Last updated: September 1, 2011 - 9:13am
The Department of Justice's decision on AT&T/T-Mobile was delivered with a political tinge, with James Cole, the deputy attorney-general, saying: “We see this as a move that will help protect jobs in the economy, not a move that’s going to in any way reduce them.” He said: “The general experience with mergers is that there is what’s called efficiencies, which is redundancies when the two companies come together, which usually reduces jobs, in our experience.” Coincidentally or not, such a rationale dovetails perfectly with the agenda of the Obama administration, which is focused on how to create, and protect, jobs, at a time of persistent high unemployment. The timing took some by surprise, as did the DoJ’s decision not to proceed in concert with the Federal Communications Commission.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- David Rehr Resigns As NAB President
- Reaction to Justice's Move to Block AT&T/T-Mobile (Updated)
- DOJ’s move to block AT&T, T-Mobile merger could be headache for Obama
- Sprint, CWA Square Off Over AT&T–T-Mobile
- Is the Specter of a 'Cyber Cold War' Real?
- Home work: Telecommuting patterns around the US
- Inside Obama’s HQ
- AT&T, rivals spar over deal's jobs impact
- AT&T left scrambling to revive deal
- To Count New Stimulus Jobs, Help Really Wanted
- Trade policies force transfer of tech expertise to China
- Silicon Valley’s most important document ever
- It's Do-Over Time At The NAB
- Short Week Not Short on News
- Countries Arming for Cyberwarfare
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

