April 2012

Publishing Is Cranky Over Snub by Pulitzers

One day after the Pulitzer Prize board said it would not award a Pulitzer in fiction for the first time in 35 years, the publishing industry was still seething, with some going as far as offering surrogate winners.

Striking a rare note of optimism, publishers of the three fiction finalists said they hoped the books would nevertheless get a boost in a rare year without a winner in the spotlight. “In years past it’s the Pulitzer winner that captures all the attention and all the sales,” said Paul Bogaards, a spokesman for Alfred A. Knopf. “But since this year there was not a winner and there’s much conversation about the finalists, this may be an opportunity and a catalyst for sales.”

In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture

On the morning of Sunday, April 8, Facebook Inc.'s youthful chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, alerted his board of directors that he intended to buy Instagram, the hot photo-sharing service. It was the first the board heard of what, later that day, would become Facebook's largest acquisition ever, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Zuckerberg and his counterpart at Instagram, Kevin Systrom, had already been talking over the deal for three days, these people said. Negotiating mostly on his own, Mr. Zuckerberg had fielded Mr. Systrom's opening number, $2 billion, and whittled it down over several meetings at Mr. Zuckerberg's $7 million five-bedroom home in Palo Alto. Later that Sunday, the two 20-somethings would agree on a sale valued at $1 billion. It was a remarkably speedy three-day path to a deal for Facebook—a young company taking pains to portray itself as blue-chip ahead of its initial public offering of stock in a few weeks that could value it at up to $100 billion. Companies generally prefer to bring in ranks of lawyers and bankers to scrutinize a deal before proceeding, a process that can eat up days or weeks. Zuckerberg ditched all that. By the time Facebook's board was brought in, the deal was all but done. The board, according to one person familiar with the matter, "Was told, not consulted."

News Corp. to Act on Breach of Ownership Rule

News Corp. is expected to disclose it is suspending half the voting rights of its foreign shareholders to deal with an inadvertent breach of the U.S. foreign ownership limits of the Communications Act, said people familiar with the situation.

The media company owns 27 television stations, mostly affiliated with the Fox network. The Communications Act of 1934 says that a broadcaster cannot have more than 25% foreign ownership. As part of a survey of News Corp.'s ownership conducted in the lead-up to renewal of certain licenses, News Corp. discovered that voting stock held by foreign investors had risen above the 25% limit, a person familiar with the situation said. Big foreign shareholders in News Corp. include Saudi investor Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, who has about 7% of the voting stock. It is possible that this shareholding, combined with stock held by other investors from Australia or Britain, put News Corp. over the limit. To deal with the breach, News Corp. will suspend 50% of the voting rights of B class voting shares held by non-American shareholders. The suspension will last until the company is in compliance with the ownership limits, said a person familiar with the situation.

Liberty Seeks FCC Recognition on Sirius

The battle for control of Sirius XM Radio is coming down to a chicken and egg argument. Liberty Media says it needs approval from the Federal Communications Commission to take "de facto" control of Sirius before it takes steps to exercise such control. Sirius argues the FCC shouldn't grant such approval because Liberty hasn't taken such steps.

A shareholder is deemed to have de facto control of a company if it has less than 50.01% but a big enough stake effectively to be in charge. Liberty since 2009 has held preferred stock that is convertible into 40% of Sirius stock. But unless Liberty converts its preferred shares, it can't vote for all directors and is limited to designating fewer than half the board seats. Liberty asked the FCC last month for approval to take "de facto" control. Sirius responded March 30 saying the petition should be rejected, partly because the media conglomerate hasn't taken actions such as buying more stock.

More congregations turn to Facebook, Web, high-tech outreach

No matter where you live, you can go to church, so to speak, with Christ Fellowship.

The McKinney, Texas, congregation is on board with almost every high-tech gambit under heaven. Find the church by going online — the 21st-century version of sighting a steeple on the horizon. Beyond their website, Christ Fellowship has a Facebook page to give it a friendly presence in social media. You can download the worship program by scanning their customized-with-a-cross QR code. The worship services are streamed online from their Internet campus — with live chat running so you can share spiritual insights in real time. Afterward, says senior Pastor Bruce Miller, "someone will ask you, 'How did it go? Did God help you, today? How can we help you?' Just like we do when people come to our building in McKinney. We are here to help people find and follow Christ, wherever they are starting out from." And wherever they are in the digital world.

Administration pushes against bipartisan House cybersecurity legislation

The White House issued a statement criticizing a House cybersecurity bill after top administration officials briefed lawmakers on the threat of cyber attacks.

In a statement, National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said any cybersecurity legislation should include strong privacy protections and should set mandatory security standards for critical infrastructure systems, such as electrical grids and water supplies. "The nation’s critical infrastructure cyber vulnerabilities will not be addressed by information sharing alone," Hayden said. "Also, while information sharing legislation is an essential component of comprehensive legislation to address critical infrastructure risks, information sharing provisions must include robust safeguards to preserve the privacy and civil liberties of our citizens. Legislation without new authorities to address our nation’s critical infrastructure vulnerabilities, or legislation that would sacrifice the privacy of our citizens in the name of security, will not meet our nation's urgent needs," she said, without explicitly mentioning CISPA.

The House is set to vote on the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) next week.

Privacy groups unimpressed with cybersecurity bill changes

Changes to a House cybersecurity bill have failed to win over the bill's critics, who warn that it could undermine online privacy.

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) would tear down legal barriers that discourage companies from sharing information about cyberattacks, but privacy groups warn the legislation could lead companies to hand over personal user information to spy agencies. The new draft would also require that the Homeland Security Department have access to all information shared with the government. Privacy advocates prefer that a domestic agency like Homeland Security play a central role in the information-sharing process instead of a spy agency like the National Security Agency. But the privacy groups noted that the change doesn't prevent companies from handing over private information to NSA or the CIA — they would just have to also share it with the Homeland Security Department. The new draft would also give people and companies the right to sue the government if it mishandles the information.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), Free Press and other groups are leading a week of protests against the legislation.

US Wireless Seen Contracting After IPhone Binge

The US wireless market, long the fastest-growing sector in the telecommunications industry, looks like it’s headed for a wall.

Sales of wireless contracts, the most lucrative segment of the business because it locks in monthly payments over long periods, may have shrunk for the first time ever in the first quarter. One big reason for the sharp reversal: Soaring iPhone sales in late 2011 may have satiated consumers’ appetites for wireless plans. A decline would mark a turning point for the previously rapid-growth business, leaving carriers such as AT&T, Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel fighting over a shrinking pool of customers. A slowdown also forces device manufacturers such as Apple and Samsung Electronics to battle more intensely for customers.

Google Rolls Out Features to Gauge Effects of Advertising

Google rolled out a new advertising feature that will make it easier for companies to know when Web surfers see their ads, an improvement aimed at getting businesses to do more marketing online.

The effort, called Brand Activate, will signal when an ad impression has been viewed. That means at least 50 percent of an ad has been viewable on a screen for at least one second. Google also will let customers make speedier adjustments to brand campaigns, depending on the responses of online users. Google is trying to get companies to spend more of their ad dollars on the Web, rather than on traditional media such as television and print. The effort will attempt to measure whether an ad for a new summer movie is driving more traffic to theaters or if a marketing effort is encouraging consumers to go to a store to buy toothpaste or shampoo.

Broadcasters meet to battle wireless

Television broadcasters are confabbing in Las Vegas this week to plot how to fight the forces of evil in Washington — wireless companies. Broadcasters say they aren’t rushing to fork over airwaves to the federal government, despite congressional go-ahead this year to reimburse them with auction proceeds from wireless carriers eager to pay billions to connect smartphones and tablets.

“They want us out of this game,” former Sen. Gordon Smith, president and chief executive of the National Association of Broadcasters, said of the wireless industry in his opening remarks at the group’s annual convention. “We can’t let down our guard.” The wireless industry says the fight song being played by broadcasters is misguided: Consumers have already voted with their feet how they want content delivered. Broadcasters see their future as a mixture of broadcast and wireless, and they argue that their use of spectrum — their signals go from one-to-many recipients — is a better use of the limited federal airwaves than wireless carriers’ one-to-one recipient service.