Technology Policy Institute
Scott Wallsten: OTI’s Broadband Map Could Be Useful If They Understood Their Data (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by benton on Tue, 07/23/2019 - 15:39Podcast: What’s the Answer to the C-Band Conundrum? (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by benton on Tue, 07/02/2019 - 16:46David Fish: If Rural Broadband Access Is Included in $2T Infrastructure Bill, It Needs Reverse Auctions and Cost Evaluations (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Fri, 05/03/2019 - 10:31Costs and Benefits of Banning Huawei (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Thu, 04/18/2019 - 12:33Note to Congress: Antitrust Exemptions Could Harm Publishers and Consumers of News (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by Robbie McBeath on Mon, 04/08/2019 - 14:07Thomas Lenard: Five Takeaways from the House and Senate Privacy Hearings (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by benton on Thu, 02/28/2019 - 11:17The Law and Economics of Apple Inc. v. Pepper (Technology Policy Institute)
Submitted by benton on Thu, 12/20/2018 - 14:37Home internet access for low-income household helps people manage time, money, and family schedules
Could home broadband access help ease the burden of the "bandwidth tax" (the phenomenon of not being able to focus on long-term goals because so much cognitive effort is spent simply figuring out how to make ends meet in the short run) by giving low-income people a tool to better manage time and information? A new survey of recent Comcast Internet Essentials (IE) subscribers suggests that it might. In particular, the survey shows that a high-speed internet subscription at home helps low-income people to better manage time and money.
Getting rid of Chevron? Be Careful What you Wish For
While unlikely to draw the level of attention given to abortion rights, the Affordable Care Act, and affirmative action, the status of the “Chevron doctrine” is, to many, a crucial consideration for and against the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court. The Chevron doctrine gives regulatory agencies substantial discretion to decide what they can do under the laws that define their authority. Perhaps the most relevant Supreme Court Chevron-related opinion these days is National Cable Television Association v. Brand X, decided in 2005.