February 2010

Open Government Momentum Continues

Agencies continue to innovate in response to the Obama administration's open government initiatives, said panelists at a Wednesday event sponsored by Government Executive.

Animated officials and an interested audience highlighted "pockets of excellence" in agencies' rollout of open government Web sites, along with a push to expand employee blogging, the potential for expanded social media use and well-attended online public forums. Running an effective dialogue is about two-way conversation, said Dave McClure, associate administrator at the General Service Administration's Office of Citizen Services, adding that there are about 500 moderators running the public forums on agencies' open pages. Strong discussions are happening at Health and Human Services, Education and Interior, among others, he said. But the open government directive isn't just about soliciting feedback from the public. HHS has created a cross-agency team to weave the principles of openness and transparency into day-to-day operations, and officials are tapping the workforce for ideas. After all, said HHS Chief Technology Officer Todd Park, it's "not something you can outsource to one dude."

White House announces plan for review of all government IT projects

The White House plans "relentless oversight" of the entire federal information technology portfolio, which will include a bottom-up review of all projects, Vivek Kundra, federal chief information officer, said at a news briefing on Wednesday.

The Obama administration plans to crack down on IT projects that do not work and to focus on the execution of those that are performing as designed, Kundra said. He provided few specifics about the review but said the federal government will no longer "put good money after bad" in pursuing troubled projects such as the Defense Integrated Military Human Resources System, which the department canceled earlier in February after investing 12 years and $1 billion.

Facebook Really Wants to Know Where You Are, Considers Buying Loopt

Rumors are swirling that Facebook's looking to purchase location-aware social net Loopt.

It makes perfect sense, given the sudden arrival recently of Google's Buzz mobile, which is location-aware from the get-go. Facebook's playing catch-up. According to TechCrunch, Facebook is busy doing due diligence on the potential deal, indicating that the idea is in its very early stages. And at such a point in deals like this, before negotiations have really kicked off, it's usual for everything to be shrouded in secrecy. Hence Loopt refused to comment, and Facebook simply trotted out the party line "we don't comment on rumor and speculation." But the rumor is apparently based on sound information. And from this we can infer that Facebook is at least very interested in acquiring Loopt, or perhaps a location-based system like it (because we don't know what other due diligence Facebook's planning team is also performing.)

Congressional-Executive Commission on China
Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 628
Constitution Avenue and 1st Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002
Monday, March 1, 2010
10:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
http://cecc.gov/index.php

Recent events, including the reported cyber attack on Google and on advocates for human rights, have highlighted the importance of China's Internet policy to a number of issues including, but not limited to, censorship, free expression and intellectual property protection. This hearing will examine the impact of China's Internet policies on the development of human rights and on the development of commercial rule of law in China.

Witnesses:

  • Nicole Wong, Esq., Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Google, Inc. (To be confirmed)
  • Rebecca MacKinnon, Visiting Fellow, Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University
  • Alan Paller, Director of Research, SANS Institute
  • Edward Black, President and CEO, Computer & Communications Industry Association


Smith Urges Support For GOFA

A week before Senate lawmakers turn their attention to issues of Internet freedom, Rep Chris Smith (R-NJ) is making another push to round up support in the House for his Internet freedom bill.

Rep Smith circulated a letter to his colleagues this week in an effort to increase the bill's co-sponsors. The bill currently has nine bipartisan cosponsors. Rep Smith said his latest version of the Global Online Freedom Act builds upon an earlier version introduced in the last Congress. It would still require U.S. information technology companies to disclose the data they block and search engine results they filter when complying with the censorship policies of foreign countries. But the latest version of the bill also would require firms to keep records on and notify the attorney general of demands for information identifying users and would give the attorney general authority to order the firms not to comply. Meanwhile, the Senate Judiciary Committee's Human Rights and the Law Subcommittee is set to hold a hearing Tuesday on global Internet freedom.

However, the Congressional-Executive Commission on China's hearing set for Monday examining Google and China's spat over Internet freedom has been postponed for a second time due to scheduling issues, according to a spokesman for the commission's chairman, Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D. The commission was established by Congress in 2000 to monitor human rights and the rule of law in China.

China: We're the ones being hacked

China's military is the victim of hackers and is not perpetrating cyber attacks, a Defense Ministry spokesman said. China's information network and "especially the military has long been a victim of overseas hacking," spokesman Huang Xueping said Thursday. China has repeatedly said it had nothing to do with the cyber attacks, something Xueping emphasized. "China's law forbids any form of cyber attack," he said. "China attaches great importance to fighting cyber crimes and has been trying to enhance cooperation with other countries and international organizations on it."

Bill Aims To Bring Foreign Talent To US

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA) and ranking member Richard Lugar (R-IN) introduced legislation Wednesday that would allow immigrants who want to start a US business to obtain a two-year visa.

The bill would provide immigrant entrepreneurs US visas if they can show qualified US investors will pour at least $250,000 into the entrepreneurs' startup businesses. "Creating a new magnet for innovations and innovators to come to the United States and create jobs here will offer our economy a double shot in the arm - robust job creation at home and reaffirmation that we're the world's best place to do business," Sen Kerry said in a statement. The legislation would create a new EB-6 visa category and would allow these entrepreneurs after two years to obtain legal resident status if they can show that they have generated at least five full-time U.S. jobs, attracted $1 million in additional capital investment or generated $1 million in revenue. The proposal is modeled on the existing EB5 visa, which allows foreigners who invest at least $1 million in the United States and create 10 jobs to obtain a green card.

Tech group urges passage of immigration legislation

A leading tech group on Wednesday urged lawmakers to adopt legislation that would allow immigrants to remain in the United States if they proved to be skillful entrepreneurs.

That bill -- the StartUp Visa Act of 2010, introduced this week -- would enable foreign workers in the United States to obtain two-year visas if they "can demonstrate that a qualified U.S. investor is willing to dedicate a significant sum -- a minimum of $250,000 -- to the immigrant's startup venue," explained the Information Technology Industry Council (ITIC) in a letter of support on Wednesday. Ultimately, those workers would have to maintain a businesses that created at least five new American jobs in its early years, ITIC emphasized.

Scribd opens up e-Reading on mobile devices

Scribd, which bills itself as the world's largest social publishing company, made its debut in the mobile space today with the lofty goal of becoming the universal adaptor for e-readers and, in doing so, expanding access to millions of written works on any mobile device.

That includes e-Readers with a "send-to-mobile" feature and eventually smartphones through a Scribd application. Scribd's open strategy allows it to avoid the e-Reader wars and run on any device, including the Apple iPhone, Google Android, so called e-book killing Apple iPad, Barnes & Noble's Nook and the Amazon Kindle. In doing so, Scribd can potentially get a piece of the action whether smartphones or e-Readers, a new category of device offering wireless connectivity sans a service contract, prove to be the most successful. The two have been in competition since the category's rise to fame, although they are also increasing blurring lines. Amazon, for example, has begun to open its Kindle service up to smartphones, including the iPhone and most recently BlackBerry. Scribd has more than 10 million documents in its arsenal and has partnerships in place with a number of major publishers including big names Random House and Simon & Schuster.

Why Can't PCs Work More Like iPhones?

The iPhone, although locked and frustratingly placed into a walled garden, is the epitome of simplicity. You control it by touching the screen — an intuitive interface that even a toddler can figure out. It's virtually impossible to change key settings by accident. And if you do somehow mess things up, it's a cinch to reset the machine back to its pristine, out-of-the-box state. Why can't PCs work that way? There are, of course, all sorts of legacy reasons why the front-end design of computer operating systems is so complicated. Microsoft, for example, strives to make each new version of Windows familiar to customers of earlier versions. But Apple's iPhone and computer operating systems are both based on the Unix operating system. Why not use the iPhone interface as the basis for a new round of Apple computers? And in Microsoft's case, what if the company scrapped the front end of Windows 7 and the troubled Vista OS and moved to the new, elegant interface it is using for its Windows Phone 7 Series mobile phones? Would users really be upset?