What the final decision on Oracle v. Google really means


Source: InfoWorld
Author: Simon Phipps
Location:
San Francisco, CA, United States

The jury in the Oracle-Google trial has found than none of the eight remaining claims in the two remaining patents was infringed by Google in Android as Oracle had alleged. Rather than the original $6 billion damages, it's doubtful Oracle can hope for more than $32 million. And for that, APIs need to be declared subject to copyright (we won't know the outcome of the API copyright ability part of the case until next week when Judge Alsup deliver his opinion). This is great news for the whole Android ecosystem. Oracle no longer has any grounds to request an injunction disrupting the flow of value or products, nor grounds to force per-unit royalty payments for these patents. Moreover, since the patents brought to trial were the best-of-the-best available, it seems unlikely that Oracle will be able to bring patent suits of this kind against Android again in the future.

Location

Javascript is required to view this map.

Ratings

Recommendation:
2
Informative:
0
Accuracy:
0

Login to rate this headline.