January 2014

Principles for a Successful IP Transition: Openness

If our broadband networks are going to replace our analog voice networks, then they must be able to support robust voice and video competition -- even if those services compete directly with services offered by the incumbent broadband network provider. The story behind open telephone networks goes back more than 45 years, to a Texan named Thomas Carter who invented a device that extended the reach of a telephone into the oil fields so supervisors could stay in touch. Since the Federal Communications Commission’s 1968 ruling in the case known as Carterphone, consumers have been allowed to connect any legal device to the network and new technologies have flourished. Such a policy is just as essential in the age of Internet Protocol (IP) as well. Some stakeholders, however, are concerned about the future of voice and video competition with incumbents when these companies own and control both the networks and the services that run over them. They suggest the policy could be in jeopardy as a shrinking number of telecommunications providers exert their control over a significant portion of the network.

Will the FCC strike down AT&T’s Sponsored Data plan?

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler indicated that he'd be watching closely as AT&T rolled out a new offering called Sponsored Data, which promises to keep certain mobile browsing from counting against your monthly data cap but which has raised the ire of network neutrality advocates.

Sponsored Data makes it possible for companies to subsidize your use of their online services by paying AT&T a separate fee. While the plan frees up more data per month for AT&T's customers, Internet advocates fear that content creators will be at a disadvantage if they can't afford to pay up. "My attitude is, let's take a look at what this is," said Chairman Wheeler. "Let's take a look at how it operates. ... If it interferes with the operation of the Internet ... if it develops into an anti-competitive practice ... if it does have some kind of preferential treatment given somewhere, then that is cause for us to intervene." “I’ve been talking about what I call the regulatory seesaw. If there are good things happening the marketplace, if there is competition, then the commission doesn’t have to do much. But it can (tilt) as well.” The current Open Internet Order, he said, “is designed to encourage competition, is designed to be different for wireless than from wire, and it makes it clear that if there are untoward things impacting things to the network, undermining innovation, then the commission should move.” Wheeler framed his thinking in terms of the new realities of regulation. “The old regulatory model was ‘We pretty much know where things are going. There are few hothouses that produce advancements, like Bell Labs; we can track those and fit those into policy.’ It was a very proscriptive model.” But now, he said, changing is happening so fast, “Even the wisest and best intentioned people can’t sit around being proscriptive. But what you can do is say you want to have an environment that encourages innovation and holds true to a set of values and maintains authority to deal with protection of those values.”

Wheeler's comments don't do much to clarify his cryptic positions on network neutrality; the agency head has previously voiced his support for the "open Internet" but has left open the prospect of letting Internet providers create a tiered system where some types of traffic enjoy an advantage over others. Critics worry that such a system would make it harder for startups to enter the market.

Wheeler’s fellow commissioners also declined to make any quick decisions. “I don’t want to pass regulatory judgment right now,” said FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn. “We need to let things develop,” agreed Commissioner Ajit Pai. “The FCC shouldn’t a priori declare business models out of bounds.” While all the commissioners support an open Internet, none would commit on what direction the FCC might take on its network neutrality rules if the DC Circuit Court strikes all or part of them down. “The prudent thing to do is wait and see,” said Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel.

Will Washington Move to Regulate the Internet of Things?

Walk the halls of the International CES and listen to tech titans like Cisco’s John Chambers and it’s easy to believe that the Internet of things is the next big thing and that it’s all but here. But while the tech industry may be embracing it, Washington policymakers, fretting over data security and privacy issues, still aren’t sure what to do about it.

At least one government regulator cautioned that Washington should relax rather than jump to regulate technology advances as they are still evolving. “We should adopt a regulatory regime that allows technology, even disruptive technology, to thrive,” said Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen of the Federal Trade Commission during a heavily attended Internet of things CES session. “Success of the Internet has been driven by the freedom to experiment even in the face of unease. It’s vital that government approach the Internet of things with regulatory humility.” “Because interconnected devices collect and share large amounts of information, the tech industry must be sensitive. It’s crucial that companies act to safeguard the privacy of users in order not to give it a bad name,” Commissioner Ohlhausen warned.

Borrowers Hit Social Media Hurdles

More lending companies are mining Facebook, Twitter and other social media data to help determine a borrower's creditworthiness or identity, a trend that is raising concerns among consumer groups and regulators.

Lending companies -- some of which are backed with venture funding from Google Ventures, the venture-capital arm of Google, and Accel Partners, an early Facebook investor -- are looking at potential problems such as whether applicants put the same job information on their loan application as they posted on LinkedIn, or if they shared on Facebook that they had been let go by an employer. A small business that draws negative reviews on eBay also could undermine its chances of getting more credit, lending companies say. The practice is being used largely by startups that grant smaller loans, but the concept seems likely to spread. Fair Isaac, which provides the credit scoring used in more than 90% of lenders decisions, says it is weighing possibilities for incorporating social media. "There could come a time where certain social media could be predictive and we're looking at that, but it isn't yet," said Anthony Sprauve, senior consumer-credit specialist at FICO. Consumer advocates say the trend increases the chance borrowers, including small businesses, will be unfairly denied credit or saddled with higher interest rates based purely on their social media presence. They say federal laws haven't kept up with the trend, leaving borrowers exposed. Regulators are watching the trend and trying to determine whether to police financial institutions' use of online data in credit scoring, officials say.

Senator Fischer calls for data privacy

Sen Deb Fischer (R-NE) took to the Senate floor to call for action on data privacy, in the wake of a data breach at the shopping giant Target over the holidays.

“This was not just an attack on Target, which has 14 stores in my home state of Nebraska. It was a crime against millions of hardworking citizens,” she said. Sen Fischer said that Congress needed to intervene, and urged the Senate Commerce Committee, on which she sits, to take up the issue. “Our nation’s entire data security system is in desperate need of revamping,” she told the chamber. “That's going to require congressional action.”

DOJ files motion to block release of NSA info

The Justice Department filed a motion that would prevent plaintiffs in one of the recent federal cases involving the National Security Agency from learning more about its surveillance activities.

“Plaintiffs have made clear their intentions to seek discovery of this kind of still-classified information, concerning targets and subjects, participating providers, and other operational details of the challenged NSA intelligence programs,” the motion stated. It continues to say disclosure of those programs “could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security.” Conservative activist Larry Klayman is the plaintiff in two lawsuits brought against the Obama Administration. He charges that the NSA’s program violates the First, Fourth and Fifth amendments.

Apple, Samsung CEOs agree to mediation in US patent fight

Apple and Samsung have agreed to attend a mediation session to be held on or before February 19, as they prepare to clash in court in March over smartphone patents. Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Oh-Hyun Kwon will attend the session with in-house lawyers only, according to a court filing. Their legal teams had met on January 6 to "discuss settlement opportunities," the filing read.

T-Mobile Added 800,000 Prized Customers in 4th Quarter

T-Mobile said it added 800,000 of the industry's most lucrative phone customers in the last three months of 2013, capping a remarkable turnaround year for a carrier that for years bled millions of customers to rivals.

Overall, T-Mobile added 869,000 so-called postpaid subscribers in the fourth quarter, up 34% from the third quarter and a significant departure from 515,000 customer losses during the same period last year. Of those additions, 69,000 involved tablets or other devices aside from phones. Total customer additions were 1.6 million for the quarter, bringing total additions in 2013 to 4.4 million. T-Mobile's postpaid "churn," or the percentage of customers leaving the carrier, dropped to 1.7% in the fourth quarter from 2.5% a year earlier. T-Mobile has mounted a flamboyant bid to win customers by doing away with much criticized standbys like service contracts and international data fees, while offering high-end phones like the iPhone and upgrading to faster next-generation network service. In a profanity-laced presentation at an industry conference in Las Vegas, T-Mobile Chief Executive John Legere said the bulk of his company's new customers were coming from AT&T and Sprint, and a smaller but growing number were beginning to join from Verizon. "We are either going to take over this whole industry, or these bastards are going to change," Mr. Legere said.

TV Makers Are Out of Ideas

[Commentary] The latest and greatest TVs are curved, offering viewers a left-to-right concavity, like watching TV on a skateboarder's half-pipe. And, somehow, curved screens make TV better, TV makers say. TV is stuck in an innovation cul-de-sac.

There are no new ideas in TV hardware that are worth paying for, so, thanks to competition and production efficiencies, good TVs keep getting cheaper. The cheaper they get, the more desperate TV makers become, filling their sets with more and more useless piffle. The death of innovation in TV hasn't come about because TVs are perfect. Far from it. It remains a big hassle to find something you want to watch, or to stream TV shows and movies without consulting a handful of remotes, or to navigate your cable system's byzantine menus. Indeed, in our modern, multidevice, multi-subscription-service livings rooms, almost nothing is as easy as is it needs to be. But TV makers aren't in a position to address any of these real problems. They don't have the clout to make significant deals with entertainment companies, which would be necessary to fix the problem of having to subscribe to many services in order to watch everything that you would like. They can't alter the way cable systems bundle channels, which might make it easier to cut your monthly bill. And TV makers, like everyone else, can't make all the devices connected to your TV obey a single, friendly on-screen interface -- which would, ultimately, be the best way to crack the problem of annoying living-room tech. In the absence of solving what really ails TV, manufacturers add on extras meant to fatten their profits.

Online Privacy Could Spark US-EU Trade Rift

US technology titans have built up powerful positions in Europe by transforming everyday information about individuals into one of the world's hottest commodities: data on everything from where they click online to where they go in real life. Now Europeans are punching back.

In Europe, some politicians see personal data as a new natural resource from which European companies should profit. Others see privacy laws as a bulwark against tyranny. Both camps are reluctant to let US companies transfer personal information -- such as Web-browsing patterns or purchase histories -- without guarantees that the US will enforce the same privacy rules as the European Union does. "Europeans have a vivid experience of oppression," said Jan Philipp Albrecht, a Green Party member of the European Parliament and privacy advocate. "Every collection of a piece of data is a violation of a fundamental right, and must be justified." In the US, that position worries some businesses and politicians, who see data as more of a commercial question.