Originally published: November 2, 2011
Last updated: December 20, 2011 - 4:07pm
People who want to limit the behavioral advertising and tracking they are subjected to on the Web aren't well served by some popular privacy tools, according to a Carnegie Mellon University study.
Researchers concluded that the tools evaluated in the study, which included IE and Firefox components, were generally too complicated and confusing, leading people to misuse them. “We found serious usability flaws in all nine tools we examined," reads the report. The nine tools fall into three main categories: tools that block access to advertising websites; tools that create cookies that indicate users want to opt out of behavioral advertising; and privacy tools built into web browsers. The researchers enlisted 45 people to try out the tools. The participants weren't technical experts, nor were they knowledgeable about privacy tools, but did have an interest in this type of tools. Each tool was tried out by five participants. Researchers observed how participants installed and configured the tools, and recorded the users' perceptions and opinions.
- Letting Down Our Guard With Web Privacy
- CA: Facebook's Beacon more intrusive than previously thought
- Why Do-Not-Track Isn't The Same As Do-Not-Call
- Two thirds of web ‘cookies’ are for ads
- Study: Commerce Department App Privacy Proposal Confuses Consumers
- Study finds 12.5% of companies violating own do-not-track policies
- Study Finds Broad Wariness Over Online Tracking
- IAB Puts a Human Face on the Privacy Debate
- How Websites Make You Spill Your Secrets
- Online advertisers scale back targeted ads amid privacy complaints, study finds
- The 0.00002% Privacy Solution
- What a Difference a Week Makes: A New Framework for Protecting Privacy
- Do Not Track effort at a crossroads
- Industry Groups Argue Against Regulations Based On Fair Information Practice Principles
- How Much Should People Worry About the Loss of Online Privacy?