December 2, 2014 (Faster Internet, or More Competitive Internet)
BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 2014
TODAY: Phoenix Center's 14th Annual U.S. Telecoms Symposium and @War: The Rise of the Military-Internet Complex http://benton.org/calendar/2014-12-02
INTERNET/BROADBAND
We can have faster Internet, or more competitive Internet, but getting both is hard - analysis
Obama’s Internet plan plays favorites, and Netflix is one of the darlings - AEI op-ed [links to web]
Outdated Regulations Will Make Consumers Pay More for Broadband - Progressive Policy Institute analysis
TDM-to-IP Transition: Does Copper Deterioration Equal Copper Retirement?
BITAG report on Interconnection and Traffic Exchange on the Internet - research
Google is starting to sign up Fiber customers in Austin [links to web]
The Public Computer Center at the College of Menominee Nations, Wisconsin [links to web]
ELECTIONS AND MEDIA
GOP's tech hurdle: They don't always get it
JOURNALISM
Majority Of 'Fox News Sunday' Guests Discussing Ferguson Are White - Media Matters for America research [links to web]
Bill Carter, Veteran New York Times TV Reporter, Taking Buyout [links to web]
The Torch is Being Passed to A New Generation of Right-Wing Media [links to web]
EDUCATION
Not So Fast - Broadcasting&Cable editorial
Online education run amok? [links to web]
Big Districts Pressure Publishers on Digital-Content Delivery [links to web]
CONTENT
A quick, jargon-free explainer to the Supreme Court case that will decide the limits of free speech online - WashPost analysis [links to web]
Supreme Court split on free speech protections for Facebook threats [links to web]
What Is a True Threat on Facebook? - NYTimes editorial [links to web]
Making social media research more reliable and reproducible [links to web]
Welcome to the web’s dark side [links to web]
ADVERTISING
Study Uncovers In-Depth Insights Into Global Internet Users For Marketers [links to web]
TELEVISION
Sen Markey Pushes Cox/Verizon For Retransmission Resolution [links to web]
FCC Urging Resolution to WFXT/FiOS Retransmission Impasse [links to web]
Reminder: You’re Not Watching Sports Without Cable TV [links to web]
WIRELESS
IDC: 1.3B smartphones will ship in 2014 but growth will slow [links to web]
T-Mobile aims to scoop up more 700 MHz spectrum for LTE deployments [links to web]
PRIVACY/SECURITY
Google needs to debunk European charges and improve privacy policies - editorial
Three Steps to Help Protect Your Personal Information on Cyber Monday - White House press release [links to web]
FCC REFORM
FCC Takes Steps to Modernize and Improve Efficiency of Filing - public notice
Cable Operators To FCC: DBS Needs Per-Sub Regulatory Fee [links to web]
STORIES FROM ABROAD
Gregarious and Direct: China’s Web Doorkeeper [links to web]
INTERNET/BROADBAND
WE CAN HAVE FASTER INTERNET, OR MORE COMPETITIVE INTERNET, BUT GETTING BOTH IS HARD
[SOURCE: Vox, AUTHOR: Timothy Lee]
[Commentary] People want today's broadband market to be competitive and reasonably priced. They also want tomorrow's networks to be faster than today's. The big challenge for regulators is that these goals are in conflict. Some countries try to deal with the first problem -- lack of competition -- by forcing incumbents to share a portion of their networks with competitors at regulated rates. This approach is known as local loop unbundling, and a number of people have argued that the United States should take a similar approach.
benton.org/headlines/we-can-have-faster-internet-or-more-competitive-internet-getting-both-hard | Vox
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
OUTDATED REGULATIONS WILL MAKE CONSUMERS PAY MORE FOR BROADBAND
[SOURCE: Progressive Policy Institute, AUTHOR: Robert Litan, Hal Singer]
[Commentary] Self-styled consumer advocates are pressuring federal regulators to “reclassify” access to the Internet as a public utility. If they get their way, US consumers will have to dig deeper into their pockets to pay for both residential fixed and wireless broadband services. How deep? We have calculated that the average annual increase in state and local fees levied on US wireline and wireless broadband subscribers will be $67 and $72, respectively. And the annual increase in federal fees per household will be roughly $17. When you add it all up, reclassification could add a whopping $17 billion in new user fees on top of the planned $1.5 billion extra to fund the E-Rate program. The higher fees would come on top of the adverse impact on consumers of less investment and slower innovation that would result from reclassification.
benton.org/headlines/outdated-regulations-will-make-consumers-pay-more-broadband | Progressive Policy Institute
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
TDM-TO-IP TRANSITION: DOES COPPER DETERIORATION EQUAL COPPER RETIREMENT?
[SOURCE: telecompetitor, AUTHOR: Joan Engebretson]
The Federal Communications Commission is seeking input on whether it should require telecommunications service providers retiring traditional copper phone wiring to provide and monitor batteries providing backup power to customer premises equipment. Additionally the commission is considering whether a service provider that lets its copper infrastructure deteriorate should be considered to have retired that equipment. These are just a few of the ideas discussed in a notice of proposed rulemaking about the TDM-to-IP transition adopted by the FCC on November 21. As usual, the NPRM includes some requirements that the FCC indicates it anticipates imposing, while other ideas are simply put forth for discussion.
benton.org/headlines/tdm-ip-transition-does-copper-deterioration-equal-copper-retirement | telecompetitor
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
INTERCONNECTION AND TRAFFIC EXCHANGE
[SOURCE: Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group, AUTHOR: ]
The Internet is a complex “network of networks” where individual networks are linked together to form a global network. In order for end users connected to one network to access data and services connected to another network, these networks must “interconnect” with each other, either by directly connecting with each other or by indirectly connecting through intermediate networks. Internet network interconnection, often referred to as “peering” or “transit,” is an increasingly important topic as the Internet ecosystem continues to evolve. The term “interconnection” refers to the various means by which network providers attach to and move traffic between one another, and is a collection of business practices and technical mechanisms that allow individually managed networks to connect together for this purpose. There is no central authority that manages Internet interconnection – the overall system arises because of the many bilateral and multilateral decisions that various actors make to interconnect. Interconnection in the United States has evolved significantly since the early days of the Internet. Peering connections, where two networks interconnect without the use of intermediate networks, are increasingly the primary interconnection paths between networks, supplanting the model of hierarchical interconnection via a small group of long-distance network providers. In most cases, two parties seeking to interconnect are able to come to terms. In some cases after an agreement is reached, however, traffic volumes or other factors may change, which in rare cases have led to “de-peering” events. More commonly, such changes lead to a renegotiation of the manner or type of interconnection agreement between the two parties. Although peering disputes over traffic imbalances, and other reasons, are not new, peering disputes in the U.S. have been increasingly publicized in recent years. With this report, BITAG’s Technical Working Group (TWG) aims to provide a technical reference on the subject of Internet interconnection, and presents a detailed review on how networks connect, the development and changes in connection models, motivations for connection, how networks manage traffic between each other and some of the challenges that arise as networks evolve.
benton.org/headlines/bitag-report-interconnection-and-traffic-exchange-internet | Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group | Multichannel News
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
ELECTIONS AND MEDIA
GOP’S TECH HURDLE
[SOURCE: Politico, AUTHOR: Tony Romm]
Republican presidential prospects like Sens Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rand Paul (R-KY) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) have tapped the tech industry’s fat wallets and mined its big-data expertise -- but these 2016 hopefuls couldn’t be further from Silicon Valley when it comes to policy. A series of major divides -- from the fate of net neutrality to the future of surveillance reform -- still splits this trio of prominent pols from Internet giants in the country’s tech heartland, which helped catapult President Barack Obama to well-funded victories in 2008 and 2012.
benton.org/headlines/gops-tech-hurdle-they-dont-always-get-it | Politico
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
EDUCATION
NOT SO FAST
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler plans to add as much as $1.5 billion to their phone bills. That’s OK, says the FCC, since it’s for a good cause: speed and education. The money would go toward increasing the funds in the E-rate subsidy and it’s undeniably a laudatory end-result -- getting faster broadband to low-income schools and libraries. But it illustrates the somewhat less preferable point that to get value, one must pay for it. How much value boosting the budget will create is a matter of dispute, but the point is the Chairman recognizes that offering more and better broadband is worth paying a little extra for. Let’s just put this on the schedule as a reminder when the “high cable bill” mantra surfaces. As Chairman Wheeler knows, having headed the National Cable & Telecommunications Association and CTIA: The Wireless Association, building out a network is not cheap, and recovering that investment takes years, particularly if you are rate-regulated.
benton.org/headlines/not-so-fast | Broadcasting&Cable
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
PRIVACY
GOOGLE IN EUROPE
[SOURCE: San Jose Mercury News, AUTHOR: Editorial staff]
[Commentary] There is a war going on in Europe that could have a significant impact on the US and its economy: Europe's war against American tech companies -- especially Google. The most serious claim is that Google's search intentionally downgrades competitors, making it impossible for others to reach scale. This places a burden on Google to show that it does not engage in anti-competitive practices. However, you have to wonder whether the inability of European entrepreneurs to swiftly innovate and compete has something to do with Europe's heavily regulated business environment -- the anti-Silicon Valley, you might say. There is one European concern we definitely share, however: user privacy. So we cheer on the EU as it attacks on the privacy front, and hope Google can neutralize the anti-competitive claim, whether by debunking it or changing some policies. As to the rest of the complaints, instead of attacking the Silicon Valley quartet, Europe might try giving its entrepreneurs the space to innovate that Silicon Valley offers. Stimulate European competition instead of stifling U.S. companies. Better privacy and more, not less, innovation. Now that's real consumer protection.
benton.org/headlines/google-needs-debunk-european-charges-and-improve-privacy-policies | San Jose Mercury News
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top
FCC REFORM
FCC FILING ORDER
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Marlene Dortch]
In this Order, the Federal Communications Commission takes steps to modernize and improve the efficiency for three common types of proceedings by implementing improved filing procedures. Specifically, this Order requires electronic filing for: (a) applications for authorization of domestic transfers of control under section 214(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act); (b) applications for authorization to discontinue, reduce, or impair a service under section 214(a) of the Act; and (c) notices of network changes under section 251(c)(5) of the Act. The FCC expects these new filing procedures to be more convenient and efficient for applicants, provide better transparency and information to the public, and save FCC staff resources.
benton.org/headlines/fcc-takes-steps-modernize-and-improve-efficiency-filing | Federal Communications Commission
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top