January 2016

Top US tech firms battle UK surveillance bill

The biggest US tech powers have joined forces to oppose a proposed British surveillance law that could give government investigators greater access to encrypted digital data. The draft measure, known as the Investigator Powers Bill, would require Internet companies to retain customers’ Web activity for up to a year and compel them to help investigators access that data upon request.

In a joint submission to a committee of British lawmakers, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Twitter and Yahoo cautioned that the bill would set “a very dangerous precedent.” Enabling governments to manipulate companies’ encrypted devices “could involve the introduction of risks or vulnerabilities into products or services,” the coalition said in its comments, which the committee published Jan 7. “We would urge your government to reconsider.” Tech giant Apple recently filed its own separate submission making the same argument. The proposed measure has become the latest point of contention in the heated debate over encryption standards and government surveillance authority. Law enforcement officials say they need greater access to secured digital data to uncover potential terrorist plots, an argument that has gained ground in the wake of the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino (CA). But privacy activists and technologists warn that any form of guaranteed access to encrypted data risks exposing broad swaths of sensitive information to hackers, as well as government investigators.

Ad Wars of 2016 Campaign Erupt in a Changing TV Arena

The ad wars of the 2016 election are at hand. “We’re getting down to the firing-squad part of the campaign,” said Larry McCarthy, the strategist making ads for Right to Rise, Jeb Bush’s super PAC. “It’s like the end of the Quentin Tarantino movie, where everyone is shooting everyone else.” It is also a huge bet that television advertisements will remain a crucial, even decisive, political battlefield when signs increasingly suggest otherwise. Candidates and their allies spent nearly $100 million on political advertising in 2014, including $72 million in Iowa and New Hampshire alone, Kantar Media/CMAG estimated. Much of that was spent by candidates promoting themselves, not attacking their rivals. Yet the biggest spenders reaped only scant improvement in the polls.

Now, with three and a half weeks until the Iowa caucuses, presidential campaigns that spent much of 2015 wooing donors and amassing large amounts of money are spending that money hand over fist, feverishly vying to buy time during every popular show from morning to late-night TV. From Jan 3 to Jan 7 alone, according to Kantar, candidates and their allies in both parties spent an estimated $5.9 million on television ads — roughly a third of what was spent in the 2012 Republican primary from the beginning of 2011 through the Iowa caucuses. And much more of it now is going toward attempts to take down their rivals.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Preserving a Free and Open Internet

[Commentary] The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) has first-ever commitments that will promote a free and open digital economy and serve as a template for 21st century trade agreements going forward. TPP contains a comprehensive set of commitments to promote a free and open Internet, including provisions to:

  • Promote the free flow of data.
  • Combat forced localization of server capacity.
  • Prevent forced tech transfer.
  • Enhance transparency and public participation.
  • Strengthen consumer protection.
  • Open markets for digital goods and services.
  • Establish duty-free treatment for IT goods.
  • Promote competitive telecom markets.
  • Facilitate digital trade and e-commerce.
  • Achieve a balanced approach to IP.

[Alan Davidson is the first director of Digital Economy at the U.S. Department of Commerce, and senior adviser to the Secretary of Commerce]