March 2016

Experts: Broadband Key to Boosting Higher Ed Access for Poor

A federal program that provides phone service to the poor could boost access to higher education if the program is upgraded to include broadband service, panelists said March 23. “We’re talking about access to the same opportunities,” said Phillip Berenbroick, counsel for government affairs at Public Knowledge. “If you’re a high school student and you can get broadband because you have a Lifeline subsidy, you’re talking about being able to learn more about the opportunities available to you,” Berenbroick said. Berenbroick made his remarks at the New America Foundation during a panel discussion titled “Bringing All Americans Online: How Updates to the FCC’s Lifeline Program Can Improve Opportunities for Underserved Communities.” [Benton Foundation sponsored the event]

Experts: Broadband Key to Boosting Higher Ed Access for Poor

A federal program that provides phone service to the poor could boost access to higher education if the program is upgraded to include broadband service, panelists said March 23. “We’re talking about access to the same opportunities,” said Phillip Berenbroick, counsel for government affairs at Public Knowledge. “If you’re a high school student and you can get broadband because you have a Lifeline subsidy, you’re talking about being able to learn more about the opportunities available to you,” Berenbroick said. Berenbroick made his remarks at the New America Foundation during a panel discussion titled “Bringing All Americans Online: How Updates to the FCC’s Lifeline Program Can Improve Opportunities for Underserved Communities.” [Benton Foundation sponsored the event]

Rural Healthcare's Broadband Gap Widens

[Commentary] Healthcare institutions in non-metro counties have significantly slower broadband than metropolitan institutions do, a new study shows. And the gap is getting bigger. Rural hospitals fare better than stand-alone facilities like clinics, pharmacies, or health departments. The study suggests that healthcare facilities in non-metropolitan counties connect with relatively slow speeds when compared to their metro counterparts. The finding comes at a time when healthcare field has changed dramatically, with technologies such as Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) becoming commonplace. These technologies require Internet connections – and, as more and more data is being transferred, those connections need to be fast.

The study takes advantage of the fact that the National Broadband Map gathered data on connectivity speeds for a variety of “Community Anchor Institutions” – including health care facilities – during its run from 2010 to 2014. Each state surveyed their own facilities, and the resulting database included over 35,000 healthcare entities in 2010 and increased to over 62,000 in 2014. The location of each facility was also recorded, allowing for analysis of whether the connection speeds varied across metro / non-metro designations. The results show a significant difference in the speeds at which healthcare facilities connect between metro and non-metro areas. In 2010, 14% of all healthcare facilities in metropolitan areas had the fastest category of connections (at least 50 Megabits per second (MBPS)). Comparatively, only about 5% of healthcare facilities in non-metro counties had connections of that speed. Non-metro facilities also had higher rates of the lowest category of speeds (< 3 MBPS), with 38% (vs. 33% in metro areas).

[Brian Whitacre is associate professor and extension economist at Oklahoma State University. The study is forthcoming in the Journal of Rural Health and is entitled “What Can the National Broadband Map Tell Us About the Healthcare Connectivity Gap?]

The state has lost control: tech firms now run western politics

[Commentary] By now, the fact that transatlantic democratic capitalism, once the engine of postwar prosperity, has run into trouble can hardly be denied by anyone with the courage to browse a daily newspaper. Hunger, homelessness, toxic chemicals in the water supply, the lack of affordable housing: all these issues are back on the agenda, even in the most prosperous of countries. This appalling decline in living standards was some time in the making – 40 years of neoliberal policies are finally taking their toll – so it shouldn’t come as a shock.

Today, however, there’s a major change. While the financial industry has historically been key to “buying time” and staving off the populist rebellion, in the future that role will be assigned to the technology industry, with a minor role played by the global advertising markets – the very magic wand that allows so many digital services to be offered for free, in exchange for our data. Since all this data generated on digital platforms has an immense market value, it can be profitably sold off to fit any holes in the budget – including by governments themselves. Universities, insurance firms, banks: plenty of companies would be happy to buy it. There’s something even more sinister afoot though. “Buying time” no longer seems like an adequate description of what is happening, if only because technology companies, even more so than the banks, are not only too big too fail but also impossible to undo – let alone replicate – even if a new government is elected.

[Evgeny Morozov is a contributing editor to Foreign Policy and runs the magazine's Net Effect blog. He is a visiting scholar at Stanford University and a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation.]

My Shared Shame: The Media Helped Make Trump

[Commentary] Those of us in the news media have sometimes blamed Donald Trump’s rise on the Republican Party’s toxic manipulation of racial resentments over the years. But we should also acknowledge another force that empowered Trump: Us. I polled a number of journalists and scholars, and there was a broad (though not universal) view that we in the media screwed up.

Our first big failing was that television in particular handed Trump the microphone without adequately fact-checking him or rigorously examining his background, in a craven symbiosis that boosted audiences for both. “Trump is not just an instant ratings/circulation/clicks gold mine; he’s the motherlode,” Ann Curry, the former “Today” anchor, told me. “He stepped on to the presidential campaign stage precisely at a moment when the media is struggling against deep insecurities about its financial future. The truth is, the media has needed Trump like a crack addict needs a hit.” Curry says she’s embarrassed by the unfairness to other Republican candidates, who didn’t get nearly the same airtime. Media elites rightly talk about our insufficient racial, ethnic and gender diversity, but we also lack economic diversity. We inhabit a middle-class world and don’t adequately cover the part of America that is struggling and seething. We spend too much time talking to senators, not enough to the jobless. Despite some outstanding coverage of Trump, on the whole we in the media empowered a demagogue and failed the country. We were lap dogs, not watchdogs.

Black caucus treads carefully into Apple-FBI fight

The Congressional Black Caucus is taking a cautious stance in the fight between Apple and the FBI over a locked iPhone even as prominent civil rights groups rush to back the tech giant. “We have not taken a position on it,” said Caucus Chairman G. K. Butterfield (D-NC).

The case has raised significant civil rights concerns, and other prominent African-American leaders and Black Lives Matter supporters are lining up behind Apple in its defiance of an FBI court order directing it to unlock the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino (CA) shooters. Those activists say an FBI win would set off a slippery slope of intrusive government data requests that would most directly affect minorities and political activists. But the CBC says it has no plans to issue a letter or statement similarly siding with Apple. Instead, several CBC members said they believe they can help find common ground in the divisive fight that has pitted law enforcement and the government against the tech community and privacy advocates. “We have a different role than our civil rights leaders and others,” said Rep Cedric Richmond (D-LA), a CBC member who is also Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies. “We have responsibilities to go into our SCIF [sensitive compartmented information facility], our confidential briefings, our classified briefings and make sure we’re getting all the information."

American Tech Giants Face Fight in Europe Over Encrypted Data

Silicon Valley’s battle over encryption is heading to Europe. In the United States, the FBI’s demands that Apple help “unlock” an iPhone used by a mass killer in California opened a heated debate on privacy. After recent attacks on the Continent, like the bombings in Brussels and the wave of violence in Paris last November, governments across the European Union are increasingly pushing for greater access to people’s digital lives.

French lawmakers are expected to debate proposals to toughen laws, giving intelligence services greater power to get access to personal data. The battle has pitted Europe’s fears about the potential for further attacks against concerns from Apple and other American technology giants like Google and Facebook that weakening encryption technologies may create so-called back doors to people’s digital information that could be misused by European law enforcement officials, or even intelligence agencies of unfriendly countries. The recent attacks have pushed many Europeans to favor greater powers for law enforcement over privacy. But opponents say such measures should not undermine the region’s tough data protection rules that enshrine privacy on par with other rights like freedom of expression. This balance between national security and privacy has put major countries in the region on opposite sides of the debate, with Germany and the Netherlands dismissing encryption laws being considered by Britain and France.

Mother Mary Angelica, Who Founded Catholic TV Network, Dies at 92

Mother Mary Angelica of the Annunciation, a cloistered Franciscan nun and media entrepreneur who founded the largest Roman Catholic television network in the country, and used it unstintingly to criticize liberalizing trends in the Catholic Church, died on March 27. She was 92. The cause was complications of a stroke, according to a statement posted online by the Eternal Word Television Network, the media organization she founded.

Mother Angelica launched the Eternal Word Television Network in 1981 with $200, a makeshift studio in a monastery’s garage in Irondale (AL) and one on-air personality, herself. By the time she retired in 2001 after a series of debilitating strokes, her homespun half-hour program of advice and commentary, “Mother Angelica Live,” was the anchor of a 24-hour Catholic programming network reaching over 100 million homes in the United States, South America, Africa and Europe. In a YouTube video announcing her death, Raymond Arroyo, the managing editor of EWTN News and a biographer of Mother Angelica, said she was the only woman in television history to found and lead a cable network for 20 years. A 1995 profile in Time magazine called her “an improbable superstar of religious broadcasting and arguably the most influential Roman Catholic woman in America.”