who follows the FCC, the idea of the agency getting involved in these kinds of messy controversies seems alien to the rest of its mission statement. But since issues related to content moderation are heating up, it’s likely the FCC will get pulled into the fray.
The United Nations Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on AI released a report, Governing AI for Humanity, calling for a new policy dialog on AI so that the UN’s 193 members can discuss risks and agree upon actions. The report asserts that while AI is transforming our world, offering tremendous potential for good, the opportunities it provides may not manifest or be distributed equitably if the technology is left ungoverned. AI, therefore, presents challenges and opportunities that require a holistic, global approach cutting transversally across political, economic, social, ethical, human rights, technical, environmental and other domains. In this interim report, the UN outlined principles that should guide the formation of new international AI governance institutions. These principles acknowledge that AI governance does not take place in a vacuum, that international law, especially international human rights law, applies in relation to AI.
On September 10, 2024, Federal Communications Commissioner Geoffrey Starks delivered remarks to the Competitive Carriers Association (CCA) at its annual convention at Amelia Island (FL). Commissioner Starks highlighted a number of broadband-related topics in his speech, including the developments in wireless technology since his 2019 CCA speech, the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, and the need for more affordability measures like the Affordable Connectivity program (ACP). "Let me be clear," said Starks. "ACP is the most effective program we’ve had in helping low-income Americans get online and stay online. In fact, in my opinion, it has been the most successful program ever in our decades-long, bipartisan effort to solve the digital divide. We’ve made real progress in closing the digital divide through ACP and we cannot afford to slide backward. I’m ready to work with Congress to re-funding this critical program."
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org), Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org), and Zoe Walker (zwalker AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2024. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-220-4531
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2024