Originally published: September 1, 2011
Last updated: September 1, 2011 - 7:00pm
Regimes survive mainly by creating a "collective action" problem for their citizenry and by playing "whack-a-protest" to prevent cascades of action. "Collective action problems" arise when a problem can be solved only through cooperation by many, but when there are strong disincentives for any one individual to participate, especially if victory is not guaranteed.
It is in this context Facebook "likes" of dissident pages such as "We are All Khaled Said," sharing of videos of regime brutality, online expressions of political anger, and acceptances of Facebook "invitations" to protest all matter as they help build a visible momentum which, itself, is a condition of success. A public is not created just because everyone individually holds an opinion but because there is multi-level awareness of other people's views leading to a spiral of action and protest. That is why the new media ecology is a game-changer.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Social media's role in Arab spring still unclear
- Chinese online censorship targets "collective action" posts
- The Declaration of Internet Freedom: how the net’s minutemen plan to protect the future
- Social media’s role in politics
- BART admits halting cell service to stop protests
- Egypt's state-run media starting to shift from pro-Mubarak coverage
- Ambassador Susan Rice hosts virtual town hall at Twitter
- Wary of Egypt Unrest, China Censors Web
- Web firms aim to benefit from role in uprising
- Using His Software Skills With Freedom, Not a Big Payout, in Mind
- UAE quiet on streets but Web reformers face heat
- US Restricts UAE Firm for Web Filter Sale to Syria
- Trying to Stir Up a Popular Protest in China, From a Bedroom in Manhattan
- Internet, activists help topple prominent Democrat
- US website blackout draws praise in China
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

