AT&T, Verizon and other price cap carriers send broadband USF proposal to FCC
As expected, six of the nation’s largest telcos -- AT&T, Verizon, Frontier, CenturyLink, and FairPoint, and Windstream -- submitted a Universal Service Fund (USF) and inter-carrier compensation (ICC) reform proposal to the Federal Communications Commission aimed at transitioning today’s high-cost, voice-focused fund to one focused on broadband without increasing the overall fund size.
A Windstream executive emphasized that the proposal submitted today focuses primarily on the broadband Universal Service program as it pertains to price-cap carriers. A critical element of the large carriers’ plan, however, is that it provides details about how today’s $4.5 billion USF would be reapportioned. The price cap carrier proposal, which the group is calling “America’s Broadband Connectivity Plan,” recommends apportioning $300 million for a mobility fund, $2.2 billion for broadband in high-cost areas and $2 billion for rate-of-return carriers. To stay within the current fund size, the proposal also recommends a satellite broadband solution to bring broadband to the 750,000 unserved U.S. homes that would be too costly to serve using a terrestrial solution. If the FCC opts to subsidize that service, the price cap carrier proposal recommends drawing from the mobility fund.
The carriers also are recommending that the broadband fund should support only a single carrier in an area and only in areas without competition. In addition, the proposal supports a minimum broadband target speed of 4 Mb/s downstream and 768 kb/s upstream—a target that is actually a bit lower than the 1 Mb/s downstream rate initially recommended by the FCC. Rural carriers, on the other hand, have recommended that speeds should be comparable with what is available in urban areas. At the present, perhaps that could be interpreted to mean 4 Mb/s- 768 kb/s speeds, but within a few years the rural carriers’ proposal could call for higher speeds.
Also three associations representing small rural telcos -- OPASTCO, NTCA and the Western Telecommunications Alliance -- sent a letter to the FCC indicating their agreement with the larger telcos on several key issues, such as lowering per-minute terminating ICC rates, phasing out USF support for competitive carriers and requiring voice over Internet (VoIP) carriers to pay ICC.
Telecom industry reaction was, not surprisingly, generally positive. Mobile Future, the Internet Innovation Alliance and US Telecom released supportive statements. The American Cable Association said it was "pleased" with parts of the new telecom-backed Universal Service Fund reform plan, including those that "appeared" to curb runaway fund growth, limiting, "if not prohibiting" funding in areas where there is already competitive broadband service, and ensuring that the fund is "fiscally responsible."
Free Press found the plan self-serving: "While this industry-authored proposal is certainly more sound than most of the prior self-interested plans we've seen, it still falls short of adequately confronting the real problems with the Universal Service Fund. Worse, it ensures that the inflated profits of telecom companies are protected by shifting the burden of reform to ordinary consumers."