October 2013

DOJ Request Pushes Sinclair-Allbritton Close Date Into ‘14

Sinclair is now scheduled to close on its $985 million acquisition of Allbritton in 2014, the time frame pushed back following a "Second Request for information" from the Department of Justice, according to Sinclair and Allbritton.

The Second Request is, as the name suggests, a request for additional information from DOJ. Sinclair says the query concerns Allbritton stations in Harrisburg (PA) and Charleston (SC). It now expects the deal to close in the first or second quarter of 2014. In addition to antitrust clearance, the transaction is subject to Federal Communications Commission approval.

Time Warner Cable Buys Southeast Fiber Network, DukeNet

Time Warner Cable will acquire DukeNet, which is currently owned by Duke Energy and Alinda Capital. DukeNet operates an 8,700 route mile fiber network throughout the southeast, with extensive operations in North and South Carolina, a key market for Time Warner Cable.

The purchase price is reported to be $600 million, including the repayment of DukeNet debt. Traditional telecommunications carriers have long known that regional fiber networks are hugely important assets in the evolving and increasingly broadband and IP dominated competitive landscape. The DukeNet deal highlights that telecom carriers are not alone in this assessment.

Google modifies Analytics in EU-wide privacy concession

Following mounting pressure from data protection agencies (DPAs) in different European countries, Google has started offering so-called data processing agreements to websites using its Google Analytics suite in the European Union, Iceland, Norway or Switzerland.

Up to now Google did not provide such contracts because it maintains that it does not process personal data. Since 2011 it has offered such agreements only in Germany, after demands from the German DPA. In a way it's also a preemptive move by Google, as Europe is moving towards a new, uniform and in some respects stricter privacy regulation, said privacy expert Herman van Braam, owner of Dutch hosting service Privyon. Under the new regime, which is still being ironed out in Brussels, one national DPA will rule on privacy issues for the whole EU, and fines can be up to two percent of the worldwide revenue of a company. In Google's case, that means potential fines of up to $1 billion.

Technologists’ Submit Comments to the NSA Review Group

A distinguished group of 47 of the world’s leading technologists -- with extensive expertise in security, privacy, and cryptography -- submitted public comments to the National Security Agency (NSA) Review Group.

These technologists:

  • emphasized the need for deep technical expertise in the work of the Review Group and, more generally, in oversight mechanisms for the NSA surveillance programs;
  • described how the NSA’s efforts to subvert many forms of encryption online and to plant backdoors in secure communications products, standards, software, and hardware undermine security for everyone online; and,
  • argued in an increasingly global information society, commitments to privacy and civil liberties necessarily must extend to non-US persons.

CDT Submits Comments to the President’s Review Group on Surveillance Reform

The Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) made a series of recommendations to the President’s Review Group on Surveillance Reform focusing on Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA”) as amended by the FISA Amendments Act, enhanced transparency, and the structure of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”).

CDT said the Review Group should recommend an end to bulk collection of telephony metadata under Section 215, and that it should prevent bulk collection under similar legal authorities. Nine bills introduced in Congress take this approach. Additionally, CDT advocated for an end to prospective surveillance under Section 215. CDT urged the Review Group to recommend raising the standard of certainty in “foreignness” of targets beyond the NSA’s current 51% standard for Section 702 surveillance, and that it end the ongoing mass “upstream” collection of communications that merely mention a target. CDT also urged the Review Group to recommend limits on the purpose of Section 702 surveillance and that it advise the President to apply the privacy provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to its surveillance that targets people abroad. The Review Group should also recommend transparency measures and finally, CDT urged the Review Group to endorse having a Special Advocate argue for privacy and civil liberties at FISA court proceedings – a concept the President already endorsed.

Joining the Surveillance Society?

[Commentary] Recent digital inclusion policies that aim to increase digital literacy of new Internet and computer users, promote civic engagement, and improve economic development do not currently address the privacy needs of new users. Now, more than ever, digital inclusion policies need to pay greater attention to developing providers’ expertise and capacity to handle privacy and surveillance concerns of new Internet users. Privacy advocates and developers also have a role to play. Expanding “digital literacy” to include privacy education requires that privacy protecting tools become easier to use. Until then, the benefits of digital inclusion are at odds with the potential harms wrought by a surveillance society.

Farzad Mostashari Joining the Engelberg Center at Brookings

Dr. Farzad Mostashari, the National Coordinator for Health IT at the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), will join the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform as a Visiting Fellow.

Dr. Mostashari plans to work on a range of topics related to helping clinicians improve care and patient health through health IT, with a focus on small practice transformation by developing innovative payment models that can better support these types of practices. Dr. Mostashari previously served as Principal Deputy National Coordinator for Programs and Policy at the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) at HHS. In his four years at ONC, he has been integrally involved in leading a broad range of initiatives to promote more effective use of health IT to improve care.

Verizon's rumored demands may help explain small cell slowdown

Apparently, Verizon Wireless wants to deploy small cells but only if they are inexpensive, according to a recent rumor. If true, that could help explain why the wireless industry's expected small cell ramp-up has not yet happened and, in fact, keeps being pushed out.

Jay Brown, CFO of tower company Crown Castle International, highlighted the issue of cost when it comes to small cell deployments. He stated that small cells are "incredibly expensive to do" based upon the total cost of deployment and said operators will only turn to small cells in locations where macro sites cannot fulfill their needs. Given that most wireless providers are still testing and piloting small cells, David Howson, president of sales and customer management at fiber backhaul provider Zayo Group, predicted small projects will be tested and deployed in 2014 in preparation for more mainstream deployments in 2015. That timeline is about a year later than many have been expecting, and likely reflects not just the cost but the complexity of integrating small cells into existing wireless networks.

Justice Scalia uses the Internet. And he thinks you people on it are narcissists.

[Commentary] In a lengthy interview with New York Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia says he uses the Internet -- but doesn't seem particularly thrilled by what he sees.

Earlier this year, Justice Elena Kagan suggested the Supreme Court as a whole hasn't really "gotten" to e-mail. But when asked about his own connectivity, Justice Scalia told New York Magazine "[s]ure, I use the Internet." He didn't blame all societal ills on the Web, but he did take some potshots at bloggers and social media users: “I’m nervous about our civic culture. I’m not sure the Internet is largely the cause of it. It’s certainly the cause of careless writing.”

Do Not Track effort at a crossroads

A group of companies and privacy advocates working to create a tool that would allow users to opt out of online tracking will vote on whether to continue. The group has missed multiple deadlines to produce a document describing a Do Not Track standard, and some stakeholders left the talks in the recent months, citing frustration with the way the process has been handled.

The most recent departure from the group was the Digital Advertising Alliance, which works with online advertising networks that depend on online tracking. When the group can’t agree, its leaders will call for objections and “pick the least objectionable option,” Justin Brookman, co-chairman of the group and director of the Center for Democracy & Technology’s Project on Consumer Privacy said. If the group does not want to move forward, it would be “better to end it now than spend another two years squabbling and not coming to resolution because people aren't invested in the process,” Brookman said.