Jesse Jackson: FBI v. Apple is a security and privacy issue. What about civil rights?

Source 
Author 
Coverage Type 

The ongoing legal drama between Apple and the Federal Bureau of investigation has largely been characterized as an Internet privacy and security issue—and a constitutional one, too. It's also been characterized as a human rights issue. Now, the Rev Jesse Jackson says it's about civil rights.

Clearly, the security, privacy, and human rights aspects of the fight are all somewhat connected to civil rights. But Jackson's letter to the judge overseeing the legal battle between the tech giant and the federal government has put his own spin on the hot-button topic. Jackson, the president and founder of the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, wrote Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of Riverside Federal Court, urging her to side against the government: "In these difficult times, the government, courts and private companies must stand up and uphold—however unpopular—our First Amendment rights, our right to privacy and basic individual freedoms guaranteed to us under the US Constitution. Other writers will weigh in on the intricacies of technology and privacy rights. What I want to bring to the forefront of this legal debate is the impact and implications this case has on civil rights and our historic civil rights movement. This case cuts right to the heart of our right to live free from unwarranted government surveillance. It is a matter of deep personal concern to me—given the past and present illegal and unwarranted spying and surveillance of civil rights organizations, much conducted under the guise of national security."


Jesse Jackson: FBI v. Apple is a security and privacy issue. What about civil rights?