Wednesday, December 8, 2021
Headlines Daily Digest
Don't Miss:
Affordability and the Digital Divide
2021 Digital Inclusion Benchmark
Here’s Where Smaller ISPs Are Blazing Ahead in the United States
Digital Inclusion
Broadband Service
Net Neutrality
Broadband Infrastructure
Local Initiatives
Competition
Wireless/Spectrum
Journalism
Broadband and Philanthropy
Platforms/Social Media
Security
Company News
Policymakers
Stories From Abroad
Digital Inclusion
Understanding affordability of internet service and its role in adoption are crucial for developing solutions to close the digital divide.The goals of this study were first to understand the barriers to connectivity and efficacy of low-cost internet service options; and second, to use the findings to inform digital inclusion policies, advocacy efforts, and other initiatives that aim to drive digital equity. The findings were informed by a national survey on broadband adoption among low- and lower-middle income households.
- 7 million households whose annual incomes are $50,000 or less have home high-speed service due to free or discount offers;
- 40% said they cannot afford to pay anything for a home internet high-speed service subscription;
- 46% said it is "very" or "somewhat” difficult to build their monthly internet bill into their budget;
- 62% would require significant cost relief (relative to market prices) to have broadband service at home;
- 25% said they heard of free or discount internet offers and 23% heard of the Emergency Broadband Benefit;
- 28% of those who heard of either discount program (in above bullet) found it difficult to sign up; and
- 37% of households said they could not afford any more than $100 for a computer.
[This survey was funded by the Ballmer Group and Microsoft. John Horrigan is a Benton Senior Fellow.]
The World Benchmarking Alliance's second iteration of the Digital Inclusion Benchmark measures and ranks 150 of the world’s most influential technology companies on their responsibility to advance a more inclusive digital society. The 2021 findings show:
- Most companies are lagging behind on digital inclusion; progress is too slow to keep up with the growing number of divides and risks in our digital world.
- Whilst many digital companies spent pages citing the benefits and potentials of artificial intelligence (AI), few seemed concerned about the risks.
- Companies aren't serious about their ‘technology for good’ initiatives.
- We need more women in tech. The lack of women engaged in research and development is a global problem.
- The industry needs to pay attention to its human rights risks and impacts.
Before 2020, explaining why the US needed to invest in expanding high-speed internet infrastructure was not always easy. Lawmakers or community leaders often did not understand or could not justify spending money on what can often be an expensive venture. Fast forward to 2021, and the level of broadband-related federal funding is mindboggling – upward of $370 billion. Now that the infrastructure bill passed, that figure rises by billions of dollars more. That’s because with the pandemic came a new understanding of the reasons that investment is necessary, not in a few years but immediately. The pandemic has been brutal for everyone, especially during those first few months of 2020. Millions of US workers suddenly had to telework. Likewise, millions of US children suddenly had to access remote learning to take part in classes. Millions of senior citizens were told to limit exposure to COVID-19 by accessing telehealth instead of going to in-office health care visits. Yet millions of kids, parents, veterans, senior citizens, low-income families and others did not have access to the high-speed internet they needed to do these things. It’s not just about the infrastructure. It's also a matter of digital literacy and affordability.
[Jessica Denson is the communications director at Connected Nation.]
While six large internet service providers (ISPs) dominate the United States fixed broadband market, Ookla's Speedtest Intelligence reveals smaller providers are sometimes the fastest ISPs in a given state in the Midwest, South and West. This analysis examines US states in which smaller ISPs were the fastest fixed broadband providers during Q3 2021. Major findings include:
- Smaller providers are fast in the Midwest. nine out of 12 Midwestern states had a fast fixed broadband provider that wasn’t one of the big six national ISPs.
- Internet cooperatives and municipal broadband providers in the South stood out during Q3 2021 by offering Southerners fast, accessible and affordable fixed broadband internet alternatives.
- Smaller ISPs in the West had a tougher time competing with national ISPs
- Smaller ISPs can be competitive locally, but face uphill battles across the country, especially the Northeast
[Josh Fomon is a content specialist at Ookla.]
Broadband Infrastructure
Land O’Lakes Played Key Role in Securing $65 Billion for Federal Broadband Funding
Not long after Beth Ford became CEO of the Land O’Lakes cooperative in 2018, she toured agriculture co-ops and farms across rural America. By early 2019, she was alarmed that many small towns and rural residents lacked high-speed internet service, which she feared would leave them behind in the 21st-century economy. She recognized the technology deficit would greatly reduce access to education and health care and harm job creation. Ford became hell-bent on securing broadband funding at the federal level. Less than three years later, on November 15, she was on the White House lawn to witness President Biden’s signing of the bipartisan infrastructure bill, which included $65 billion for broadband. “I couldn’t be happier, “ Ford said, as she ticked off the names of several Land O’Lakes leaders who helped her build a national coalition that was unrelenting in pressing for broadband funding. She recalls telling her core team: “Look what you did. We know this is so important to all of us, and look at how you drove change.” In an interview with Twin Cities Business, Ford described the steps that she and Land O’Lakes took to build national awareness of the technology gap, to create the American Connection Project to leverage political support, and to work with powerful chief executives in the Business Roundtable to elevate the importance of a bipartisan infrastructure package.
The explosion of the internet of things (IoT) is enabling communities across the globe to evolve into smart cities. Leveraging sensors, networks and data analysis, communities are addressing challenges in health care, energy, the workforce, public safety and many other sectors. But what’s behind the pulse of the smart city? Fiber infrastructure serves as the veins that support emerging applications, such as smart traffic sensors, connected vehicles and modern, cloud-connected medical devices. In 2017, San Diego spent $30 million to install 4,200 LED smart lights, traffic sensors, and pedestrian and public safety monitors. The investment saved more than $3 million a year in power usage. What started as a cost-saving program ended up becoming one of the largest smart-city sensor platforms in the country. Fiber is at the heart of smart-city initiatives because of its low-latency, high-bandwidth carrying capacity. Government funding will pay off as the US moves into a connected future. The San Diego example demonstrates the true, tangible impact of smart-city investments. Promoting economic growth, a skilled workforce, increased quality of life, and a sustainable future is on everyone’s agenda. Let’s all work to advocate for fiber-fed broadband, which allows us to reap benefits in nearly every element of our lives and in our communities.
[Kevin Morgan is the chief marketing officer for Clearfield.]
Verizon and AT&T are hoping new swaths of C-band cellular radio spectrum will help make the 5G hype closer to reality, but the big mid-band 5G rollout may have a side effect. Airplanes rely on radio altimeters to tell how high they are above the ground to safely land when pilots can’t see, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is now instructing 6,834 of them to not do that at certain airports because of 5G interference. The FAA ruled on December 7 that those thousands of US planes (and some helicopters) won’t be able to use many of the guided and automatic landing systems that are designed to work in poor visibility conditions if they’re landing at an airport where there’s deemed to be enough interference that their altimeters aren’t reliable. “Landings during periods of low visibility could be limited due to concerns that the 5G signal could interfere with the accuracy of an airplane’s radio altimeter, without other mitigations in place,” said an FAA spokesman. That likely means flight delays: “These limitations could prevent dispatch of flights to certain locations with low visibility, and could also result in flight diversions,” reads the FAA’s written statement. “We are engaged with the wireless operators, as well as our interagency partners, to do everything possible to make sure the mitigations are tailored to prevent disruptions,” an FAA spokesman said.
Newspapers all over the country have been quietly filing antitrust lawsuits against Google and Facebook for the past year, alleging the two firms monopolized the digital ad market for revenue that would otherwise go to local news. What started as a small-town effort to take a stand against Big Tech has turned into a national movement, with over 200 newspapers involved across dozens of states. "The intellectual framework for this developed over the last 3-4 years," said Doug Reynolds, managing partner of HD Media, a holding company that owns several West Virginia newspapers, including the Charleston Gazette-Mail. Reynolds, along with a group of lawyers, filed the first newspaper lawsuit of this kind in January 2021 in West Virginia. As a part of the first lawsuit, Reynolds worked with a coalition of lawyers that has agreed to represent newspapers all over the country looking to file similar lawsuits. To-date, the group has been retained by over 30 newspaper ownership groups (list) on behalf of over 200 publications to file lawsuits. The goal of the litigation is "to recover past damages to newspapers" caused by Big Tech companies, says Clayton Fitzsimmons, one of the lawyers representing the newspapers.
Nonprofit newsrooms like States Newsroom keep close tabs on the state legislatures and regulatory agencies where decisions are being made that affect many aspects of daily life for citizens: taxes, environmental rules, health care policy, school funding, workers rights and much more. With funding from foundations and a variety of donors, States Newsroom formed two years ago to attempt to fill a void in what many government watchdogs and civil-society experts believe is one of the biggest manifestations of the local journalism crisis: the dire shortage of reporters covering state government. States Newsroom will soon announce plans to nearly double its presence, from its current 25 states to about 40 over the next two and a half years. It will open its next five outlets in Nebraska, Alaska, Arkansas, South Carolina and Kentucky. It’s also launching “News from the States,” a new online clearinghouse to showcase all their affiliates’ reporting. Each news bureau is run independently, usually by veteran journalists, with staffs of about four or five journalists. And each allows other news organizations to republish its work free.
Philanthropy
Bridge to Everywhere: Practical Considerations for Philanthropy for Expanding Broadband Access in Rural Communities
This paper is designed as a guide for philanthropic organizations interested in narrowing the digital divide, or the gap between those with internet access and those without, in rural communities. Philanthropy’s role in this space is not always clear. Broadband expansion is technically complex, extremely expensive, and often viewed as the domain of government and/or internet service providers. The authors’ intent is to demystify this complex topic and provide concrete examples of how philanthropy can support long-term solutions that connect rural communities and enable them to access and benefit from this technology. We do not intend to provide a comprehensive guide, but a starting point from which philanthropic leaders can then decide to explore further. This guide focuses heavily on physical broadband infrastructure and affordable access because in many rural communities, they present the most immediate challenge. However, digital inclusion is also an extremely important area that may benefit from philanthropic investments.
Comcast has touted all the network upgrades it is doing as it pushes toward DOCSIS 4.0, but it appears to be planning one more key move: rolling out new Wi-Fi routers that can handle the speeds it’s aiming to deliver. Comcast Cable CEO David Watson said the company views Wi-Fi as a key element of its broadband package. Rather than trying to push out new customer premises equipment all at once when it’s ready to roll out symmetrical and multi-gig speeds, Watson said it’s trying to get ahead of the curve. “We will be delivering early next year a new gateway that is the first tri-band gateway device that includes the 6 GHz band. So, we’ll have 2.4, 5 GHz, 6GHz, plenty of bandwidth. And it really is a terrific way to make sure proactively as we grow and go towards multi-gig symmetrical down the road that we have the right [customer premises equipment].” In September 2021, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts highlighted the company’s strategy of trying to deepen its customer relationships with the right products and services, like Wi-Fi and TV. But Watson said it is also working to grow the sheer number of customers it has in the first place. “We are not standing still,” he said. “We added last year alone over 870,000 new homes passed. So, we also are growing and adding more capability. Our total addressable marketplace will continue to increase.”
The Senate voted 68-31 to confirm Federal Communications Commission Chair Jessica Rosenworcel, the first woman to hold that title, to another five-year term, narrowly avoiding a Republican majority at the agency once her current term was set to expire at the end of 2021. Rosenworcel will be tasked with expanding broadband connectivity, supporting 5G implementation and bringing back net neutrality rules. Rosenworcel has been a champion of closing the so-called homework gap, which refers to the divide between students with and without access to broadband. During the pandemic, she was among those who advocated for reinterpreting E-Rate rules, which helps schools and libraries get connected to the internet, to allow students in distance learning to access those funds.
Federal Communications Commission nominee Gigi Sohn [Senior Fellow and Public Advocate at the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society] could be running into more Republican and industry headwinds in the Biden administration's effort to get a Democratic majority on the agency. Despite a relative lack of contentiousness in Sohn's confirmation hearing and despite Republicans concerned about her past advocacy for fair use carve-outs for copyrighted material and her criticism of Fox News Channel, there are reports that a hold could be put on her nomination by one of those concerned Republicans. A definite potential source of the hold is Sen Thom Tillis (R-NC), ranking member on the Senate Intellectual Property Subcommittee. Tillis asked President Joe Biden to withdraw Sohn's nomination, saying he had many concerns but copyright was chief among them. On December 6, his office confirmed he would do whatever he could to stop the nomination, including placing a hold. Another possible hold source is Sen Dan Sullivan (R-AK), arguably her toughest opponent at the nomination hearing, particularly over the issue of her past tweets critical of Fox News. The hold could have backers among both internet service providers and broadcasters, ISPs over that net neutrality stand and broadcasters over signals she’s sent that she could support restoring some broadcast regulation, a group one source characterized as “the coalition of the freaking out.”
Overseas telecom providers, increasingly frustrated with American tech firms whose apps are gobbling up bandwidth, are pushing them to pay more for it. Any effort to reslice the "cost of internet bandwidth" pie could shake up the entire industry, make new winners and losers, and put new pressure on US tech giants. Chief executives of more than a dozen of Europe's major telecom companies, including Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom, said that US tech firms should "bear some of the costs of developing Europe's telecoms networks because they use them so heavily," according to Reuters. Tech giants already have a target on their backs with foreign governments over privacy and anti-competitive practice concerns, and telecom companies calling them out adds fuel to that fire. Broadband industry trade group USTelecom says tech companies have grown thanks to the investment of broadband providers, and should contribute to the fund. The Internet Association, which represents big tech companies, has opposed efforts to make its members pay into the broadband fund.
Benton (www.benton.org) provides the only free, reliable, and non-partisan daily digest that curates and distributes news related to universal broadband, while connecting communications, democracy, and public interest issues. Posted Monday through Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments, policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are factually accurate, their sometimes informal tone may not always represent the tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang (headlines AT benton DOT org) and Grace Tepper (grace AT benton DOT org) — we welcome your comments.
© Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 2021. Redistribution of this email publication — both internally and externally — is encouraged if it includes this message. For subscribe/unsubscribe info email: headlines AT benton DOT org
Kevin Taglang
Executive Editor, Communications-related Headlines
Benton Institute
for Broadband & Society
1041 Ridge Rd, Unit 214
Wilmette, IL 60091
847-328-3040
headlines AT benton DOT org
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society All Rights Reserved © 2021