The Clinton campaign’s totally bogus claim about its press availability
[Commentary] It's been six months since Hillary Clinton held a news conference, and reporters are beginning to complain. The likely Democratic presidential nominee told CNN's Jake Tapper that she is "sure" she will conduct one soon. But the Clinton campaign's contention is that disgruntled journalists are arguing semantics here.
Technically, yes, it has been a long time since the candidate's last formal news conference, but she routinely answers questions in other settings, press secretary Brian Fallon argued on CNN. A news conference, he said, "oftentimes is just defined by whether you have a banner behind you or a podium in front of you." Fallon added this: "Oftentimes ... we will do an 'avail' — what would be known as an avail to the people in your business — where she informally comes out after an event has concluded, after she's taken some photos and some selfies, and she will literally stand there for 15, 20 minutes and answer questions from her traveling press corps, including the embeds from the various networks." Except this is not true. If Clinton were truly in the habit of fielding questions from reporters for an extended period of time — a period of time that resembles the duration of a news conference — then griping about the informal nature of the sessions would indeed be harder to justify. Talking to reporters in a scrum isn't particularly conducive to live television — and the comparison here is to Trump's regularly scheduled news conferences, which cable channels often air live — but at least Clinton would be submitting herself to a similar level of questioning.