October 2008

McCain opposes regulation -- until he supports it

As financial collapse threatened Wall Street and consumed Washington, John McCain appeared to undergo a dramatic transformation. The candidate who would shrink government became the candidate who would bulk it up. The turnabout is a move McCain has perfected in 26 years on Capitol Hill. The Arizona senator embraces his party's popular critique of government, frequently invoking the deregulatory rhetoric that has helped Republicans win five of the last seven presidential elections. But when a crisis or scandal makes headlines and sparks a public outcry, McCain is among the quickest in his party to call for robust government intervention. Over the last decade, he also championed greater government authority over airlines, automobiles, tobacco, television programming, even baseball, which he targeted after reports of steroid use in the sport. Sen McCain wanted to regulate when broadcasters could air violent programming. In one unusual bid to expand government authority, McCain introduced legislation in 2003 to control how broadcasters cover elections. Under McCain's proposal, broadcasters would have been required to air two hours a week of candidate- or issue-centered programming and to offer political candidates the lowest advertising rates.

Financial Downturn Further Weakens Newspaper Publishers

The credit crunch has further weakened newspaper publishers, which already are reeling from a prolonged drop in advertising revenue. Several major chains, including Tribune Co., MediaNews Group Inc. and McClatchy Co., have significant debt loads. As debt conditions sour, interest rates will go up for many papers, and lenders will impose onerous conditions. Some publishers risk default or even a trip into bankruptcy court. The good news is that banks -- many facing their own troubles -- are expected to cut newspaper companies some slack on debt terms. The alternative may be taking over newspapers, something many banks won't stomach. For one thing, newspapers are a tough sell in current conditions.

Will your IT job survive the financial meltdown?

Fearful tech workers tiptoeing along the shaky alleys of Wall Street -- and fretting about losing their jobs -- should take a deep breath. Of the more than 100,000 job losses expected as a direct result of the financial crisis, only a tiny slice will likely be from the tech ranks, figures Sean O'Dowd, an analyst at market researcher Financial Insights. As with any market consolidation, finance companies "will look for redundancies and overlap," O'Dowd says. For IT, that means management, not programmers, admins, and other line staff. "I think [layoffs] will come out of the IT management layer such as CIOs, so you're looking at hundreds [of layoffs], not necessarily thousands. Companies will continue to need a lot of the rank-and-file IT folks."

Can tech companies withstand hard times?

How will Silicon Valley make out if the economy slides into recession? Tech suppliers expect to be hit hard. But big winners could quickly start to emerge from the chaos, say tech industry analysts. With credit scarce and job cuts mounting, consumers and businesses have begun adopting a cautious approach to tech spending. No one will escape the unfolding economic slowdown, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer told reporters in Oslo, Norway, this week. "I think one has to anticipate that no company is immune to these issues, " Ballmer said. Yet some tech companies are better equipped than others. Google, for instance, which dominates search advertising, should hold steady so long as Web users continue to shop, socialize and do research online. But Yahoo, the leader in brand advertising, could be vulnerable as advertisers trim budgets for image ads. IBM, Hewlett-Packard and Oracle can hunker down with cash pouring in from a diverse array of corporate and government contracts; they also stand to earn billions helping the credit industry reconstitute itself.

Hollywood could get a cut of the bailout

Hollywood would get a little unexpected boost from the proposed $700-billion bailout of the nation's financial system. The bill wending its way through Congress would provide tax breaks worth more than $470 million over the next decade for movie and TV producers that shoot in the US. That's not a lot of money, given that the average studio movie costs $106.6 million to make and market, but it could keep some low-budget productions -- and jobs -- from going offshore. Hollywood has long sought measures to curb so-called runaway production, which it blames for causing thousands of job losses in Southern California as filmmakers have fled to Canada and other foreign countries that offer cost savings through tax breaks and other incentives. One provision would provide film and TV producers with the same tax deductions that American manufacturers such as General Motors Corp., Boeing Co. and Xerox Corp. receive for making their products in the US. Specifically, the legislation would allow filmmakers who shoot in the U.S. to qualify for a tax deduction granted in 2004 to domestic manufacturers that capped the top tax rate at 32% instead of 35%. Additionally, the tax package lifts the budget cap on the existing tax deduction, which was limited to movies that cost less than $15 million to make -- in effect excluding most studio films, which cost a lot more.

Rep Dingell Seeks Input From Phone Cos On Regulatory Issues

Just days before lawmakers leave town, perhaps for the rest of the year, House Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell (D-MI) wants AT&T, Verizon Communications, and Qwest Communications to state their positions on several telecommunications issues that Congress could consider next year. Among other things, he wants executives at the three largest phone companies in the country to explain why firms' requests for regulatory relief should be granted automatically if the Federal Communications Commission's votes are tied. In a letter sent to the companies Tuesday, Chairman Dingell noted that the five-member FCC could be forced to operate with just four commissioners -- two Republicans and two Democrats -- as early as November, and they could split votes on controversial decisions. Chairman Dingell asked the three companies whether they have waiver requests pending at the FCC that could come due between November 2008 and early 2009. He also asked the three companies if the FCC should shorten the transfer interval for telephone customers who opt to keep their phone numbers when switching services. Transferring phone numbers generally takes a couple of hours for wireless switches, but the industry standard for landline changes is four days.

Senate Analog Nightlight Bill Introduced

A bill was introduced in the Senate that would allow broadcasters to continue broadcasting in analog for 30 days after the Feb. 17, 2009, date for TV stations to transition to full-power digital TV. Broadcasters would still transition their primary channel feeds to digital Feb. 17, but they could continue to broadcast DTV-education information and emergency information for that 30-day period. The analog cutoff is currently set, by statute, for Feb. 17. The Senate bill was introduced by Sen John Rockefeller (D-WV). Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA) introduced a similar bill in the House last week.

FCC's Quiet Period Review Awaits Martin Vote

Apparently, every member of the Federal Communications Commission except Chairman Kevin Martin has voted to seek public comment on the cable industry's retransmission consent quiet period. A Notice for Proposed Rulemaking will be released once Chairman Martin casts his vote. In Oct 15 House testimony, Chairman Martin supported a quiet period in concept and mentioned one close to the date of the DTV transition.

Federal copyright board to set digital music royalties

Royalties that digital music companies from Apple Inc. to record labels pay songwriters for selling their music as ringtones, CDs and permanent digital downloads are to be set Thursday by a federal agency. This is the first time in nearly three decades that the industry has been unable to decide the fee for sales of recorded music on its own. Apple has so strongly opposed increasing the rate, now 9.1 cents per song, that it threatened to shut down the iTunes store if the rate goes up — a move experts said was unlikely. More likely is the Copyright Royalty Board hiking the rate incrementally, in line with the fraction of a penny that it has risen every two or three years since 1981, when it was 4 cents per song.

Tech Sector Could Star In US Economic Salvation

As USC professor Jon Taplin sees it, the government needs more than legislation. It needs a national policy designed to allow information technology companies and energy technology companies to power our economic recovery to address the US financial crisis. "Just recapitalizing the banks is not going to revive the economy," said Taplin. "The economy is going to have to be spurred to be a much more production-oriented economy, rather than a consumer-oriented economy. Seventy two percent of our economy is based on people going to the mall. That's not a competitive situation when you have a Chinese economy in which 65% of the economy is based on producing real stuff." As Taplin sees it, the government has to help direct private sector innovation through investment. "The government is going to have to spur extraordinary levels of spending, as they did in the '30s, and the smartest, most efficient ways to do that would be to make sure we have universal broadband, spending on energy technologies, and alternative technologies," he said. "The way out of the crisis will be, I think, a very large investment program built by the government, based on leadership in IT and ET." Taplin expects that the recovery will be traumatic and painful. "There are going to be a lot of empty shopping malls," he said. "But coming out of that on the other side, becoming once again the world leader in technology could be an exciting thing. We did it once before in the '60s and '70s when the IT revolution started, and it was the government, through DARPA, that provided the money to get it going. The Internet wouldn't exist if it wasn't for government spending."