June 2007

Building a TV Station and a Platform for Leftists

BUILDING A TV STATION AND A PLATFORM FOR LEFTISTS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Simon Romero]
A look at Telesur, the regional Spanish-language network financed largely by Venezuela’s government. Less than two years old, Telesur is seen as this hemisphere’s answer to Al Jazeera, a Latin American network aimed at fostering integration and countering the influence of news organizations like CNN. The man guiding this experiment is Andrés Izarra, a rising star of President Hugo Chávez’s ambitious project to upend elites in Venezuela and elsewhere in the region.

Pearson puts out feelers on Dow Jones

PEARSON PUTS OUT FEELERS ON DOW JONES
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson, Francesco Guerrera and Joshua Chaffin]

Broadcasters See Red Over White Spaces

BROADCASTERS SEE RED OVER WHITE SPACES
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]

Ohio House OKs Franchise-Reform Bill

OHIO HOUSE OKs FRANCHISE-REFORM BILL
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]

TV Networks Gain In 'Upfront' Ad Deals

TV NETWORKS GAIN IN 'UPFRONT' AD DEALS
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Suzanne Vranica suzanne.vranica@wsj.com]

Internet Radio Races To Break Free of the PC

INTERNET RADIO RACES TO BREAK FREE OF THE PC
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Sarah McBride sarah.mcbride@wsj.com]

Cereal Killer

CEREAL KILLER
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Monday June 18, 2007

UNIVERSAL BROADBAND/UNIVERSAL SERVICE
Make no little digital plans, group tells Chicago Mayor
APT: U.S. at Risk of Becoming Gated Digital Communities
Guarding The Beachfront
Fund to subsidize rural phones faces dispute
Studies Questioning the Benefits of USF Subsidies to Wireless Carr=
iers

NETWORK NEUTRALITY
NCTA: Don't Regulate Net Neutrality
Internet Content Providers Urge the FCC Not to Regulate the Net
Earthlink Asks FCC to Ensure Broadband Competition
Hands Off the Internet on Net Neutrality
NBC Tells FCC To Fight Traffic In Stolen Digital Goods

JOURNALISM
It's Not About Dan and Katie
Kennedy critiques government and press on environment
Bill Clinton Issues Media Challenge
Mirror, Mirror
Newspapers try to restore investor confidence
Pearson puts out feelers on Dow Jones
NBC goes to print for '08 race
Building a TV Station and a Platform for Leftists
Citizens are the media in S. Korea

BROADCASTING/CABLE
FCC Seeks Comment on Commercial Leased Access Rules
Broadcasters See Red Over White Spaces
Ohio House OKs Franchise-Reform Bill
TV Networks Gain In 'Upfront' Ad Deals

QUICKLY -- Internet Radio Races To Break Free of the PC; Cereal Killer

UNIVERSAL BROADBAND/UNIVERSAL SERVICE

MAKE NO LITTLE DIGITAL PLANS, GROUP TELLS DALEY
[SOURCE: Chicago Tribune, AUTHOR: Jon Van]
Chicago should undertake a communitywide campaign=20
to become the nation's most advanced digital=20
city, a mayor's advisory committee report urged=20
Friday. Instead of only seeking to extend=20
connectivity to underprivileged neighborhoods,=20
the city should help poorer residents get=20
subsidized computers, get needed instruction and=20
make digital communications an integral part of=20
community activities, said the report presented=20
by Julia Stasch, an executive at the John D. and=20
Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and Mayor=20
Richard Daley's former chief of staff. She=20
unveiled the report at a Community Media Summit,=20
a gathering at Columbia College of about 150=20
policymakers, philanthropists and others=20
concerned with promoting neighborhood=20
communications. Called the "City That Networks,"=20
the report said that rather than merely seeking=20
to close the digital divide that separates=20
cyberspace haves from have-nots, the city should=20
pursue digital excellence, which Stasch defined=20
as "universal, active and meaningful=20
participation" in the digital world. The report=20
calls upon Mayor Daley to appoint two local=20
business leaders to head a private campaign to=20
rally citizens toward digital excellence.
http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/business/~3/125308184/...
-sat_wifi_0616jun16,0,3835615.story
http://feeds.chicagotribune.com/~r/chicagotribune/business/~3/125184742/...
-070615wifi,0,6021013.story
* Chicago Report on Digital Excellence
http://wrythings.net/2007/06/16/chicago-report-on-digital-excellence/
* "A very special day for community in Chicago=20
and for Chicago community media."
http://www.afcn.org/node/271

ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC TECHNOLOGY WARNS FCC: US AT=20
RISK OF BECOMING GATED DIGITAL COMMUNITIES
In comments filed by the Alliance for Public=20
Technology with the Federal Communications=20
Commission, Dr. Robert Atkinson cautioned that=20
the alternative to universally deployed broadband=20
is "a nation of gated digital communities." The=20
subject of the comments is the Commission's=20
measurements of broadband deployment in the=20
United States and the need for more detailed data=20
collection tactics (WC Docket No. 07-38). To spur=20
U.S. deployment efforts, APT urged the Commission=20
to adopt the following recommendations: 1)=20
Collect data based on the exact number of=20
subscribers in each 9-digit zip code. The current=20
system, which uses one subscriber in a 5-digit=20
zip code is inadequate and misleading. 2) The FCC=20
should collect data on the number of homes passed=20
with high-speed services. The availability of=20
broadband connections to the home is essential to=20
a community's quality of life today, regardless=20
of the level of subscribers. 3) The FCC should=20
make use of commercial databases and services to=20
augment its own data, but not rely exclusively on=20
private sources. Government resources, such as=20
NTIA, the Bureau of the Census and the GAO should=20
be considered as well. 4) APT supports the=20
development of an automated voluntary reporting=20
mechanism for consumers to inform the FCC about=20
the state of broadband in their communities. 5)=20
The Commission should analyze broadband prices,=20
looking for discrepancies between zip=20
codes. Where inequities are found, they should be addressed.
http://www.apt.org/news/apt-press-releases/2007/PR061507.html
* APT comments:
http://www.apt.org/news/apt-press-releases/2007/PR061507.html

GUARDING THE BEACHFRONT
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
If a handful of public-interest advocates had=20
their way, the Federal Communications Commission=20
would ban cable operators and phone companies=20
from the upcoming 700-MHz spectrum auction that=20
some consider the most important the agency will=20
ever conduct. Consumers Union, Public Knowledge=20
and the Media Access Project (MAP) are leading=20
the assault, claiming a ban would spur=20
competition in providing high-speed Internet=20
access to consumers. Otherwise, big cable-system=20
operators such as Comcast and Time Warner Cable=20
and phone giants such as AT&T and Verizon=20
Communications would keep out smaller rivals,=20
dominating the business and stifling innovation.=20
=93We think it makes excellent sense just to keep=20
the incumbents out of this auction,=94 said MAP=20
senior vice president Harold Feld. =93If we really=20
want a genuine third pipe -- that is to say, one=20
that competes against telephone [digital=20
subscriber line] and the cable broadband platform=20
-- keep those guys out.=94 While not unprecedented,=20
sweeping auction restrictions on cable would be a=20
setback as cable operators continue to search for=20
ways to add a robust wireless component to their=20
voice, video and data services. That =93triple=20
play=94 has been such a huge success that it=20
probably led Rupert Murdoch to give up News=20
Corp.=92s controlling stake in DirecTV, the leading satellite TV provider.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6452620.html
-- See also --
* Sides press for advantage in airwaves auction
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2007/06/18/sides_pres...
or_advantage_in_airwaves_auction/
* Spectrum auction has plenty on the line
http://www.thestar.com/article/226423

FUND TO SUBSIDIZE RURAL PHONES FACES DISPUTE
[SOURCE: St Louis Dispatch 6/13, AUTHOR: Tim Logan tlogan( at )post-dispatch.com]
Rural telephone companies and wireless companies=20
agree on this: the Universal Service Fund --=20
which eats up nearly 12 percent of every=20
American's phone bill to subsidize certain phone=20
services -- needs to be fixed. They don't agree=20
on much else. They sit at opposite ends of a=20
debate that's been roiling the telephone industry=20
in recent weeks: whether the expansion of=20
wireless phone service across rural America under=20
the $7 billion fund should be capped while=20
federal officials redesign the program for a=20
fast-changing telecommunications world. The=20
federally-mandated fund subsidizes a number of=20
things, including high-cost service in parts of=20
the country that no phone company will serve on=20
its own. That part of the fund has soared in=20
recent years, from $2.6 billion in 2001 to $4.1=20
billion in 2006. Most of the growth has been=20
driven by wireless companies that are using the=20
fund to build cell towers. In contrast, spending=20
by landline companies has been relatively stable in recent years.
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/0/698B062B4BBB2C09...
572F9000C1E40?OpenDocument

STUDIES QUESTIONING THE BENEFITS OF USF SUBSIDIES TO WIRELESS CARRIERS
[SOURCE: Criterion Economics 6/13]
Criterion Economics released two studies today=20
calling into question whether universal service=20
subsidies for cell phone companies generate=20
benefits for consumers. The first study, by=20
Criterion expert Nicholas Vantzelfde, compares=20
the coverage of subsidized wireless carriers with=20
coverage provided by unsubsidized wireless=20
carriers in the same areas. The second study, by=20
Criterion economist Kevin Caves and Chairman=20
Jeffrey Eisenach, uses regression analysis to=20
examine the relationship between subsidies and=20
wireless availability. Both studies find that the=20
current universal service program is ineffective=20
in increasing wireless availability and that=20
policymakers should consider capping funding and/or implementing reforms.
* Press release:
http://www.criterioneconomics.com/docs/Criterion%20USF%20Press%20Release...
061307.pdf
* Links to studies:
http://www.criterioneconomics.com/news/070613.phphttp://www.criterionecon=
omics.com/news/070613.php

NETWORK NEUTRALITY

NCTA: DON'T REGULATE NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The cable industry asked the FCC Friday to leave=20
the Internet unregulated, saying it is network=20
flexibility that has promopted hundreds of=20
billions of dollars in investments in network build-outs and upgrades.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6452646.html?rssid=3D193

INTERNET CONTENT PROVIDERS URGE THE FCC NOT TO REGULATE THE NET
[SOURCE MovieFlix/Doctors TeleHealth/KinderStart]
MovieFlix, Doctors TeleHealth Network, and=20
KinderStart urged the Federal=20
Communications Commission not to regulate the=20
Internet by adopting network neutrality rules.=20
The companies differ from some other content=20
providers who think the government needs to adopt=20
network neutrality regulations. "There is growing=20
evidence that [network neutrality regulation]=20
could slow the deployment of the super-fast local=20
broadband networks that are crucial to continued=20
growth of our industry. Evidence of this risk=20
comes from the cable, cellular, and telephone=20
carriers who have begun to deploy these=20
extraordinarily expensive networks, from Wall=20
Street analysts, from telecom researchers, and=20
from scores of companies that produce the=20
hardware and software products necessary to make=20
broadband networks work. If investment in local=20
broadband networks were to slow as a result of=20
net neutrality regulation, the Internet content=20
industry would be hurt by forcing it to rely on=20
existing and less desirable network technologies."
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=3D109&STORY=3D/www/sto...
06-15-2007/0004609205&EDATE=3D

EARTHLINK ASKS THE FCC TO ENSURE BROADBAND COMPETITION
[SOURCE: TMCnet, AUTHOR: Spencer Chin]
Internet service provider EarthLink has filed=20
comments with the Federal Communications=20
Commission requesting that the Commission promote=20
market competition for last-mile broadband=20
access, in response to attempts by large cable=20
and telco companies to monopolize access to=20
unbundled cooper loops. EarthLink argued that the=20
Commission should not bow to pressure from cable=20
and telco providers to eliminate access to=20
unbundled cooper loops, to =93effectively protect=20
the vibrant, open nature of the Internet.=94=20
EarthLink argued that enabling it and other ISPs=20
to access the loops would make the market less=20
vulnerable to the anti-competitive practices of=20
the large cable/telco monopolies, who are=20
increasingly bundling phone, Internet, and TV=20
services. EarthLink contends that the incumbent=20
providers are more likely to =93block, impair,=20
degrade, and discriminate against Internet content and applications.=94
http://internetcommunications.tmcnet.com/topics/broadband-mobile/article...
647-earthlink-asks-fcc-ensure-broadband-competition.htm

HANDS OFF THE INTERNET ON NET NEUTRALITY
[SOURCE: Hands Off the Internet press release]
[Commentary] Hands Off the Internet, a coalition=20
of businesses, provided the Federal=20
Communications Commission with the results of its=20
study showing the reasons why adoption of new net=20
neutrality regulations would hinder development=20
of the next generation Internet, and would harm=20
consumers. Hands Off, which examined in depth the=20
legal, regulatory, economic, business and=20
consumer protection issues relating to the issue=20
of so-called =93net neutrality=94, provided the=20
results of its study in its submission to the=20
Commission in connection with the FCC=92s inquiry=20
into broadband market practices. The Hands Off=20
submission explains that broadband capacity,=20
especially in connections to consumers at their=20
homes, must be greatly increased to handle the=20
massive increase in data traffic (due in large=20
part to video applications like YouTube). As=20
explained in the FCC filing, tiered services and=20
new business arrangements by broadband access=20
providers will not result in content=20
discrimination or service degradation, but will=20
spread the cost of the new build-out so that=20
consumers will not be saddled with the entire=20
cost. Additionally, the submission shows that=20
prominent economists agree that the unintended=20
consequences of premature regulation could well=20
result in a slowdown in broadband deployment and higher costs for consumers.
http://handsoff.org/blog/press-releases/reason-instead-of-rhetoric/

NBC TELLS FCC TO FIGHT TRAFFIC IN STOLEN DIGITAL GOODS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
One thing NBC Universal is not neutral on is=20
copyright violations. NBCU used comments in the=20
FCC's network neutrality docket Friday to push=20
for a government crackdown on intellectual=20
piracy, specifically calling for FCC regulations=20
requiring Internet service providers to police=20
their networks for illegal content.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6452680.html?rssid=3D193

JOURNALISM

IT'S NOT ABOUT DAN AND KATIE
[SOURCE: The Nation, AUTHOR: Katrina Vanden Heuvel]
[Commentary] The media firestorm following Dan=20
rather's remark -- that network executives had=20
tried to boost ratings by "dumbing [CBS Evening=20
News] down and tarting it up" -- illustrates the=20
very point Rather was trying to make about the=20
degradation of the mainstream, corporate news biz=20
and the obliteration of the line between news and=20
entertainment. As another CBS alum, Walter=20
Cronkite, recently said, that the pressure for=20
profits is "threatening the very freedom the=20
nation was built upon." And in a recent New York=20
Times op-ed, FCC Commissioner Michael Copps=20
warned of "pressure from media conglomerates"=20
that has made licensing renewals for the free use=20
of the public airwaves a virtual "rubber-stamp"=20
every eight years. He contrasts this with a past=20
when every three years the requirement that=20
networks serve the public interest was given "a=20
hard look" =96 prior to "deregulatory mania in the=20
1980's." We desperately need a news media that=20
raises the tough questions, acts as watchdogs of=20
the public interest, questions=20
authority--performs the basic duties required of=20
a free press in a democracy. A flawed media leads=20
to a flawed democracy. And in these past six or=20
so years, with some notable exceptions, the media=20
has been too easily intimidated by an=20
administration that used fear to make its case=20
for war, labeled its critics un-American, quashed=20
dissent, perverted the meaning of patriotism and=20
brazenly -- on all fronts -- subverted the=20
Constitution. It ain't about Dan, and it ain't=20
about Katie. It's about consolidation,=20
conglomeration, and the impact on the Fourth Estate and our democracy.
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut?bid=3D7&pid=3D204994

KENNEDY CRITIQUES GOVERNMENT AND PRESS ON ENVIRONMENT
[SOURCE: SunValleyonline.com, AUTHOR: Gary Stivers]
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. railed against the failures=20
of the current American government, corporate=20
power and the press who he said are committing a=20
travesty against the public trust. Speaking about=20
the Bush Administration he said, "These=20
individuals have entered public service not to=20
serve the public interest but to subvert the very=20
laws they are charged with enforcing in order to=20
enrich the president's corporate paymasters. They=20
have imposed tremendous diminution in quality of=20
live for people in this country. Most Americans=20
don't know about it, they're unaware of the=20
connections, they don't make the connection,=20
because we have a negligent and indolent press in=20
this country that has simply let down American=20
democracy. That's a really important issue and=20
one of the two most important environmental=20
issues -- the other one is campaign finance=20
reform." Kennedy continued. "People are talking=20
about the 'liberal' media. I was thinking,=20
'There's no such thing as the Liberal Media.'=20
What do you have? You have The Nation magazine,=20
Mother Jones, I guess Rolling Stone, and Air=20
America Radio and Pacifica Radio and that's=20
pretty much it. That's the Liberal Media. But=20
there's a right-wing media in this country and if=20
you look at where Americans are=20
disproportionately getting their news, that's=20
where it's coming from. The Pew [Research Center]=20
just did a survey which showed that 30% of=20
Americans now say their primary news source is=20
talk radio, which is 95% controlled by The Right.=20
Twenty-two percent said cable news, mainly Fox=20
News. Ten percent [said] Sinclair Network =96the=20
most right-wing of them all- which is the largest=20
television network in America and it's run by a=20
former pornographer who requires all 75 of his=20
local affiliate stations to take a pledge not to=20
report critically about this president on Iraq=20
and other issues. Only 11% of Americans now read=20
newspapers," Kennedy went on, "The rest of us are=20
getting our news from the traditional corporate=20
media, ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN, who have no=20
ideology other than their own pocketbooks."
http://www.sunvalleyonline.com/news/article.asp?ID_Article=3D3554

BILL CLINTON ISSUES MEDIA CHALLENGE
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Chris Pursell]
Speaking to a standing-room-only crowd of=20
marketers, branders and media executives from=20
around the country, former President Bill Clinton=20
challenged the press to =93render complex messages=20
to audiences without turning them into=20
two-dimensional cartoons=94 as the next election=20
approaches. Considering the average Promax=20
participant controls 20,000 minutes of air time a=20
year at their stations, President Clinton=92s=20
message to the media was clear, noting how=20
certain messages from candidates and officials=20
are never highlighted by the media because they=20
didn=92t fit in with how parties and issues are=20
pre-branded by the press. Comparing show business=20
to politics, the Democratic former president=20
noted how the political shift back to the=20
Republican Party in 2000 was due to the fact that=20
=93they were better branders than we were.=94
http://tvweek.com/news/2007/06/bill_clinton_issues_media_chal.php
(requires free registration)

MIRROR, MIRROR
[SOURCE: The Huffington Post, AUTHOR: Rory O'Connor]
[Commentary] The Mirror Awards -- sponsored=20
by Syracuse University's S.I Newhouse School of=20
Public Communications -- honored reporters,=20
editors and teams of writers "who hold a mirror=20
to their own industry for the public's benefit."=20
So who's the fairest of them all? To O'Connor,=20
not the Big Media boys like David Carr of The New=20
York Times, whose weekly column won for 'Best=20
Commentary,' or Philip Weiss and Clive Thompson=20
of New York magazine, who won for 'Best Profile'=20
and 'Best Single Article,' respectively -- as=20
worthy as their entries may have been. Instead,=20
O'Connor's favorite was culled from Nieman=20
Reports, the small publication of The Nieman=20
Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.=20
The category was 'Best Coverage of Breaking=20
Industry News,' and the author is Dean Miller,=20
executive editor of the definitely small and=20
obscure Post Register in Idaho Falls, Idaho.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rory-oconnor/mirror-mirror_b_52357.html

NEWSPAPERS TRY TO RESTORE INVESTOR CONFIDENCE
[SOURCE: Reuters 6/15, AUTHOR: Robert MacMillan]
U.S. newspaper executives will meet in New York=20
to wrestle with one of their biggest challenges:=20
persuading investors to stick around. But there=20
will be some conspicuous absences at the annual=20
Mid-Year Media Review hosted by the Newspaper=20
Association of America. Los Angeles Times owner=20
Tribune Co. and Wall Street Journal publisher Dow=20
Jones & Co. Inc. will skip the meeting. One is=20
going private, the other may get bought.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=3DindustryNews&storyID=
=3D2007-06-15T171409Z_01_N15268387_RTRIDST_0_INDUSTRY-NEWSPAPERS-CONFERENCE=
-DC.XML

PEARSON PUTS OUT FEELERS ON DOW JONES
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Andrew=20
Edgecliffe-Johnson, Francesco Guerrera and Joshua Chaffin]
Pearson, owner of the Financial Times, is in=20
active discussions with General Electric about a=20
possible joint offer for Dow Jones in response to=20
Rupert Murdoch=92s $5bn attempt to buy the Wall=20
Street Journal. Neither Pearson nor General=20
Electric would comment, but people familiar with=20
the situation said that Pearson had made contact=20
in recent weeks with the US conglomerate, which=20
controls the NBC entertainment group and CNBC,=20
the business news channel. GE and Pearson have=20
met, these people said, but they cautioned that=20
the talks were of a preliminary nature and that=20
it was not yet clear whether they would lead to a=20
bid. GE would be expected to finance a large part=20
of any offer, according to people familiar with=20
the matter. Pearson is also understood to have=20
reached out to Barry Diller=92s IAC and Hearst.=20
Neither company was available to comment.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/efdf08a2-1b82-11dc-bc55-000b5df10621.html
(requires subscription)
* FT Looking To Enter Joint Bid For Dow Jones
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1003599759
* G.E. and Pearson Are Said to Study Bid for Dow Jones
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/18/business/media/18dow.html

NBC GOES TO PRINT FOR '08 RACE
[SOURCE: Hollywood Reporter, AUTHOR: Paul J. Gough]
NBC News is reaching into the world of print to=20
help it cover the 2008 presidential election. NBC=20
News is teaming up with the National Journal=20
Group for reporters who will go in-depth with the=20
candidates on the campaign trail beginning late=20
this summer. The staff will be a mix of new hires=20
and existing employees from NBC News and National=20
Journal; all the staff will be on board within=20
the month. These "mobile campaign bureau"=20
journalists will cover the candidates and=20
political events with a mixture of text, audio=20
and video to supplement the work of NBC News=20
crews. The blogs, video blogs and other material=20
will appear on platforms from NBC to MSNBC and=20
MSNBC.com as well as the National Journal, the Hotline and CongressDaily.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3ie...
c170a1ef017816373814392a09ff

BUILDING A TV STATION AND A PLATFORM FOR LEFTISTS
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Simon Romero]
A look at Telesur, the regional Spanish-language=20
network financed largely by Venezuela=92s=20
government. Less than two years old, Telesur is=20
seen as this hemisphere=92s answer to Al Jazeera, a=20
Latin American network aimed at fostering=20
integration and countering the influence of news=20
organizations like CNN. The man guiding this=20
experiment is Andr=E9s Izarra, a rising star of=20
President Hugo Ch=E1vez=92s ambitious project to=20
upend elites in Venezuela and elsewhere in the region.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/16/world/americas/16izarrap.html
(requires registration)

CITIZENS ARE THE MEDIA IN S KOREA
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Don Lee]
Although traditional newspapers and magazines=20
around the world are cutting jobs amid declining=20
circulation and a shift toward the Internet,=20
OhmyNews continues to recruit. It currently has a=20
reporting corps of 50,000. The company's motto,=20
posted outside its crammed office in central=20
Seoul, is a big help-wanted sign: "Every citizen can be a reporter."
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-ohmynews18jun18,1,744...
1.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
(requires registration)

BROADCASTING/CABLE

FCC SEEKS COMMENT ON COMMERCIAL LEASED ACCESS RULES
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
Adopted March 2, but just released Friday is a=20
new FCC proceeding on leased access and program=20
carriage rules which require a cable operator to=20
set aside channel capacity for commercial use by=20
video programmers unaffiliated with the operator.=20
The FCC is seeking public comment on the=20
following: The current status of leased access=20
programming. Do programmers actually use leased=20
access channels? To what extent are they able to=20
use the set-aside channels? How many leased=20
access channels do cable operators=20
provide? Which programmers are using those=20
channels? Are programmers using the channels on=20
a full-time or part-time basis? For what=20
purposes are leased access channels used? Do=20
cable operators turn down requests for leased=20
access? If so, why? To what extent and for what=20
purposes do the cable operators use the channels=20
for themselves? Does the cable operators' option=20
to use the channels contribute to programmers'=20
lack of use of the set-aside channels? Are the=20
terms in leased access agreements the same or=20
similar to those that the cable operator has with=20
its programmers? Do cable operators impose=20
different requirements regarding, for example,=20
insurance or termination provisions? If so,=20
why? We also seek comment on the effectiveness=20
of leased access enforcement. We seek comment=20
specifically on the costs associated with the=20
complaint or other dispute resolution processes,=20
as well as whether there should be a defined time=20
period for cable operators to respond to leased=20
access requests or other aspects of the=20
enforcement process. The Commission's rules=20
allow programmers to file complaints to challenge=20
a cable operator's rates before the=20
Commission. To what extent do programmers make=20
use of this provision to challenge rates that=20
they believe violate the Commission's=20
regulations? Is the process too burdensome? Is=20
it effective? Should there be changes to the=20
complaint process, such as an expedited complaint=20
process before the Commission? The Commission's=20
rules also require a cable operator to respond to=20
a programmer's request for rate information=20
within 15 calendar days. Are cable operators=20
responsive to programmer's requests? When they=20
respond, do they include all required information?
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A1.doc
* FCC Commissioner Copps:
"This rulemaking is about independent programming=20
and ensuring that independent programmers have a=20
fair shot at carriage on cable and other=20
multi-channel distribution platforms.... We must=20
meet these statutory directives, not only because=20
it's our duty, but because these independent=20
programmers provide the diversity of voices that=20
is so central to the proper functioning of our=20
media and, ultimately, to our democracy=20
itself. If our rules aren't giving independent=20
programmers the carriage opportunities to which=20
they're entitled, we'd better fix them -- and fast."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A2.doc
* FCC Commissioner Adelstein:
"Commission rules and practices have made it=20
prohibitively expensive and unnecessarily=20
burdensome for most independent programmers to=20
obtain and maintain leased access."
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-18A3.doc

BROADCASTERS SEE RED OVER WHITE SPACES
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Broadcasters are warning FCC Commissioners and=20
staffers of a threat to the DTV transition from=20
allowing unlicensed personal, portable devices=20
like PDAs and microphones to operate in the=20
so-called white spaces between DTV channels. They=20
say the potential for interference to DTV signals=20
could stop the transition cold. Congressional=20
Democrats have been hammering the commission over=20
the DTV transition, warning that the February=20
2009 date to end analog broadcasts could slip if=20
the FCC doesn't move more aggressively.=20
Broadcasters argue that their DTV signals will be=20
sitting ducks if the FCC allows unlicensed=20
wireless devices to share their digital spectrum,=20
as computer companies have been pushing for.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6452661.html

OHIO HOUSE OKs FRANCHISE-REFORM BILL
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Linda Haugsted]
The Ohio House overwhelming approved a=20
franchise-reform bill Thursday that will transfer=20
video oversight to the state Director of=20
Commerce. Under the terms of the bill, the state=20
official will have 45 days to approve competitive=20
video-service agreements. Unlike other states,=20
this bill contains some customer-service=20
regulatory specifics. For instance, the law would=20
mandate that consumers be compensated for=20
provider-caused outages of four hours or more=20
with a credit for a full day's service. Rebates=20
will be mandatory for outages of more than 24=20
hours that are caused by external forces. The=20
House added more service regulations to its=20
version and revised the number of public,=20
educational and government channels required by=20
operators going forward. The latter amendments=20
are also causing concern among incumbent operators.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6452424.html?rssid=3D196

TV NETWORKS GAIN IN 'UPFRONT' AD DEALS
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Suzanne=20
Vranica suzanne.vranica( at )wsj.com]
In television's upfront advertising market, which=20
usually occurs between mid-May and early June, TV=20
networks sell about three-quarters of their=20
prime-time ad inventory for the coming fall=20
season. For the past couple of years the major=20
broadcast networks' overall upfront take has=20
fallen slightly, to about $9 billion last year,=20
due to advertisers shifting money out of=20
television into Web ads and delaying their TV ad=20
purchases until later in the year. Several of the=20
major TV networks are winning significant price=20
increases this year, reflecting stronger early=20
demand for ad time than in the past couple of=20
years. Apparently, some advertisers are moving=20
money typically reserved for ad purchases later=20
in the year -- in the so-called scatter ad market=20
-- for ad time bought close to the airdate, and=20
putting it into the upfront. The reason: Scatter=20
prices in 2006 and early 2007 rose higher than=20
upfront prices for the first time in several=20
years because of the decision by some advertisers=20
to do their ad deals later in the year.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118212505467738526.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)

QUICKLY

INTERNET RADIO RACES TO BREAK FREE OF THE PC
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Sarah McBride sarah.mcbride( at )wsj.com]
Internet radio, which can draw on vast troves of=20
music from around the world and customize them to=20
a listener's personal tastes, is growing. While=20
ratings for traditional radio broadcasters have=20
been lackluster, Internet radio listenership in=20
the U.S. has risen to 29 million a week, up from=20
20 million three years ago. Even so, the nascent=20
industry has yet to capture the biggest prize --=20
portability. Some halfway solutions exist, such=20
as music devices that allow people to stream=20
Internet radio on speakers, or software that=20
allows technology buffs to access Internet radio=20
from their phones. But results can be glitchy,=20
expensive and technically against the terms of=20
contracts with mobile-phone service providers.=20
Now, start-ups and giants are jockeying for=20
position in mobile Internet radio, in a race that=20
could rearrange the business model of music and broadcasting.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118213164387538671.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
e_one
(requires subscription)

CEREAL KILLER
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] Remember when the idea of lawsuits=20
over sugared cereal was a joke? Back when Joe=20
Camel was public enemy number one, skeptics=20
warned that Tony the Tiger would be next. Well,=20
we're almost there: Last Thursday, Kellogg Co.=20
announced it would stop using licensed characters=20
like Shrek for marketing, unless the food in=20
question meets certain nutrition benchmarks for=20
sugar, fat and calories. No family brand looks=20
forward to a public shellacking for causing=20
obesity and other afflictions in children, but=20
for Kellogg to cave so quickly is an unfortunate=20
sign of the times. By withdrawing advertising=20
from elementary schools and certain programming,=20
and getting rid of movie characters like Shrek=20
and Spongebob (bad body types?), companies like=20
Kellogg will only encourage more intimidation by lawsuit.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118212415966038500.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
nion
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

June 16, 2008 (FISA; Election; XM-Sirius)

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for MONDAY JUNE 16, 2008 (Happy Bloomsday -- see story below)

Find Headlines online at http://www.benton.org/headlines

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
FISA negotiators near deal

ELECTIONS & MEDIA
The Internet and the 2008 Election
HisSpace
Can McCain compete with Obama online?
Barack Obama’s Media Agenda
Cable Doesn't Face Easy Choice With McCain Or Obama
Primaries' TV Victors

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
FCC Chair To Support XM-Sirius Merger
Google-Yahoo ad deal faces intense scrutiny
NBCU Enters Exclusive Talks for Weather Channel
NBC To Take Over More Local Stations' Web Sites
Tribune Plans Safety Net for Stations

INTERNET/BROADBAND
FCC Finally Redefines Broadband
Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
Google prepping broadband-monitoring tools

BROADCASTING
Red Lion Redux
Rep Boehner, Conservative Groups Weigh In on Localism
DTV Angst Abounds
Cultural divide needs bridging as TV goes digital
Schumer has plan to smooth digital TV transition
Separate Bloomsdays for Theater and Radio

WIRELESS/SPECTRUM
Ambassador: U.S. Wireless Policies Emulated by Developing Nations

CHILDREN & MEDIA
Adelstein: Rate Commercials for Content

QUICKLY -- EU scales back plan for telecommunications regulator; AT&T: termination fees ultimately a great deal for consumers; Verizon: Drop your landline, get a discount; Weak evidence links congressmen's cyberattacks to China

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS

FISA NEGOTIATORS NEAR DEAL
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Manu Raju]
Apparently House and Senate negotiators are on the verge of striking an accord on a contentious overhaul of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The proposed agreement would give federal district courts the authority to review whether civil liability protections should be afforded to those companies that received orders from the administration to wiretap phones after Sept. 11, 2001. That plan differs from the approach Republicans offered before Memorial Day to give that authority to the secret court that operates under the FISA. But the deal allows a court to look at a lower standard of evidence to determine if companies received such orders -- a provision sought by the GOP. The language will likely anger people on both sides of the debate. Initially, Republicans insisted on full retroactive immunity for the telephone firms, saying companies would be less likely to participate if they had to face lawsuits for cooperating, and that would undermine national security. But Democrats contend that blanket immunity is not needed if the Bush administration and the phone companies did not break the law when eavesdropping on American citizens. About 40 lawsuits are pending nationwide against the companies, which they say could cost them billions of dollars. Civil libertarians are certain to object to the deal over concerns that courts may simply rubberstamp immunity orders without looking at the possibility that companies broke the law. Caroline Fredrickson, director of the Washington legislative office of the American Civil Liberties Union, said the deal appears unconstitutional.
http://thehill.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=74112&Itemi...

ELECTIONS & MEDIA

THE INTERNET AND THE 2008 ELECTION
[SOURCE: Pew Internet & American Life Project, AUTHOR: Aaron Smith, Lee
Rainie]
A record-breaking 46% of Americans have used the Internet, email or cell phone text messaging to get news about the campaign, share their views and mobilize others. And Barack Obama's backers have an edge in the online political environment. Furthermore, three online activities have become especially prominent as the presidential primary campaigns have progressed: First, 35% of Americans say they have watched online political videos a figure that nearly triples the reading the Pew Internet Project got in the 2004 race. Second, 10% say they have used social networking sites such as Facebook or MySpace to gather information or become involved. This is particularly popular with younger voters: Two-thirds of Internet users under the age of 30 have a social networking profile, and half of these use social networking sites to get or share information about politics or the campaigns. Third, 6% of Americans have made political contributions online, compared with 2% who did that during the entire 2004 campaign. A significant number of voters are also using the Internet to gain access to campaign events and primary documents.
http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/252/report_display.asp
* Survey: Record number of Americans following election via Web
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9968497-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=...
* So maybe the Internet is a cure for stupidity after all
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-9968429-60.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag...
* Study: Americans use Net to look beyond sound bite (Associated Press)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080615/ap_on_hi_te/internet_politics
* Web is window into '08 election for many
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080616/a_capcol16.art.htm

HISSPACE
[SOURCE: The Atlantic, AUTHOR: Marc Ambinder]
America's politics have regularly been transformed by sudden changes in the way we communicate. And revolutions in communications technology have always bestowed great gifts on those politicians savvy enough to grasp their full potential. Improvements to the printing press helped Andrew Jackson form and organize the Democratic Party, and he courted newspaper editors and publishers, some of whom became members of his Cabinet, with a zeal then unknown among political leaders. The postal service, which was coming into its own as he reached for the presidency, was perhaps even more important to his election and public image. Newspapers enabled Lincoln to become a viable national candidate. Franklin Roosevelt used radio to make his case for a dramatic redefinition of government itself. John F. Kennedy understood the strengths and limitations of broadcast television before his peers did, and his election and popularity resulted partly from that understanding. The communications revolution under way today involves the Internet, of course, and if Barack Obama eventually wins the presidency, it will be in no small part because he has understood the medium more fully than his opponents do. Obama clearly intends to use the Web, if he is elected president, to transform governance just as he has transformed campaigning.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200806/ambinder-obama

CAN MCCAIN COMPETE WITH OBAMA ONLINE?
[SOURCE: Politico, AUTHOR: Ben Adler]
Comparing Sens John McCain (R-AZ) and Barack Obama (D-IL) campaigns’ respective approaches to technology, PoliticsOnline founder Phil Noble said, "It's the difference between a horse and buggy and a NASA space ship." "Every time Obama had seven seconds when we spent the day together in South Carolina, he whipped out his Blackberry," recalled Noble. Contrast that to McCain's response when Politico's Mike Allen asked him whether he used a Mac or a PC: "Neither. I'm an illiterate that has to rely on my wife for all of the assistance I can get." "There is a gap between people who are digital natives and people who are digital immigrants. Obama clearly has an advantage over McCain in that he is a more comfortable user of these tools," said Micah Sifry, founder of TechPresident.com, a blog that covers how the 2008 presidential candidates use the Web. And in the ways they use the Web, "campaigns are a reflection of the candidate," he added. "In terms of the usage of new media, there's definitely a dramatic difference between how McCain and Obama are operating," said Ian Rowe, vice president for strategic partnerships and public affairs at MTV, who worked in the Bush White House. "Within barackobama.com he has the same set of tools you use in Facebook or MySpace or YouTube. The age gap inherently creates more of an affinity with the younger generation [for Obama]. But Obama's general approach is in tune with reaching young people where they are." Obama has also significantly outspent McCain in online advertising, according to an analysis of Federal Election Commission numbers by Politico's Ken Vogel. While Obama has reported spending $6.8 million on Web ads (including ads on Politico.com) since beginning his campaign, McCain has reported spending $1.9 million on "Web service" — a category that likely includes advertising, among other things.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11086.html

BARACK OBAMA'S MEDIA AGENDA
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
A Q&A with Sen Barack Obama (D-IL) on his communications policy agenda. He indicates that he is committed to working toward a digital-TV transition that is without significant disruption (the switchover would come less than four weeks after his inauguration); said the Federal Communications Commission needs to take merger reviews more seriously; asserted that FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, like his predecessor Michael Powell, has tried to “dismantle” rules that protect the public; and gave his thoughts on whether cable content should be regulated or its channels unbundled. Sen Obama believes the consequence of consolidation of media ownership has been less diversity, less local news and the parroting of stories across multiple outlets. That, he said, needs to change.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570325.html?desc=topstory

CABLE DOESN'T FACE EASY CHOICE WITH MCCAIN OR OBAMA
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
Would the cable industry prefer Sen John McCain (R-AZ) or Sen Barack Obama (D-IL) as president? Tough choice. Sen McCain voted to regulate cable rates in 1992 and refused to deregulate the industry in 1996. Sen Obama favors Network Neutrality which would regulate how cable operators manage traffic on their broadband networks. Even cable's top lobbyist -- National Cable & Telecommunications Association president Kyle McSlarrow -- is unsure what awaits his industry when the White House gains a new occupant next January. “I guess the good news is that after the last couple of years, I'm kind of ready for anything now,” quipped McSlarrow, referring to cable's repeated clashes with Federal Communications Commission chairman Kevin Martin. McSlarrow is personally backing presumptive Republican nominee McCain and is one of his biggest fund-raisers. “I think what matters is that we have members of the FCC and people in key positions in the administration who have some appreciation for the extraordinary change and dynamism of this industry across the board,” McSlarrow said.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6570420.html?nid=4262

PRIMARIES' TV VICTORS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Robert Marich]
Cable TV news networks were able to parlay the election-induced ratings bump into a 10% year-over-year revenue jump since October 2007, according to research firm SQAD. Buoyed by the long and high-profile race for the Democratic nomination between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the ad dollar increases for CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC significantly outperformed the 3% average ad revenue hike across all basic cable networks for the same period. Researcher SNL Kagan estimates that the three big cable news networks will rake in around $1.4 billion in gross advertising revenue this year. SNL Kagan forecasts Fox News will capture 47% of gross ad spend in the category, versus 40% for CNN and 13% for MSNBC.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570388.html
* Election Ad Uptick (Multichannel News)
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6570404.html?nid=4262

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

FCC CHAIR TO SUPPORT XM-SIRIUS MERGER
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Cecilia Kang]
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin said yesterday that he will support a merger between the nation's sole satellite radio operators, XM and Sirius, a decision that could remove the last regulatory hurdle in the lengthy and heavily criticized move to make the companies one. Chairman Martin could circulate an approval for the merger for the other four FCC commissioners to vote on as early as this week after the companies agreed to several commitments intended to prevent the monopoly from raising programming prices and from stifling competition among radio makers. The companies have agreed to: 1) Place price caps on programming and offer a la carte programming so that subscribers could pick programs they want and not have to subscribe to all channels or certain packages. 2) Open their technology standards to any radio-device manufacturer, paving the way for consumers to buy radio transmitters from retail stores. 3) Provide interoperable radios. 4) Set aside 12 channels for noncommercial services such as educational and public safety programming [long live POTUS!]. They would lease another 12 channels for programming run by minorities and women, groups that are underrepresented in entertainment broadcasting. If the merger is approved, it would be a major reversal of FCC rules. The agency distributed licenses to XM and Sirius in 1997 on the condition the two satellite companies never merge.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/15/AR200806...
(requires registration)
* FCC Staff Back XM-Sirius Merger
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121357587939276011.html?mod=todays_us_ma...
* FCC chief expected to back Sirius-XM merger
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9969202-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=...
* FCC Chief Backs XM-Sirius Deal (Associated Press)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/business/16fcc.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1...

GOOGLE-YAHOO AD DEAL FACES INTENSE SCRUTINY
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Richard Waters, Joshua Chaffin]
Google and Yahoo have structured an alliance that cleverly gets around the immediate antitrust pitfalls that stem from linking the two biggest Internet search companies. However, the two face a tough ride in Washington over the longer-term implications of a link that could further strengthen Google’s grip on a market it already dominates. Much will depend on whether advertisers and publishers are alarmed enough about this long-term risk to lobby against the deal. Yahoo’s decision came as a disappointment to media companies, which had hoped an acquisition of the company by Microsoft would establish a stronger competitor to Google and give them leverage to negotiate better terms for search and other online advertising deals. The Department of Justice now has three and a half months – the length of time Google and Yahoo said they would allow before going ahead with the alliance – to weigh up the strength of those concerns.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ac4c7718-3973-11dd-90d7-0000779fd2ac.html
(requires subscription)

NBCU ENTERS EXCLUSIVE TALKS FOR WEATHER CHANNEL
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Robert Marich]
A consortium led by NBC Universal said late Friday that it started exclusive negotiations to buy The Weather Channel, shortly after Time Warner pulled out of the auction because pricing concerns. The price tag for the cable channel is approximately $3.5 billion. NBC Universal’s bid is in partnership with private-equity outfits Blackstone Group and Bain Capital. NBCU could realize its own synergies by linking TWC to its NBC Weather Plus service.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570253.html?rssid=193

NBC TO TAKE OVER MORE LOCAL STATIONS' WEB SITES
[SOURCE: Silicon Alley Insider, AUTHOR: Michael Learmonth]
NBC is going to bring the Web operations of eight owned stations currently managed under contract by Internet Broadcasting back into NBC, where they will be managed by a group headed by Brian Buchwald, NBC SVP of Local Integrated Media. The transition will happen by the end of the year. This is a bit of a no-brainer. The sites look like they're languishing under Internet Broadcasting, and NBC can broaden the reach of its sales and share content and share resources such ad sales, news operations, and content -- like video from newly-acquired LX.TV, which produces local lifestyle and cultural programming. NBC says its 10 owned local station Web sites draw 7.2 million unique visitors and 95 million page views annually.
http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/5/nbc_to_take_over_more_local_stations_...

TRIBUNE PLANS SAFETY NET FOR STATIONS
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Chris Pursell, Jon Lafayette]
The Tribune Co., which owns 23 television stations, is beefing up its library of programming, providing the company flexibility either to launch a new national broadcast network or invigorate the slate of its rebranded WGN America channel. The contingency plans are being spurred in part by concern about the future of the company’s 15 CW affiliates. The CW, which went live in 2006, has stumbled in the ratings. Should it not be able to return to the air for the 2009-2010 season, Tribune doesn't want its CW outlets to have to scramble for programming. Tribune executives said they hope The CW will return for another season and they are optimistic about the network’s upcoming schedule. Still, one executive said, they don't “want to be caught with their pants down,” recalling the difficulty Fox initially had pulling together viable programming for MyNetworkTV after its stations lost their UPN programming. The plans for a new network are being developed to prepare for a “worst-case scenario."
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/06/tribune_plans_safety_net_for_s.php
(requires free registration)

INTERNET/BROADBAND

FCC FINALLY REDEFINES BROADBAND
[SOURCE: TelecomWeb, AUTHOR: ]
The Federal Communications Commission, following years of criticism and threats of Congressional action, yesterday finally issued an order scrapping its previous definition of "broadband" as any service delivering of at least 200 Kb/s. The order, to be implemented by new rules to be issued within 120 days, sets 768 Kb/s as the minimum speed for what the FCC is now calling "basic" broadband, which extends up to 1.5 Mb/s. Slower speeds, from the old 200 Kb/s definition of broadband up to 768 Kb/s are redefined as "first generation data." In addition, the FCC said it will now require broadband providers to report subscriber totals for individual higher speed tiers, which it didn't give names to, of; 1.5 Mb/s - 3 Mb/s; 3 Mb/s - 6 Mb/s; and above 6 Mb/s. Changing the definition of broadband had become a highly politicized issue, with the Republican-controlled FCC often accused of keeping the lower speed definition in an attempt to show that broadband in the United States was growing at a healthy pace. However Democrats, on both the FCC and in Congress, had been howling. Now, with election year finesse, things are apparently changing. The FCC also is scrapping the highly-criticized FCC methodology of using Zip codes to assess broadband penetration, and counting an entire Zip code as having broadband available if even just one resident had broadband. Data will now be collected by census tract, giving a much finer-grained view of the situation. Also changed has been the FCC's practice of completely ignoring the difference between business and residential broadband. The new rules require wired, terrestrial fixed wireless, and satellite broadband service providers to report, for each census tract and each speed tier in which the provider offers service, the number of subscribers and the percentage of subscribers that are residential. The rules don't, though, require categorization of business broadband - essentially services that might be symmetrical and delivers speeds that can be 100 Mb/s or even 1 Gb/s. Also glaringly absent from the new reporting regime, in the opinion of highly vocal members of the Democratic minority on the FCC, is any requirement to provide pricing information.
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/260781.html

CHARGING BY THE BYTE TO CURB INTERNET TRAFFIC
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Brian Steler]
(6/15) Some people use the Internet simply to check e-mail and look up phone numbers. Others are online all day, downloading big video and music files. For years, both kinds of Web surfers have paid the same price for access. But now three of the country’s largest Internet service providers are threatening to clamp down on their most active subscribers by placing monthly limits on their online activity. One of them, Time Warner Cable, began a trial of “Internet metering” in one Texas city early this month, asking customers to select a monthly plan and pay surcharges when they exceed their bandwidth limit. The idea is that people who use the network more heavily should pay more, the way they do for water, electricity, or, in many cases, cellphone minutes. That same week, Comcast said that it would expand on a strategy it uses to manage Internet traffic: slowing down the connections of the heaviest users, so-called bandwidth hogs, at peak times. AT&T also said Thursday that limits on heavy use were inevitable and that it was considering pricing based on data volume. “Based on current trends, total bandwidth in the AT&T network will increase by four times over the next three years,” the company said. All three companies say that placing caps on broadband use will ensure fair access for all users. Critics of the bandwidth limits say that metering and capping network use could hold back the inevitable convergence of television, computers and the Internet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/15/technology/15cable.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)
* Debate at Broadband Policy Summit (BroadbandCensus.com)
http://broadbandcensus.com/blog/?p=34

GOOGLE PREPPING BROADBAND-MONITORING TOOLS
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Steven Musil]
When it comes to your broadband connection, Google wants you to know that it has your back. The Internet giant is developing a suite of tools to help broadband users identify traffic discrimination by their Internet service providers. "We're trying to develop tools, software tools...that allow people to detect what's happening with their broadband connections, so they can let (ISPs) know that they're not happy with what they're getting--that they think certain services are being tampered with," Google Senior Policy Director Richard Whitt said during a panel discussion at the Innovation '08 conference. "If the broadband providers aren't going to tell you exactly what's happening on their networks, we want to give users the power to find out for themselves."
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9968972-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=...

BROADCASTING

RED LION REDUX
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] B&C is in agreement with the Parents Television Council and not with the Parent Teacher Association on how deeply the Supreme Court should delve into the arcane workings of the Federal Communications Commission's indecency campaign. In short, the trade magazine wants the Court to wade in and rule on whether the FCC should still be in the business of regulating broadcast content based on the shopworn and ludicrous justification of spectrum scarcity. As you can guess, we don't think that scarcity issue is justified, especially now. In a world where there are literally millions of information outlets, arguing that broadcasting must be micromanaged by government bureaucrats because it is unique is a joke.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570392.html
* Interest groups to FCC: "Save the Red Lion!"
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080615-save-the-red-lion.html

REP BOEHNER, CONSERVATIVE GROUPS WEIGH IN ON LOCALISM
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) wrote Federal Communications Commission Kevin Martin saying that adopting new localism requirements would be a "stealth enactment of the Fairness Doctrine." "It is clear," Boehner said in a statement, "that the commission is proposing no less than a sweeping takeover by Washington bureaucrats of broadcast media." Elsewhere on the localism pen-pal front, a group of conservative organizations including Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, the Christian Coalition and Citizens United wrote Martin to say that they were "deeply concerned" by the proposals.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570305.html?rssid=193

DTV ANGST ABOUNDS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
An optimist might suggest that as the digital-TV countdown clock continues to tick away toward the Feb. 17, 2009 deadline, problems should be dissipating. But if that is the case, it would be hard to tell from the issues that roiled in Washington last week. Smaller cable operators, for one thing, are attempting to leverage the DTV transition in their battle with broadcasters over the retransmission consent process. Officials last week were making the novel argument that breakdowns in retransmission consent negotiations (many current contracts are up at the end of this year) could confuse viewers and impede the process. Also in conflict is the issue of how to handle DTV-to-analog converter box subsidies when the program runs through its first round of funding -- $890 million -- less than two months from now. At a Capitol Hill oversight hearing on the state of the transition last week, there appeared to be confusion, or at least disagreement, over whether viewers whose $40 DTV-to-analog converter box coupons had expired would be able to reapply for them. Some key legislators have been pushing for an answer to that question, though the government agency overseeing the program may have to turn back to those same legislators to get that authority. At that same hearing, Mark Goldstein of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) pointed out that more than a third of analog-only households surveyed indicated they had no plans to buy a new TV or converter box, or had no plans to hook up to cable or satellite, or did not know what they would do.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570378.html

CULTURAL DIVIDE NEEDS BRIDGING AS TV GOES DIGITAL
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Joe Garofoli]
The cable and consumer electronics industry is spending more than $1 billion to make sure that TV-watching Americans know they have until February to prepare their sets to receive a digital signal. It's a public information campaign so pervasive that every American will be exposed to an estimated 642 messages - on TV, radio, online and elsewhere - reminding them that if they don't take the appropriate action they will live the darkest of American nightmares: Their TVs will stop working on Feb. 17, 2009. Make that every English-speaking American will receive that number of nags. For other sectors of the TV audience - specifically, TV watchers for whom English is a second language, money is sometimes tight and television is a main connection to native culture - the warnings will be few. Some representatives of that audience were sitting among the gray-haired folks in Lady Shaw Senior Center in San Francisco's Chinatown this week listening to community organizer Anni Chung explain the technicalities and practicalities of the digital TV changeover. None of the campaign's billion dollars trickled down to Chung's Self-Help for the Elderly senior care organization, but she's taken the responsibility of spreading the message to native Chinese speakers, particularly low-income seniors.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/06/13/DDJA1180IU.DTL

SCHUMER HAS PLAN TO SMOOTH DIGITAL TV TRANSITION
[SOURCE: Ithaca Journal, AUTHOR: Laura Brandt]
Sen Charles Schumer (D-NY) said that nearly 300,000 Upstate New York households, particularly the elderly, may be left in the dark as television switches from analog to digital transmission. He went on to unveil a three-part plan he said would ensure that residents get coupons for the DTV converter boxes that older TVs will require when the switch is made nationally on Feb. 18, 2008: 1) Increase funding for awareness and implementation of the analog-to-digital switch and converter box coupon program; 2) Direct the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to allow consumers with expired coupons to reapply for new ones; and 3) Request the Federal Communications Commission to identify the pitfalls of the program and fix them.
http://www.theithacajournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080614/NEWS...

SEPARATE BLOOMSDAYS FOR THEATER AND RADIO
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Colin Moynihan]
For nearly three decades theatergoers, literature lovers and admirers of Irish culture have traveled to Symphony Space or tuned in to WBAI on June 16 in order to watch or listen to actors honor the life of James Joyce and interpret his novel “Ulysses,” one of the most celebrated and recondite books of the 20th century. June 16 -- Bloomsday -- is the day in 1904 on which the characters in “Ulysses,” among them Leopold and Molly Bloom, roam the streets of Dublin. The sprawling novel of more than 200,000 words includes inebriated hallucinations, a visit to a brothel and the famous lengthy monologue of erotic musings. The date also marks the actual day that Joyce and his future wife, Nora Barnacle, are thought to have had one of their first formal outings. On Monday night, for the first time since 1981, the theater and radio productions, long the joint effort of the Symphony Space artistic director, Isaiah Sheffer, and Larry Josephson, a producer for WBAI (99.5 FM in New York), will go their separate ways as a result of apprehension about obscenity and government regulation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/arts/16bloo.html?ref=todayspaper
(requires registration)

WIRELESS/SPECTRUM

AMBASSADOR: US WIRELESS POLICIES EMULATED BY DEVELOPING NATIONS
[SOURCE: BroadbandCensus.com, AUTHOR: William Korver]
America’s wireless policies continue to be emulated by developing nations, Ambassador David Gross, United States coordinator for international communications and information policy, said Friday at Broadband Policy Summit IV. Therefore, the US must “think domestically” but “act internationally” in wireless regulation – because many nations “monitor and dissect carefully” the telecommunications debates that now rage in Washington. More than 100 independent regulatory agencies have been modeled on the Federal Communications Commission. Gross also said that it was the US model of private enterprise that is “now widely adopted throughout the world.” Gross, who will be attending the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development “ministerial” next week in Seoul, noted the exponential growth of cellular devices. He said that India and China represent the height of cellular expansion. In India, the cell phone industry gains over 10 million new subscribers each month. In China, seven to eight million are added monthly. Wireless expansion has also occurred in Iraq and Afghanistan as well, he said.
http://broadbandcensus.com/blog/?p=33

CHILDREN & MEDIA

ADELSTEIN: RATE COMMERCIALS FOR CONTENT
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
This week's guest on C-SPAN's The Communicators is Federal Communications Commission member Jonathan Adelstein. He said children are "swimming in a sea" of inappropriate material across the TV, cable, satellite and video-game platforms and programmers should rate their commercials as well as their shows. Watching sports or American Idol, kids are likely to see ad for erectile dysfunction [down, boy] or beer or a violent program that is inappropriate for children. If broadcasters are going to do that, they should rate their ads just as they rate their shows. Commissioner Adelstein said a parent has the right to control that ad, as well as the program.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6570328.html?rssid=193

QUICKLY

EU SCALES BACK PLAN FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATOR
[SOURCE: International Herald Tribune, AUTHOR: Stephen Castle]
The European Commission on Thursday scaled back plans to create a Europe-wide telecommunications regulator, apparently making a tactical retreat as it attempted to win support for more controversial measures to regulate the sector. At a meeting of telecommunications ministers in Luxembourg, Viviane Reding, the commission member who oversees the industry, conceded that her proposals would have to be scaled back, admitting that they had faced "a lot of opposition" from European Union member states. Nevertheless, plans to replace the existing network of national regulators with a still-to-be-defined new agency will proceed. The proposed new body, however, will not merge with the European Network and Information Security Agency, or Enisa, which oversees the security of telecommunications networks, and is likely to have a staff of 50, or half of what Reding had proposed. Though the decision was a setback for the commission, the EU-wide regulator was just one element of a wide-ranging package of measures designed to overhaul the regulatory system.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/12/business/regulate.php

AT&T: TERMINATION FEES ULTIMATELY A GREAT DEAL FOR CONSUMERS
[SOURCE: ars technica, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
Those early termination fees (ETFs) that consumers pay for switching cell phones in mid-contract are a great deal, an attorney for AT&T told the Federal Communications Commission. "ETF-backed term contracts give customers the ability to lower their monthly charges and upfront handset costs in exchange for their promise to pay monthly charges for the life of the contract or alternatively to pay the ETF in lieu of the remaining charges," Seamus C. Duffy explained to the FCC. Not only that, but "the overwhelming popularity of these rate plans has fueled the tremendous increase in wireless penetration, usage, and technical innovation documented by the [FCC's] annual reports on wireless competition." Ironically, the reason Duffy spoke before the Commission was because these allegedly popular plans have also fueled a veritable tsunami of state-level class action lawsuits across the country. He represents AT&T in several of them.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080613-att-termination-fees-ultim...

VERIZON: DROP YOUR LANDLINE, GET A DISCOUNT
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Leslie Katz]
Verizon Communications says it will offer discounts to landline-free wireless customers who combine Internet or TV service from the company. The discounts will range from $8 to $21 a month, depending on the wireless package. As early as this week, Verizon will introduce the Flex Double Play bundle for those who combine a Verizon Wireless plan with broadband or Fios TV, the company's cable TV service. The discount applies to DSL service with downloads at 3 megabits per second, and to Fios (fiber-optic) broadband at up to 20Mbps. The fastest DSL plan, at 7Mbps, and the fastest Fios service, at 50 mbps, are not eligible for the bundle.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9968910-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=...

WEAK EVIDENCE LINKS CONGRESSMEN'S CYBERATTACKS TO CHINA
[SOURCE: InfoWorld, AUTHOR: Robert McMillan]
House of Representatives members who worry that China may have been responsible for attacks on their computers have provided little evidence to back up their claims, according to computer security experts. Computer attacks are often launched from Chinese IP addresses because a large number of computer systems in China have been hacked and are being used to redirect online attacks. Also, the country is notorious for providing so-called "bulletproof" hosting services that keep servers running even when international law enforcement tries to take them down.
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/redirect?source=rss&url=http://www.info...

FCC Denies Challenge To Chicago, Milwaukee TV Stations

FCC DENIES CHALLENGE TO CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE TV STATIONS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]