Submitted: April 16, 2012 - 8:42am
Last updated: April 19, 2012 - 5:53pm
Last updated: April 19, 2012 - 5:53pm
Source:
Wall Street Journal
Author:
Melinda Beck
Location:
University of Pennsylvania, 3730 Walnut Street , Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
Looking for medical information on Internet message boards can be risky for consumers. Some of it is confusing, misleading or downright wrong. But for medical researchers, all that chatter can yield some valuable insights. Scientists from the University of Pennsylvania, for example, are mining message boards and Twitter feeds to see what breast-cancer and prostate-cancer patients are saying about herbal and nutritional supplements—including whether they take them and why and what side effects they encounter.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Local News Lost in Digital Translation
- I Want My Non-Nielsen TV
- Wireless data plans put spotlight on FCC billing protection
- Right Venue, Wrong Message
- Expert says data on federal transparency site is wrong
- Learning, and Profiting, from Online Friendships
- SOTU winners and losers, according to social media
- Sen Coons admits: SOPA "really did pose some risk to the Internet"
- Fact-Checking the Spectrum Food Fight
- Network Neutrality: Avoiding a Net Loss
- How Media Companies Can Boost Ad Revenues
- DirecTV’s Digital Transition Ads May Be Confusing Viewers
- Study Measures the Chatter of the News Cycle
- Some high-profile municipal broadband efforts have failed, but quite a few have succeeded
- Indecency In A Post-Fox World: What's Up Next?
Location
Javascript is required to view this map.
Ratings
Recommendation:
1
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0
Login to rate this headline.

