February 2017

Getting Internet Companies to Do the Right Thing

[Commentary] New America’s Open Technology Institute has been working on answering this question: how do you get companies to do the right thing? We’ve studied three positive privacy and security practices that have been adopted by internet companies over the years—first by a few companies as an innovative new practice, then as a best practice by more companies, and finally as an established standard practice by most of the industry—so that we could chart the different events and influences that helped make that widespread adoption possible. Our hope was that by looking across several cases, we could identify what types of political, technical, and social interventions were most likely to help spur widespread change at the industry level, and could maybe even provide a roadmap for future advocates to follow.

Specifically, OTI’s new “Do The Right Thing” project has mapped the key milestones along the road to adoption for three major privacy and security practices that have now become standard in the internet industry: (1) publishing transparency reports that detail government demands for user data, (2) encrypting web traffic by default (as of the end of last year, over half of all web traffic is now encrypted!) and (3) offering two-factor authentication (2FA) to better guard your online accounts against unauthorized intruders.

Arizona State University, New America, and Slate
Thursday, February 23, 2017
6:00 PM – 9:00 PM CST
Mexico City, Mexico
https://www.newamerica.org/future-tense/events/will-internet-set-us-free/

Agenda

6:00 - 6:30: Reconciling Freedom and Security in a Digital Age

Jonathan Koppell
Dean and Professor, College of Public Service and Community Solutions, Arizona State University
Author, World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy and the Design of Global Governance
@DeanKoppell

Katherine Mangu-Ward
Editor in Chief, Reason
Future Tense Fellow, New America
@kmanguward

Carlos Bravo Regidor
Coordinador De La Maestría En Periodismo Y Asuntos Públicos, Centro De Estudios Y Docencia Económicas
@carlosbravoreg

Moderator:
Andrés Martinez
Editorial Director, Future Tense
Professor of Practice, Cronkite School, Arizona State University.
@andresDCmtz

6:30 - 7:10: Free Speech, Censorship and Disinformation

León Krauze
Anchor, Univisión
Author, La mesa: Historias de nuestra genre
Wallis Annenberg Chair in Journalism, University of Southern California
@LeonKrauze

Emily Parker
Author, Now I Know Who My Comrades Are: Voices From the Internet Underground
Future Tense Fellow, New America
@emilydparker

Moderator:
Andrés Martinez

7:10 - 7:30: Big Brother Inc.

Mark Hass
Professor of practice, Cronkite School and the W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University
Former CEO, Edelman U.S.
@markhass

Moderator:
Andrés Martinez

7:30 - 8:00: When Citizens Mobilize With Data

Dan Gilmor
Professor of Practice, Cronkite School, Arizona State University
Author, We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People
Future Tense Fellow, New America
@dangillmor

Gabriella Gómez-Mont
Director and Founder, Laboratorio Para La Ciudad
@Gabriella_Lab

Alexandra Zapata Hojel
Senior Researcher, Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad
Coordinator, Mejora tu Escuela
@azapatah

Moderator:
León Krauze

8:00 - 8:40: Combating Secretive Governments with Transparency

Alfredo Corchado
Southwest Borderlands Initiative Professor, Cronkite School, Arizona State University
Author, Midnight in Mexico
@ajcorchado

Carlos Brito
Director de Incidencia, Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales
@Britovsky

Shane Harris
Senior National Security Writer, The Wall Street Journal
Author, @War: The Rise of the Military-Internet Complex
@shaneharris

Shane Harris
Presidenta, Consejo Nacional para Prevenir la Discriminacion
@ahaasp

Moderator:
León Krauze

Reception to follow



THIS HEARING HAS BEEN POSTPONED

Federal Communications Commission Reauthorization

Communications and Technology Subcommittee
House Commerce Committee
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
https://energycommerce.house.gov/news-center/press-releases/blackburn-an...

A hearing examining the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) reauthorization, budget, spectrum auctions, and proceedings.

All three current commissioners are set to testify.

THIS HEARING HAS BEEN POSTPONED



Republicans are ready to take down the FCC

Newly-appointed Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai has already chipped away at network neutrality, slowed a program that assists low-income households with broadband access, and hurt efforts to reform exorbitant calling fees for inmates — and that’s just his first two weeks on the job. The chairman of the FCC has exceptional power over what the commission does and how it functions. And that means Chairman Pai, more than anyone else right now, has control over the fate of not just hot-button issues like net neutrality, but the competitive landscape of the cable and wireless industries. Pai’s oft-repeated mission statement has been to “[eliminate] unnecessary and burdensome rules” at the commission. But so far, that’s meant scaling back vital protections for the internet that advocates and millions of consumers loudly fought for and won. As Chairman Pai continues to tweak regulations, he has the ability to undermine core tenets of net neutrality and broadly reshape the FCC in the process.

Some Republicans have long hoped to turn the FCC into a toothless management office, and these early actions demonstrate Pai’s power to help them do it. There are two ways Republicans can go about curtailing the power of the FCC. The more transformative method is to overhaul telecom law in order to strip out its strength as a regulator and its mandate to look out for the public good. The easier, if less transformative method — since core functions of the FCC are ultimately dictated by law — would be to have the FCC reorganize itself, which it can do in small ways on its own and in larger ways with a nod from Congress.

New Rules Intended to Protect Your Online Privacy Are Already Under Threat

[Commentary] For years, the Federal Trade Commission has been the lead federal agency in protecting the privacy and data-security rights of the American consumer by bringing cases against companies that act against consumers’ privacy interests. The FTC has also advocated for telling consumers about the data being collected about them and for offering people a choice before sensitive information—like data about their health, finances, children, or geolocation—is gathered and shared.

But the system has worked because the FTC has not acted alone. Other federal agencies (including the Federal Communications Commission) and state attorneys general have been helpful in this mission. In October, the FCC took the historic step of enacting basic consumer-privacy rules for internet service providers and wireless carriers. These new rules were aimed at providing people with a choice about whether to allow their carriers and cable companies to use and share their sensitive personal information. They are remarkably similar to the enforcement practices of the FTC’s long-standing and successful privacy program. Unfortunately, with the change in administrations, one of the first orders of business for the cable and broadband companies (not to mention the Trump White House and congressional Republicans) is to rescind these rules. But removing them would essentially leave the cable and phone companies without any privacy regulator.

[Rep. Frank Pallone is the ranking member of the House Commerce Committee. Terrell McSweeny is a commissioner at the Federal Trade Commission.]

Democratic Senators Push FCC Chairman Pai to Reverse Lifeline Decision

Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Corey Booker (D-NJ) are leading more than a dozen senators (all Dems except independent Bernie Sanders of Vermont) calling on Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai to reverse his decision to withdraw Lifeline broadband subsidy authorizations from nine companies.

Chairman Pai said the decision was due to 1) procedural errors, 2) because they were issued in the waning hours of the previous Administration, something Republicans warned against, and 3) because he suggested the FCC needed to hit the pause button on expanding the low-income subsidy program until it got a better process for monitoring for waste, fraud and abuse. The senators -- who also included Al Franken (D-MN), Ed Markey (D-MA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) -- said they were deeply troubled by the action. They said the chairman was undermining the program, making it more difficult for low income residents to afford critical communications services, and appearing to run counter to his pledge in the first days of his chairmanship to make closing the digital divide a priority under his watch. The senators pointed out that the customers of at least one of the nine would have to be disconnected.

Evoking section 706 of the Communications Act, they said that the FCC has an obligation to ensure “consumers in all regions of the country, including low-income consumers” have access to “advanced telecommunications services,” and asked him to reconsider the decision.