Originally published: November 6, 2011
Last updated: December 20, 2011 - 8:43pm
The White House took umbrage with comments and blog posts claiming it hasn't taken its responses to petitions posted on its new We the People website seriously.
"Every petition that reaches the threshold is put through a review process that begins with the policy experts who deal in the appropriate area," White House Digital Strategy Director Macon Phillips wrote in a blog post. "There has been some frustration with the answers from those who disagree with Administration policy, and that's fair," Phillips wrote. But "while people may not agree with a position, it's crucial to understand its rationale . . . If these petitions are fostering a debate that might not otherwise take place about the issues Americans care about, that's a positive thing." We the People is averaging about 20,000 new users and 31,000 new signatures each day, Phillips said.
- White House to petitioners: We ARE listening
- White House grapples with a flood of online petitions
- White House 'We the People' Site, Explained
- White House issues first online petition response
- We The People Petitioners Typically Wait Three Months for a Reply
- Fewer online petitions posted to We the People website
- The White House's New We the People Petition Website
- White House Ramps Up E-Petition Responses
- When The People Speak Is Anyone Listening?
- Measuring Government Social Media Part II: We The People
- Is Online Transparency Just a Feel-Good Sham?
- We the Coders: Open-Sourcing We the People, the White House's Online Petitions System
- White House Drops First Names From We The People Petitions
- The Case of the Missing We The People Petitions
- What Is the Democratic Function of the White House's We The People Petition Website?