Originally published: April 19, 2012
Last updated: April 20, 2012 - 12:13am
With the 2012 campaign coverage beginning in earnest, journalistic fact-checking efforts are getting underway in swing state North Carolina.
This week, The News & Observer of Raleigh announced the launch of a new fact-check blog with an early focus on state races. And the other big McClatchy paper, The Charlotte Observer, paired its report on Mitt Romney’s recent visit to Charlotte with a fact-check box assessing the presidential candidates’ competing claims on job figures. These are welcome efforts, and a good start on the tough work that lies ahead. Another recent episode, unfortunately, offers an example of news coverage that fails to sufficiently sort out a war of words between rival campaigns -- and as a result, leaves voters in the dark.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- AP editor cites Bachmann fact-checking ‘quota’
- Big ad spending, little press scrutiny
- Fact-Checking Is Not Enough
- A Last Fact Check: It Didn’t Work
- News Outlets Doing More Fact-Checking Of Political Ads
- How Fact-Checking Took Center Stage in 2008 Campaign
- Denver newsrooms tops in fact-checking
- Doing Something About Truthiness in Politics and News
- WSJ mangles history to argue government didn't launch the Internet
- A most poisonous campaign
- Fact-Checking and Misinformation on the 2012 Campaign Trail
- During debates voters turn to mobile for instant answers
- New election low: distorting the fact-checking
- News Media Survival Requires Fact-Checking
- Little Truth In Many Groups' Campaign Ads
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

