Originally published: November 6, 2011
Last updated: December 20, 2011 - 7:43pm
The White House took umbrage with comments and blog posts claiming it hasn't taken its responses to petitions posted on its new We the People website seriously.
"Every petition that reaches the threshold is put through a review process that begins with the policy experts who deal in the appropriate area," White House Digital Strategy Director Macon Phillips wrote in a blog post. "There has been some frustration with the answers from those who disagree with Administration policy, and that's fair," Phillips wrote. But "while people may not agree with a position, it's crucial to understand its rationale . . . If these petitions are fostering a debate that might not otherwise take place about the issues Americans care about, that's a positive thing." We the People is averaging about 20,000 new users and 31,000 new signatures each day, Phillips said.
- White House to petitioners: We ARE listening
- White House grapples with a flood of online petitions
- White House 'We the People' Site, Explained
- We the Coders: Open-Sourcing We the People, the White House's Online Petitions System
- White House issues first online petition response
- White House Ramps Up E-Petition Responses
- The New We the People Write API, and What It Means for You
- Measuring Government Social Media Part II: We The People
- We The People Petitioners Typically Wait Three Months for a Reply
- One-third of We the People petitions are Six Months Old
- Is Online Transparency Just a Feel-Good Sham?
- Why We’re Raising the Signature Threshold for We the People
- White House to respond to petition urging veto of online piracy bill
- 3,000 sign We The People petition seeking "vapid response," cookies
- Here are the 30 questions the White House doesn’t seem to want to answer