February 2016

Why Sharing is the Answer to Rising Demand for Spectrum

It is clear that we can’t meet the challenges that arise from increased demand by using the traditional methods of spectrum reallocation, which often take too long and cost too much money. Innovation in spectrum use must be met with innovation in spectrum allocation. The answer is spectrum sharing, a flexible and evolving option that is helping to optimize this resource to the benefit of both the public and private sectors.

Sharing offers increased access to both federal and non-federal users. It’s also more flexible and efficient than the typical process of relocating federal operations. And it’s an improving science – researchers at the Center for Advanced Communications (CAC) in Boulder are focused on cutting-edge spectrum sharing research and development, experimentation and testing. At its core, however, spectrum sharing is nothing new. Business and government already share a large amount of spectrum today. Take the spectrum within the 225 MHz to 3700 MHz range, which has historically been viewed as the most valuable spectrum for commercial use. One of the myths that has entered the conversation around spectrum policy is that the federal government controls as much as 70 percent of that range. However, that figure fails to account for the significant number of shared frequencies that are assigned to both federal and non-federal users on a primary basis.

Twin Cities families get needed lift across digital divide

The divide is deep in our Twin Cities. Only 57 percent of residents of the Phillips neighborhood have computers with Internet access, as do 65 percent of residents on the Near North Side, compared with 82 percent of households citywide. That’s why an 11th-hour save by Internet provider Comcast deserves our thanks.

Comcast leapt in to partner with St. Paul-based PCs for People to offer 8,500 Twin Cities families low-priced Internet services that they were about to lose. PCs for People’s executive director, Casey Sorensen, explained that along with giving away nearly 10,000 refurbished computers this year, his nonprofit has offered Internet services to thousands of low-income Twin Citians through a wireless-data network from Sprint. When Sprint suddenly announced it was shutting down its outdated network in early November, Sorensen scrambled to keep his clients connected. Comcast’s “Internet Essentials” offers high-speed home Internet for $10 a month, plus free Wi-Fi, free installation and free Internet training. No contract or credit check is required, which sets it apart from other providers, Sorensen said. Families getting wind of the news are jumping in to register.

Idea to retire: IT-led service innovation

[Commentary] With the rising importance of technology in our daily lives and in the transformation of governmental operations and service delivery, the idea of “IT-led service innovation” must be abandoned.

The proposition here seems counter-intuitive. Today, public managers at all levels of the government often turn to technology as a solution to cut costs, improve operational efficiency, and meet the quality and performance expectations of the public. Given the prominent role of technology in these transformations of public service management and delivery, it is natural to think that the Information Technology (IT) Department or the Chief Information Officer (CIO) should lead a public organization’s groundbreaking initiatives. However, this idea is actually counterproductive and can stifle the effectiveness of innovative change in public organizations. Technologies are only delivery tools, not the ultimate goal. Innovation has to serve the mission and program goals of an organization and innovative ideas have to be grounded in the needs and interests of the target clients and service providers. Any adoption of a new technology should be considered within the core values and strategies of an organization.

[Alfred Ho is a faculty member of the School of Public Affairs and Administration at the University of Kansas. Edinger is the Chief Performance Officer for the City & County of Denver, Colorado.]