Originally published: April 10, 2012
Last updated: April 10, 2012 - 9:33pm
A US appeals court rejected the government's broad reading of a computer fraud law to prosecute workers who steal from company computers, saying it could expose millions of Americans to prosecution for harmless activities at work.
The 9-2 decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco diverges from broader readings of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by three other federal appeals courts. This raises the chance that the U.S. Supreme Court might decide to try to resolve the issue. The decision, written by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, upheld a lower court's dismissal of five of 20 counts against David Nosal, a former manager at Korn/Ferry International who left that executive search firm in October 2004.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- US court approves warrantless searches of cell phones
- US ban on political ads on public TV struck down
- New Jersey court denies blogger shield protection
- Supreme Court rejects plea to ban taping of police in Illinois
- England riots: Court rejects Facebook sentence appeals
- Attorney General Holder defends prosecution of Web activist Swartz
- Appeals court: Feds need warrants for e-mail
- Appeals court guts landmark computer privacy ruling
- Apple fails to fend off mobile tracking lawsuit
- Appeals court to review standards for cell phone data requests by government
- Court grants AT&T, government appeal in spy case
- Supreme Court rejects Internet music download case
- Terms of service violations not a crime, appeals court rules
- Media Groups Unite on Protecting Sources
- Digital Crossroads: Painful as slander may be, don't turn service providers into speech police
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

