Originally published: April 25, 2012
Last updated: April 25, 2012 - 8:40pm
The White House issued a veto threat against the current version of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) as House Republicans prepared to take it to the floor.
Just as the House Rules Committee convened to weigh amendments to the measure, spearheaded by Reps. Mike Rogers (R-MI) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-MD), the administration released a formal policy statement that raised the stakes: It said President Barack Obama’s advisers would recommend that the President veto the bill unless there are significant changes to boost privacy protections, add new protections on users' personal information and alter its liability protection language. "The administration looks forward to continuing to engage with the Congress in a bipartisan, bicameral fashion to enact cybersecurity legislation to address these critical issues," it continued. "However, for the reasons stated herein, if H.R. 3523 were presented to the president, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the bill."
- Intel panel hopes to avoid new cybersecurity fight with President Obama
- Seven co-sponsors of CISPA cybersecurity bill voted against it
- CISPA critics bolstered by Obama veto threat
- Rep Ruppersberger: House Intelligence Committee to re-introduce CISPA this year
- Rules panel blocks privacy amendments to CISPA
- House panel to reintroduce controversial cyber bill, setting up White House fight
- Controversial cyber bill CISPA returns to Congress for debate, same as before
- White House threatens veto against CISPA, citing privacy concerns
- Who’s Going to Blink First on Cyber – Obama, or the House?
- Rep Langevin defends CISPA, points to 'rigorous privacy requirements'
- House weighs changes to cybersecurity bill after veto threat
- War over CISPA
- Cybersecurity Legislation Must Not Violate Americans' Right to Privacy
- House panel set to debate CISPA
- Intel panel chiefs outline amendments to cyber bill