Last updated: June 20, 2012 - 8:23am
Under fire from Republicans who claim that the White House has leaked classified information to make him look tough, President Obama has pointed to his administration’s unmatched record in prosecuting leaks. The statistics are certainly on his side: six leak-related prosecutions in Obama’s first term, compared with three under all previous presidents combined.
It is a record that has heartened security hawks while drawing criticism from advocates for whistle-blowing. But a closer look reveals a surprising conclusion: the crackdown has nothing to do with any directive from the President, even though he is now promoting his record as a political asset. Instead, it was unplanned, resulting from several leftover investigations from the Bush administration, a proliferation of e-mail and computer audit trails that increasingly can pinpoint reporters’ sources, bipartisan support in Congress for a tougher approach, and a push by the director of national intelligence in 2009 that sharpened the system for tracking disclosures.
- Administration Takes a Hard Line Against Leaks to Press
- Obama’s War on Journalists
- Planned NSA reforms still leave journalists reason to worry
- US Attacks, Online and From the Air, Fuel Secrecy Debate
- Spying on The Associated Press
- Olympic Games are Just the Beginning for Cyberwarfare
- Under Fire, White House Pushes to Revive ‘Media Shield’ Bill
- The Justice Department and a free press
- What’s in a ‘scoop’? The White House has a strategy for that.
- President Obama to Call for End to NSA’s Bulk Data Collection
- Congress needs to enact a shield law for journalists
- Debate on Secret Data Looks Unlikely, Partly Due to Secrecy
- The White House on Spying
- The Obama Administration and the Press
- Press disclosures help more than hurt