Science policy positions reveal candidates’ views of America

[Commentary] Though rarely a talking point, science policy has managed to glean some attention in the primary season’s deluge of debates, town hall meetings, and press releases. Given the historical benefits of scientific research, science policy must be incorporated into the 2016 general election discussion.

Hillary Clinton recognizes that the country faces major issues, but she envisions a future where science plays a critical role in making America stronger. In stark contrast, Donald Trump sees the US on the brink of catastrophic decline. Focused on the present, Trump’s commitment to current issues rather than science funding suggests that the country must first be saved before it can work towards a more prosperous and scientific future. While often difficult to justify in the short term, applied and theoretical scientific research regularly has widespread impact on current and future challenges. Scientific research by NASA, NIH, national labs, and universities has created its own surprising solutions to difficult problems. From solar power to wireless communications, nuclear energy to the internet, science research has helped shape the modern world. Ultimately, candidates must successfully balance solving imminent challenges with the need for continued scientific exploration to create a successful present and prosperous future.