Submitted: January 26, 2012 - 9:44am
Last updated: January 26, 2012 - 10:07am
Last updated: January 26, 2012 - 10:07am
Source:
New York Times
Author:
Jeremy Peters
As the debates have taken on an outsize significance in this Republican primary, attention has shifted to whether the news media, in their desire for a television moment, are creating too raucous an atmosphere. Over the course of the campaign, candidates have risen (Newt Gingrich) and fallen (Gov. Rick Perry) based on their debate performances. But the audience’s response has become as much a part of the calculation as the jabbing and parrying on the stage. The cheering, the booing and, perhaps worse, the silence affect the perception of how the candidates fared.
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Expensive and Bitter Media War Already Ignited
- Forget the Debates -- Focus on the Air War!
- Debates Take Candidates for a Bumpy Ride
- New Hampshire Barely Moves the Ratings Needle
- Romney Ramps Up Illinois Spending
- Restore Our Future, Mitt Romney Super PAC, Launching $4 Million Ad Buy In 9 States
- Fall’s Must-See TV: Obama-Romney Debates
- Expensive and Bitter Media War Already Ignited
- The Fox News Candidate Is ... Fox News
- Gingrich Bets on Attack Mode Against News Media
- Debates take toll on Republican field
- How biased are the media, really?
- Mitt, Paul winning Facebook primary
- A Taste for Reality TV Seen in Popularity of Presidential Debates
- Romney says ‘vast left-wing conspiracy’ in media is attacking him
Ratings
Recommendation:
2
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

