Last updated: December 22, 2011 - 4:47am
[Commentary] The Federal Communications Commission thinks we have too few wireless competitors, though most Americans have a choice of five, and that's one or two more than most advanced countries find they need. In reality, the problem isn't too little competition, but not enough revenue to pay for the rapidly growing amounts of bandwidth customers are using. Raising prices and throttling users isn't working, so the only solution is to cram more and more paying customers onto the network. Even AT&T and Verizon are desperate for more customers, never mind congestion, because that's the only way they can generate revenues to cover the needed investment. In blocking the T-Mobile acquisition, Washington cites a looming Verizon-AT&T duopoly. The truth is, with its own deal, Verizon leaps so far ahead that it's becoming Verizon versus a distantly trailing pack.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- AT&T-Verizon: The inevitable duopoly?
- Wi-Fi and the Mobile Meltdown
- The unholy alliance of NAB, News Corporation, and the Wall Street Journal’s Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.
- Verizon Fixed-Line Sale Would Enable Vodafone Combination, Goldman Says
- Sen Franken: Small companies fear retribution if they oppose Verizon-cable deal
- Harmless Collaboration or a Threat to Competition and Consumers?
- Verizon's big plans for 4G next year
- Merger aftermath: Everywhere AT&T loses, Verizon wins
- Nixon's Lesson for Obama on AT&T
- Deutsche Telekom Asks FCC Chairman To Block Verizon-Cable Deal
- Verizon Deal Critics To Launch Coalition
- Verizon urges FCC to approve deal with cable companies
- T-Mobile is buying neither Verizon’s story, nor its spectrum
- Despite AT&T’s defeat, wireless deals will continue
- Surrender by AT&T is victory for consumers and regulators
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

