January 2011

Americans Spend Twice As Much Time on Facebook As Twitter

Americans are spending more time on Facebook and Twitter than ever before, but according to a new study, one service is eating up far more hours than the other.

Experian Hitwise reported that users spend an average of 2 hours and 12 minutes per month tweeting, and a whopping 4 hours and 35 minutes posting and reading updates on Facebook. Consumption (or addiction) is rising on both social networks, compared to last year--an increase of 18% for Twitter, and 6.5% for Facebook. At this rate, will the microblogging service be able to catch up to Mark Zuckerberg's 600-million-strong behemoth? Experian's data shows signs of hope for Twitter. According to the report, the average number of monthly visits to Twitter.com has risen 37%, whereas Facebook's visits increased by just 10%. The average user now visits Twitter 10 times per month--a figure fast nearing Facebook's total of 11.8 monthly visits. Still, the average amount of time users spend on Facebook is miles ahead of Twitter. The typical session on Facebook, reports Experian, is 23 minutes and 21 seconds; on Twitter, it's 13.1 minutes.

EU clears Intel's purchase of McAfee

The European Union's competition authorities have cleared Intel's proposed acquisition of McAfee subject to certain conditions.

The European Commission had conducted an investigation into the planned deal amid fears that rival IT security products could be excluded from the marketplace due to Intel's strong position in the global computer chip market. The concern was that Intel would build security functions into its chips that would only work with McAfee products. However, to alleviate those concerns, Intel made commitments to the Commission earlier this month that it would ensure the interoperability of the merged entity's products with those of competitors. The Commission indicated that those promises had been sufficient and decided to approve the acquisition rather than continue with a further four-month probe. The approval is conditional upon Intel's commitments to ensure fair competition between the parties and their competitors in the field of computer security.

The Real Privacy Threat Is From Offline (Not Online) Marketers

[Commentary] Congress and the media have been all over the online community about risks to privacy and the need for more transparency, notice and choice, and there, of course, has been talk of new “Do Not Track” rules. But is the relentless focus on Internet marketers deflecting attention from more worrisome practices in the offline world? Offline marketers collect and share more information on consumers than their online counterparts do -- and it’s more cumbersome for consumers in the offline world to effect change to those practices. Unlike offline marketers, the vast majority of online marketers simply don't collect personally identifiable information, or PII, unless there is an explicit opt-in from consumers.

Justice Department Wants ISPs To Turn Over More User Data

There’s a vigorous privacy debate in Washington, spurred by the Federal Trade Commission and others, that is questioning whether Internet companies have too much data about users’ net-browsing activities. The House Judiciary Committee looked like a parallel universe Jan 25 -- although nobody seemed to recognize the irony.

A lawyer from the Department of Justice told Congress that in order to hunt down child pornographers and other criminals, Internet service providers need to retain data, such as records of which users are at which IP addresses, for a much longer period -- perhaps a year. That would be a big change for ISPs, which have varying data-retention practices and aren't currently required to hold data at all, although most do for a short period. Politicians from both parties were annoyed by the DOJ request, but mainly because it lacked specifics.


Information Technology and Information Foundation
Friday, January 28, 2011
9:00 - 10:30 AM
http://itif.org/node/1979/signups

There is considerable disagreement on optimal antitrust policy both within the United States and between the United States and other nations. These fundamental disagreements over the right approach to competition don't stem principally from politics, rather they stem from doctrine---- the overarching view of antitrust held by regulators and other policymakers. In a new report, ITIF examines the four principle antitrust doctrines, how they influence approaches to and positions on particular antitrust issues (e.g., monopoly, collusion, pricing, and mergers), and how the field of antitrust can move forward to better cope with the challenges of the 21st century, innovation-based global economy.

Join ITIF for the release of a new report on the role of economic thinking in antitrust.

Presenters:
Robert Atkinson
President and Founder, Information Technology and Information Foundation

David Audretsch
Distinguished Professor, Indiana University

Respondents:
Seth Bloom
General Counsel, Senate Antitrust Subcommittee, Staff of Senator Kohl, Chairman

Joseph Farrell
Director of the Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission

Janet L. McDavid
Partner, Hogan Lovells

Register for the event.

This event will not be webcast live.
Video and audio files of the event will be posted shortly afterwards.



President's Order on Regulatory Review Does Not Apply to FCC, FTC

Cass Sunstein, the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget, testified before the House Commerce Committee's Oversight Subcommittee on Jan 26. He said President Barack Obama's new executive order calling for government agency regulatory review does not apply to independent agencies including the Federal Communications and the Federal Trade Commission.

Sunstein said President Obama was following the lead of Republican President Ronald Reagan, who he said began the practice of not applying executive orders to independent regulatory agencies out of concern for overreaching executive branch authority. Sunstein said that practice had been followed by subsequent presidents. He conceded that OIRA did oversee information gathering, including from those independent agencies, per the Paperwork Reduction Act. Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI), chair of the House Commerce Committee, suggested the issue needed to be studied and perhaps some action taken. "No agencies should be exempt," he said. Committee Republicans talked about the explosion of regulations under the Obama administration, while Sunstein countered that the number of regulations was about the same as the last two years of the Bush administration. Ranking Committee Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) said it looked like the Republicans were repeating their 1995 "all-out assault" on regulations. He warned against painting the issue with too broad a brush. He said he believed in eliminating unnecessary regulations, but that regulations also grow the economy and preserve the environment. He called myths the suggestion that regulations destroy jobs and stymie the economy.

Consumers Union wants more transparency on wireless charges

AT&T and Verizon haven't done enough to notify customers about recent changes to their wireless subscription agreements, according to a letter from Consumers Union.

The nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports wrote to the chief executives of both firms along with Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski urging them to step up their efforts to inform customers about the changes to their wireless plans. “In light of the tough economic times many consumers are facing, these companies need to provide greater transparency in, and disclosure of, these new plans and terms of service,” said policy counsel Parul Desai. According to Consumers, AT&T has dropped two limited text messaging plans, leaving customers with the option of paying $10 a month for 1000 messages or $20 a month for unlimited texts. AT&T is also cutting off its upgrade discount program, which gave customers $50 to $100 off a new phone every two years.

FCC Approves LightSquared Request

The Federal Communications Commission adopted an order granting LightSquared Subsidiary LLC (LightSquared), a Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) licensee in the L-Band, a conditional waiver of the Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) "integrated service" rule.

On November 18, 2010, LightSquared submitted an application for modification of its existing ATC authorization, asserting that the services it plans to offer would meet the Commission's integrated service requirements for MSS/ATC for L-Band MSS systems. In considering LightSquared's request, and in granting this waiver, the FCC considered several factors, including LightSquared's provision of substantial satellite service in the L-Band, its ongoing efforts to coordinate with other L-Band operators and make substantial investments to rationalize operations in the L-Band to enable use of this spectrum for both MSS and ATC broadband services, the steps it has taken to promote an MSS/ATC marketplace that includes dual-mode satellite/terrestrial devices, and its deployment of a 4G satellite/terrestrial network in the L-Band pursuant to unique and substantial terrestrial buildout requirements. The FCC attached conditions to the waiver, drawn from commitments made by LightSquared in its request, to ensure that LightSquared's proposed service offering - both its improved satellite service and its ancillary terrestrial component - will achieve the purposes of the integrated service rule. The FCC also attached conditions to address concerns that commenters and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) have raised about potential interference with Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers.

NTIA Administrator Lawrence Strickling said, "We are pleased that the FCC has taken our recommendation and is requiring that the potential interference concerns be addressed before LightSquared begins offering commercial broadband service. We will continue to work in consultation with the FCC, government agencies, and industry to ensure that any harmful interference concerns are resolved.”

Canada wages YouTube war against metered Internet billing

Canadians hate metered Internet pricing, or Usage Based Billing (UBB) as they call it -- letting the dominant Internet Service Providers charge broadband subscribers and smaller competitive ISPs by the quantity of data use. That's a practice that the government regulator, the Canadian Radio-Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), approved for Bell Canada in September.

Rep Baca wants to slap warning labels on violent games

Video games in the United States have their ratings on the front of the box, with a description of what content led to that rating on the back of the box. The issue of whether playing violent video games leads to real-world violence is a contentious one, and Congressman Joe Baca (D-CA) wants to be proactive on this issue.

Rep Baca has introduced a new version of the Video Game Health Labeling Act, which would force the game industry to place yet another warning label on the box of video games rated "Teen" or above. "The video game industry has a responsibility to parents, families, and to consumers—to inform them of the potentially damaging content that is often found in their products," Rep Baca stated. "They have repeatedly failed to live up to this responsibility. Meanwhile, research continues to show a proven link between playing violent games and increased aggression in young people. American families deserve to know the truth about these potentially dangerous products." Not only does Rep. Baca think that the link between violent content and violent behavior has already been proven (it hasn't), Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) likens the effects of games to those of smoking, in terms of causal relationships. "Just as we warn smokers of the health consequences of tobacco, we should warn parents -- and children -- about the growing scientific evidence demonstrating a relationship between violent video games and violent behavior," Rep Wolf said. "As a parent and grandparent, I think it is important people know everything they can about the extremely violent nature of some of these games."