Last updated: April 5, 2012 - 3:30am
The Obama administration takes petitions posted to its We the People website seriously and during weekly meetings discusses responses to those that cross the 25,000-signature threshold , officials said.
The response was to a petition snarkily titled Actually Take These Petitions Seriously Instead of Just Using Them as an Excuse to Pretend You Are Listening. It was posted on Oct. 28, 2011, after the first round of White House responses. The reply from White House Digital Strategy Director Macon Phillips was titled We're Listening. Seriously. It outlines several situations in which he said officials have learned about new issues or changed course because of a We the People petition. "No one here at the White House thinks this is perfect" Phillips said in a video embedded in the response. "We think it's the right thing to do. [We're] making sure we're speaking with people about the issues they care about and oftentimes that means issues we aren't currently addressing in our day to day activities."
- We The People Petitioners Typically Wait Three Months for a Reply
- Why We’re Raising the Signature Threshold for We the People
- When The People Speak Is Anyone Listening?
- White House 'We the People' Site, Explained
- On Year Later We The People Petitioners have Mixed reviews
- White House grapples with a flood of online petitions
- White House defends We the People petition responses
- One-third of We the People petitions are Six Months Old
- White House issues first online petition response
- Petition to fire DOJ lawyer hits threshold in wake of activist suicide
- Fewer online petitions posted to We the People website
- Happy Birthday, We The People!
- Who’s Going to Blink First on Cyber – Obama, or the House?
- White House Announces We the People
- This White House petition on Internet privacy now requires a response