Originally published: May 17, 2012
Last updated: May 17, 2012 - 9:30pm
Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI), chairman of the Senate antitrust panel, is raising fresh questions about Verizon’s proposal to buy spectrum from cable providers following the company’s decision to stop offering DSL Internet as a stand-alone service.
In a letter sent to Verizon General Counsel Randal Milch, Chairman Kohl said he is concerned about "the potential harm to both competition and consumers that could result" from the decision to only offer DSL in a bundle with other products. Chairman Kohl questioned whether the decision undermines Verizon’s promise that the companies plan to purchase spectrum from cable companies won’t limit consumer choice. Chairman Kohl noted that Verizon didn't announce the discontinuance of standalone DSL until after a hearing his subcommittee held and said the move contradicts Verizon's testimony at that hearing. Chairman Kohl closed the letter with a series of questions, asking when Verizon decided to discontinue stand-alone DSL, whether it had anything to do with the spectrum deal, what Verizon's savings will be from discontinuing stand-alone DSL and the reason for the "price differential" between bundled and stand-alone DSL. He said he expects a response from Verizon within three weeks.
DirecTV sent a letter "expanding on its concerns" about associated commercial marketing agreements between Verizon and the cable operators. DirecTV complains that it was working with Verizon on a next-generation fixed wireless broadband product that they would jointly market with DirecTV's video bundle, a project that was abandoned, DirecTV says, after Verizon entered into the agreements with cable operators to jointly market wireless and video services. It argues that dropping DSL broadband service "continues the pattern of abandoning initiatives that would compete with cable."
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Verizon’s wireless, marketing deal with cable firms to be considered at Senate hearing
- Recap -- The Verizon/Cable Deals: Harmless Collaboration or a Threat to Competition and Consumers?
- Justice Department Requires Changes to Verizon-Cable Company Transactions to Protect Consumers, Allows Procompetitive Spectrum Acquisitions to Go Forward
- Sen. Lee defends Verizon, cable providers’ proposed spectrum deal
- Chairman Kohl: Verizon-Cable Deals Raise 'Serious' Concerns
- Commenters Weigh In on Verizon's Cable Spectrum Deals
- Harmless Collaboration or a Threat to Competition and Consumers?
- A Stand-Alone T-Mobile Isn't an Option for the Future. So What’s Best for Consumers and Workers?
- Sen Kohl asks NBC about Olympic site pay-TV link
- Time Warner Cable Profit Tops Estimates On Internet Gains
- Broadband Bundling: Trends and Policy Implications
- Groups Ask FCC to Stop Clock on Verizon/Cable Spectrum Deal
- Verizon Wireless Allies With Cable in $3.6 Billion Deal
- Dish Network aims for smarter phones, simpler bills
- Harmless Collaboration or a Threat to Competition and Consumers?
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

