October 2015

The Future of the Internet Is Flow

[Commentary] The conventional website is “space-organized.” Instead it might have been “time-organized,” like a parade.

We go to the Internet for many reasons, but most often to discover what’s new. Today, time-based structures, flowing data—in streams, feeds, blogs—increasingly dominate the Web. Flow has become the basic organizing principle of the cybersphere. The trend is widely understood, but its implications aren’t. Your future home page—the screen you go to first on your phone, laptop or TV—is a bouquet of your favorite streams from all over. News streams are blended with shopping streams, blogs, your friends’ streams, each running at its own speed. This home stream includes your personal stream as part of the blend—emails, documents and so on. Your home stream is just one tiny part of the world stream. You can see your home stream in 3-D on your laptop or desktop, in constant motion on your phone or as a crawl on your big TV. By watching one stream, you watch the whole world—all the public and private events you care about. To keep from being overwhelmed, you adjust each stream’s flow rate when you add it to your collection.

[Gelernter is a professor of computer science at Yale. Freeman is a founder of WickedlySmart]

AT&T testing fixed wireless local loop services with speeds of 15-25 Mbps

AT&T is currently testing fixed wireless local loop technology in select areas of the country with local residents who want to try the service, including in Alabama, Georgia, Kansas and Virginia, and is seeing speeds of around 15 to 25 Mbps.

The operation is part of AT&T’s work with the Federal Communications Commission's Connect America Fund; AT&T has promised to provide connectivity to over 1 million locations with speeds of at least 10 Mbps down and 1 Mbps up. "We'll do that through a variety of options, one of which may be fixed wireless local loop, which is currently being trialed," AT&T said.

Charter may need to build “gigabit” networks for New York to approve deal

New York state regulators are suggesting Charter Communications should build “gigabit” Internet networks in the state’s largest markets as part of the company’s $55 billion proposed acquisition of Time Warner Cable.

The suggestion was included in a Sept. 16 report by staff at the state Public Service Commission, which is reviewing the merger as part of its regulation of the utility markets in New York. Charter, which is already planning to sell Internet service that is faster and cheaper than Time Warner Cable’s existing plans, threw cold water on the idea of being forced to build out gigabit networks across the state. In a filing made with the commission, Charter’s lawyers argued that federal law prohibited the government from dictating which technologies or Internet speeds a cable company offers the public.

“There is no reason for the commission to take the unprecedented step of conditioning its approval of this transaction on the provision of certain minimum broadband speeds,” Charter wrote. Charter spokesman Justin Venich says the company’s plans for the state already include bringing Internet speeds of 100 Mbps or higher to upstate customers within two and a half years as it converts to an all-digital network, a move in line with the Cuomo administration’s goal to have universal 100 Mbps Internet service in place by the end of 2018.

Government Broadband Monopolies Bad For Consumers

[Commentary] On September 21st, President Barack Obama’s Broadband Opportunity Council released its first report. The council outlined four main recommendations for promoting broadband, but the council’s report was also notable for what it left out – any specific mention of municipally-run broadband services.

The omission was particularly stunning considering the Federal Communications Commission voted to overturn municipal broadband laws in North Carolina and Tennessee, a move that will allow government-owned networks (GONs) in that state to expand. President Obama also promoted municipal broadband networks in advance of his State of the Union in January. Perhaps the members of the Broadband Opportunity Council, understand the risks associated with GONs better than the President’s White House advisers, or certain members of the FCC. For policymakers looking to advance broadband in their city, county or state, the White House’s Broadband Opportunity Council offers some suggestions. Those options include streamlining the permitting process for new broadband projects and expanding federal support for broadband investments. Those options are worthy ones to consider, and ones that will truly result in better competitive options for consumers. The Council’s omission of GONs as one of the options is correct. We should avoid broadband at government speeds.

[Pociask is president and CEO of the American Consumer Institute]