October 2007

Verizon's Big TV Bet Pays Off

VERIZON'S BIG TV BET PAYS OFF
[SOURCE: Business Week, AUTHOR: Steve Rosenbush]

Will A Google Phone Change The Game?

WILL A GOOGLE PHONE CHANGE THE GAME?
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek, AUTHOR: Roger O. Crockett]

Clarence Thomas, Rupert Murdoch, And The Candidates

CLARENCE THOMAS, RUPERT MURDOCH, AND THE CANDIDATES
[SOURCE: Off The Bus, AUTHOR: Jon Wiener]

Cameras in the Courtroom

CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM?
[SOURCE: USAToday]
[Commentary] It seems that you can see Supreme Court justices on TV almost anywhere these days — except where they work. Justices say cameras would threaten their 'collegial dynamic,' security.

* The first Monday in October brings another TV blackout
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20071002/edit02.art.htm

U.S. delays domestic satellite spying program

US DELAYS DOMESTIC SATELLITE SPYING PROGRAM
[SOURCE: Reuters]
The U.S. government has delayed the start of a program that would use spy-satellite images for domestic purposes including counterterrorism efforts, according to Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss). The Department of Homeland Security informed Rep Thompson that the program would not be launched until it had addressed civil-liberties issues he raised in August.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0133926820071001

Internet gambling regs exempt some transfers

INTERNET GAMBLING REGS EXEMPT SOME TRANSFERS
[SOURCE: Reuters]

Google: Search and Data Seizure

GOOGLE: SEARCH AND DATA SEIZURE
[SOURCE: The Nation, AUTHOR: Jeff Chester]

An Analysis of the Net Neutrality Debate of 2006

AN ANALYSIS OF THE NET NEUTRALITY DEBATE OF 2006
[SOURCE: Professor Jeffrey A. Hart, Indiana University]
In 2006, a major telecommunications bill failed because it did not include guarantees for something called "net neutrality." The purpose of this paper is to describe and explain the politics behind the net neutrality debate of 2006 and to predict its likely future course.
http://www.indiana.edu/~globalm/pdf/apsa07.pdf

Advertisers Push FEC on Nonpolitical Ads Featuring Candidates

ADVERTISERS PUSH FEC ON NONPOLITICAL ADS FEATURING CANDIDATES
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Tuesday October 2, 2007

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.

LOBBYING
Corporate-funded research designed to influence public policy
Ex-NAB Head Fritts Hired by CBS, FOX, Vonage

DTV TRANSITION
Barton, Upton Seek DTV Answers from Martin
The Night The TVs Go Out

BROADCASTING/CABLE
FCC: Free, Noncontroversial VNRs Can Still Trigger Fines
Public Access TV Group Sues Florida County
White Spaces Debate More Heat Than Light
Radio industry gets a bad signal

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
100 Leading Media Companies
Belo Shares Surge After Spinoff News
Tribune gets tax refund in Matthew Bender case

TELECOM
Verizon's Big TV Bet Pays Off
Will A Google Phone Change The Game?
Court seeks govt's view on AT&T case

INTERNET/BROADBAND
Its Creators Call Internet Outdated, Offer Remedies
Sprint Presses for Cheaper Access to Broadband Lines

MEDIA & ELECTIONS/POLITICS
Anchor Out After Affair With L.A. Mayor
Clarence Thomas, Rupert Murdoch, And The Candidates
Cameras in the Courtroom

HISTORY LESSON
50 Years Ago, Launch of a New World

QUICKLY -- U.S. delays domestic satellite spying=20
program; Internet gambling regs exempt some=20
transfers; Google: Search and Data Seizure; An=20
Analysis of the Net Neutrality Debate of 2006;=20
Advertisers Push FEC on Nonpolitical Ads=20
Featuring Candidates; With continuing resolution passed, approps work begins

LOBBYING

CORPORATE-FUNDED RESEARCH DESIGNED TO INFLUENCE PUBLIC POLICY
[SOURCE: Nieman Watchdog, AUTHOR: Bruce Kushnick]
[Commentary] Reports by well-known think tanks=20
and individuals funded by telecoms are helping=20
quash competition, increase phone rates and set=20
up a corporate-oriented Internet system. Is there=20
any reason to trust these reports? Or to trust=20
experts who testify before regulators without=20
revealing the sources of their funding? It is=20
clear that we are in the age of "stink tanks,=94 in=20
which corporate-funded think tanks and well-paid,=20
credentialed academics are hired to make=20
corporate arguments and give the appearance of=20
being independent experts. What should happen=20
with these groups and individuals that pass as=20
independent think tanks or expert professors but=20
that are in part paid consultants working to help=20
big corporations achieve their goals? 1) The=20
Internal Revenue Service should remove their=20
non-profit status, with Congressional=20
authorization and direction if necessary. 2) The=20
IRS should consider imposing penalties for=20
violation of non-profit status. 3) The Justice=20
Department should investigate bringing criminal=20
and civil charges for defrauding the government.=20
4) Congress should require disclosure of all=20
related payments from all corporations,=20
associations, etc., by individuals seeking to=20
testify at any public hearing or other event=20
before the FTC, FCC, Congress, state and federal=20
regulatory and governmental agencies.
http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=3Dbackground.view&backgro...
id=3D00208

EX-NAB HEAD FRITTS HIRED BY CBS, FOX, VONAGE
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
Broadcaster CBS Corp. paid Fritts Group $160,000=20
to lobby the federal government in the first half=20
of 2007. The firm lobbied the Federal=20
Communications Commission as well as Congress on=20
legislation dealing with indecent programming and=20
an effort to prevent the return of the Fairness=20
Doctrine. News Corp., the media company=20
controlled by Rupert Murdoch, also paid Fritts=20
Group $160,000 to lobby the federal government in=20
the first half of 2007. The firm lobbied Congress=20
on an effort to prevent the return of the=20
Fairness Doctrine and legislation to protect=20
children from exploitation by online predators.=20
Internet phone company Vonage Holdings Corp. paid=20
Fritts Group $160,000 to lobby the federal=20
government in the first half of 2007. The firm=20
lobbied Congress on legislation to ensure that=20
users of Internet-based phones can access=20
emergency 911 service and legislation to make it=20
easier for consumers to keep their home phone=20
number when switching to an Internet provider=20
such as Vonage. (After 23 years as Chief=20
Executive Officer of the National Association of=20
Broadcasters (NAB), Edward O. Fritts launched The=20
Fritts Group to offer clients a personalized approach to government relatio=
ns.)
* CBS paid lobbyist $160,000
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S0MHL00.htm
* News Corp. paid lobbyist $160,000
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S0MJ800.htm
* Vonage paid lobbyist $160K in first half
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S0MNA81.htm
* Fritts Group
http://www.frittsgroup.com/story.shtml

DTV TRANSITION

BARTON, UPTON SEEK DTV ANSWERS FROM MARTIN
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Republican leaders on the House Commerce=20
Committee have written to Federal Communications=20
Commission Chairman Kevin Martin asking if they=20
should start moving a bill that would give the=20
FCC express authority to mandate=20
digital-TV-transition education initiatives. Reps=20
Joe Barton (R-TX) and Fred Upton (R-MI) want to=20
know when the FCC plans to decide what steps, if=20
any, it needs to mandate, which could include=20
requiring broadcasters to air a certain number of=20
public-service announcements, on-screen crawls,=20
bill-stuffers in the case of cable and satellite=20
and periodic reporting requirements. Chairman=20
Martin has said that he wanted to see how the=20
voluntary efforts progressed first. But some=20
people worry nonetheless that voluntary industry=20
efforts may not be enough, Reps Barton and Upton=20
wrote, asking whether, if government outreach and=20
industry efforts weren't sufficient, the=20
legislators should start pushing a bill they=20
introduced in January that would mandate industry=20
education efforts similar to those the FCC has=20
proposed. They also want to know when the FCC=20
will release new figures on what percentage of=20
viewers are over-the-air only and will be most affected by the transition.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6485908.html?rssid=3D193
* See press release:=20
http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/News/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=3...
24
* See letter:=20
http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/File/News/10.01.07_Let...
_to_Kevin_Martin.pdf

THE NIGHT THE TVs GO OUT
[SOURCE: Washington Post 9/29, AUTHOR: Kim Hart]
The industry has tried to get the word out, but=20
many consumers still aren't getting the message:=20
In a year and a half, millions of television=20
screens could go dark. Not the fancy=20
high-definition TVs or those connected to cable=20
or satellite. But the 70 million sets relying on=20
rooftop or "rabbit ears" antennas will end up=20
showing nothing but snow. Broadcasters will stop=20
sending analog signals and move to all-digital=20
programming on Feb. 17, 2009. After that, antenna=20
TV watchers will need a special converter box to=20
watch their sitcoms and newscasts. But many=20
consumers have no idea that this change is=20
coming, and members of Congress are voicing=20
concern over the lack of cooperation between=20
federal agencies and the entertainment industry.=20
The political static comes as broadcasters,=20
retailers, cable operators and regulators clash=20
over how to educate consumers about the change.=20
Sales of digital television sets have nearly=20
tripled since 2005, and the Consumer Electronics=20
Association expects annual sales to top $26=20
billion this year. With the holiday season=20
approaching, government officials in charge of=20
managing the transition to digital TV say that=20
they're severely underprepared and that they=20
worry that the biggest electronics retailers are misinformed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/28/AR200709...
1769.html
(requires registration)

BROADCASTING/CABLE

FCC: FREE, NONCONTROVERSIAL VNRs CAN STILL TRIGGER FINES
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The Federal Communications Commission's latest=20
proposed fines for unidentified video-news=20
releases clarified that just because a station=20
doesn't pay for a nonpolitical or issues-oriented=20
VNR doesn't mean that it can't get fined for=20
airing it without an on-screen identification.=20
That came in a decision in which the FCC's=20
enforcement bureau issued four more proposed=20
fines, totaling $16,000, against Comcast for=20
unidentified VNRs on noncontroversial issues that nobody paid it to run.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6485879.html?rssid=3D193

PUBLIC ACCESS TV GROUP SUES FLORIDA COUNTY
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Kent Gibbons]
The non-profit corporation that operates a=20
public-access channel called Speak Up Tampa Bay=20
is suing Florida=92s Hillsborough County for=20
cutting channel funds, saying the county used=20
budget woes as a pretext to censor constitutionally protected speech.
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6485886.html
* Tampa Public Access Organization Files Lawsuit Against Hillsborough County
http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2007/10/tampa-public-ac.html
* Speak Up Tampa Bay doesn't expect to ride into the sunset quietly
http://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/stories/2007/10/01/daily5.html

WHITE SPACES DEBATE MORE HEAT THAN LIGHT
[SOURCE: tvnewsday, AUTHOR: Harry A. Jessell]
[Commentary] Right now, nobody really knows what=20
impact unlicensed wireless devices in the=20
broadcast band would have on digital TV=20
reception. If Jessell were an FCC commissioner=20
and had to vote today, he would go with the=20
conclusion of the FCC engineers and vote no, but=20
with no certainty that he wasn't, as the white=20
spaces proponents claim, squandering many=20
megahertz of valuable spectrum. He writes, "What=20
kills me is the certainty with which groups like=20
the Media Access Project, Freepress.net and the=20
New America Foundation are backing the white=20
spaces proponents, blindly accepting the=20
high-tech industry data and treating the=20
proceeding like a political campaign." He=20
continues, "NAF, Freepress.net and MAP ought to=20
go to bed each night thinking about how they can=20
preserve FREE over-the-air TV, instead of=20
crawling into bed with a bunch of computer geeks=20
who want to sell more toys to the rich." His=20
advise to FCC Chairman Martin: Put the proceeding=20
on hold and ask the NTIA to test the white spaces=20
prototypes and the feasibility of broadcast=20
spectrum sharing at its well-respected Institute=20
for Telecommunications Sciences.
http://www.tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/10/01/daily.4/
* Broadcasting coalition calls unlicensed broadband devices "germs"
[SOURCE: Lasar's Letter on the FCC, AUTHOR: Matthew Lasar]
The debate over "white space" just got a bit more colorful.
http://www.lasarletter.net/drupal/node/478

RADIO INDUSTRY GETS A BAD SIGNAL
[SOURCE: The Charlotte Observer, AUTHOR: Mark Washburn]
In an address that made the musings of=20
Nostradamus seem rosy by comparison, a respected=20
industry observer warned radio executives last=20
week that their industry would all but evaporate=20
within 20 years. Michael Harrison, publisher of=20
the talk-radio magazine Talkers, told a group at=20
the National Association of Broadcasters Radio=20
Show that competing technologies -- like=20
Internet, Wi-Fi, podcasts and cell phones --=20
would all but fill the niche they now occupy.=20
"These are dark times for terrestrial radio,"=20
Harrison said. "And most people in terrestrial radio are in denial of it."
http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

100 LEADING MEDIA COMPANIES
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Bradley Johnson]
The nation's 100 Leading Media Companies over the=20
past year concocted more than a dozen major=20
mergers, acquisitions and spinoffs with a total=20
value topping $85 billion. Private equity gets=20
much of the credit (meaning a pile of debt and=20
lots of challenges ahead). Shareholders last week=20
approved media's most recent biggie, the $19.5=20
billion leveraged buyout of Clear Channel=20
Communications, No. 16 in this issue's media=20
ranking. Amid all the mergers and acquisitions,=20
the Media 100's U.S. media revenue jumped 8.1% to=20
a record $287 billion in 2006. The 10 largest=20
companies accounted for 55.6% of revenue=20
collected by the Media 100 in 2006, according to=20
the Ad Age DataCenter. Time Warner, which has=20
held the No. 1 spot each year since 1995,=20
collected 11.8% of Media 100 revenue -- nearly=20
one of every eight dollars spent by advertisers=20
and consumers on products and services from the=20
top 100. Time Warner is more than 100 times the=20
size of the smallest ranked entry, Schurz=20
Communications, a newspaper, broadcasting and=20
cable operation with estimated revenue of $301=20
million. But Schurz has scale in its own way:=20
This is the first year that media companies=20
needed more than $300 million to make Ad Age's=20
ranking. The entry point for the Media 100 topped=20
$200 million in 1999 and $100 million in 1986.
http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=3D120726

BELO SHARES SURGE AFTER SPINOFF NEWS
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: David Koenig]
Belo Corp. said Monday it plans to spin off its=20
newspapers into a new company that will operate=20
separately from its 20 television stations.=20
Investors had pressed Belo to consider splitting=20
the TV and newspaper businesses, but Chairman and=20
Chief Executive Robert Decherd had resisted. In=20
February, he said the newspaper side of the=20
company was too small to stand on its own. He=20
will run the new newspaper business, A.H. Belo=20
Corp, which will include The Dallas Morning News,=20
The Providence Journal, The Press-Enterprise of=20
Riverside (CA), the newspapers' Web sites, direct=20
mail and commercial printing businesses. Belo=20
President and Chief Operating Officer Dunia Shive=20
will become president and CEO of the TV business.=20
By spinning off the newspapers instead of the TV=20
stations, Belo won't have to reapply for its TV=20
licenses, Decherd said. The spinoff would be made=20
through a tax-free distribution of A.H. Belo=20
shares to current Belo shareholders. The spinoff=20
is expected to be in the first quarter of 2008.
http://www.tvnewsday.com/articles/2007/10/01/daily.10/
* Belo announces spinoff of newspaper properties
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/100107...
usbelo.1295c515e.html
* Texas Media Firm to Spin Off Newspapers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/01/AR200710...
1632.html

TRIBUNE GETS TAX REFUND IN MATTHEW BENDER CASE
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Tribune Company said on Monday it received a=20
refund of about $344 million in federal income=20
taxes and interest paid after settling a case=20
regarding Matthew Bender Publishing. Legal=20
publisher Matthew Bender was part of the Times=20
Mirror Co, which Tribune acquired in 2000. Prior=20
to the merger, the Times Mirror had carried out a=20
series of transactions that gave control of Matthew Bender to Reed Elsevier.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=3DindustryNews&storyID=
=3D2007-10-01T212924Z_01_WEN1402_RTRIDST_0_INDUSTRY-TRIBUNE-REFUND-DC.XML

TELECOM

VERIZON'S BIG TV BET PAYS OFF
[SOURCE: Business Week, AUTHOR: Steve Rosenbush]
Although much-criticized two years ago, Verizon's=20
push into the TV market is starting to pay off.=20
Revenues from the effort are surging, and=20
Verizon's TV service is helping to stem the loss=20
of telephone customers to cable rivals. Verizon=20
is adding nearly 2,000 television customers a=20
day, seven days a week. Even Comcast, Verizon's=20
largest cable competitor, is publicly=20
acknowledging that it's feeling the heat. At the=20
end of the second quarter, Verizon had laid=20
enough fiber cable to offer TV service to 3.9=20
million homes. But by the end of 2010, the=20
company expects to have fiber in at least 18=20
million households in its traditional East Coast=20
territory, more than four times the potential=20
customers it has today. If cable rivals such as=20
Comcast and Cablevision Systems are under=20
pressure now, it's only going to get worse. By=20
investing in fiber, Verizon has the ability to=20
offer essentially unlimited bandwidth. The=20
company has the capacity to offer consumers=20
Internet connections of 100 megabits (Mb) or more=20
should they demand it. And the fiber network,=20
called FiOS, allows Verizon to provide TV signals=20
without resorting to compression. Rivals from=20
AT&T to the cable companies typically compress=20
some of their channels because they have less bandwidth.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2007/tc20070928_484223...
m?chan=3Dtop+news_top+news+index_businessweek+exclusives

WILL A GOOGLE PHONE CHANGE THE GAME?
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek, AUTHOR: Roger O. Crockett]
Could we soon see an ad-supported cell phone=20
service? It may be coming in the form of a Google=20
phone. Wireless industry consultants and=20
marketing executives with knowledge of Google's=20
plans say it has been showing prototypes of a new=20
phone to handset manufacturers and network=20
operators for a couple of months. Its plans have=20
been kept top secret, but Google is expected to=20
tap a company on the Pacific Rim that specializes=20
in mobile design and manufacturing to build a=20
handset to its specs. Google could then apply its=20
expertise in operating software and user=20
applications, says Paul Catalano, a partner at=20
consultancy RelevantC Business Group. Google=20
officials won't talk about phones, and industry=20
sources don't expect one before the second half=20
of 2008. Still, Google has made it clear it has=20
an interest in wireless. It is experimenting with=20
wireless broadband networks in a couple of U.S.=20
cities. In August, CEO Eric Schmidt announced his=20
intention to participate in a federal auction=20
early next year of the sort of radio spectrum=20
that would help pull off a phone service.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_41/b4053084.htm?chan=3Dt...
nology_technology+index+page_top+stories

COURT SEEKS GOVT'S VIEW ON AT&T CASE
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
The Supreme Court asked the Bush administration=20
Monday to weigh in on AT&T Inc.'s appeal of a=20
class action case that resulted in a $31.2=20
million verdict against the company. The case=20
began in October 2001, when a class action was=20
filed against a pension plan administered by=20
local phone company Ameritech, which later became=20
part of AT&T. The suit alleges that a 1999=20
amendment to Ameritech's pension plan illegally=20
reduced the lump sum retirement benefits due to some employees,
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8S0N6000.htm

INTERNET/BROADBAND

ITS CREATORS CALL INTERNET OUTDATED, OFFER REMEDIES
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Bobby White bobby.white( at )wsj.com]
There's a growing debate over whether the=20
Internet's current infrastructure is sufficient=20
to handle the explosion of bandwidth-hungry=20
services such as Internet telephony and video. In=20
a recent report, Cisco calculated that monthly=20
Internet traffic in North America will increase=20
264% by 2011 to more than 7.8 million terabytes,=20
or the equivalent of 40 trillion email messages.=20
If such Internet traffic continues increasing,=20
many believe networks could crash or at least=20
slow to a crawl. Today, information travels the=20
Web by being broken into tiny bits called=20
packets, which are routed through the least=20
congested pipes to their destination. Once the=20
packets arrive, they are reassembled into their=20
original form. The problem is that the increasing=20
size of files, such as video, has begun=20
overwhelming some equipment handling the traffic,=20
resulting in errant or lost packets. To tackle=20
the problem, a slew of start-ups are producing=20
gear and software to accelerate Internet traffic=20
or to increase the network's capacity.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119128309597345795.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
ketplace
(requires subscription)
* Our fraying Internet infrastructure (Commentary)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=3D/c/a/2007/10/01/EDGBSAN...
DTL

SPRINT PRESSES FOR CHEAPER ACCESS TO BROADBAND LINES
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Kim Hart]
Sprint Nextel is picking a fight with the=20
country's largest phone companies over the price=20
it pays for access to their fastest networks. The=20
industry skirmish has swelled into a political=20
battle that will find an audience in front of=20
members of Congress today. Sprint says it has=20
hundreds of millions of dollars riding on an=20
upcoming Federal Communications Commission=20
decision, which hinges on the unpredictable swing=20
vote of Republican Commissioner Robert M.=20
McDowell. The dispute centers on the=20
high-capacity fiber-optic lines that provide huge=20
volumes of phone and Internet connections to=20
businesses. The largest telecom companies --=20
AT&T, Verizon and Qwest Communications -- have=20
networks that reach most buildings, and=20
competitors such as XO Communications and Level 3=20
Communications often lease capacity on those=20
lines to serve their customers. Wireless=20
companies including Sprint and T-Mobile also use=20
the capacity to connect calls to their cellphone=20
towers. But these competitors, led by Sprint, say=20
the giants charge too much for access to the=20
high-capacity lines and want the FCC to more tightly regulate the prices.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/01/AR200710...
1655.html
(requires registration)

MEDIA & ELECTIONS/POLITICS

ANCHOR OUT AFTER AFFAIR WITH LA MAYOR
[SOURCE: Associated Press]
The Spanish-language newscaster who was suspended=20
for two months after having an affair with Mayor=20
Antonio Villaraigosa while reporting on him left=20
her job at the station on Monday. A KVEA-TV=20
spokesman declined to elaborate why Mirthala=20
Salinas did not show up to start her new=20
assignment after the unpaid suspension.=20
"Telemundo and Mirtha Salinas have mutually=20
agreed to end our employment relationship=20
effective October 1," station spokesman Victor M.=20
Franco said. Salinas, 35, worked at the station=20
for a decade. Her contract with Telemundo expires in December.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/01/AR200710...
1995.html
(requires registration)

CLARENCE THOMAS, RUPERT MURDOCH, AND THE CANDIDATES
[SOURCE: Off The Bus, AUTHOR: Jon Wiener]
[Commentary] The long-awaited publication of=20
Clarence Thomas's memoir, My Grandfather's Son,=20
out Monday, makes you wonder: how come none of=20
the presidential candidates have said a word=20
about the Supreme Court in any of their debates?=20
Three sitting justices are expected to resign in=20
the next four years--and they're all on the=20
liberal side: John Paul Stevens, David Souter,=20
and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The publication facts=20
behind Thomas's book ought to be discussed by all=20
the candidates: he received an advance of $1.5=20
million in 2003 from HarperCollins, which is=20
owned by Rupert Murdoch. If you thought the Court=20
dealt with any issues of relevance to Murdoch,=20
you might call it a conflict of interest for=20
Thomas to accept that payment--far more than any=20
sitting justice ever received from any single=20
source. At least you might mention the fabled=20
"appearance of impropriety." You might call the=20
$1.5 million a thank-you gift from Murdoch for=20
services rendered. You might even wonder if it=20
might be a subtle suggestion to other justices=20
who will be ruling on Murdoch-related issues in the future.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-wiener/clarence-thomas-rupert-m_b_6670...
tml

CAMERAS IN THE COURTROOM?
[SOURCE: USAToday]
[Commentary] It seems that you can see Supreme=20
Court justices on TV almost anywhere these days =97=20
except where they work. Justices say cameras=20
would threaten their 'collegial dynamic,' security.
* The first Monday in October brings another TV blackout
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20071002/edit02.art.htm
* 'Over my dead body'
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20071002/oppose02.art.htm

HISTORY LESSON

50 YEARS AGO, LAUNCH OF A NEW WORLD
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Joel Achenbach]
Sputnik and its aftermath are a familiar tale at=20
this point -- the story of a fat and happy=20
superpower suddenly finding itself in a=20
full-blown existential crisis but shaking free of=20
its torpor, revamping science and math education,=20
and winning the race to the moon. Fifty years=20
later, however, the standard narrative of=20
disaster, recovery and triumph is being=20
overhauled by historians. They're more likely to=20
speak of Sputnik's impact as a shock to the=20
system that incited political maneuverings and=20
media misinformation. Much that seemed certain in=20
October 1957 turned out to be misunderstood or=20
purely illusory. Humans have not set up space=20
colonies or left boot prints on Mars, as widely=20
predicted, but we have launched a stunning number=20
of new Sputniks -- thousands of satellites for=20
communications, navigation and surveillance that=20
have changed everything from how we fight wars to=20
how our rental cars guide us to our hotels. One=20
result of Sputnik had nothing to do with space.=20
It was the creation of the Pentagon's Defense=20
Advanced Research Projects Agency, a technology=20
think tank that went on to develop a computer=20
network called Arpanet. Arpanet evolved into the=20
Internet. More broadly, the Space Age, so=20
famously inaugurated by Sputnik, has taken on new=20
shadings in recent years. The "conquest of space"=20
has never played out according to script: Sputnik=20
signaled the moment when humankind escaped the=20
gravity well of the planet, but rather than=20
propelling us to the stars, space technology=20
keeps turning back toward terrestrial needs and desires.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/01/AR200710...
1678.html
(requires registration)
* How NASA helped invent Silicon Valley
http://www.news.com/How-NASA-helped-invent-Silicon-Valley/2009-11397_3-6...
034.html?tag=3Dnefd.lede
* The age of the satellite
The satellite industry has grown by leaps and=20
bounds in the 50 years since the Russian=20
government launched Sputnik, generating more than $100 billion annually.
http://www.news.com/The-age-of-the-satellite/2009-1033_3-6210986.html

QUICKLY

US DELAYS DOMESTIC SATELLITE SPYING PROGRAM
[SOURCE: Reuters]
The U.S. government has delayed the start of a=20
program that would use spy-satellite images for=20
domestic purposes including counterterrorism=20
efforts, according to Rep. Bennie Thompson=20
(D-Miss). The Department of Homeland Security=20
informed Rep Thompson that the program would not=20
be launched until it had addressed civil-liberties issues he raised in Augu=
st.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0133926820071001
* Privacy questions stall 'spy satellite' plans
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9788800-7.html

INTERNET GAMBLING REGS EXEMPT SOME TRANSFERS
[SOURCE: Reuters]
Internet gambling regulations proposed by U.S.=20
officials on Monday stopped short of requiring=20
U.S. banks to block checks their customers make=20
to online casinos while forcing banks to halt=20
debit and credit payments. The Treasury=20
Department and the Federal Reserve issued a plan=20
requiring bank policies and procedures that are=20
"reasonably designed to prevent payments being=20
made to gambling businesses in connection with=20
unlawful Internet gambling." The new U.S.=20
regulations would make the banks responsible for=20
blocking credit and debit card payments for=20
online gambling. It also bars bank customers such=20
as online casinos from receiving Internet=20
gambling proceeds. "I think that that's doable,"=20
an industry source said of the proposal.
http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN0143096420071001

GOOGLE: SEARCH AND DATA SEIZURE
[SOURCE: The Nation, AUTHOR: Jeff Chester]
Google is far more than the digital incarnation=20
of Madison Avenue in the twenty-first century. It=20
is the engine driving us into a new=20
communications era, in which interactive=20
marketing will significantly shape our lives. The=20
company is aggressively expanding its advertising=20
role, building out a sales team poised to partner=20
with the biggest brand advertisers on the planet.=20
Google is pitching its souped-up interactive=20
advertising system to global corporations so they=20
can better blend marketing messaged into the=20
news, information and entertainment we consume.=20
Google's message to Madison Avenue is that its=20
technology can leverage tremendous insights about=20
global consumers of products and information, and=20
can deliver the right interactive marketing=20
messages to consumers at precisely the right moment.
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071015/chester

AN ANALYSIS OF THE NET NEUTRALITY DEBATE OF 2006
[SOURCE: Professor Jeffrey A. Hart, Indiana University]
In 2006, a major telecommunications bill failed=20
because it did not include guarantees for=20
something called =81\net neutrality.. The purpose=20
of this paper is to describe and explain the=20
politics behind the net neutrality debate of 2006=20
and to predict its likely future course.
http://www.indiana.edu/~globalm/pdf/apsa07.pdf

ADVERTISERS PUSH FEC ON NONPOLITICAL ADS FEATURING CANDIDATES
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
Advertisers have told the Federal Election=20
Commission that the Supreme Court's decision on=20
electioneering communications was a broad=20
assertion of First Amendment rights and should=20
not be narrowed by proposed FEC rules meant to=20
implement that decision. The Association of=20
National Advertisers, the American Association of=20
Advertising Agencies and the American Advertising=20
Federation told the FEC they are particularly=20
concerned that the FEC read the court's decision=20
as extending to commercial and business ads, as=20
well as ones with advocacy or grassroots lobbying.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6485947.html?rssid=3D193

WITH CONTINUING RESOLUTION PASSED, APPROPS WORK BEGINS
[SOURCE: The Hill, AUTHOR: Jim Snyder]
The fiscal year started Monday as it has since=20
1994: with annual spending bills still=20
unfinished. This week, lobbying efforts in the=20
Senate are focused on spending measures that fund=20
the Defense, Commerce and Justice departments. In=20
years passed, the CJS bill has been a=20
particularly difficult spending measure to get=20
through. Its jurisdiction included the Securities=20
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal=20
Communications Commission (FCC), and the bill=20
would attract amendments related to everything=20
from stock options and media ownership. But the=20
Democrats realigned the appropriators=92=20
responsibilities, giving jurisdiction over SEC=20
and FCC to the Financial Services and General Government subcommittee.
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/with-continuing-resolution-passed-ap...
ps-work-begins-2007-10-02.html
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------