November 2005

Tuesday, November 29th, 12:00 – 1:30 p.m.
Save the Date! CLE on “” hosted by the CLE Committee. More info to follow.

http://www.fcba.org/



Co-sponsored with: American Library Association
Location: ALA, 1615 New Hampshire Ave, NW, First Floor
Guest Speaker: Lynne Bradley, Director, ALA Office of Government Relations

RSVP: eberger@apt.org



House Passes DTV Bill

The full House passed the budget reconciliation bill 217-215 in the wee hours of Friday morning. House Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Tex.) cast the last vote after former Majority Leader Tom "The Hammer" Delay pinned Barton's right arm behind his back and waltzed him down the aisle. Passing intact as part of that legislation was the Commerce Committee's DTV transition bill. That bill sets a hard date of Dec. 31, 2008, for the cut-off of analog TV service and the return of spectrum for auction, bringing billions to the treasury -- some say as much as $30 billion. But before Uncle Sam gets his hands on that money, $990 million will be set aside for a converter box subsidy to let analog-only sets receive a DTV signal after analog is cut-off on that date. The bill also contains a number of other DTV-related items, including money for first responders, a consumer education campaign and TV set labeling, and provisions for allowing cable to convert an HDTV signal to standard DTV, and DTV to analog. Now comes the hard work of reconciling that bill in conference with the already-passed Senate version, which sets aside $3 billion for a subsidy; establishes an April 7, 2009 hard date; and gives twice as much money to first responders (over a billion versus $500 million). But that is about all it does because Senate rules prevent legislating on appropriations bills.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6285138?display=Breaking+News...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
* NAB Asks Broadcasters to Weigh In Against House DTV Bill
"Between now and when conference work begins, broadcasters should convey to Members of Congress the importance of removing the House down conversion language from the final budget package. The down conversion language is anti-consumer. Consumers who have spent thousands of dollars on high-definition DTV sets should not be deprived the benefits of their investment. Under the down conversion language, cable subscribers with high-definition sets will receive lesser quality standard definition signals."
http://www.nab.org/xert/corpcomm/newsletters/TVtoday/2005/112105/page3.asp
* Legislation headed to a House-Senate conference committee would pave the way for completing the digital television transition in 2008.
http://energycommerce.house.gov/108/News/11182005_1725.htm

Advisory Panel Proposes Public-Interest TV Programming

[SOURCE: National Journal, AUTHOR: Drew Clark]

Kids Cases Consolidated in 6th Circuit

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]

Feingold Intros Payola Bill

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]

CPB IG To Investigate Station Lobbying

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]

Unused Digital TV Channels Could Increase U.S. Wireless Access

Increased access to wireless networks may be just around the corner. Before the end of the year, the House is expected to consider a provision proposed by Representative Jay Inslee (D-WA) that would force the Federal Communications Commission to decide whether "white spaces" -- empty broadcast-TV channels -- should be made available for use by unlicensed wireless networks. With both the House and the Senate having recently passed bills requiring television broadcasts to switch from analog to digital sometime in early 2009, the 700-MHz band (channels 52 to 69) will be cleared of programming and moved to lower frequencies (channels 2 to 51). The 700-MHz band will be set aside for public-safety emergency transponders and for bidding by wireless networks. According to the New America Foundation , the average TV market in the United States uses approximately 7 high-power channels of the 67 that it is allocated. This leaves an abundance of free channels that could be used for wireless access.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/18/AR200511...
(requires registration)

Big Three in Trouble

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John M. Higgins]
Although you may be reading about the 22% drop in revenues for the "Big Three" broadcast TV networks, remember that the 2004 numbers were inflated by Olympics coverage. Adjusting for that, the largest broadcast networks' revenues increased 3% during the quarter. Summer and early-fall prime time increased 8% to $1.3 billion, but that was chipped away by declines in late night and news.

Networks Make Nice, Not War

[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: J. Max Robins]
[Commentary] With everything from the cable box to the Xbox attacking their business, broadcast networks have had a sort of revelation: They're more interested in selling their collective product than in kicking the daylights out of each other.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6285481?display=News&referral...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)