Originally published: May 24, 2012
Last updated: May 24, 2012 - 3:03pm
The jury in the Oracle-Google trial has found than none of the eight remaining claims in the two remaining patents was infringed by Google in Android as Oracle had alleged. Rather than the original $6 billion damages, it's doubtful Oracle can hope for more than $32 million. And for that, APIs need to be declared subject to copyright (we won't know the outcome of the API copyright ability part of the case until next week when Judge Alsup deliver his opinion). This is great news for the whole Android ecosystem. Oracle no longer has any grounds to request an injunction disrupting the flow of value or products, nor grounds to force per-unit royalty payments for these patents. Moreover, since the patents brought to trial were the best-of-the-best available, it seems unlikely that Oracle will be able to bring patent suits of this kind against Android again in the future.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Google proposes Android revenue for Oracle
- Jury: Google did not infringe Oracle patents with Android
- Google infringed on Oracle copyrights, jury finds, but leaves key question unanswered
- Oracle v. Google patent phase wraps up
- Judge tosses Oracle's $6.1 billion damage estimate in claim against Google
- A Verdict That Alters an Industry
- Judge Slashes Jury Award in Apple-Samsung Case
- Oracle loses bid for ruling Google use of IP wasn't fair use
- Google tries to destroy Oracle's case, asks for judgment on Java copyrights
- Apple wins $1 billion victory over Samsung
- Oracle Sues Google, Saying Android Violates Java Copyrights
- Oracle seeks billions in Google lawsuit
- Google says it had Sun's full support in building Android
- BT sues Google over Android
- Apple, Samsung drop some patent claims as trial approaches
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

