April 2012

NTIA Cautions Against Early Public Safety LTE Deployments

Officials for the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) recently asked jurisdictions with plans to deploy public-safety LTE systems during the next year to stop their work to ensure that money is not wasted on equipment that will not integrate into the nationwide broadband network.

Communicated during individual meetings with 700 MHz broadband waiver recipients and during group calls with relevant stakeholders, this request is an attempt by NTIA to have any money spent on LTE deployments fit into the nationwide-network design. That design will be created by the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet), which may not exist until Aug. 22. “Essentially, NTIA is recommending that BTOP jurisdictions hold off on the purchase of LTE equipment,” said Bill Schrier, chairman of the Operator Advisory Committee — a group of jurisdictions that have received waivers to utilize public-safety broadband spectrum in the 700 MHz band. “This is a reversal of NTIA’s previous advice.”

DHS Network Monitoring: 4th Amendment Problems?

An intrusion detection program that the federal government uses to protect its computer networks could raise privacy concerns under the Fourth Amendment, Congress' policy research organization said in a recent report.

In a March report, the Congressional Research Service said that the federal government's monitoring of network traffic under the Einstein network monitoring and intrusion detection and protection program could constitute unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, though it noted that the government has strong arguments that the program is constitutional. Einstein, operated by the Department of Homeland Security with some help from the National Security Agency, is a cross-government effort to monitor federal networks for cyberattacks. As part of those efforts, the system monitors all communications, including federal employee communications with private citizens, which, according to the report, "may trigger Fourth Amendment guarantees to the right to be free from unreasonable searches and excessive government intrusion," despite the steps the government has put in place to mitigate privacy concerns.

How many iPhones did Apple sell last quarter?

The most important metric for Apple in the quarter that ended two weeks ago -- likely to account for more than half of the company's revenue for fiscal Q2 2012 -- is the number of iPhones it sold from Jan. 1 to Mar. 31.

We've polled 48 analysts -- evenly divided between professional and independent -- and the indies, as usual, have gone considerably further out on a limb than the pros. The numbers from the two dozen Wall Street analysts we've heard from range from a high of 33.1 million from Pacific Crest's Andy Hargreaves to a low of 26 million, submitted by both Deutsche Bank's Chris Whitmore and Brian Marshall of the ISI Group. The average among the Wall Street analysts is 30.5 million, which would represent a year-over-year unit sales increase of 63.8%.

Information and Communication Technologies and Productivity Growth -- A Survey of the Literature

The wealth of nations and their economic fortunes are ultimately driven by productivity. More productive workers earn higher wages and experience higher living standards than past generations. Hence, studying the driving forces behind productivity growth is an important question for researchers and policymakers alike.

In Europe, it is especially interesting as for much of the recent past it has been lagging behind in many of the relevant measures of economic growth and wellbeing, including productivity. This short paper relies on some of my recent work on the topic. As a review of the existing literature, it is necessarily incomplete and selective. However, there is a general shortage of recent studies that take a methodological approach to screening the literature and, more importantly, presenting the headline findings in a coherent and parsimonious way. This paper is an attempt to do that. While doing so, I hope to point out areas for future research while also summarizing what we do know (and what we do not know) about the impact of ICT on economic growth.

2012 Mirror Awards Finalists

Syracuse University’s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications today announced the finalists in the sixth annual Mirror Awards competition honoring excellence in media industry reporting. The competition drew over 300 entries. Winners will be announced at a June 13 awards ceremony in New York. Finalists are chosen by a group of journalists and journalism educators.

Best Single Article, Traditional/Legacy Media

  • Jodi Enda, “Politico, Act II” (American Journalism Review)
  • Felix Gillette, “The Rise and Inglorious Fall of Myspace” (Bloomberg Businessweek)
  • Adam Lashinsky, “How Apple works: Inside the world’s biggest startup” (Fortune)
  • Gabriel Sherman, “The Elephant in the Green Room” (New York Magazine)
  • Emily Steel and Geoffrey A. Fowler, “Big Brands Like Facebook, But They Don’t Like to Pay” (Wall Street Journal)

Best Single Article, Digital Media

  • Joshua Benton, “That was quick: Four lines of code is all it takes for The New York Times’ paywall to come tumbling down” (Nieman Journalism Lab)
  • Paul Ford, “Facebook and the Epiphanator: An End to Endings?” (New York Magazine)
  • Lauren Kirchner, “AOL Settled with Unpaid ‘Volunteers’ for $15 Million” (Columbia Journalism Review)
  • Mallary Jean Tenore, “In real-time, journalists’ tweets contribute to a ‘raw draft’ of history” (Poynter)
  • Rhonda Roland Shearer and Malik Ayub Sumbal, “Mrs. Bhutto’s Murder Anniversary Part 1: Troubling Double Standard, American photojournalism's different treatment of foreign victims” (iMediaEthics)

Best Profile, Traditional/Legacy Media

  • Ken Auletta, “Changing Times” (The New Yorker)
  • Felix Gillette, “Demand Media’s Planet of the Algorithms” (Bloomberg Businessweek)
  • Vanessa Grigoriadis, “Maharishi Arianna” (New York Magazine)
  • Evan Osnos, “The Han Dynasty” (The New Yorker)

Best Profile, Digital Media

  • Danny Gold, “The Man Who Makes Money Publishing Your Nude Pics” (The Awl)
  • Joe Pompeo, “The road ahead for The Huffington Post: Nine months and a merger later, ‘Capital-J Journalism’ is still a work in progress” (Capital New York)
  • Rachel Sklar, “Chelsea Handler Has It Covered” (Change The Ratio)

Best Commentary, Traditional/Legacy Media

Eric Alterman (The Nation)

  • “How Low Will the ‘Washington Post’ Go?”
  • “How Rupert Murdoch Buys Friends and Influences People”
  • “The Agony and Ecstasy—and ‘Disgrace’—of Steve Jobs”

Syed Irfan Ashraf (The DAWN Media Group/Individualland)

  • “Cost of self-censorship”
  • “Media’s apologetic professionals”
  • “A synthetic image”

John Gapper (Financial Times)

  • “Huffington is right to take the cash”
  • “The conflict of interest in free news”
  • “Innovators don’t ignore customers”

Anna Holmes (The New York Times, The Washington Post)

  • “The Disposable Woman”
  • “Anna Holmes on Donald Trump’s Sexism”
  • “The best TV criticism’s ink is pink, but powerful”

Best Commentary, Digital Media

Gavin Polone (Vulture/New York Magazine)

  • “Polone: Why TV Networks Don't Need to Worry About Netflix and Hulu’s Original Programming”
  • “Polone’s Four-Step Plan for Saving NBC”
  • “Polone’s Hollywood Cost-Cutting Solution No. 2: Stop the Pricey Producer Deals”

Rem Rieder (American Journalism Review)

  • “The Incredible Shrinking Rupert”
  • “The Wall Street Journal Careens off the Rails”
  • “Passing on Rumors”

Jack Shafer (Reuters Blog)

  • “The trial of Stephen Glass”
  • “Who gets to be anonymous?”
  • “The apotheosis of Steve Jobs”

Mallary Jean Tenore (Poynter)

  • “How accessible do journalists really want to be?”
  • “Journalists value precise language, except when it comes to describing ‘minorities’”
  • “Have newsrooms relaxed standards, sanctions for fabrication and plagiarism?”

Rebecca Traister (Salon.com, The New York Times)

  • “The Soap Opera Is Dead! Long Live The Soap Opera!”
  • “‘30 Rock’ takes on feminist hypocrisy — and its own”
  • “Seeing ‘Bridesmaids’ is a social responsibility”

John M. Higgins Award for Best In-Depth/Enterprise Reporting

  • Jodi Enda, “The Bloomberg Juggernaut” (American Journalism Review)
  • On The Media Team: Brooke Gladstone, Bob Garfield, Katya Rogers, Nazanin Rafsanjani, Jamison York, Mike Vuolo, Sarah Abdurrahman, PJ Vogt, Alex Goldman, “Does NPR Have a Liberal Bias?” (NPR/On The Media)
  • Peter Maass, “The Toppling” (The New Yorker and ProPublica)
  • Seth Mnookin, “The Kingdom and the Paywall” (New York Magazine)
  • Brian Rosenthal, “In Focus: Investigative Journalism students used questionably ethical reporting tactics, sources say” and “‘Dismantling of a legacy’: The rise and fall of David Protess” (The Daily Northwestern)

Apple and ACCC iPad mediation fails

Mediation between Apple and Australia's competition watchdog has ended without a resolution. The next phase of the case will be determined at a directions hearing this afternoon before Justice Mordecai Bromberg of the Federal Court in Melbourne. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission took the world's biggest company to court on March 27 after it failed to respond to its concerns that the name of its new tablet – iPad Wi-Fi + 4G – would mislead Australian consumers.


How Fox and MSNBC Are Transforming American Politics

New America Foundation
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.

In February, former President Bill Clinton told Esquire magazine that MSNBC "has become our version of Fox."

The success of Fox News - measured in terms of viewership, profits or influence - has been impressive, so it's not surprising that a more traditional news operation like NBC has sought to emulate its preaching-to-the-choir approach, at least on cable TV. This partisan TV trend, moreover, reflects the broader "sorting out" in our culture, in which consumers of news and information increasingly create virtual communities of like-minded souls, catered to by like-minded content providers.

For better or for worse, the notion of impartial sources of news and information that curate "the truth" for Americans of all political persuasions is becoming an anachronism. Is the trend towards more partisan TV fostering higher levels of civic engagement, as some have argued? Or is it contributing to a nastier, zero-sum form of political discourse?

Come ponder these questions over cocktails and conversation featuring New America Schwartz Fellow and New Republic Editor Frank Foer, New York Magazine Contributing Editor Gabriel Sherman (the author of a forthcoming book on Fox News which will be published by Random House in 2013) and Matt Welch, editor-in-chief of Reason magazine.

Featured Speakers

Franklin Foer
Bernard L. Schwartz Fellow, New America Foundation
Editor At Large, The New Republic

Gabriel Sherman
Contributing Editor, New York Magazine

Matt Welch
Editor-in-Chief, Reason

To RSVP for the event:
http://newamerica.net/events/2012/red_channel_blue_channel

For questions, contact Stephanie Gunter at New America at (202) 596-3367 or gunter@newamerica.net

Discounted happy hour specials will be available.



Senate Judiciary Committee
April 18, 2012
10:00 AM

Witness List

James Xavier Dempsey, to be a Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

Elisebeth Collins Cook, to be a Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

Rachel L. Brand, to be a Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight

David Medine, to be Chairman and Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

Patricia M. Wald, to be a Member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board



Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation
House Science Committee
April 18, 2012
2:00pm

Witnesses
Dr. James Olthoff, Deputy Director, Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Mr. Richard Bennett, Senior Research Fellow, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Mr. Christopher Guttman-McCabe, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs, CTIA–The Wireless Association

Ms. Mary Brown, Director, Technology and Spectrum Policy, Cisco Systems, Inc.

Dr. Rangam Subramanian, Chief Wireless and Technology Strategist, Idaho National Laboratory



Brookings Institution
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
2:00 PM to 3:30 PM
http://www.brookings.edu/events/2012/0424_education_collaboration.aspx

If Facebook were a country, it would be the world’s third–most populous nation. Such powerful statistics have led many policymakers to explore how social networking can be used to address various policy challenges. Educators are experimenting with social networking to test how it can enhance school curricula, student engagement and performance and the overall classroom experience. What technologies are being used in the classroom, and how effective are they? How does the use of social media compare to traditional teaching tactics? What does the future hold for technology and education collaboration, and how can policymakers harness social networking to improve outcomes for students and teachers?

On April 24, the Center for Technology Innovation at Brookings will hold a forum on the growing collaboration between social networking and education. A panel of experts will address the challenges of using new technology and the policies behind integrating technology into the American education system.

Introduction and Moderator
Darrell M. West
Vice President and Director, Governance Studies

Panelists
Constance Steinkuehler Squire
Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Science and Technology Policy
Executive Office of the President

Janet Kolodner
Program Officer, Information and Intelligent Systems
National Science Foundation

Holly Sagues
Chief Policy Officer
Florida Virtual School

Marla Ucelli-Kashyap
Assistant to the President for Educational Issues
American Federation of Teachers