July 2012

Journalists: Ethiopia refining Internet censorship

The Committee to Protect Journalists says it appears Ethiopia is extending and refining its censorship of Internet news with a sophistication that could encourage other authoritarian regimes in Africa. Prime Minister Meles Zenawi's government has been blocking major news sites and blog hosts since disputed general election results in 2005 led to violent protests. Voice Over Internet Protocol such as Skype also is blocked, forcing people to use the state telephone system.

The Great Spectrum Swap

On June 25, Verizon Wireless announced an agreement with T-Mobile USA to exchange specific spectrum in the Advanced Wireless Services (AWS) band. The deal encompasses spectrum in 218 areas, and would improve T-Mobile’s spectrum position in 15 of the top 25 markets in the US, notably Philadelphia, Washington (DC), Detroit, Minneapolis, Seattle, Cleveland, Columbus (OH), Milwaukee, Charlotte (NC), Raleigh (NC), Greensboro (NC), Memphis, and Rochester (NY). Under the agreement, both companies also will receive additional spectrum depth in specific markets to meet Long Term Evolution (LTE or 4G) capacity needs and enable LTE expansion. The agreement includes a number of intra-market spectrum swaps that will result in better use of the AWS band for both companies. The agreement also includes exchanges of spectrum between the companies in numerous markets which result in an overall net transfer of spectrum from Verizon Wireless to T-Mobile and a cash payment from T-Mobile to Verizon Wireless. Financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed. Since this agreement includes spectrum that will be purchased by Verizon Wireless in its transactions with SpectrumCo, Cox and Leap, this agreement is contingent on the closing of those transactions.

Recap -- The Need for Privacy Protections: Is Industry Self-Regulation Adequate?

The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on the current state of industry self-regulation in providing consumers with adequate tools to protect their personal information.

Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) said, “I recognize that consumer information is the currency of the web. Thanks to advertising revenue, much of the rich content of the Internet is available to consumers for free. I also understand that advertising is more effective and valuable to companies when it is tailored to match consumers’ individual interests and tastes. But there has to be some balance. Consumers should have some degree of control over their personal, often sensitive, online information.” He added, “I want to hear from our witnesses what consumers should expect when they tell online companies that they do not want their information collected for any purpose other than the functionality of the service. No one wants to ‘break the Internet.’ But what many of us want is an Internet where consumers have some control over their personal information.

Testifying before the Committee, advertisers took aim at Microsoft's decision to make do-not-track a default setting in its new browser. Bob Liodice, president of the Association of National Advertisers, said in a testimony that the "unilateral decision" by one browser company could cause confusion and would "profoundly, adversely impact the broad array of advertising-supported services they currently widely use." Under pressure from the Administration, the Digital Advertising Alliance - - Liodice was speaking for them at the hearing -- adopted a voluntary opt-in, do-not-track mechanism.

Berin Szoka, president of TechFreedom and an opponent of default do-not-track, answered that it the Federal Trade Commission and the Administration pressure industry to adopt a default mechanism, it could change the how nature of the Internet "from today's low-friction, flat ecosystem of independent sites and services funded by impersonal data collection to one with fewer players who collect more data."

Ohio State Law Professor Peter Swire said that if the U.S. did not protect privacy, it could get locked out of international markets that do have such protections.

Alex Fowler of Mozilla said that he was not ready to say the U.S. should adopt a European-style model, but suggested it already had one since U.S. companies had to respect that regime when interacting with European countries. Liodice said that if the U.S. government extends its do-not-track reach to far through legislation, it could hurt cybersecurity or antifraud efforts by limiting information currently available to law enforcement. Rockefeller countered that that was a red herring.

Rockefeller says big tech companies acting like Standard Oil

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) said that technology companies like Apple, Google and Facebook are behaving like his family's old company, Standard Oil, which the federal government broke up in the early 1900s in a landmark antitrust case.

Speaking to reporters after a Senate hearing on privacy, Chairman Rockefeller, the great-grandson of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller, said President Teddy Roosevelt "did exactly what he should have done" by going after the oil giant. But he said the instinct to build anti-competitive monopolies is "alive and well in the United States … with a lot of these big computer companies." "Some of them are larger than the law — or at least they think they are," Chairman Rockefeller said.

Supreme Court rejects appeal of media ownership restrictions

The Supreme Court has turned down an appeal by media companies of government restrictions on the ownership of a newspaper and broadcast station in the same market, leaving the rules in place and sending the contentious issue once again back to the Federal Communications Commission.

The FCC is in the midst of its periodic review of media ownership rules, which broadcasters and news organizations have argued are outdated in the Internet era. The agency relaxed some of the rules in 2007, after the last review. But an appeals court tossed out the looser regulations, which largely applied to the top 20 U.S. markets, saying the FCC hadn't followed proper procedures in making the changes. The Supreme Court on Friday declined to hear an appeal of that lower court ruling by Media General, the National Association of Broadcasters, Tribune Company (which owns the Los Angeles Times and KTLA-TV Channel 5) and other media companies. Media General, Tribune and the broadcasters said they were disappointed. But both sides in the case had thought it unlikely the high court would accept an appeal that revolved around procedural issues.

Since 1975, the FCC has banned so-called cross-ownership of newspapers and TV and radio stations in the same city. But it frequently has granted waivers. Media companies had argued to the Supreme Court that the rules were no longer needed because people have many more ways to access news. But public interest groups said the increased demand for wireless spectrum by telecommunications companies made media ownership rules important to preserving diverse voices on the public airwaves.

"The public still gives broadcasters exclusive use of this finite and valuable resource free of charge, as well as other important privileges, in exchange for certain, reasonable commitments," said the Prometheus Radio Project and other groups that had challenged the FCC's 2007 loosening of the rules.

Supreme Court refuses FCC bid to fine CBS for Janet Jackson incident

The long legal battle between CBS and the Federal Communications Commission over Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show is over.

The Supreme Court on June 29 refused to hear the FCC's request to reinstate a $550,000 indecency fine against CBS for the halftime performance featuring Jackson and Justin Timberlake, who at the end of a song tore a piece of Jackson's top, exposing her bare breast to an audience of about 90 million. "It is now clear that the brevity of an indecent broadcast — be it word or image — cannot immunize it from FCC censure," said Chief Justice John Roberts. "Any future 'wardrobe malfunctions' will not be protected on the ground relied on by the court below." In addition, Chief Justice Roberts said that calling it a "wardrobe malfunction" when Justin Timberlake ripped away part of Jackson's bustier "strained the credulity of the public." CBS said it was "gratified to finally put this episode behind us" and noted that "at every major turn of this process, the lower courts have sided with us." The network added that since the Super Bowl, it has added delays to all live programming to prevent similar incidents from happening.

Your E-Book Is Reading You

It takes the average reader just seven hours to read the final book in Suzanne Collins's "Hunger Games" trilogy on the Kobo e-reader—about 57 pages an hour. Nearly 18,000 Kindle readers have highlighted the same line from the second book in the series: "Because sometimes things happen to people and they're not equipped to deal with them." And on Barnes & Noble's Nook, the first thing that most readers do upon finishing the first "Hunger Games" book is to download the next one.

In the past, publishers and authors had no way of knowing what happens when a reader sits down with a book. Does the reader quit after three pages, or finish it in a single sitting? Do most readers skip over the introduction, or read it closely, underlining passages and scrawling notes in the margins? Now, e-books are providing a glimpse into the story behind the sales figures, revealing not only how many people buy particular books, but how intensely they read them.

Inside Murdoch's Decision

This week, Rupert Murdoch relented, agreeing to pursue a plan to divide up his empire, News Corp, a company he built from a single newspaper he inherited in Australia in the 1950s to a conglomerate with more than $33 billion in revenue and a market capitalization of $53 billion. But he still doesn't care about the so-called "Murdoch discount" that hovers over the company's share price. "I don't give a ---- about that," he said.

Instead, what helped change his mind was a perception that the entertainment and publishing businesses had become different enough that they needed separate management teams. While entertainment is surging, the publishing business faces challenges. In particular, with the inclusion of The Wall Street Journal, acquired in 2007 along with other Dow Jones & Co. assets, executives realized the publishing company had a global brand that could allow it to stand alone. Down the road, separating publishing could even allow him to acquire more newspapers, without facing the wrath of shareholders, according to a person familiar with his thinking. The change of heart was a long time coming.

Senate ready to move on cybersecurity legislation, but differences remain

Senators are set to tackle legislation to protect the nation’s computer system when the upper chamber returns from its July 4th recess, but the efforts are being hampered by disagreements over the government’s role in overseeing cybersecurity standards.

Senate Majority Leader Harry (D-NV) has repeatedly said he believes cybersecurity legislation is critical, and he is expected to push for a vote in July. "There hasn't been a time that I've talked with [Reid] in the last year where he hasn't talked about the need to get cybersecurity to the floor," Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) told reporters after a Senate hearing last week. "No other subject reigns so supreme."

U.S. pressures companies to report cybercrime

Amid whispers of sensational online break-ins resulting in millions of dollars in losses, it remains remarkably difficult to identify corporate victims of cybercrimes. Companies are afraid that going public will damage their reputations, sink stock prices or spark lawsuits. Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) is adding a provision to cybersecurity legislation that would strengthen the reporting requirement. The SEC's cybersecurity guidance issued in October is not mandatory. It was intended to update for the digital age a requirement that companies report "material risks" that investors want and have a right to know. Rockefeller's measure would direct the SEC's five commissioners to make clear when companies must disclose cyber breaches and spell out steps that companies are taking to protect their computer networks from electronic intrusions.