Originally published: January 4, 2012
Last updated: January 4, 2012 - 4:50pm
A Missouri federal judge ruled the FBI did not need a warrant to secretly attach a GPS monitoring device to a suspect’s car to track his public movements for two months.
The ruling, upholding federal theft and other charges, is one in a string of decisions nationwide supporting warrantless GPS surveillance. The decision comes as the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the issue within months in an unrelated case. The ruling from Magistrate David Noce mirrored the Obama Administration position before the Supreme Court during oral arguments on the topic in November. In short, defendant Fred Robinson, who was suspected of fudging his time sheets for his treasurer’s office job for the city of St. Louis, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his public movements, Magistrate Noce said.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Court Case Asks if ‘Big Brother’ Is Spelled GPS
- GPS and the Right to Privacy
- Is GPS tracking too '1984'?
- Justices Say GPS Tracker Violated Privacy Rights
- The Supreme Court left too much unresolved with its GPS ruling
- Ruling Spurs Debate on Digital Tracking
- Supreme Court to decide whether police can attach GPS device to a car without a warrant
- Judges Weigh Phone Tracking
- Passing the buck on location tracking
- Judges Drive Truck Through Loophole in Supreme Court GPS Ruling
- Supreme Court appears troubled by police use of GPS tracking without warrants
- Judge Declares Law Governing Warrantless Cellphone Tracking Unconstitutional
- Domestic surveillance court approved 100% of 2010 warrant requests
- Police GPS tracking case to be heard by Supreme Court
- Appeals court guts landmark computer privacy ruling
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

