July 2015

The FCC's vocal minority speaks out

Michael O'Rielly, the newest commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission, is frustrated. Commissioner O'Rielly, one of two Republicans on the five-person FCC, joined the agency in October 2013. And since then he has been in one battle after another with his Democratic colleagues. For the most part, he's lost. "It takes time and effort to soldier on and make your arguments," he said. "I do the work you'd expect me to do. I read every item. I do my homework. And I make substantive suggestions. But I'm often shot down."

His frustration with the FCC underscores the contentious interaction among the commissioners, which make up one of the more politically divisive commissions in recent history. From hotbed issues such as network neutrality, which touches on the regulation of Internet traffic, to expanding a program to provide broadband services to the poor, Commissioner O'Rielly has been a vocal minority, railing against the initiatives with little effect. "They [the FCC majority] know exactly what they want to do," he said. "It's either you can sign up for what we want to do or not, but we're going forward." Commissioner O'Rielly and his Republican colleague, Commissioner Ajit Pai, have opposed all the major Democrat-supported issues that have passed, in large part due to philosophical differences they have with their colleagues across the political aisles on these issues. But Commissioner O'Rielly said what has truly frustrated him is what he sees as an unwillingness by the FCC leadership to find consensus on any issue.

Cybersecurity task force looks to next administration

A group of former federal employees and industry experts are getting together to ensure major cybersecurity initiatives don't fall through the cracks as more candidates pile into the 2016 race and Washington prepares for a transition in leadership. The Center for Strategic and International Studies has brought together a cybersecurity task force made up of experts from the public and private sector to issue a series of reports, culminating in a transition report with recommendations a new administration can put in place within the first 60 days.

"You don't want to lose the momentum that this administration is creating with the things that they're doing," said Karen Evans, director of the US Cyber Challenge and advisor to the task force. "You don't want a new administration [to come in] and have a hiatus where things aren't happening." Evans stressed the importance of issuing actionable recommendations — such as suggestions for executive orders that include specific language -- that the next administration can implement immediately, regardless of party affiliation. "The report should be written in a way that it doesn't matter who wins," said James Lewis, CSIS senior fellow and director of the Strategic Technologies Program, who is leading the task force's efforts. The bipartisan initiative also has the backing of members of congress, namely Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) and Sen Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), who are acting as co-chairs.

Accelerating the Use of Prizes to Address Tough Challenges

Later in 2016, the Federal government will celebrate the fifth anniversary of Challenge.gov, a one-stop shop that has prompted tens of thousands of individuals, including engaged citizens and entrepreneurs, to participate in more than 400 public-sector prize competitions with more than $72 million in prizes. The May 2015 report to Congress on the Implementation of Federal Prize Authority for Fiscal Year 2014 highlights that Challenge.gov is a critical component of the Federal government’s use of prize competitions to spur innovation. Federal agencies have used prize competitions to improve the accuracy of lung cancer screenings, develop environmentally sustainable brackish water desalination technologies, encourage local governments to allow entrepreneurs to launch new startups in a day, and increase the resilience of communities in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.

To build on this momentum, the Obama Administration will hold an event this fall to highlight the role that prizes play in solving critical national and global issues. The event will showcase public- and private-sector relevant commitments from Federal, state, and local agencies, companies, foundations, universities, and non-profits. Individuals and organizations interested in participating in this event or making commitments should send us a note at challenges@ostp.gov by August 28, 2015.

A Note About Our Coverage Of Donald Trump's 'Campaign'

[Commentary] After watching and listening to Donald Trump since he announced his candidacy for President, we have decided we won't report on Trump's campaign as part of The Huffington Post's political coverage. Instead, we will cover his campaign as part of our Entertainment section. Our reason is simple: Trump's campaign is a sideshow. We won't take the bait. If you are interested in what The Donald has to say, you'll find it next to our stories on the Kardashians and The Bachelorette

Huffington Post wrong to consign Trump to entertainment section

[Commentary] The Huffington Post has decided wrongly that Donald Trump’s campaign should be stuck closer to its coverage of the Kardashians, U2 or Taylor Swift than of Sen Ted Cruz (R-TX) or Sen Mitch McConnell (R-KY). This is especially dubious in an era where the nexus of entertainment and politics is often quite obvious and growing. One need only look at the dramatic fragmentation in media and how the Obama White House is trying to find niche audiences anywhere it can find them. That means not just going on lots of late-night and soft afternoon talk shows. It means doing garage podcasts and giving “exclusive” interviews to YouTube stars. You might think Trump is a buffoon. But he may have, for the moment at least, touched some nerve of dissatisfaction, perhaps partial explanation of his decent showing in some early Republican polls.

Something of the sort happened long ago with some guys who were actually professional actors and were similarly disparaged. They, too, could have been journalistically segregated long ago as not meeting some arbitrary test of seriousness and legitimacy. You do remember Ronald Reagan and Arnold Schwarzenegger, don’t you? Yes, the current Trump appeal just might not just be a total function of his celebrity, or his notoriety. It’s possible that something may resonate right now, even if smart Vegas oddsmakers would bet on his ultimate political self-immolation. Yes, the media may now be consigned to a reportorial traffic jam, slowing down and shaking its collective head as it watches the wreck that can seem Donald Trump. But it doesn’t mean you don’t acknowledge the wreck in a fashion that fits the relative support he’s generating.

Why We All Need to Make the Internet Fun Again

[Commentary] The latest Internet boom has brought us a wide range of services, but variety is remarkably absent from a key category: The Internet itself. Some 20 years after its launch, the consumer Internet has reached a creativity plateau, with the same websites now being created by the thousands from the same content-management systems every day. At the same time, Facebook and other social networks have forced us into what I call “templated selves” -- standardized units of user identity and user-generated content, confining free expression into a limited set of prefabricated molds. And mobile app stores, once the promised platform for new businesses drawn from new ideas, are drowning in largely homogeneous content, with the barrier to discovering truly unique apps now raised so high, few can effectively compete. In a word, the Internet has become boring.

When it went mass market in the mid-’90s, the Web was promised as a place of open exploration and creativity. Now, instead, it restricts our activity at nearly every turn. This doesn’t just constrain us as people, but threatens to impede the very inventiveness that the Internet industry depends on to continue thriving. What’s needed now is an understanding of how we reached this point -- and an alternative vision for the Internet’s next generation.

[Amber Case is an entrepreneur and former co-founder and CEO of Geoloqi]

How the FCC’s ban on prioritization puts patients at risk

[Commentary] Telemedicine could transform the medical experience we are accustomed to today. While it holds great promise, the Federal Communications Commission’s recent Open Internet rules threaten to bring this healthcare revolution to a stuttering halt. Certain medical practices require prioritization, in one form or another, for timely data and optimal real-time performance. Delaying or dropping telemedicine packets – whose contents contain important health information for the sole sake of “packet equality” is a misguided choice detrimental to patient health. What the FCC’s Open Internet rules do not acknowledge is that different services absolutely have different demands of the network. While we may agree to equal treatment of data in principle, enacting wholesale bans on prioritization and resource-reservation network technology is a bad idea. It denies the multiple service requirements a network was designed to accommodate and discriminates against emerging services that need prioritization in order to work. Ruining the quality of experience of one service type for the sake of equality with a differing service type (with dissimilar network demands) is not a true solution.

Telemedicine has been a long-awaited move towards customer-centered healthcare that has reached a boiling point. The recent Open Internet rules effectively turn off the heat, dictating that the coming feast be prepared in a tepid pool of inaction, all in the name of equality. The FCC should not be a gatekeeper to the future of telemedicine. We need Congress to act, not only to clarify the role of the FCC, but to provide a much-needed modernized legal framework for Internet innovation.

[Roslyn Layton studies Internet economics at the Center for Communication, Media, and Information Technologies at Aalborg University in Copenhagen, Denmark]

July 17, 2015 (FCC Mtg News; US Addresses the Digital Divide)

BENTON'S COMMUNICATIONS-RELATED HEADLINES for FRIDAY, JULY 17, 2015

See the Benton Foundation’s Weekly Round-up, a recap of the biggest (or most overlooked) telecommunications stories of the week. https://www.benton.org/headlines/weekly-roundup

NEWS FROM THE FCC MEETING
   FCC Reforms Competitive Bidding Rules for Spectrum Auctions - press release
   FCC Adopts Plan to Modernize Field Operations - press release
   FCC Announces Tentative Agenda For August 2015 Open Meeting - press release
   Seizing the Opportunities of Unlicensed Spectrum and Wireless Microphones - Chairman Wheeler press release
   Chairman Wheeler Addresses Spectrum Auction Questions
   FCC Poised to Reject Dish Partners’ Spectrum Discounts

WIRELESS/SPECTRUM
   A bitter clash at the FCC is gumming up one of the most important issues in tech right now
   Lawmakers and broadcasters to FCC: Avoid putting TV stations in duplex gap
   Chairman Wheeler Addresses Spectrum Auction Questions
   The surprising way smartphones are changing the way we shop [links to web]

INTERNET/BROADBAND
   US Addresses the Digital Divide Where it Lives - analysis
   Remarks of Lawrence Strickling Regarding Multistakeholder Process at Internet Governance Forum USA - speech
   For the Poor, Lifeline Prevents Dire Choices - Jessica González op-ed

CYBERSECURITY
   There’s A Plan to Immediately Purge Some Governmentwide Network Surveillance Data
   Major computer hacking forum shut down by 20 countries, US announces [links to web]
   Hackers for hire: How online forums make cybercrime easier than ever [links to web]
   Do Encrypted Phones Threaten National Security? - analysis [links to web]
   Dozens of phone apps with 300 million downloads vulnerable to password cracking [links to web]

PRIVACY
   Do Not Track 2.0 - op-ed [links to web]

OWNERSHIP
   Everything to know about the FTC’s antitrust review of Apple’s music business [links to web]
   21st Century Fox Unloads Spanish-Language MundoFox [links to web]

CONTENT
   Parents and Social Media - Pew research
   How moms won the Internet -- and what that means for the rest of us - analysis [links to web]
   The Washington Post tests new ‘Knowledge Map’ feature - press release [links to web]
   Do Americans deserve a 'right to be forgotten' rule from Google? - LA Times editorial [links to web]
   Ad Blockers, Internet Advertisers Play Cat and Mouse [links to web]

TELEVISION
   US Judge Says Internet Streaming Service Should Be Treated Like Cable
   Early morning, noon and late evening slots drive growth in local TV news - Pew research [links to web]
   Password Sharing: Are Netflix, HBO Missing $500 Million by Not Cracking Down? [links to web]

ELECTIONS AND MEDIA
   Social media aim for US politicians’ marketing budgets [links to web]
   Hollywood stars shell out for Hillary [links to web]
   Sen Ted Cruz makes New York Times' list [links to web]

HEALTH
   How your cellphone knows if you’re depressed. It has to do with how you move through time and space. [links to web]

DIVERSITY
   Silicon Valley struggles to hack its diversity problem [links to web]
   Will 'Girly' Tech Attract More Girls to Computer Programming? [links to web]

GOVERNMENT & COMMUNICATIONS
   After Dodging the Bullet that Hit OPM, Interior ‘Owns’ Up to Cyber Problem [links to web]
   FCC Wants to Operate 100 Percent in the Cloud by the End of 2017 [links to web]

POLICYMAKERS
   FCC Seeks Nominations for Twelve Board Member Positions on the Universal Service Administrative Company Board of Directors - public notice [links to web]
   Technology, telecommunications expert Sascha Meinrath named Palmer Chair at Penn State - press release [links to web]

COMPANY NEWS
   The National Journal to End Print Edition [links to web]

STORIES FROM ABROAD
   BBC, a Target of Conservatives, Faces a Review of Its Mission [links to web]
   Ofcom probes options to improve UK telecoms market [links to web]

back to top

NEWS FROM THE FCC MEETING

FCC REFORMS COMPETITIVE BIDDING RULES FOR SPECTRUM AUCTIONS
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Press release]
The Federal Communications Commission adopted a report and Order that modernizes and reforms polices designed to facilitate small business' ability to participate in spectrum auctions and the wireless marketplace. These polices are commonly known as the Designated Entity Rules. With the action, the FCC is taking the following steps to provide small businesses -- including enterprises owned by women and minorities -- with a better on-ramp into the wireless industry, to increase the participation of rural service providers in future auctions and to eliminate outdated rules that no longer reflect the developments in today’s wireless marketplace:
Elimination of the attributable material relationship rule that limited the amount of spectrum a small business could lease in order to provide small businesses the flexibility to leverage leasing and other spectrum use agreements to gain access to capital and operational experience.
Adoption of a first ever 15 percent bidding credit for qualifying service providers that provide commercial communications services to a customer base of fewer than 250,000 combined wireless, wireline, broadband, and cable subscribers and serve predominantly rural areas.
Establishment of a first ever cap on the total amount of bidding credits that a small business or rural service provider can receive in any particular auction. The cap will vary on a service-by-service and auction-by-auction basis. For the Incentive Auction, the Report and Order adopts a cap of$150 million for small businesses and a $10 million ceiling on the overall amount that any entity -- either a small business or rural service provider -- can receive in smaller markets.
Modifications to the FCC’s attribution rules to guard against unjust enrichment.
Amendment of the competitive bidding rules to prohibit joint bidding and multiple applications by one party as well as parties with common controlling interests except in limited circumstances.
benton.org/headlines/fcc-reforms-competitive-bidding-rules-spectrum-auctions | Federal Communications Commission
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


FCC ADOPTS PLAN TO MODERNIZE FIELD OPERATIONS
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Press release]
The Federal Communications Commission adopted a plan to modernize the agency’s field operations within the Enforcement Bureau. The proposal will improve efficiency, better position the agency to do effective radio interference detection and resolution and meet other enforcement needs, and save millions of dollars annually after implementation is complete. The field reorganization plan adopted by the FCC aligns the field’s structure, operations, expenses, and equipment with the agency’s priorities such as radio frequency interference. It also prepares the field to address future enforcement needs in an ever more complex spectrum environment, and aligns field operations to support this mission. Through this plan, the FCC is maintaining a commitment to respond in a timely manner to interference issues anywhere in the nation, including responding to all public safety spectrum complaints within one day.
benton.org/headlines/fcc-adopts-plan-modernize-field-operations | Federal Communications Commission | read the Order | Commissioner Pai | Commissioner O'Rielly
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


FCC ANNOUNCES TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR AUGUST OPEN MEETING
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: Press release]
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler announced that the following items are tentatively on the agenda for the August Open Commission Meeting scheduled for Thursday, August 6, 2015:
Emerging Wireline Networks and Services: The FCC will consider a Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that will advance longstanding competition and consumer protection policies on a technologically-neutral basis, and further the technology transitions underway in our Nation’s fixed communications networks
that offer the prospect of innovative and improved services to consumers and businesses alike.
Ensuring Continuity of 911 Communications: The FCC will consider a Report and Order that would protect consumers through the transitions from legacy copper networks to modern
networks by adopting rules to ensure that consumers have options, and sufficient information about those options, to maintain 911 communications at home during power outages.
Mobile Spectrum Holdings: The FCC will consider an Order on Reconsideration addressing petitions for reconsideration of certain aspects of the Mobile Spectrum Holdings
Report and Order.
Incentive Auction Procedures: The FCC will take the next step to commencing the incentive auction in the first quarter of 2016 by considering the Procedures Public Notice, which
adopts a balanced set of auction procedures that will ensure an effective, efficient, and timely auction. The Public Notice establishes and provides information on final procedures for setting
the initial spectrum clearing target, qualifying to bid, and bidding in the reverse and forward auctions.
Unlicensed Operations in TV Bands and 600 MHz Band: The FCC will consider a Report and Order that adopts technical and operational rules for unlicensed services, including wireless
microphone operations, in the broadcast television bands and in the post-incentive auction 600 MHz band. The rules are intended to maximize unlicensed access to spectrum while ensuring
that licensed services are protected from harmful interference.
Wireless Microphones: The FCC will consider a Report and Order that adopts a plan to accommodate the long-term needs of wireless microphone users by providing new opportunities for their use in the broadcast television bands and in several other frequency bands.
benton.org/headlines/fcc-announces-tentative-agenda-august-open-meeting | Federal Communications Commission
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITIES OF UNLICENSED SPECTRUM AND WIRELESS MICROPHONES
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission, AUTHOR: FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler]
In 2014, the Federal Communications Commission adopted an Incentive Auction Report & Order that proposes three channels for unlicensed use nationwide. While some have sought to define “nationwide” as synonymous as “uniform in every market,” that is most likely a physical impossibility that ignores how broadcast participation can vary in every market. I’m circulating two items for consideration, alongside the other Incentive Auction items, at August’s open meeting. The Part 15 Report and Order will assure unlicensed spectrum is available in every market. The Wireless Microphones Comprehensive Report & Order will address the long term needs of wireless microphone users. Our proposal would benefit consumers in the form of increased investment and innovation in unlicensed products and services. The proposal also helps those who rely on wireless microphones by altering operational parameters and expanding access to spectrum. The technical standards we are proposing for unlicensed operations would create certainty for unlicensed device users and manufacturers while reducing the risk of interference to licensed users. These items are important components of a suite of proposals that establish clear rules and protections for unlicensed devices as well as licensed wireless microphone devices in the Incentive Auction band as well as in other wireless bands where licensed wireless mics will gain additional access. These proposals join two other Incentive Auction-related items slated for consideration at August’s open meeting: a Public Notice establishing the bidding procedures for the Incentive Auction and the Reconsideration of the Mobile Spectrum Holdings Order. These items were originally scheduled for our July meeting, but were rescheduled for August 6.
benton.org/headlines/seizing-opportunities-unlicensed-spectrum-and-wireless-microphones | Federal Communications Commission
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


SPECTRUM AUCTION QUESTIONS
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
After a contentious Federal Communications Commission monthly meeting foreshortened when two controversial topics about the broadcast spectrum incentive auction were dropped from the agenda, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler faced a news conference where, predictably, the major interest was in those two topics. "I feel comfortable that we will be able to issue a public notice [about the auction] in three weeks," Chairman Wheeler said, insisting that his August 6 target date will stick for a vote on auction procedures. "We are working toward a solution that will make sure that there is a majority vote," he said. "When we bring it up, that will happen." He offered no details about how he plans to assure that both Democratic commissioners vote with him. Although Chairman Wheeler sidestepped the question of whether he can tailor the "duplex gap" issue in a way that will convince Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel to vote with him, Chairman Wheeler expounded on the data that explain solutions for spectrum repacking, which is believed to be at the core of Rosenworcel's dissatisfaction with the current plan. Several reports noted that Chairman Wheeler pulled the auction items because of Rosenworcel's reticence rather than because of congressional or NAB requests based on the release of limited repacking simulations.
benton.org/headlines/chairman-wheeler-addresses-spectrum-auction-questions | Multichannel News
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


FCC POISED TO REJECT DISH PARTNERS' SPECTRUM DISCOUNTS
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Thomas Gryta, Shalini Ramachandran, Ryan Knutson]
Apparently, the Federal Communications Commission is poised to reject $3.3 billion in discounts requested by partners of satellite-TV provider Dish Network in the government’s $45 billion airwave auction earlier in 2014. After a review of $13.3 billion of winning bids by two small companies backed by Dish, FCC officials concluded that the two entities didn’t qualify for the small-business discounts. Apparently, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler on July 15 circulated a draft order to the FCC’s other four commissioners. The auction, which lasted for more than two months, drew more than double the amount analysts expected. Dish’s entities were surprise second-place finishers with a total of $13.3 billion in winning bids. AT&T was the auction’s top bidder with $18.2 billion of licenses, and Verizon won $10.4 billion. Bidding is anonymous during the auction, but Dish and the two entities stayed in contact with one another because they disclosed the arrangement in advance. That meant there were instances where rivals saw three distinct bidders when in fact those were Dish and its partners working together. Dish has said it adhered to the rules and noted that its practices didn’t diverge from those employed by other companies in previous FCC auctions. For this auction, Dish had invested in two small companies, SNR Wireless and NorthStar Wireless, each of which applied for the FCC’s 25 percent discount for small businesses.
benton.org/headlines/fcc-poised-reject-dish-partners-spectrum-discounts | Wall Street Journal
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top

WIRELESS/SPECTRUM

A BITTER CLASH AT THE FCC IS GUMMING UP ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES IN TECH RIGHT NOW
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Brian Fung]
Bowing to pressure from Republican Representatives, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler won't be holding a hotly anticipated vote on rules for a looming, high-stakes auction of wireless airwaves. TV industry advocates say the real reason the vote fell apart was because Chairman Wheeler couldn't find enough Democratic votes to move ahead, in an indication of how fragile the FCC's Democratic majority can sometimes be. The discord, according to those advocates, stems from fears that the draft auction rules could unintentionally lead to interference between mobile devices. The FCC's proposal would have considered relocating some TV station channels into this gap. Mainly, these stations would be the ones that decided not to give up their airwaves to cell service providers such as Verizon and AT&T. But some within the FCC, such as FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, worried that plan would render some mobile technologies unusable, said Preston Padden, a former Disney executive who now leads a coalition of TV stations interested in selling their airwave rights. But because the FCC is not offering enough money to TV stations to entice them to sell, the FCC "is saying, 'Oh no, we're going to have to jam broadcasters in [the duplex gap] and that's what caused the fight," said Padden, whose coalition members would benefit from a higher auction price. (The auction works by having the government buy up the TV stations' airwave rights and then reselling them to cellular carriers.) Padden claimed that if the FCC offered 5 percent more money to broadcasters, more of them would agree to sell -- and fewer would need to be relocated. "They're being penny wise and pound foolish, and that's why they've got this problem," said Padden.
benton.org/headlines/bitter-clash-fcc-gumming-one-most-important-issues-tech-right-now | Washington Post
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


LAWMAKERS AND BROADCASTERS TO FCC: AVOID PUTTING TV STATIONS IN DUPLEX GAP
[SOURCE: Katy on the Hill, AUTHOR: Kathryn Bachman]
In a letter to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler on July 15, Sens Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Cory Booker (D-NJ) urged Chairman Wheeler to preserve the duplex gap for unlicensed and wireless mics. “A diverse coalition of broadcasters, tech companies, and consumer advocates have raised concerns that placing broadcasters in the duplex gap will complicate and inhibit live news reporting in major urban areas. Furthermore, the current proposal would deprive millions of Americans of the full benefit of next generation unlicensed technologies, including Wi Fi, enabled by making three channels available for unlicensed use on a national basis,” wrote the Senators. Disney, CBS, FOX and NBCUniversal, Univision, along with affiliate organizations jointly wrote to the FCC asking that the agency preserve reserved spectrum for use by wireless microphones that are critical to news gathering. “We are concerned that, as part of the incentive auction re-packing, the FCC may place TV stations in the portion of the duplex gap that the FCC previously reserved for use solely by wireless microphones. Although we understand that the FCC intends to minimize the number of markets in which this could happen, we remain concerned that the implications of this decision have not been fully explored, as well as with the level of uncertainty about which and how many markets will be impacted by this potential decision."
benton.org/headlines/lawmakers-and-broadcasters-fcc-avoid-putting-tv-stations-duplex-gap | Katy on the Hill
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top

INTERNET/BROADBAND

US ADDRESSES THE DIGITAL DIVIDE WHERE IT LIVES
[SOURCE: Benton Foundation, AUTHOR: Kevin Taglang]
[Commentary] The biggest news of the week was, of course, the historic accord reached by Iran and a group of six nations led by the United States to significantly limit Tehran’s nuclear ability for more than a decade in return for lifting international oil and financial sanctions. But there was big news in telecommunications, too, as President Barack Obama and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Julián Castro announced ConnectHome, an initiative to extend affordable broadband access to families living in HUD-assisted housing. Through ConnectHome, Internet service providers, non-profits and the private sector will offer broadband access, technical training, digital literacy programs, and devices for residents in assisted housing units in 28 communities across the nation. Appearing at a school in Durant, Oklahoma, in the heart of the Choctaw Nation, where 32 percent of children live in poverty, President Obama said it is unacceptable for young people not to have access to the same technological resources in their homes that their wealthier counterparts do. Among them could be “the next Mark Zuckerberg, the next Bill Gates,” he said. “If we don’t get these young people the access to what they need to achieve their potential, then it’s our loss; it’s not just their loss.”
https://www.benton.org/blog/us-addresses-digital-divide-where-it-lives
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


REMARKS OF LAWRENCE STRICKLING REGARDING MULTISTAKEHOLDER PROCESS AT INTERNET GOVERNANCE FORUM USA
[SOURCE: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, AUTHOR: Lawrence Strickling]
I will use my time this morning to take stock of the multistakeholder process as a tool for addressing the key issues that exist in the Internet policy space and to reaffirm our strong support for the model in the work we do. In the next several weeks, National Telecommunications and Information Administration will be kicking off two new multistakeholder processes. The first will tackle issues related to privacy, transparency and accountability regarding unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). Our first meeting is scheduled for August 3. The second new process will focus on cybersecurity vulnerability disclosures and will get underway in September. We will also be reconvening the facial recognition privacy multistakeholder process on July 28. In all three instances, we selected the topics after soliciting broad input from the community. I realize these multistakeholder processes collide with the culture of Washington. It is more comfortable for companies to hire a team of lobbyists to work the regulatory agencies, lobby the Hill, and hire litigation specialists to represent their interests. It is how things have been done in this town for decades. But we’re talking about the Internet here. The Internet has disrupted many entrenched industries from newspapers to travel to taxicabs. Perhaps it’s time for some Internet thinking by businesses to disrupt how business is done in Washington. Imagine what could be accomplished with the brightest technologists, policy makers and academics who come together in good faith to debate and reach consensus on the solutions for our most important policy challenges in the Internet age. That’s the promise of the multistakeholder model.
benton.org/headlines/remarks-lawrence-strickling-regarding-multistakeholder-process-internet-governance-forum | National Telecommunications and Information Administration
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top


LIFELINE PREVENTS DIRE CHOICES
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Jessica González]
[Commentary] The Wall Street Journal’s July 11 editorial “Who Needs an ObamaPhone?” wrongly suggests that Lifeline, which provides a modest subsidy to families struggling to afford basic communications services, may be unnecessary. Subsidy or not, it is clearly reasonable for poor families to prioritize access to communications so that they may call 911 in an emergency, communicate with employers, contact a child’s school or interact with health-care professionals. For many, paying a phone bill means other needs will go unmet. In millions of American homes, Lifeline allows families to avoid the tough choice between staying connected or keeping roofs above heads, food on plates and clothes on backs. The Economic Policy Institute estimates a family of three (two parents, one child) in Hickman County, Tenn., in Rep. Marsha Blackburn’s district, needs to earn $48,000 a year to cover housing, food, child care, transportation, health care, taxes and other necessities—and attain “a secure yet modest” standard of living. However, a family living at 135% of the federal poverty guideline, and therefore eligible for Lifeline, earns about $27,000 per year—almost half of what it actually needs to cover critical expenses. It’s no wonder that 320,000 families in Tennessee utilize Lifeline. For some families, this difficult balancing act can ultimately prove unsustainable without help. Nearly 44% of smartphone users making less than $30,000 a year reported having to cancel or suspend service due to the financial burden.
[González is Executive Vice President and General Counsel at the National Hispanic Media Coalition]
benton.org/headlines/poor-lifeline-prevents-dire-choices | Wall Street Journal
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top

CYBERSECURITY

THERE'S A PLAN TO IMMEDIATELY PURGE SOME GOVERNMENTWIDE NETWORK SURVEILLANCE DATA
[SOURCE: nextgov, AUTHOR: Aliya Sternstein]
After a series of stinging government hacks, the Department of Homeland Security said scans of incoming Internet traffic from the public would be amped up. It has been unclear how this monitoring might affect the privacy of citizens and employees. Now, a little-noticed National Archives and Records Administration assessment offers some insight: Any surveillance data collected that does not trigger alarms will be erased pronto, according to a pending records disposal plan. DHS’ National Cybersecurity Protection System, better known as EINSTEIN, collects streams of traffic containing, among other things, e-mails and Web-surfing habits, to flag patterns indicative of known malicious attacks. On June 9, NARA tentatively green-lighted a DHS request to "destroy or delete immediately" information "inadvertently collected or captured by any or all NCPS capabilities that are determined not to be related to known or suspected cyberthreats or vulnerabilities." Such data typically includes anything from authorized online banking sessions to, some federal employees suspect, porn-site visits. "It’s likely they are bulk-collecting data and to avoid any accusations of monitoring things they aren't chartered to monitor, they must purge the data," said Jason Lewis, chief collections and intelligence officer at LookingGlass Cyber Solutions. EINSTEIN "casts a wide collection net, so they have to delete information they didn't intend to capture."
benton.org/headlines/theres-plan-immediately-purge-some-governmentwide-network-surveillance-data | nextgov
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top

CONTENT

PARENTS AND SOCIAL MEDIA
[SOURCE: Pew Internet, Science and Tech, AUTHOR: Maeve Duggan, Amanda Lenhart, Cliff Lampe, Nicole Ellison]
Social media networks have become vital channels for Americans’ daily interactions. Users rely on these platforms to keep in touch with family and friends, gather information and share what is important to them. This report explores how parents -- 75 percent of whom use social media -- turn to social media for parenting-related information and social support. Among the findings:
Mothers are heavily engaged on social media, both giving and receiving a high level of support via their networks. 81 percent of parents who use social media try to respond to good news others share in their networks, including 45 percent of social-media-using parents who “strongly agree” that they do so. Some 53 percent of mothers say they “strongly agree,” compared with 33 percent of fathers who say that.
Social media is broadly viewed as a source of useful information and as one parenting tool among a collection of options. Mothers use it as a parenting resource slightly more often than fathers.
Few parents say they have felt uncomfortable when information about their children is shared by other family members or caregivers on social media.
Parents, like non-parents, use a variety of social media platforms.
Parents are particularly active on Facebook and LinkedIn, while non-parents use Instagram more frequently.
benton.org/headlines/parents-and-social-media | Pew Internet
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top

TELEVISION

STREAMING LIKE CABLE
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Andrew Chung]
US District Judge George Wu in Los Angeles ruled that online television service FilmOn X should be treated like a traditional cable system in order to transmit the programs of the nation’s broadcasters over the Internet. The ruling, coming as consumer TV-watching habits are increasingly migrating to the Internet, is the first to first to view a streaming service like a cable provider and could have major implications for broadcasters if it is upheld by higher courts. Judge Wu ruled that FilmOn X is entitled to a compulsory license under the Copyright Act to retransmit the broadcasters’ programs if it meets the law’s requirements. Acknowledging the major commercial consequences of his decision, Judge Wu said he would allow an immediate appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. He also left in place an injunction against FilmOn X’s operations that the broadcasters had won in 2012, so FilmOn will still not able to stream their content pending the appeal. John Bergmayer, Senior Staff Attorney at Public Knowledge, said, "If upheld, this decision could help bring more competition to the video marketplace. Similar services shouldn't be subject to totally different rules depending on whether they’re offered over coaxial cable, fiber, satellite transmissions, or online.”
benton.org/headlines/us-judge-says-internet-streaming-service-should-be-treated-cable | Reuters | Public Knowledge
Share: Twitter | Facebook
back to top

US Addresses the Digital Divide Where it Lives

[Commentary] The biggest news of the week was, of course, the historic accord reached by Iran and a group of six nations led by the United States to significantly limit Tehran’s nuclear ability for more than a decade in return for lifting international oil and financial sanctions. But there was big news in telecommunications, too, as President Barack Obama and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Julián Castro announced ConnectHome, an initiative to extend affordable broadband access to families living in HUD-assisted housing. Through ConnectHome, Internet service providers, non-profits and the private sector will offer broadband access, technical training, digital literacy programs, and devices for residents in assisted housing units in 28 communities across the nation. Appearing at a school in Durant, Oklahoma, in the heart of the Choctaw Nation, where 32 percent of children live in poverty, President Obama said it is unacceptable for young people not to have access to the same technological resources in their homes that their wealthier counterparts do. Among them could be “the next Mark Zuckerberg, the next Bill Gates,” he said. “If we don’t get these young people the access to what they need to achieve their potential, then it’s our loss; it’s not just their loss.”

For the Poor, Lifeline Prevents Dire Choices

[Commentary] The Wall Street Journal’s July 11 editorial “Who Needs an ObamaPhone?” wrongly suggests that Lifeline, which provides a modest subsidy to families struggling to afford basic communications services, may be unnecessary.

Subsidy or not, it is clearly reasonable for poor families to prioritize access to communications so that they may call 911 in an emergency, communicate with employers, contact a child’s school or interact with health-care professionals. For many, paying a phone bill means other needs will go unmet. In millions of American homes, Lifeline allows families to avoid the tough choice between staying connected or keeping roofs above heads, food on plates and clothes on backs. The Economic Policy Institute estimates a family of three (two parents, one child) in Hickman County, Tenn., in Rep. Marsha Blackburn’s district, needs to earn $48,000 a year to cover housing, food, child care, transportation, health care, taxes and other necessities—and attain “a secure yet modest” standard of living. However, a family living at 135% of the federal poverty guideline, and therefore eligible for Lifeline, earns about $27,000 per year—almost half of what it actually needs to cover critical expenses. It’s no wonder that 320,000 families in Tennessee utilize Lifeline. For some families, this difficult balancing act can ultimately prove unsustainable without help. Nearly 44% of smartphone users making less than $30,000 a year reported having to cancel or suspend service due to the financial burden.

[González is Executive Vice President and General Counsel at the National Hispanic Media Coalition]