Columbia Journalism Review
Opinion: Journalists are rightly suspicious of ad tech. They also depend on it. (Columbia Journalism Review)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Tue, 12/04/2018 - 13:57Wikipedia’s co-founder wanted to let readers edit the news. What went wrong? (Columbia Journalism Review)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Sun, 11/25/2018 - 22:03CNN suit is an important and necessary defense of press freedom
When the government establishes an open forum for expressive activity, the First Amendment forbids it from selectively excluding speakers because of their viewpoints. As a federal appeals court held in a case decided four decades ago, this means that the White House can’t arbitrarily bar a journalist from White House press facilities. The record strongly suggests that the White House revoked CNN Jim Acosta’s access because of the viewpoint implicit in Acosta’s questions.
Editorial: What's at stake in the CNN suit against the White House? (Columbia Journalism Review)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Tue, 11/13/2018 - 16:27Analysis: Nov 6's midterms were also a referendum on the press (Columbia Journalism Review)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Wed, 11/07/2018 - 10:20How the law protects hate speech on social media
What does the law say about hate speech online? The First Amendment provides broad protection to speech that demeans a person or group on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or similar grounds.