President Obama to discuss cybersecurity with China's Xi: White House
President Barack Obama will discuss cybersecurity with Chinese President Xi Jinping when the two leaders meet in California next week, White House spokesman Jay Carney said.
President Barack Obama will discuss cybersecurity with Chinese President Xi Jinping when the two leaders meet in California next week, White House spokesman Jay Carney said.
New America Foundation
1899 L St. NW Suite 400
Washington DC, 20036
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
12:15 - 1:30 p.m.
People spent the twentieth century obsessed with the future and in pursuit of networks that could provide instantaneous connections, knowledge, and entertainment. In his influential 1970 book, Future Shock, Alvin Toffler theorized that things were changing so fast we would soon lose the ability to cope.
Now, with the advent of Twitter, email, and smartphones, we have a completely new relationship to time. We live in an eternal present, in which the priorities of the current moment seem to mean everything.
In his latest book, Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now, leading media theorist Douglas Rushkoff argues that the dissonance between our digital selves and our analog bodies has thrown us into a new state of anxiety. He examines what it means to be human in an always-connected reality-how modern events and trends have affected our biology, behavior, politics, and culture. Ultimately, Rushkoff offers hope for anyone seeking to transcend the false sense of "now" by suggesting that individuals and communities can make a choice to live in the present: to favor eye contact over texting, quality over speed, and human quirks over digital perfection.
Featured Speakers
Douglas Rushkoff
Digital Literacy Advocate, Codecademy.com
Author,
Christine Rosen
Bernard L. Schwartz Fellow, New America Foundation
Senior Editor, The New Atlantis
Marvin Ammori
Bernard L. Schwartz Fellow, New America Foundation
Author, On Internet Freedom
While the bidding fracas over Hulu begins to take on the dimensions of an all-out war, it appears that the brand's suitors are unwilling to pay anywhere near its $2 billion valuation.
Yahoo announced it would throw its hat into the ring, and the reported bid (between $600 million and $800 million) is the largest that has been leaked thus far. Trouble is, it only accounts for between 30 percent to 40 percent of Hulu's year-ago value. Marissa Mayer's gambit comes on the heels of Yahoo’s $1.1 billion investment in the revenue-challenged microblogging site Tumblr. Other Hulu suitors include DirecTV, Time Warner Cable and the Chernin Group, as well as the private equity firms Guggenheim Digital, KKR & Co and Silverlake Partners. One factor in the declining valuation of Hulu is its loss of market share. Not only has Hulu been dominated by the 800-lb. gorilla that is Google, but it is also losing ground to ad-supported video services such as BrightRoll, LiveRail and Adap.TV.
[Commentary] Recently we have seen stories about wireless carriers “offering” content creators the opportunity to pay to exempt their content from data caps. We pointed out that this type of arrangement is exactly the type of thing that net neutrality is supposed to prevent. However, some wireless carriers have defended it as merely a modern day 1-800 number. What they forget is that 1-800 numbers did not exist in a vacuum.
Yes, 1-800 numbers allowed businesses to make incoming calls free to customers by picking up the charge. In that sense, they superficially resemble a scheme where certain content is exempted from data caps. But stopping there kind of misses the point. 1-800 numbers exist within a larger regulatory framework that protects consumers (and the businesses that use them) from abuse at the hands of the phone company. This framework, known to telecom attorneys as “Title II” (after the part of the law that governs phone networks) establishes the rules that allow the phone network to function in a reliable, affordable way.
While there are many parts of Title II, the overarching concept is established in the first section: “All charges, practices, classifications, and regulations for an in connection with such communications service, shall be just and reasonable, and any such charge, practice, classification, or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is declared to be unlawful.”
And the second section: “It shall be unlawful for any common carrier to make any unjust or unreasonable discrimination in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities, or services …”
Sounds good, right?
Researchers at Alcatel-Lucent’s Bell Labs have devised a new way to transmit data super-fast over fiber cables: using “twin waves” of information rather than just one and them bringing them together when they arrive at their destination. The result cut down on signal distortion and led to rates of 400 Gbps across a record distance of 12,800 kilometers, or more than 7,900 miles, according to the research paper, published by the journal Nature Photonics. The pairing of signals in essence cancels out the ups and downs — peaks and troughs, in physics terms — of data. That means the signal-to-noise ratio improves, which lets fiber optic communications travel farther without more gear along the way to boost the signal. That’s a big deal.
The European Union's telecoms chief set out an ambitious time scale for an overhaul of the bloc's telecom rules, saying a package of initiatives to foster a single market for the industry across Europe would be ready by next Easter but that they won't include plans for a single European regulator.
"The speed is badly needed because we are in a crisis," EU Commissioner for Digital Agenda Neelie Kroes said. But it also means that rather than pursuing the "dream" of a single telecoms regulator for all 27 EU countries, "we should be pragmatic...just put in the basket what you really need." Kroes said her full proposals would be detailed in July or August, before being put to EU leaders at their October summit, with the aim of getting the package approved by the European Parliament before it breaks for elections in May 2014. In order to get her reforms implemented as soon as possible, she won't pursue a single regulator. Instead she will suggest that telecoms operators, which currently have to work with the regulator in each country where they are present, pick a "home" regulator and just deal with them. Previous hopes of a single regulator across Europe have been rebuffed by member states, which don't want to cede control to Brussels.
The European Union's competition watchdog is likely to ask Google to make further concessions to address the concerns of competitors who have complained about the way the Internet search giant displays results, EU Commissioner Joaquín Almunia said.
"This market test should have been concluded yesterday, but at the request of some participants we have decided to prolong [by] one month the market test, so at the end of June we will receive the answers," Almunia said in the European Parliament. "After we will analyze the responses…we will ask Google probably, I can't anticipate this formally but almost 100%, we will ask Google to improve the proposals." Almunia said he's looking into a separate complaint that Google uses its cellphone operating system Android to monopolize the mobile marketplace. "We have received a formal complaint regarding some aspects of the Android ecosystem," Almunia said at the hearing before the European Parliament. "We haven't decided if we will open or not a formal investigation."
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has unanimously ruled that Comcast did not violate the Federal Communications Commission's program carriage rules.
"The Commission has failed to identify adequate evidence of unlawful discrimination," the court concluded. It did not reach issues regarding the First Amendment or statute of limitations. In writing for the majority, Judge Stephen Williams wrote that the court concluded that the commission "has nothing to refute Comcast's contention that its rejection of Tennis' proposal was simply a straight-up financial analysis." In essence, the court was agreeing with Comcast that Tennis had not shown how its proposal of wider carriage provided any business benefit to the cable operator that it would be forgoing to favor its own co-owned networks. Cable operators are allowed to discriminate in carriage so long as it is not for anticompetitive reasons.
Sorenson Communications, an Internet-based Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) provider, has agreed to pay $15.75 million to settle an investigation by the Federal Communications Commission’s Enforcement Bureau into whether the company billed the TRS Fund for calls made by unregistered, unverified, or ineligible individuals, and for calls that were made by or on behalf of the provider itself.
FCC registration and verification requirements are designed to protect the integrity and of the TRS Fund, which compensates TRS providers for reasonable costs of providing interstate TRS calls involving persons with disabilities, and is funded from a fee paid for by subscribers of interstate telecommunications services. As part of the settlement, Sorenson must implement a robust compliance plan, requiring detailed operating procedures, comprehensive training of its employees, and immediate reporting of possible violations. Of the $15.75 million, just over $4.2 million will be reimbursed to the TRS Fund, and the remaining approximately $11.5 million will be paid to the U.S. Treasury as a voluntary contribution. TRS enables an individual who is deaf, hard of hearing, deaf-blind, or who has a speech disability, to engage in telephone communications with one or more individuals.
It’s “quite plausible” that Google Fiber’s deployment in the Kansas Cities will deliver an attractive internal rate of return (IRR) based on anticipated costs and expected demand for services, while also representing a scenario that could be replicated in other markets, Sanford C. Bernstein concluded in a report.
Google Fiber has “a good shot at being profitable” while also doing some damage to incumbent service providers over the long haul, noted report authors Carlos Kirjner and Ram Parameswaran. Bernstein foresees probability occurring in two different scenarios – one in which Google Fiber is able to crank out highly attractive IRRs of greater than 35%, as well as an “overly pessimistic” view that generates an IRR of just 12% -- still slightly above Google’s cost of capital. The level of success will be determined in part by how differentiated Google Fiber’s services are, if Google Fiber can sustain high service penetrations, and if it can scale economically without compromising service quality, the report said. Among other key factors: the penetration of homes passed when Google first starts to deploy the network, and the service penetrations achieved during the first five years.
© 1994-2024 Benton Institute for Broadband & Society. All Rights Reserved.