June 2003

Communications-Related Headlines for June 4, 2003

A service of the Benton Foundation (http://www.benton.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNET
Blogger Salam Pax Identified by UK Newspaper
Counteracting the Internet Rumor
Bloggers Report Alt News From G8

PRIVACY
TiVo Plans to Sell Information on Customers' Viewing Habits

RADIO
US Digital Radio Revolution Stalls

EDTECH
Parents of Students at Troubled Cyberschool Prepare for Closing

DIGITAL DIVIDE
Lack of Technology Denies Grants to Blacks, Study Says

INTERNET

BLOGGER SALAM PAX IDENTIFIED BY UK NEWSPAPER
Rory McCarthy, writing for the British newspaper The Guardian Unlimited,
claims to have tracked down "Salam Pax." Salam Pax was the online alias of a
person who claimed to be a young gay Iraqi publishing a Web log from
Baghdad. After several news outlets profiled the blog before the start of
the war, Salam Pax quickly became a wartime online celebrity -- not only for
the quality of his writing, but the fact that he was an anonymous Baghdadi
relaying detailed, witty first-person accounts from the city over the
Internet. Salam Pax's blogs went quiet as the war picked up, sparking a
furious "Where's Salam Pax?" debate on the Net, but writer McCarthy says
that he has found Pax in the flesh. Salam is a young male Iraqi architect
who spent much of his childhood in Vienna, but now resides with his family
in Baghdad. Salam says that he continued to write throughout the war, but
was unable to publish once the authorities shut down local Internet access.
The Guardian also premiered a fortnightly column by Salam today. Salam
begins his new blog by quoting an Iraqi paper: " Vacancies: President needed
-- fluent in English, will have limited powers only. Generous bonuses...."
SOURCE: The Guardian Unlimited; AUTHOR: Rory McCarthy
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,966819,00.html
Salam's new column for the Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,969950,00.html

COUNTERACTING THE INTERNET RUMOR
The latest Internet rumor plaguing the much-maligned Starbucks suggests a
"nefarious intent" in the company's decision to pull out of Israel.
Starbucks, a veteran of Internet rumor wars, has developed some effective
defensive tactics. One technique was a campaign to discreetly disseminate
the correct information -- that they had pulled out for purely economic
reasons -- to interested parties while avoiding spreading the rumor to the
masses. Perhaps the most effective weapon proved to be the Anti-Defamation
League, which contacted Starbucks to investigate the matter and later
circulated the company's message on its website and in telephone calls.
Other companies have not been as fortunate, though. According to a recent
study, only three of 24 Fortune 500 companies have handled Internet rumors
or hoaxes in a responsible manner. "If they handled sales with the same care
they handled Internet rumors, they wouldn't be companies very long," said
John T. Llewellyn, associate professor of communication at Wake Forest
University. According to Mary Frances Luce of the Wharton School of
Business, silence can be construed as guilt, but an aggressive defensive may
publicize the rumor. "There's a fine line in being too loud about it or not
loud enough," she said.
SOURCE: NYTimes.com; AUTHOR: Sherry Day
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/02/technology/02NECO.html

BLOGGERS REPORT ALT NEWS FROM G8
Protesters served up their own version of the demonstrations at the Group of
Eight summit in France by posting commentary on Web logs, or blogs. Web
designer and protester Geoffroi du Chambon differentiated himself from
mainstream reporters by offering updates as often as every half-hour on the
activities of the protesters. Other websites, such as Project Hive, allowed
protesters to submit comments and pictures through web-enabled phones and
PDAs. According to Howard Rheingold, author of Smart Mobs: The Next Social
Revolution, cell-phones have allowed protesters to better organize
themselves. With the popularization of next-generation 3G videophones,
protesters can submit video instantly to blogs:"Then you no longer need to
depend on what ABC News has to say about what's going on there," he said.
Blogger du Chambon is unsure of the impact of his blog on public perception
of protesters, but he believes that technology and demonstrating go together
in a certain way. "Blogging is partly based on hyperlinks, reinforcing the
feeling that you are part of something bigger. Demonstrating is also based
on human hyperlinks, materializing the need for fraternity," he said.
SOURCE: Wired News; AUTHOR: Elisa Batista
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,59086,00.html

PRIVACY

TIVO PLANS TO SELL INFORMATION ON CUSTOMERS' VIEWING HABITS
Digital TV recording manufacturer TiVo announced that it will begin to sell
information about the viewing patterns of its customers to advertisers and
programmers, claiming that it can offer far more precise data than
traditional rating methods. TiVo devices contain hard drives connected to a
central server, thus allowing the company to track specific actions taken by
individual viewers, such as how often they skip commercials or at what exact
point they change channels. TiVo President Martin Yudkovitz noted that the
data would be filtered through a third party to prevent advertisers from
having information on specific individuals. Early reports showed that 54
percent of viewers fast-forwarded through commercials during prime time.
SOURCE: The New York Times; AUTHOR: Amy Harmon
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/02/business/media/02TIVO.html

RADIO

US DIGITAL RADIO REVOLUTION STALLS
With the promise of digital radio due for delivery this fall, the US
National Radio Systems Committee (NRSC) last week suspended its
standard-setting process, stating that the current technology's sound
quality is insufficient for broadcast. Columbia, Maryland-based iBiquity
Digital, the company that developed the technology, must take their in-band
open channel (IBOC) system back to the drawing board. The IBOC technology
squeezes both analogue and digital signals into the current AM and FM bands.
Listeners would need an IBOC-compatible radio in order to listen once the
conversion takes place, but such devices will not be available until the
NRSC sets its standards. The delay is a victory for the Amherst Alliance, a
group of broadcasters, webcasters and concerned citizens hoping that the
NRSC will consider other technologies, such as the Eureka technology
developed in Europe and adopted in several countries.
SOURCE: New Scientist; AUTHOR: Barry Fox
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993772

EDTECH

PARENTS OF STUDENTS AT TROUBLED CYBERSCHOOL PREPARE FOR CLOSING
After two years of legal and funding battles, the Einstein Academy Charter
School in Philadelphia has had its charter revoked. The Einstein school
offered services to some 3,000 students when it opened its virtual doors in
2001, but enrollment has dropped to around 660 amid allegations that the
school provided inadequate special education services and mismanaged its
finances, among other things. Linda Cross, whose son Cory has overcome
dyslexia during his time at the on-line school, disagrees. "I've told people
that if Einstein were to survive one more year, my son wouldn't need special
education help anymore. He would be able to go back to a regular classroom,"
she said. The Einstein Academy failed to provide free computers, texts and
Internet connections to students as it had promised, critics allege, but
school officials counter that school districts withheld tuition payments.
Supporters of cyberschools enjoy the flexibility offered to students who may
learn in non-traditional ways, but many superintendents fear that
cyberschools "constitute a largely unregulated form of homeschooling."
SOURCE: USA Today; AUTHOR: The Associated Press
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/techinnovations/2003-06-02-cyberschool...
sing_x.htm

DIGITAL DIVIDE

LACK OF TECHNOLOGY DENIES GRANTS TO BLACKS, STUDY SAYS
The US Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (FBCI) may be
preventing small organizations from having equal access to its funding
because of its online-only applications. For example, some churches may be
hesitant to go online. "I feel that some are fearful because it's a
different way of going about things," said the Rev. Alfred Smith, who uses
his computer for such things as researching religious texts and accessing
book reviews. According to Andrew Sears, director of the Association of
Christian Community Computer Centers, financial constraints can prevent
black churches from advancing technologically. "It's a reflection of larger
society," he said. "There are lots of areas with economic injustices."
Churches such as Rev. Smith's teach classes at their own computer labs in an
effort to promote computer literacy. "Without greater adoption of IT, these
organizations will be further marginalized, and the digital divide will
become wider," Lee said.
SOURCE: The Patriot-News; AUTHOR: Laura Michalski
http://www.pennlive.com/news/patriotnews/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/html_s...
ard.xsl?/base/news/1054633184166101.xml

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Communications-Related Headlines for June 3, 2003

A service of the Benton Foundation (http://www.benton.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
FCC Ruling to Face Possible Legislative, Court Challenges
FCC Decision Deals a Blow to Diversity and Democracy
FCC, Big Media Make Scary Bedfellows
Media Giants, Publishers Hail FCC Vote
Enter the Matrix: The FCC's New Rules

DIGITAL DIVIDE
UN Seeks to Bridge the Digital Divide
Forum: Bridging the Global Digital Divide
Partnership Built On the Web

QUOTABLES
Beltway Comments on Media Ownership Decision

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

FCC RULING TO FACE POSSIBLE LEGISLATIVE, COURT CHALLENGES
Yesterday's FCC vote to relax media ownership rules has drawn a swift
response from Beltway critics, many of whom expect to see legislative and
judicial responses very soon. "As more and more Americans find out about the
FCC's order and rule changes, they are going to push for Congress to
overturn them," said Gene Kimmelman, public policy director for Consumers
Union. US senators from both sides of the aisle criticized the FCC move.
"There clearly now is going to be an orgy of mergers and acquisitions," said
Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) of the Senate Commerce Committee, who called the
FCC's decision "dumb and dangerous." Commerce Committee ranking Democrat
Ernest Hollings (D-SC) and former Republican Senate leader Trent Lott (R-MS)
joined Dorgan in criticizing the ruling, threatening congressional action to
block it. However, committee chairman John McCain (R-AZ) stated on Sunday
that he opposed legislative involvement in the matter.
SOURCE: Seattle Times; AUTHOR: David Ho, Associated Press
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/APWires/business/D7RE3O580.html

FCC DECISION DEALS A BLOW TO DIVERSITY AND DEMOCRACY
[Commentary] Joining the cacophony of dissenting voices regarding the FCC's
media ownership ruling yesterday, the Center for Digital Democracy's Jeff
Chester notes that at least one positive may have come from an otherwise
dismal day for democracy. "With his high-handed attitude, neither brooking
dissent nor even listening to the opposition, [FCC Chairman] Michael Powell
may have done more for freedom of the press than anyone since Tom Paine,"
observed Chester, suggesting that Powell may have "unwittingly galvanized
legions of opposition forces."
SOURCE: Center for Digital Democracy; AUTHOR: Jeff Chester
http://www.democraticmedia.org/news/june2.html

FCC, BIG MEDIA MAKE SCARY BEDFELLOWS
[Commentary] In the opinion of Toronto Star columnist Antonia Zerbisias,
America gets the democracy it pays for. Case in point: the FCC decision to
relax media ownership rules. Citing the Center for Public Integrity,
Zerbisias says that over the past eight years FCC staffers have accepted
some 2,500 trips costing nearly $2.8 million to first-class destinations
such as Paris, Hong Kong and Rio. All of these trips were paid for by the
very media industries that the FCC is supposed to regulate, she writes. The
Center also documented some 70 closed-door sessions the broadcasters took
part in at the FCC. In addition to political contributions, Zerbisias argues
that the "Top Five" media owners "greased palms" by donating $24.6 million
in the past two years to the campaigns of Congress members who oversee the
FCC. The FCC decision came despite a record 520,000 comments from citizens,
activists and consumer groups, most of them against the changes. Zerbisias
cites the stifling of voices for peace during Operation Iraqi Freedom and
the dearth of television reporting on the FCC proposed changes as evidence
of the abysmal American mainstream media. Zerbisias fears that Canadian
media, already more consolidated than US media, will demand similar
deregulation for competitive reasons.
SOURCE: Toronto Star; AUTHOR: Antonio Zerbisias
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/A...
le_Type1&c=Article&cid=1052251719124&call_pageid=968867495754&col=9694831916
30
(URL may require pasting together if broken)

MEDIA GIANTS, PUBLISHERS HAIL FCC VOTE
While opponents of the new FCC rules raise concerns about the stifling of
competition and independent voices, the stock market yesterday responded
with gains for media stocks, including Viacom, Fox and Hearst-Argyle
Television. Officials from media giants such as Disney and News Corp., as
well as large newspaper publishers such as Tribune Co. and Knight-Ridder
Inc. supported the FCC decision. Radio companies are not as pleased, though,
as radio markets were redefined to prevent market domination. "The real
issue is that the FCC has basically used a sledgehammer when they should've
used a scalpel to correct the rule," said Andrew Levin, senior vice
president of government affairs for the nation's largest radio operator,
Clear Channel Communications Inc. Some industry watchers foresee a
grassroots reaction among the public. "Now the real question is... how can
we move things in the opposite direction as soon as possible?," said Mark
Crispin Miller, executive director of the Project on Media Ownership at New
York University. "We have to restore competitiveness, which will require
antitrust measures."
SOURCE: Reuters; AUTHOR: Reshma Kapadia
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030602/media_nm/medi...
c_reaction_dc_6

ENTER THE MATRIX: THE FCC'S NEW RULES
Howard Finberg, director of e-learning at the Poynter Institute, has
compiled a matrix explaining yesterday's FCC media ownership ruling.
Finberg's matrix compares many of the old regulations with the new
regulations that were just approved by the FCC.
SOURCE: Poynter Institute; AUTHOR: Howard Finberg
http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=56&aid=36005

DIGITAL DIVIDE

UN SEEKS TO BRIDGE THE DIGITAL DIVIDE
[Commentary] Despite euphoric claims of politicians to the contrary, the gap
between the information haves and have-nots is only widening, writes E.D.
Mathew, a former international development aid worker. Industrialized
countries, with about 15 percent of the world's population, make up nearly
90 percent of all Internet users. There are fewer than two million Internet
users on the continent of Africa, compared with more than 12 million in
Britain. "The remarkable information technology advances have created vast
new opportunities, yet they have also generated 'new divides' between rich
and poor," UN Secretary General Kofi Annan said last week at a meeting of
information and broadcasting ministers in Bangkok. The widening digital
divide has led the UN to call the first-ever World Summit on the Information
Society this December, bringing together political, private sector, civil
society and media leaders to spread the benefits of the digital revolution
and promote "inclusive digitalization."
[SOURCE: Daily Nation on the Web; AUTHOR: E.D. Mathew]
http://www.nationaudio.com/News/DailyNation/Today/Comment/Comment0306200...
tml

FORUM: BRIDGING THE GLOBAL DIGITAL DIVIDE
The Business Council of the United Nations and 3Com are hosting "The Net
World Order: Bridging the Global Digital Divide" June 18-19 in New York
City. Held in conjunction with the CeBIT America conference, the forum will
focus on the role of business in bridging the digital divide
internationally, especially in developing nations. The current list of
speakers includes UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, Cisco Systems CEO John
Chambers, MIT Media Lab director Walter Bender, Infosys Technologies
chairman Narayana Murthy and various IT ministers from around the world.
SOURCE: Business Council of the United Nations
http://www.cebit-america.com/1909

PARTNERSHIP BUILT ON THE WEB
Efforts to bring Nigeria into the global economy have been bolstered by a
new partnership. The Global Trade and Investment Management network, a
collaborative effort led by the US Embassy in Nigeria and several
private-sector partners, is a Web-based service designed to "convert an
aspiring entrepreneur into a global business person, whether doing business
across the street or across the ocean." Nigerian entrepreneurs can use the
Web portal to engage in trade and learn global investment skills. Outgoing
ambassador and commercial counselor Miguel Pardo de Zela said that under
Africa's increasingly liberalized trade barriers, "Nigerian entrepreneurs
need to learn -- better still, master -- a set of managerial skills that
will enable them to stand up to the global competition, be it in their own
local markets or those existing thousands of miles away." The GTIM project
is set to open on Wednesday.
SOURCE: AllAfrica.com; AUTHOR: Agha Ibiam, This Day
http://allafrica.com/stories/200306020474.html

QUOTABLES:
BELTWAY COMMENTS ON MEDIA OWNERSHIP DECISION

"This is the fastest, most complete cave-in to corporate interests I've ever
seen by what is supposed to be a federal regulatory agency. This decision
advances big corporate interests, and does so at the expense of the public
interest. It is a decision that chooses concentration over competition." -
Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND)
http://dorgan.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=204445

"I want to emphasize that there is not a partisan position here... A lot of
Republicans -- in fact, probably most of the Republicans in the Congress,
would not agree with this [FCC] decision." - Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS)
http://www.sanmateocountytimes.com/Stories/0,1413,87~11268~1432144,00.html

"We as a society are best served by a diverse marketplace of ideas and
viewpoints. This deregulation serves only to accommodate the growth of media
giants, and the unavoidable result will be a further stifling of democratic
discourse." - Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
http://boxer.senate.gov/newsroom/200306/20030602_cons.html

"The FCC has spent considerable resources examining these issues, and the
rules they adopted today appear to retain important limitations on media
ownership. These are complex decisions, however, and it is difficult to know
exactly where to set these limits.... Congress must remain vigilant to
guarantee the important values of competition, diversity and localism within
our nation's media markets." - Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)
http://mccain.senate.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=NewsCenter.ViewPressReleas...
ntent_id=1073

"This is such a disastrous proceeding and finding and rule by the
commission itself this morning that I'm convinced that we've got to weigh-in
in the Congress... The people, they want to be heard. This concentration is
absolutely in opposition to the interests of the public itself. And there's
no ground for it. There's no reason for it other than greed." - Sen. Ernest
Hollings (D-SC)
http://hollings.senate.gov/~hollings/press/2003602A13.html

"Upon close examination, the rules adopted yesterday by the Federal
Communications Commission can only be seen as a radical deregulation of the
media industry in America. The number of markets in which mergers would be
allowed by the rules is increased dramatically; media mergers will now be
permitted in over 150 markets across the country representing 98 percent of
the American population. The size of the dominant media firms will increase
dramatically and the public interest review of mergers is eliminated
entirely. The result is certain to be an increase in concentration of local
markets and consolidation of the media in national chains. Democratic debate
in American will be weakened. Consumers will suffer from less competition.
Citizens will suffer from less diversity. Communities will suffer from less
local focus in their news and public affairs programming." - Dr. Mark
Cooper,
Director of Research, Consumer Federation of America
http://www.consumerfed.org/FCC_Rule.pdf

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Communications-Related Headlines for June 2,

A service of the Benton Foundation (http://www.benton.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

IN FOCUS: SPECIAL ISSUE ON MEDIA OWNERSHIP

FCC Votes to Ease Media Ownership Rules
Senate Commerce Committee to Hold FCC Oversight Hearing
Michael Powell and the FCC: Giving Away the Marketplace of Ideas
Whose News?: A Look at Media Ownership in St. Petersburg, Florida
Media Moguls Have Second Thoughts
Stop Murdoch's DirecTV Takeover
FCC Media Ownership Quiz
A Final Note

FCC VOTES TO EASE MEDIA OWNERSHIP RULES
The Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 along party lines this
morning to relax its long-standing rules governing media ownership. Among
the changes were provisions permitting companies to buy more television
stations and own a newspaper and a broadcast outlet in the same city. The
vote has been called a victory for FCC Chairman Michael Powell, who has
faced intense criticism from interest groups that favor maintaining the
current regulations. "Our actions will advance our goals of diversity and
localism," Powell said, noting that the new rules would withstand court
challenges and better match the current media environment. The order raised
the cap on the percent of the population a single company's TV stations can
reach from 35 percent to 45 percent, eliminated all "cross-ownership" rules
in markets with nine or more TV stations and eased rules on local ownership
to allow a company to own two stations in most cities and three in larger
markets. "The more you dig into this order the worse things get," said
Commissioner Michael Copps, who voted against the plan.
[SOURCE: The Washington Post; AUTHOR: David Ho]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3076-2003Jun2.html

SENATE COMMERCE COMMITTEE TO HOLD FCC OVERSIGHT HEARING
The US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation will hold a
hearing on FCC oversight this Wednesday, June 4, at 9:30 a.m. in Room 253 of
the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington DC. Committee members will
discuss the FCC's decision today to relax various media ownership rules and
will also consider issues related to the FCC's reauthorization. All five FCC
commissioners are scheduled to appear as witnesses.
[SOURCE: Senate Commerce Committee]
http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/witnesslist.cfm?id=796

MICHAEL POWELL AND THE FCC: GIVING AWAY THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS
[COMMENTARY] Washington Post media critic Tom Shales issued a blunt critique
of the FCC plan to further deregulate US media ownership rules, which passed
by a 3-2 vote today. "Revising and relaxing the rules that prohibit a single
entity from controlling too large a percentage of American media will allow
corporations that are already too big to become much, much bigger," Shales
writes. "Also much more powerful and much more oblivious to the common
good." In particular, Shales rhetorically targets FCC Chairman Michael
Powell: "It appears he is trying to do more damage than any other chairman
in FCC history," he says. Shales notes that the proposal has drawn together
a politically diverse group of opponents, from consumer groups to the
National Rifle Association, creating a certain amount of unease at the White
House. But the hundreds of thousands of citizen emails protesting the plan
did little to stop the it. "Michael Powell and the FCC are riding to the
rescue of huge media conglomerates that need rescuing about as much as
Spider-Man, Batman and the Terminator do," Shales writes. "Unfortunately,
you and I and the freedom of speech are the ones getting trampled in the
stampede."
SOURCE: Washington Post; AUTHOR: Tom Shales
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1424-2003Jun1.html

WHOSE NEWS?: A LOOK AT MEDIA OWNERSHIP IN ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA
Jeff Harrington of the St. Petersburg Times takes a look at the Tampa/St.
Pete market to see how today's rulemaking might affect media businesses in
the area, and offers a who's who of local owners. Rather than provoking a
"feeding frenzy of dealmaking among the Tampa Bay area's media powerhouses,"
many believe that today's FCC decision to relax media ownership rules will
more likely result in a first round of local TV station swapping. Executives
at Media General, which owns the Tampa Tribune newspaper and TV station
WFLA-Channel 8, have said they are eager for more cross-ownership
opportunities. "We believe we've proven that convergence makes sense
journalistically and, without question, improves product quality," said
Media General Chairman Stewart Bryan. Other owners, however, have
misgivings about cross-ownership. Paul C. Tash, editor and president of the
St. Petersburg Times, is concerned about preserving editorial independence
and unique voices in the community. "There's very little local radio any
more, and I think it would be a bad thing if all the television stations in
the country were owned by three companies the way all the radio stations are
owned by three companies," said Tash. The Times is the largest and only
independently held daily newspaper in Florida.
SOURCE: St. Petersburg Times; AUTHOR: Jeff Harrington
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/06/02/Business/Whose_news.shtml

MEDIA MOGULS HAVE SECOND THOUGHTS
Ted Turner is one of a number of media executives having second thoughts
about the size and concentration of media companies. AOL Time Warner, one
of the industry's most aggressive consolidators, has lost about 75 percent
of its value in the last two years, and is now trying to cut its losses by
selling burdensome properties. Aside from the financials, Turner laments
the loss of independent voices: "Media companies have gotten so large and
concentrated that an independent voice has an almost impossible time getting
started in any kind of meaningful way, and that's a great tragedy for our
country." Liberty Media's John Malone, however, doesn't believe that
consumer choice is being denied. In Malone's view, Internet broadcasting
will open access to voices that might not be heard through traditional
channels. But cross-ownership critic and USA Interactive head Barry Diller
warns that only about 22 million homes have high-speed Internet -- and even
they "can't get a video picture bigger than a postage stamp."
SOURCE: USA Today; AUTHOR: David Lieberman
http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2003-06-01-moguls-second-thoughts_x.htm

STOP MURDOCH'S DIRECTV TAKEOVER
[Commentary] The FCC is currently reviewing News Corp.'s proposed purchase
of a controlling interest in DirecTV, a deal which the Center for Digital
Democracy says "threatens fair competition in the media industry, the
quality and diversity of television programming, and ... the ability of the
public to obtain unbiased news in order to participate in our democratic
system." CDD offers an avenue for public participation via their website by
allowing users to file comments with the FCC before its June 16the deadline.
The page also contains resources for readers to educate themselves on the
details of the merger.
[SOURCE: Center for Democratic Media; AUTHOR: Jeff Chester]
http://www.democraticmedia.org/getinvolved/directvAction.html

FCC MEDIA OWNERSHIP QUIZ
The Washington Post has published an online quiz to test readers' knowledge
of US media ownership rules and the ownership debate. Take the test and see
how you measure up.
SOURCE: Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/polls/technology/fcc_060203.htm

A FINAL NOTE
The Benton Foundation would like to welcome graduate fellow Jennifer Hill to
the Headlines team. Jennifer is currently pursuing a Masters degree in
international development at American University. She'll be joining Andy and
Charlie on Headlines each morning, as well as working on Benton's Digital
Opportunity Channel and Digital Divide Network websites, among other
projects. Welcome aboard, Jennifer!

----------------------------------------------------------------------