Benton RSS Feed

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 12/07/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

DIGITAL TV CONVERSION
Congress Settles for DTV Resolution
Reps. Seek Digital-Decision Delay

BROADCASTING
Newspaper/Broadcast Cooperation
Ten Troublesome Trends in TV Health News
CBS Research Finds DVRs Less of a Threat to TV Advertising

QUICKLY -- Questionable Future Looms for Common Carriage Regulations;
Corporate America can't write

DIGITAL TV CONVERSION

CONGRESS SETTLES FOR DTV RESOLUTION
Congress is expected to approve a nonbinding resolution soon calling for
passage of legislation next year that would end the digital-television
transition as early as Dec. 31, 2006. The resolution -- contained in
intelligence legislation expected to gain final passage this week --
weakened Senate-approved legislation that called for the return of 24
megahertz of analog-TV spectrum by 2008 if certain conditions were met.
Congress wants to use the analog spectrum -- 108 MHz in all -- not just for
public safety but also for allocation to wireless-broadband companies in an
auction expected to raise billions of dollars for the U.S. Treasury.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA485900.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)

REPS SEEK DIGITAL-DECISION DELAY
A group of lawmakers representing mostly rural or African-American
districts Monday asked FCC Chairman Michael Powell to delay a vote on his
plan to accelerate the transition to all-digital TV. Despite the lawmakers'
worries, some FCC officials and industry lobbyists say no vote on the plan
is slated for this month, and even a vote in January is unlikely. But
staff for the lawmakers say rumors persist that Powell will attempt to
bring the matter to a vote with only a few days notice.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA485726?display=Breaking+News&...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

BROADCASTING

NEWSPAPER/BROADCAST COOPERATION
The majority of newspapers in the United States have not partnered with
television and radio stations in their local communities, according to a
Newspaper Association of America report (see
http://www.digitaledge.org/DigArtPage.cfm?AID=6511). Smaller-market papers
(50,000 daily circulation and under) were least likely to partner. Among
the biggies (250,000+), 32% formed a relationship with a TV station and an
equal percentage has not linked up with a media partner. Only 4% of
respondents work with a radio station, according to "Newspapers' Online
Operations: Performance Report 2004."
[SOURCE: Poynter Institute, AUTHOR: Rob Runett]
http://www.digitaledge.org/DigArtPage.cfm?AID=6511

TEN TROUBLESOME TRENDS IN TV HEALTH NEWS
A 2002 Gallup poll showed that many Americans consider television their
most important source of news and information on health. It also showed
that television is one of the least trusted sources of such news and
information. University of Minnesota Professor Gary Schwitzer studied each
of the 840 health news stories that appeared between February and May 2003
on four television stations (KARE, KSTP, KMSP, WCCO) in Minneapolis-St
Paul, Minnesota. Ten troublesome trends in televised health news coverage
became apparent in his research.
[SOURCE: BMJ.com, AUTHOR: Gary Schwitzer, University of Minnesota
schwitz( at )umn.edu]
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7478/1352

CBS RESEARCH FINDS DVRs LESS OF A THREAT TO TV ADVERTISING
CBS is telling advertisers that digital video recorders (like TiVo) are
less of a threat than -- um, well -- advertised. An internal CBS study of
734 DVR viewers found ad skippers recalled on average two commercials they
fast-forwarded through and one brand. That is about the same recall as live
TV viewers. The research also found that if time-shifting viewers were
added to the shows' live audience, it would nearly double the ratings for
most of the top 20 network series.
[SOURCE: AdAge, AUTHOR: Mercedes Cardona]
http://www.adage.com/news.cms?newsId=42099

QUICKLY

QUESTIONABLE FUTURE LOOMS FOR COMMON CARRIAGE REGULATIONS
Over the next year, FCC Chairman Michael Powell will have an opportunity to
complete a mission he launched several years ago to free broadband Internet
services from the burden of being regulated as common carriers. As groups
opposed to deregulation see it, the stakes couldn't be higher: "For the
first time in the history of this country the dominant means of
communication, and some people think commerce, [could] be entirely in the
hands of private carriers with no public obligation whatsoever," says
consumer advocate Mark Cooper.
[SOURCE: Online Journalism Review, SOURCE: Mark Thompson]
http://209.200.80.136/ojr/stories/041202thompson/

CORPORATE AMERICA CAN'T WRITE
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Sam Dillon]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/07/business/07write.html
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 12/06/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

INTERNET
Supreme Court Takes Brand X Case
Bush Signs Net Access Tax Ban Into Law
Artists and Musicians are Enthusiastic Internet Users

OWNERSHIP
8-Year-Old Basic Law May Be Outdated Already
How Regulators Reshaped the Way Companies Run
Bush May Spur More Newspaper Consolidation

INDECENCY/CENSORSHIP
When Is a Dirty Show Indecent?
Yesterday's FCC Can Teach Us a Lesson in Free Speech

QUICKLY -- Advocacy Groups Blur Media Lines; Digital TV; Public
Radio Checkup; Broadcast News; Wi-Fi Networks;
Web use in China; Fox Will Become Main News Source For
Clear Channel; No DTV Vote Soon; Powell is NOT Funny

BRAND X COMMENTS

INTERNET

SUPREME COURT TAKES ON BRAND X CASE
The Supreme Court decided on Friday to review Brand X Internet Services vs.
Federal Communications Commission, a case from the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit that voided the FCC's March 2002 ruling that
cable-modem providers did not have to share facilities at regulated rates.
The Ninth Circuit held that because cable-modem service is partly a
telecommunications service and not solely an unregulated information
service, traditional open-access telephone policies apply to cable's data
service. Andrew Jay Schwartzman, an attorney with Media Access Project who
is representing the Center for Digital Democracy in the case, said he was
disappointed that the court agreed to hear the case. "The outcome of this
case will -- quite literally -- determine the future of the Internet as we
know it. If the Supreme Court rules against Internet open access, cable
companies will be able to block content at will for political and financial
reasons and deny the public the ability to choose among competing Internet
providers," Schwartzman said. FCC Chairman Michael Powell said, "High-speed
Internet connections are not telephones, and I'm glad the Supreme Court has
agreed to review the 9th Circuit's ruling that they are. The 9th Circuit's
decision would have grave consequences for the future and availability of
high-speed Internet connections in this country. As the Commission is
uniquely charged with the task of promoting the deployment of such advanced
services to the public, we look forward to our opportunity to present our
case before the high court."
Cable attorneys said the court has scheduled oral arguments for March 23,
but that date could change. A decision is expected to be released by June,
before the court's summer recess.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA485203.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)
http://www.mediaaccess.org/press/BrandXRelease.pdf
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254990A1.doc
More coverage --
* TV Week
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=6853
** For more reaction to this decision, see Brand X Comments below **

BUSH SIGNS NET ACCESS TAX BAN INTO LAW
On Friday, President Bush signed into law a bill that renews a temporary
ban on Internet access taxes. "It's an important step forward in bridging
the economic digital divide," said Sen. George Allen, a Virginia Republican
and a bill sponsor who attended the signing ceremony at the White House
complex. "This measure will help make sure for those of lower income and
those who live in small towns and rural areas that they can get connected
more easily to broadband," he said.
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Andy Sullivan]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=JTXW2QB53HMXQCRBAELC...
See more at:
http://allen.senate.gov/?c=story&story=2004120366016.625

ARTISTS AND MUSICIANS ARE ENTHUSIASTIC INTERNET USERS
The first large-scale surveys of the Internet's impact on artists and
musicians reveal that they are embracing the Web as a tool to improve how
they make, market, and sell their creative works. They eagerly welcome new
opportunities that are provided by digital technology and the Internet. At
the same time, they believe that unauthorized online file sharing is wrong
and that current copyright laws are appropriate, though there are some
major divisions among them about what constitutes appropriate copying and
sharing of digital files. Their overall judgment is that unauthorized
online file-sharing does not pose a major threat to creative industries:
Two-thirds of artists say peer-to-peer file sharing poses a minor threat or
no threat at all to them. Across the board, among those who are both
successful and struggling, the artists and musicians we surveyed are more
likely to say that the Internet has made it possible for them to make more
money from their art than they are to say it has made it harder to protect
their work from piracy or unlawful use. Surveys by the Pew Internet &
American Life Project show there are 32 million Americans who consider
themselves artists and about 10 million earn at least some level of
compensation from their performances, songs, paintings, videos, creative
writing, and other art. The report includes special analysis of "Paid
Artists," those respondents who are musicians, writers and filmmakers and
earn some income from their art.
[SOURCE: Pew Internet & American Life Project, AUTHOR: Mary Madden]
http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/142/report_display.asp
Pew File-Sharing Survey Gives a Voice to Artists
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Tom Zeller]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/06/arts/06down.html
(requires registration)
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=5CT0KTO1O0LYYCRBAELC...

OWNERSHIP

8-YEAR OLD BASIC LAW MAY BE OUTDATED ALREADY
There's a lot of talk of rewriting the Telecommunications Act of 1996. But
for all the talk, there remain significant impediments to a quick overhaul.
In the first place, no consensus has emerged on many of the most important
issues now confronting policy makers, notably how to regulate the new
Internet telephone services or to fix the ailing program that provides
billions of dollars for universal telephone service. Second, the
administration has not made rewriting the act a priority. Finally, House
Republican leaders and their counterparts in the Senate have different
ideas and priorities. "There is a consensus that a train wreck is
approaching, and that there need to be some changes," said Blair Levin, a
regulatory analyst at Legg Mason and former senior official at the Federal
Communications Commission. "But there is no consensus about a myriad of
details."
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/06/business/businessspecial2/06telecom.ht...
(requires registration)

HOW REGULATORS RESHAPED THE WAY COMPANIES RUN
In a collection of short articles looking at Insurance, mutual funds,
software and media, the Times considers how government action changed the
rules for each industry. The media article focuses on Big Media and efforts
at the FCC to allow for Bigger Media. In the coming weeks, the largest
media conglomerates and the FCC will decide (how?) to appeal the
Philadelphia federal court decision that threw out the FCC's 2003 attempt
to loosen media ownership rules. The new rules would have allowed the same
company to own up to three television stations, eight radio stations, a
cable operator and a newspaper in the same market.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
(http://www.nytimes.com/)
(requires registration)

BUSH MAY SPUR MORE NEWSPAPER CONSOLIDATION
Four more years could mean... more media ownership consolidation? Many
media companies are hopeful that the Bush administration and a
Republican-controlled Congress will help encourage the adoption of a 2003
plan to relax rules that ban media conglomerates from owning television
stations and newspapers in the same market. The announcement from
family-controlled Pulitzer last week that it is exploring options for a
sale struck some as odd. The controversial new rules proposed last year by
the Federal Communications Commission that, among other things, would allow
cross-ownership of newspapers and TV stations have been in limbo since
June, when a U.S. appeals court blocked them from taking effect. That means
that the most strategically logical Pulitzer acquirers -- Gannett Co. and
Tribune Co., which each own a TV station in St. Louis -- will have to
gamble that the rules eventually will be loosened, if they choose to bid.
"What we have here is a certain level of risk, which on some level
diminishes the price," said Blair Levin, a former FCC official who is now
regulatory strategy analyst at Legg Mason. "People have been waiting for
some time for the cross-ownership issue to be resolved. Maybe people are
finally just saying, 'Okay, we're going to roll the dice and see what
happens.' Bush getting re-elected may have given them some comfort."
[SOURCE: Boston Globe/Associated Press]
http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2004/12/03/bush_may_spur_more_ne...

INDECENCY/CENSORSHIP

WHEN IS A DIRTY SHOW INDECENT?
To be hit with a fine, a program must first be found to shock, titillate or
pander to the audience. Second, it must be graphic in its depiction of
sexual or excretory activities, and finally, it must be found to violate
community standards. One First Amendment lawyer argues that broadcasters
might find it impossible to sort out how the FCC decides when a program has
crossed any of these three hurdles. The FCC has been going to great lengths
to justify recent decisions for or against a fine, and the Commission makes
clear that there's no hard and fast rule: context is key. But even FCC
Commissioner Michael Copps, the Commission's most ardent indecency foe,
thinks enforcement is inconsistent and warns of creating different
standards for television and radio. Industry lawyers counter that the FCC's
context reviews are wildly unpredictable and sometimes don't occur at all
-- they are likely to attack the perceived inconsistency and, they hope,
derail the indecency crackdown.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA485336?display=The+Beat&refer...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
See also:
Fox Broadcasting Challenges Indecency Fine
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=6851

YESTERDAY'S FCC CAN TEACH US A LESSON IN FREE SPEECH
[Commentary] It might be useful for us, and the FCC, to stop, take a breath
and look back 60-plus years, when another call for censorship swept the
land. On Oct. 30, 1938, Orson Welles' Mercury Theater of the Air performed
a radio version of H. G. Wells' "War of the Worlds," the famous story of
Martians invading the Earth. Over one million radio listeners believed the
drama in the form of a newscast was real. The public demanded the FCC do
something. But the FCC did nothing at all. Partially this was because,
having never foreseen such a crisis, the Commissioners simply didn't know
how to respond. But there were others who said that punishing artists could
have a chilling effect on art. Still others argued that, in an era of
fascist repression of speech, America needed to set an example of freedom
for all the world to see. Which brings us back to 2004. We live in a world
of censorship aplenty. Al Jazeera refuses to show the execution of Margaret
Hassan; Russia gobbles up anti-Putin media outlets; China and Iran jam
Internet sites. Shouldn't America still be the country which set the
standard of open, free media, without the threat of censorship? Shouldn't
Michael Powell and today's FCC show the wisdom of their predecessors in
1938, and back off?
[SOURCE: San Francisco Chronicle, AUTHOR: Cynthia Bass, novelist]
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/1...

QUICKLY

ADVOCACY GROUPS BLUR MEDIA LINES
Communications scholars cringe at the notion that lobbying groups are
obscuring or playing down their participation in publications and programs
that push a narrow point of view. "People judge communication by its source
so when you deny people full knowledge of that source of information they
are losing something important about evaluating the message," said Kathleen
Hall Jamison, dean of the University of Southern California's Annenberg
School for Communication. Geneva Overholser of the University of Missouri's
journalism school's Washington bureau said anything less than thorough
disclosure "is deceitful and imbalanced." Otherwise, she said, citizens
"don't have enough information to judge" publications or broadcasts.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Jeffrey H. Birnbaum]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38184-2004Dec5.html
(requires registration)

WIDE OPEN FUTURE
The percentage of homes tuning in to high-definition television (HDTV)
programs is poised to make a big leap beginning in 2006: from 30% of all
homes to about 50% of all U.S. homes by the end of 2007, according to the
Consumer Electronics Association. That's more than 50 million HDTV sets by
2007. B&C has a special report on digital television this week, including
information on consumer buying habits. Right now, only about 3 million
homes have high-definition TV, though many millions more think they do. See
the URLs below for more.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Ken Kerschbaumer/Kevin Downey]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA485286.html?display=Feature&r...
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA485285.html?display=Feature&r...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

PUBLIC RADIO GET A CHECKUP FROM CPB
In a November study, "Having It All," a consulting firm found that 45% of
all public radio stations were operating in the red in 2003. But the same
report finds that public radio stations can achieve superior financial
health and, at the same time, provide excellent service to their audience.
Stations are not forced to choose between one objective or the other. They
can have both. Release of the report kicks off a broad review of the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting's funding priorities for public radio.
A series of panels will address the system's direction and future.
[SOURCE: Current, AUTHOR: Mike Janssen/Jeremy Egner]
(http://www.current.org/)
http://www.cpb.org/radio/stations/havingitall_radioreport_04.pdf

BROADCAST NEWS CAN STILL TRUMP THE WEB
[Commentary] While the Big 3 network evening newscasts continue to attract
an aggregate of 25 million viewers or more each night, they will not be
lightly cast aside. The audience for all-day, all-week cable news channels,
especially for their straight newscasts rather than their interview shows,
special reports and shouting matches, is nowhere near that. Many people may
use the Web for news -- especially the free sites of newspapers -- but how
long will they be able to get that news without paying for it?
[SOURCE: TV Week, AUTHOR: Reuven Frank, former president of NBC]
http://www.tvweek.com/article.cms?articleId=26579

WI-FI FOR EVERYONE?
[Commentary] The Pennsylvania law restricting municipal broadband networks
isn't all that bad, McCullagh writes. The guiding spirit behind the law is
that the proper role of government should be carefully circumscribed to
providing what private companies can't. Police, courts and roads arguably
fall into that category. Wireless service doesn't.
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Declan McCullagh]
http://news.com.com/Wi-Fi+for+everyone/2010-7351-5476718.html

PUBLIC INTEREST COALITION SUPPORTS UNLICENSED SPECTRUM USE
Last week a national coalition of consumer, education, media reform and
community wireless networks filed comments urging the FCC to immediately
provide local Internet service providers and consumer WiFi devices with
unlicensed access to empty TV channels on a market-by-market basis. The
empty TV channels occupy "beachfront" spectrum worth tens of billions of
dollars. Yesterday was the deadline for comments on the FCC's proposed
rule opening unassigned TV channels for WiFi and other unlicensed broadband
technologies. "We strongly support FCC Chairman Powell's effort to
reallocate prime spectrum from broadcast to affordable broadband, thereby
opening wasted airwaves to be shared by wireless service providers and
consumers to help close the digital divide in under-served areas," said
Michael Calabrese, vice president of the New America Foundation, a
Washington think tank that initiated the proposal. New America and Media
Access Project, a public interest law firm, drafted the comments.
[SOURCE: New America Foundation Press Release]
http://www.newamerica.net/Download_Docs/pdfs/Doc_File_2076_1.pdf

BEIJING LOVES THE WEB UNTIL THE WEB TALKS BACK
As the number of people online has quintupled over the last four years, the
government has shown itself to be committed to two competing goals:
strategically clamping deploying the Internet to economic advantage, while
clamping down -- using surveillance, filters and prison sentences -- on
undesirable content and use.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Tom Zeller]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/06/business/businessspecial2/06net.html
(requires registration)

TRYING TO REACH CUSTOMERS IN THE ERA OF E-MAIL SUSPICION
Will 2005 be the year of the unanswered e-mail? Given increased instances
on Internet fraud, especially a form of identity theft called "phishing,"
people may grow more and more reluctant to open unexpected email.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Bob Tedeschi]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/06/business/businessspecial2/06secure.html
(requires registration)

FOX WILL BECOME MAIN NEWS SOURCE FOR CLEAR CHANNEL
News Corp.'s Fox News has reached an agreement to become the primary news
provider to radio giant Clear Channel. Under the terms of the five-year
deal, which starts next year, as many as 172 of Clear Channel's news and
talk stations could eventually carry Fox's radio service, which includes
news updates of up to five minutes per hour and syndicated talk shows by
some of its cable news personalities.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Joe Flint joe.flint( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110229064974891515,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)

FCC'S POWELL TO DELAY DIGITAL-TV VOTE, AIDES SAY
You might ask how you can accelerate something by delaying a vote on it,
but that's how things (don't) work in DC. Apparently, FCC Chairman Michael
Powell is planning to push back 'til March a vote on a plan that would help
end by 2009 the nation's conversion to digital-only television
broadcasting. They vote had been targeted for the FCC's Dec 15 meeting, but
the dominant topic that day will be phone competition rules. In delaying
the vote, Chairman Powell may get enough time to gain support for the
digital TV transition plan in Congress and within the TV industry.
[SOURCE: Bloomberg, AUTHOR: Neil Roland nroland( at )bloomberg.net]
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000006&sid=a_iypPBKCFMs&refer...

FCC Chairman Michael Powell is not funny.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA485313?display=Breaking+News&...

BRAND X COMMENTS

Statement of Jeff Chester, executive director, Center for Digital
Democracy, on the decision of the Supreme Court to review the "Brand X"
open access case: "This case is nothing less than a battle for the soul of
the Internet--and for the public's First Amendment rights in the broadband
era. While the cable industry is intent on transforming the Internet into
an extension of its tightly controlled cable business, it is critical that
we maintain an open, nondiscriminatory platform for the exchange of ideas
and information. The Internet must not become the preserve of any one
media or telecom industry. Rather, it should reflect the highest
aspirations of our democracy: the free flow of information, unimpeded
access to all manner of content, and a platform for the broadest diversity
of viewpoints."
See also: Next Stop: Supreme Court. Review of the "Brand X" Case will
shape broadband's future.
http://www.democraticmedia.org/news/washingtonwatch/BrandXSCreview.html
[SOURCE: Center for Digital Democracy]
http://www.democraticmedia.org/news/BrandXSC.html

Supreme Court Grants Cert in the Brand X Case
The Supreme Court's decision to grant cert in the Brand X case sets the
stage to finally remove a barrier to competition and consumer choice on the
high-speed Internet. For almost a decade the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) has ignored the Communications Act and allowed cable
operators to force consumers to pay twice to choose their Internet Service
Provider when accessing the high-speed Internet with cable modem service.
We are confident that when the Court examines the facts, it will decide to
uphold the 9th Circuit Appeals Court ruling that affirmed the critical
principle of open, non-discriminatory networks as the cornerstone of
competition in communications markets. Consumers should be allowed to enjoy
the increased choice and lower prices that come with a more competitive
broadband market, as they do in the traditional "dial up" Internet market.
We believe that the Supreme Court will uphold the 9th Circuit ruling, which
ordered the FCC to remove this barrier to a competitive market, where
consumers can select from a broad array of providers.
[SOURCE: Consumers Union Press Statement]
http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_telecom_and_utilities/001698.html...

Statement of Robert Sachs, President & CEO National Cable &
Telecommunications Association Regarding the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision
to Review the Brand X Case: "We are pleased by the Supreme Court's decision
to review this significant case and are optimistic that the Court will
affirm the FCC's decision that cable modem service is an interstate
information service, fostering a deregulatory environment for cable
high-speed Internet access. Establishing a deregulatory environment for
cable modem service is critical to the universal deployment in the U.S. of
broadband services, including emerging services such as Voice over Internet
Protocol service. This case presents a fundamental question of
communications law, carefully decided by the FCC and then overturned by a
circuit court that simply ignored what the agency had done, refusing to
accord the FCC the deference Supreme Court precedent requires. Classifying
cable modem service as an interstate information service, as the FCC did,
puts this innovative service on the right deregulatory path."
[SOURCE: National Cable & Telecommunications Association]
http://www.ncta.com/press/press.cfm?PRid=556&showArticles=ok
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 12/3/04

Three items for next week: 1) on Wed the FCC will release the agenda for=20
its 12/15 meeting; 2) on the 9th, Commissioners Copps & Adelstein will=20
attend a forum on media ownership in MN (see link to agenda below); and 3)=
=20
the Advisory Committee on Diversity for Communications in the Digital Age=20
meets one week from today. For these and other upcoming media policy=20
events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

OWNERSHIP
Media Consolidation a Threat, Blethen tells Portland Audience
FCC's Powell Sees Long Road for Media Rules
Agenda for Media Concentration Meeting
Viacom to Buy Sacramento Station from Sinclair
North Dakota Radio Station to Clear Channel

PUBLIC TELEVISION
Mitchell Lays Out PBS Funding Initiative

CONTENT
Since When Does Conflict Turn Off the Networks?
The Nascar Nightly News: Anchorman Get Your Gun
Don't Expect the Government to Be a V-Chip
The Unreal World

CABLE
Powell: Regs Would Hike Modem Rates
Comcast Floats New Set-Top Deadline
Rural Consumers Require Greater Flexibility In
Choosing Television Programming

QUICKLY -- News about the Internet; TV Time, Unlike Child Care, Ranks High=
=20
in Mood Study

OWNERSHIP

MEDIA CONSOLIDATION A THREAT, BLETHEN TELLS PORTLAND AUDIENCE
According to Frank Blethen, board chairman of Blethen Maine Newspapers and=
=20
the Seattle Times, consolidation of media ownership threatens American=20
democracy because it saps investment in local journalism and stifles=20
controversial coverage that conflicts with corporate interests. Citizen=20
involvement policy making both at Congress and the FCC may be the only=20
remedy. Blethen offered his views as the featured speaker Wednesday at the=
=20
monthly breakfast meeting of the Portland Community Chamber. An outspoken=20
critic of media consolidation, Blethen is publisher and chief executive=20
officer of The Seattle Times and a fourth-generation newspaper owner. He=20
distributed a written list of what he considers principles for reclaiming=20
America's media. His first priority is to maintain current FCC rules,=20
including minority ownership requirements and public service obligations.=20
He also supports new legislation to ban companies from owning both=20
television stations and newspapers in the same market. Radio ownership=20
rules should be rolled back to 1996, when regulations were relaxed.
[SOURCE: Maine Today, AUTHOR: Tux Turkel tturkel( at )pressherald.com]
http://business.mainetoday.com/news/041202blethen.shtml

FCC'S POWELL SEES LONG ROAD FOR MEDIA RULES
FCC Chairman Michael Powell is predicting that it could take as long as=20
seven years for "reestablishment of both a framework and a national=20
consensus" on media ownership rules. The FCC attempted to loosen media=20
ownership regulation in 2003, but the new rules were challenged and then=20
rejected in court and later reversed by Congress. Andrew Schwartzman, the=20
lead attorney who persuaded the appeals court to put the relaxed media=20
rules on hold, said there already was a political consensus on what the=20
regulations should be. "The chairman's problem is he doesn't like it," he=20
said. "It is clear that the American public and a majority of Congress, if=
=20
not the leadership in the House, thinks only modest change is needed in=20
media ownership rules." "We believe there is a pressing need for a quick=20
resolution to broadcast ownership rules that hamstring the ability of local=
=20
radio and television stations to compete with giant cable and satellite=20
providers," spokesman Dennis Wharton said.
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Jeremy Pelofsky]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=3DtopNews&storyID=3D6981407
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-media3dec03,1,7403594...
ry?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business

AGENDA FOR MEDIA CONCENTRATION MEETING
Commissioners Michael J. Copps and Jonathan S. Adelstein Thursday announced=
=20
the agenda for the forum on media concentration to be held in St. Paul (MN)=
=20
on December 9. The hearing will be organized into two panels - "Local News=
=20
and Information," and "Media Diversity." After the panels, there will be=20
an opportunity for members of the general public to make comments. The=20
purpose of the hearing is to give citizens outside of Washington, DC, an=20
opportunity to voice their opinions about media consolidation and to offer=
=20
comments on how the agency can develop protections that provide citizens=20
with viewpoints from a diversity of sources and enhance the marketplace of=
=20
ideas.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254939A1.doc

VIACOM TO BUY SACRAMENTO STATION FROM SINCLAIR
Viacom has agreed to purchase KOVR-TV, the CBS affiliate in Sacramento (CA)=
=20
from the Sinclair Broadcast Group for $285 million. With UPN-affiliated=20
KMAX-TV, the purchase gives Viacom its 9th duopoly. The station, the only=20
one owned by Sinclair on the West Coast, produces local news programs from=
=20
early-morning through late-night. It is expected to be a good fit with=20
KMAX, which has five hours of local news on weekdays and four hours on=20
weekends. Sacramento is the 19th-largest TV market in the country.
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Michele Greppi]
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D6846

NORTH DAKOTA RADIO STATION TO CLEAR CHANNEL
Commissioners Copps and Adelstein respond to Clear Channel's acquisition of=
=20
KDAM(FM), Hope, North Dakota: The FCC approved Clear Channel's acquisition=
=20
of a radio station in a market in which Clear Channel already controls over=
=20
50% of the market and Clear Channel and the next largest owner together=20
control over 90%. Given this extreme level of market concentration, we=20
cannot support grant of this transfer absent additional information on the=
=20
public interest benefits of the transaction. Yet, here, the majority has=20
not even considered the public interest benefits or harms. We are troubled=
=20
by the trend toward greater and greater consolidation of the media,=20
particularly in smaller radio markets, and this Commission's acceptance of=
=20
such levels of concentration with hardly any analysis. For a robust=20
marketplace of ideas to survive, every community deserves to have a=20
diversity of sources of information available to its members - not just=20
those who live in the largest cities. We find that the amount of=20
concentration at issue here is potentially very harmful to competition, to=
=20
the listening public and to America's deeply held values of localism and=20
diversity.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-232A2.doc
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-232A1.doc

PUBLIC TELEVISION

MITCHELL LAYS OUT PBS FUNDING INITIATIVE
Speaking at The Future of Public Television conference in Chicago, Pat=20
Mitchell, president and CEO of the Public Broadcasting Service, said=20
Thursday her organization is launching the Enhanced Funding Initiative to=
=20
help develop new sources of funding and increase revenues in a diverse=20
media market. Former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt and former Netscape CEO James=
=20
Barksdale will lead the effort with the National Policy Committee of PBS's=
=20
board overseeing the effort. It will include the Corporation for Public=20
Broadcasting, the Association of Public Television Stations and National=20
Public Radio and seek input from public interest groups and other=20
interested parties. Participants will review research and gather=20
information on various approaches to enhancing funding for public=20
television, including the feasibility of building a federal trust fund=20
based on the proceeds of early-returned analog spectrum from public=20
television stations to add to the current federal funding mix. The results=
=20
of the meetings will be compiled into a report to PBS's National Policy=20
Committee that will analyze current funding models, examine potential=20
solutions for bolstering funding and describe how such a proposal would be=
=20
executed. The process will start this month and run for three to six months.
John Lawson, president and CEO of the Association of Public Television=20
Stations (APTS) also spoke at the conference. In his address, titled "DTV:=
=20
Public Television's Second Chance," Lawson laid out his vision of the=20
unique role that digital technology must play in the future of all public=20
television stations. Whether it is through the provision of greater=20
programming services to communities through multicasting, or the potential=
=20
to generate new streams of revenue through datacasting, Lawson encouraged=20
public television stations to embrace digital technology. Lawson stressed=20
the importance of the local public television station, working with their=20
producers at the local level and PBS nationally, to develop digital=20
content, particularly in education, to renew public television stations'=20
missions after the digital conversion. After his remarks, Lawson was joined=
=20
in a panel discussion by Joe Bruns (WETA), Sherri Hope Culver (WYBE), James=
=20
Pagliarini (TPT), Sandra Session-Robertson (WCEU) and Dan Schmidt (Network=
=20
Chicago). The station leaders discussed the innovative ways their stations=
=20
are meeting the needs of their local communities.
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Christopher Lisotta]
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=3D6844
For more information on the Future of Public Television conference which=20
continues today see:
http://culturalpolicy.uchicago.edu/pbs/

CONTENT

SINCE WHEN DOES CONFLICT TURN OFF THE NETWORKS?
[Commentary] A UCC minister responds to the decision by television networks=
=20
not to run a church ad welcoming homosexuals and other minorities. If=20
advocacy is truly the objection, then ads from the armed services should=20
also be banned because recruitment of soldiers is clearly advocacy for war,=
=20
she writes. Shockley believes the networks should either let the church buy=
=20
the time to welcome people who feel excluded from some Christian churches=20
or send news crews to UCC's 6,000 churches that openly accept gays and=20
lesbians. "To neither cover us as news nor allow us to buy time because=20
we're too controversial is to deny us our freedom of speech and our freedom=
=20
of religion." Right-wing/fundamentalist Christianity has so dominated the=20
media that many Americans don't believe liberal/progressive Christianity=20
even exists. The fundamentalist message is the de facto Christian message=20
because such groups have the money to not only buy airtime but to have=20
their own shows. And every time Jerry Falwell blames gays or feminists for=
=20
society's ills, he shows up on the news.
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR:Madison Shockley, United Church of=
Christ]
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-shockley3dec03,1,...
899.story?coll=3Dla-news-comment
(requires registration)

THE NASCAR NIGHTLY NEWS: ANCHORMAN GET YOUR GUN
When TV news organizations start repositioning themselves to pander to=20
Nascar dads and "moral values" voters, it's a problem for everyone. There's=
=20
a war on. TV remains by far the most prevalent source of news for=20
Americans. We need honest information to help us navigate, not bunkum=20
skewed to flatter one segment of the country, whatever that segment might=
be.
[SOURCE: New York Times 12/5, AUTHOR: Frank Rich]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/05/arts/05rich.html?oref=3Dlogin&oref=3Dl...
(requires registration)

DON'T EXPECT THE GOVERNMENT TO BE A V-CHIP
[Commentary] As one deeply suspicious of government involvement in the=20
regulation of content, I understand and often agree with those who stand up=
=20
for the cherished value of free speech. But as a parent, I respect the=20
desire of the American people for a minimum level of decency on the public=
=20
airwaves - particularly where their children are concerned. The often=20
unenviable task of striking a balance between these two competing values=20
falls to the Federal Communications Commission. Context remains the=20
critical factor in determining if content is legally indecent. That context=
=20
and the specific facts of each program are reasons the government can't=20
devise a book of rules listing all the bad stuff. Further the=20
Communications Act expressly forbids the FCC from banning a program before=
=20
broadcast, and any such effort might very well run afoul of the First=20
Amendment. If one slices through the rhetoric, you'll find that most=20
opponents of the agency's strong enforcement efforts believe that the=20
government simply should not impose any decency standard at all. Berating=20
citizens who believe in values and reasonable limits is insulting and=20
polarizing and distracts from the legitimate issues of this policy debate.=
=20
Critics of the law should instead focus their efforts on changing the law,=
=20
if that's what they want. Until then, the American people have a right to=20
expect that the FCC will continue to fulfill its duty of upholding the law,=
=20
while being fully cognizant of the delicate First Amendment balance that=20
must be struck.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: FCC Chairman Michael Powell]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/03/opinion/03powell.html
(requires registration)

THE UNREAL WORLD
The formula for every successful reality show is an easily understandable=20
premise steeped in some social belief that provokes an audience reaction of=
=20
=93Oh, my god! =85What=92s wrong with you?=94 Viewers may be drawn to=
reality TV by=20
a sort of cinematic schadenfreude, but they continue to tune in because=20
these shows frame their narratives in ways that both reflect and reinforce=
=20
deeply ingrained societal biases about women, men, love, beauty, class and=
=20
race. The genre teaches us that women categorically =93are=94 certain things=
=97=20
for example, no matter their age, they=92re =93hot girls,=94 not self- aware=
or=20
intelligent adults.
[SOURCE: Ms. Magazine, AUTHOR: Jennifer Pozner ]
http://www.msmagazine.com/fall2004/unrealworld.asp

CABLE

POWELL: REGS WOULD HIKE MODEM RATES
Applying traditional phone-industry rules to cable-modem service would=20
raise consumer rates by about 10% or $1 billion, predicts FCC Chairman=20
Michael Powell. His comments came one day before the U.S. Supreme Court is=
=20
scheduled to decide whether to hear Brand X Internet Services vs. FCC, a=20
case from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that threatens=20
cable-modem service with traditional telecommunications obligations such as=
=20
open access to Internet-service providers, universal-service payments and=20
interconnection with other telecommunications carriers. Consumer groups and=
=20
various ISPs support the Brand X ruling, saying that it would expose=20
cable-modem service to greater competition and make broadband access more=20
affordable.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: ]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA484860.html?display=3DBreaking+News
(requires subscription)

COMCAST FLOATS NEW SET-TOP DEADLINE
The Federal Communications Commission is planning to ban cable-operator=20
distribution of new integrated digital and hybrid boxes after July 2006,=20
but cable giant Comcast has a proposal that would give cable operators=20
until at least 2008 to discontinue the deployment of set-tops. An=20
integration ban would mean that all new cable boxes except analog-only=20
units would need to support CableCards -- devices inserted into set-tops=20
that store the conditional-access codes to guard against signal theft.=20
Comcast and the National Cable & Telecommunications Association claimed=20
that the integration ban would raise the price of set-tops. They also=20
argued that the ban is unnecessary because the market offers=20
CableCard-enabled digital-TV sets that receive one-way cable programming=20
without set-tops.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA484803.html?display=3DBreaking+News
(requires subscription)

RURAL CONSUMERS REQUIRE GREATER FLEXIBILITY IN CHOOSING TELEVISION=
PROGRAMMING
The National Telecommunications Cooperative Association (NTCA) is concerned=
=20
that a study conducted by the FCC=92s Media Bureau on the sale of video=20
programming services discounts the possibility of customers being able to=20
choose a la carte video programming. NTCA believes that certain consumers=20
could benefit from having the option to subscribe to a la carte services.=20
NTCA=92s members provide cable TV and other video programming services to=20
customers in rural areas. However, small providers lack negotiating=20
leverage and are forced to buy packages that do not reflect their=20
customers=92 preferences. In addition, as smaller providers have limited=20
capacity on their networks, having to purchase bundled packages that may=20
include unwanted programming restricts their flexibility in other program=20
offerings. According to the Media Bureau=92s "Report on the Packaging and=20
Sale of Video Programming Services to the Public," consumers who subscribe=
=20
to more than nine channels likely would face an increase in their monthly=20
bills under an a la carte regime. As such, the price increase would be felt=
=20
by the average consumer, who watches approximately 17 different channels,=20
including broadcast stations, the study concludes. But NTCA contends that=20
these results, in fact, may indicate that those whose viewing preferences=20
are more focused actually could see a decrease in expenditures, if allowed=
=20
to subscribe to video programming on an a la carte basis.
[SOURCE: National Telecommunications Cooperative Association Press Release]
http://www.ntca.org/ka/ka-3.cfm?content_item_id=3D2768&folder_id=3D298

QUICKLY

Domain Names Body Meets with Full Agenda
The Internet Corporation on Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is meeting=20
in Cape Town, South Africa, with a full agenda framed by ICANN's newly=20
released strategic plan and the recent formation of a UN working group on=20
Internet governance with potential implications for ICANN.
[SOURCE: Center for Democracy and Technology]
(http://www.cdt.org)

US netizens: white, wealthy and full of it - shock!
A survey by the US Department of Commerce's National Telecommunications and=
=20
Information Administration shows that the Internet has entrenched the=20
divide between rich and poor, and the races. Statistics reveal an Internet=
=20
that's overwhelmingly white, wealthy and urban. The pace of Internet=20
adoption has tapered off to a trickle, with a substantial part of the=20
population not interested in the Internet at any price.
[SOURCE: The Registar, AUTHOR: Andrew Orlowski]
http://www.theregister.com/2004/12/01/us_doc_internet_survey/

Nielsen/NetRatings estimates that there are now over 100 million Internet=20
users in Europe and more than half connect using broadband.
[SOURCE: Reuters]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=3DZTAEC0O3XXAVICRBAE...
Y?type=3DtechnologyNews&storyID=3D6979104

Telecom Experts Suggest Pace of Technological Change & Competition Makes=20
Existing Laws Passe
A report released Wednesday by the New Millennium Research Council (NMRC)=20
reveals that some regulators believe that a new paradigm for Internet=20
Protocol (IP)-based networks and applications providers is best left to=20
market forces with minimal regulation at the federal and state levels.=20
Officials note that important social policies such as E-911, universal=20
service, and access for law enforcement and people with disabilities should=
=20
be ongoing topics of interest for regulators.
[SOURCE: New Millennium Research Council Press Release]
http://www.newmillenniumresearch.org/news/mr12-1-04.pdf

TV Time, Unlike Child Care, Ranks High in Mood Study
A team of psychologists and economists is reporting today what many=20
Americans know but do not always admit, especially to social scientists:=20
that watching television by oneself is a very enjoyable way to pass the=20
time, and that taking care of children - bless their little hearts - is=20
often about as much fun as housework.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: ]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/03/health/03mood.html
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
...and we are outta here (to watch TV and kids!). Thanks for reading this=20
far -- have a great weekend.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service=20
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through=20
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,=20
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are=20
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the=
=20
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang=20
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 12/02/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

AGENDA ITEMS
Improving Spectrum Management for the 21st Century
White House Seeks to Speed DTV Switch
Upcoming Congressional Agenda

MEDIA
CBS, NBC Refuse to Air Church's Television Advertisement
Networks' New Wave of News

BROADBAND
Fast Internet Service for The People
Carriers Throw their Weight Around Towns
Verizon Concessions Tip Balance In Favor of PA Broadband Law
High Tech Players Urge Opening TV 'White Spaces' to Broadband

QUICKLY -- Minnesota Backs Away from VoIP Regulation; Comcast Seeks
Deregulation in Dallas; EU Review of
Microsoft-ContentGuard Deal;
Digital Forensics

AGENDA ITEMS

IMPROVING SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
President Bush has directed the heads of executive departments and agencies
to implement the recommendations in the of two Department of Commerce
reports titled Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century: The Presidents
Spectrum Policy Initiative. Specifically, the President is asking 1) the
Office of Management and Budget, within six months, to provide guidance for
improving capital planning and investment control procedures to better
identify spectrum requirements and the costs of investments in
spectrum-dependent programs and systems -- and for agencies to adopt these
recommendations by 12/05; 2) any agency head chosen by the Secretary of
Commerce to provide strategic spectrum plans including a) spectrum
requirements, b) plans for new technology adoption, and c) suggestions for
efficient approaches to meeting identified spectrum requirements; and 3)
the Secretary of Homeland Security to present public safety spectrum needs
and a plan to meet these needs.
[SOURCE: The White House]
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/11/20041130-8.html
Reaction from NTIA:
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2004/execmemo_12012004.html

WHITE HOUSE SEEKS TO SPEED DTV SWITCH
One of the recommendations in "Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century" (see
story above) concerns the transition to digital television. The Commerce
Department is to establish a private-sector advisory committee to help the
federal government keep the digital-TV transition on track and to resolve
other tricky telecommunications issues, such as promoting nationwide,
affordable access to high-speed Internet service. Although the FCC has said
it will be hard to complete the switch to all-digital TV before 2009, the
White House still insists that the Commerce Department's National
Telecommunications and Information Administration try to wrap it up by Dec.
31, 2006, the government's target date for reclaiming old analog channels.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA484757?display=Breaking+News&...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

UPCOMING CONGRESSIONAL AGENDA
Incoming Senate Commerce Committee staff director Lisa Sutherland told a
telecom conference audience that telecommunications reform legislation in
the next Congress may also include reforming the FCC's decision-making
process. She noted that the telecom industry always seems to be in a state
of uncertainty because FCC
rulemakings take too long and are held up in lengthy court challenges.
Other Hill staffers identified priorities for the next Congress: universal
service, intercarrier compensation, regulatory parity, antitrust
protection, and accelerating the digital television conversion.
At a Media Institute meeting, industry analysts offered their predictions
on the FCC and Congressional agenda. They said support for the FCC's plan
to accelerate the digital TV conversion (by counting cable and satellite
subscribers as digital households) has lost momentum. They predicted no
telecom reform bill will pass in the next Congress especially if they
address controversial issues like media ownership and indecency standards.
The were unanimous in declaring a la carte pricing a dead issue for next
Congress.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Terry Lane]
(Not available online)

MEDIA

CBS, NBC REFUSES TO AIR CHURCH'S TELEVISION ADVERTISEMENT
The CBS and NBC television networks are refusing to run a 30-second
television ad from the United Church of Christ that has been deemed "too
controversial" because its ad implies acceptance of gay and lesbian couples
-- among other minority constituencies. "Because this commercial touches
on the exclusion of gay couples and other minority groups by other
individuals and organizations," reads an explanation from CBS, "and the
fact the Executive Branch has recently proposed a Constitutional Amendment
to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is
unacceptable for broadcast on the [CBS and UPN] networks." CBS and NBC's
refusal to air the ad "recalls the censorship of the 1950s and 1960s, when
television station WLBT in Jackson, Miss., refused to show people of color
on TV," says Ron Buford, coordinator for the United Church of Christ
identity campaign. Buford, of African-American heritage, says, "In the
1960s, the issue was the mixing of the races. Today, the issue appears to
be sexual orientation. In both cases, it's about exclusion." "The
consolidation of TV network ownership into the hands of a few executives
today puts freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression in
jeopardy," says former FCC Commissioner Gloria Tristani, currently managing
director of the UCC's Office of Communication. "By refusing to air the
United Church of Christ's paid commercial, CBS and NBC are stifling
religious expression. They are denying the communities they serve a
suitable access to differing ideas and expressions." Adds Andrew
Schwartzman, president and CEO of the not-for-profit Media Access Project ,
"This is an abuse of the broadcasters' duty to inform their viewers on
issues of importance to the community. After all, these stations don't mind
carrying shocking, attention-getting programming, because they do that
every night."
[SOURCE: United Church of Christ Press Release]
http://www.ucc.org/news/u113004a.htm
See also --
* Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26458-2004Dec1.html
* NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/02/national/02church.html

NETWORKS' NEW WAVE OF NEWS
With Brian Williams taking over tonight for Tom Brokaw on "NBC Nightly
News," and Dan Rather's announcement last week that he is leaving "CBS
Evening News" in March, the often-staid broadcast news divisions appear
ready to embrace change. Everything seems to be on the table. Networks
might push newscasts to later in the evening to adapt to family schedules
and commuters. Anchors such as Williams will increasingly turn up on early
morning shows and Internet chat rooms to gain more exposure, and broadcast
executives hope, viewers. And yes, they will make frequent guest
appearances on entertainment programs like "The Daily Show," which has
become a proxy newscast for many young viewers. Entertainment values --
employed fully by Fox News Channel in its successful decade-long battle
against CNN -- are becoming paramount. Orville Schell, dean of the Graduate
School of Journalism at UC Berkeley, is convinced the new strategies will
reduce the quality of news programming. He noted the networks' obsession
with ratings, which drive advertising rates.
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR:Scott Collins]
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-et-networks2dec02,1,29...
(requires registration)

BROADBAND

FAST INTERNET SERVICE FOR THE PEOPLE
Consumer advocates denounce the new Pennsylvania law restricting municipal
broadband networks. They say it amounts to governments now needing a
permission slip from entrenched cable and telephone monopolies to put a
vital economic and educational tool within everyone's reach. Government has
a long history of providing essential public services, these advocates
remind, pointing to national highways or electricity in rural areas. "The
Internet . . . is a true global public utility," said Jeffrey Chester,
director of the Center for Digital Democracy, an advocate for consumer
rights online. "We should be trying to provide it for free." Harold J.
Feld, associate director of the Media Access Project, a consumer-media
advocacy group, said a phone or cable company could always come in and
provide a wireless network, competing on price and service with any
municipal offering. "But who gets to decide what municipalities can do?"
Feld said. "Will it be corporations?" Companies such as Verizon, which
helped shape the Pennsylvania law, argue that telecommunications firms
would have little incentive to build networks if they have to compete with
government-subsidized service.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Jonathan Krim]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26409-2004Dec1.html
(requires registration)
See also --
* Despite lip service, telecom execs hate competition
[Commentary] A recent report shows that the United States has slipped from
11th place to 13th place among nations in terms of broadband penetration.
If policy-makers want to reverse that trend, they need to stop kowtowing to
powerful interests and start working to promote broadband competition in
all of its forms.
[SOURCE: San Jose Mercury News, AUTHOR:Miguel Helft]
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/10313755.htm
* NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/02/technology/02wireless.html
* Center for Digital Democracy's response to the PA law outlawing municipal
networks:
http://www.democraticmedia.org/news/Rendell.html

CARRIERS THROW THEIR WEIGHT AROUND TOWNS
As competition between cable and phone companies becomes increasingly
cutthroat, these arch-rivals are shelving their differences, teaming up to
derail community broadband projects. This alliance of odd couples is making
a multipronged attack, from lobbying state legislators to ban
government-run broadband networks, to flooding airwaves and mailboxes with
messages against these projects. As evidence of their success, the
incumbents won a huge victory in the spring when the U.S. Supreme Court
ruled that states can pass laws barring municipalities from building
broadband networks that could compete with private companies. "The issue is
(that the municipalities) control rights of way, and to regulate us at same
time they're competing with us is a recipe for trouble," said Dave
Pacholczyk, an SBC spokesman.
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Jim Hu]
http://news.com.com/Carriers+throw+their+weight+around+towns/2100-1034_3...

VERIZON CONCESSIONS TIP BALANCE IN FAVOR OF PA BROADBAND LAW
There's plenty of bad things in the legislation, but will anything good
come from the bill signed by Pennsylvania Governor Edward Rendell (D) that
restricts municipal broadband networks? Possibly. 1) To protect affordable
phone service for low-income households, the law requires incumbents to
automatically notify residents who apply for state public assistance that
they are eligible for an $8 discount on monthly phone bills and up to $100
toward installation charges. The bill also allows these low income
subscribers to buy services such as caller ID or call waiting. Previously,
these customers weren't allowed to have these services, and this
restriction was considered a significant impediment to Lifeline enrollment.
2) The bill requires Verizon and other incumbents to provide broadband
service to K-12 schools at 30% off the market rate or, if it's less, the
actual incremental cost of providing service to the buildings. 3) It also
established a $10 million education technology fund to help schools pay for
the equipment needed to take advantage of their broadband connections. 4)
Verizon promised to sell broadband equipment to schools at a discounted
price equal to cost plus 5%. And it agreed to sell its managed network
services to schools at a 20% discount from list. Rendell said the law's
discounts and Verizon's commitments would represent at least $350 million
in broadband savings to schools the next 10 years. 5) The law also sets up
a process by which the state Dept. of Community & Economic Development
(DCED) can designate specific rural communities to go to the head of the
deployment queue to serve local economic development projects. Under this
provision, incumbents must provide broadband service to DCED-designated
communities within 12 months of the request from that agency. 5) Verizon
promised Gov Rendell that, regardless of what the federal jurisdiction may
do with regard to unbundling, it will continue to offer unbundled services
to competitors up to 40% off list.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Herb Kirchhoff, Susan Polyakova]
(Not available online)

HIGH TECH PLAYERS URGE OPENING TV 'WHITE SPACES' TO BROADBAND
High tech companies, anxious to open up more spectrum for Wi-Fi and other
unlicensed uses, strongly supported an FCC proposal to allow the use of
"white spaces" between TV channels, in comments on a proposed rulemaking.
In general, high tech companies view the lower-frequency spectrum as
especially valuable for unlicensed
use because of its superior propagation characteristics. As expected,
broadcasters slammed the plan. Cable operators cited a potential threat to
their operations. The FCC appears likely to offer a pilot project testing
FCC Office of Engineering & Technology arguments the white spaces can be
safely used. Sources said Wed. only a change in leadership at the
Commission would potentially kill the initiative.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily]
(Not available online)
[The Benton Foundation signed on to comments drafted by the Media Access
Project and the New America Foundation that support the FCC proposal. See
those comments at:
http://www.mediaaccess.org/programs/broadband/BcstBandsFINALforNAF.pdf]

QUICKLY

MINNESOTA BACKS DOWN ON VOIP RULES -- FOR NOW
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission has temporarily halted the
first-ever attempt by a state to impose its telephone rules and regulations
on an Internet phone service provider -- in part because the FCC recently
claimed sole jurisdiction over VoIP. In halting its regulatory plan on
Tuesday, the Minnesota commission promised to resurrect the effort should a
judge or Congress modify the FCC's order. Minnesota utility regulators also
will jump-start the effort should a court decide U.S. District Court Judge
Michael Davis was wrong to permanently bar the state from regulating
Internet phone company Vonage last October. A decision is expected in about
90 days.
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Ben Charny]
http://news.com.com/Minnesota+backs+down+on+VoIP+rules--for+now/2100-735...

COMCAST SEEKING DALLAS DEREGULATION
Arguing that at least 15% of the local market subscribes to satellite TV,
Comcast is asking the FCC to free the cable giant of rate regulation in
Dallas. If Comcast is successful, Dallas would lose authority to set
basic-cable rates at a time when large cable companies are announcing 2005
rate increases that are not playing well in the national media. The Dallas
government, which oversees Comcast's basic rates, is planning to oppose the
company at the FCC, said Nick Fehrenbach, the city's manager of regulatory
affairs and utility franchising.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA484751.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)

EU REGULATORS SUSPEND REVIEW OF MICROSOFT-CONTENTGUARD DEAL
With electronics maker Thomson SA joining Microsoft and Time Warner's
investment in antipiracy-software company ContentGuard, the European Union
Commission has stopped the clock on its review of the deal waiting for new
information about Thomson's role. EU Commission regulators sent out formal
objections to the venture last month, saying it may give Microsoft too much
power over the technology made by ContentGuard, which is becoming crucial
for online sales of music and video. Regulators still could demand
concessions in exchange for approval or block the deal outright. They even
might require the deal to be resubmitted in a new form, triggering a second
investigation.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: William Echikson
william.echikson( at )dowjones.com ]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110190719223287932,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)

DEPUTY GEEK, REPORTING FOR DUTY
The European Information Society Group (EURIM) is calling on the U.K.
government to recruit information technology workers as special constables,
or volunteers who work with police officers to take a byte out of crime on
the Internet. The recommendations follow findings earlier this year that
only approximately 240 people are qualified to work in digital forensics
and evidence recovery. EURIM, a British technology lobbying group, is
proposing to increase the number of skilled police officers monitoring the
cyberworld.
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Dan Ilett]
http://news.com.com/Deputy+geek%2C+reporting+for+duty/2100-7348_3-547308...
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 12/01/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

TODAY'S QUESTION: Is it really a good idea to give phone companies the
right to deny municipalities the ability to deploy their own networks? (see
first story below)

TELECOM POLICY
Law Restricts Municipal Wi-Fi Networks
TV Stations Urge Go-Slow Approach on Wi-Fi
NCTA Raises TV-Interference Concerns
Nation's Advocates Propose Wireless Consumer Protections
Bright House Seeking 'Naked' DSL Ruling
FCC Should Embrace 'Dynamic Deregulation'

MEDIA POLICY
APTS Applauds the Continued Growth in Federal Support
for Public Television
PBS Deal With Comcast Seen as Militating Against
Mission & Values
Fighting FCC on Indecency
TV Executives Urge Taking Wider View of Family Friendly Programming
EchoStar Says It Can't Provide Local Emergency Alerts
Libel Case Could Chill Speech Online
The Fight for Docu-Democracy

WORTH A LISTEN? -- Digital Generations; Payola Persists

FROM THE BLOGSPHERE -- Pegasus News; Media as Election '04 Loser

TELECOM POLICY

LAW RESTRICTS MUNICIPAL WI-FI NETWORKS
Pennsylvania Gov. Edward Rendell (D) said late Tuesday night that he had
signed into law a large telecommunications bill placing severe restrictions
on the ability of cities and towns to offer telecommunications services, an
item that was heavily lobbied by Verizon and other big telephone companies
in similar legislation across the country. The legislation signed by Gov.
Rendell gives phone companies the right to deny municipalities the ability
to deploy their own networks, which could hinder the deployment of Wi-Fi
networks throughout the state. Gov. Rendell said that the bill's provision
limiting municipal competition was a "problem." However, he pointed to
Verizon's agreement to waive its right to stop Philadelphia's plan for a
Wi-Fi network, and said the state would "work with other municipalities on
projects that they have established or propose to establish in order to
ensure that, to the extent that they are now viable, they will also have
the opportunity to succeed." The legislation also contains a potentially
lucrative provision giving phone companies like Verizon large incentives to
promise to modernize their networks. Some have criticized that provision
since companies would be eligible for the incentives after filing the
modernization plans, but before the upgrades have actually taken place.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Jesse Drucker jesse.drucker( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110185892280287396,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)
See also:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23826-2004Nov30.html

TV STATIONS URGE GO-SLOW APPROACH ON WI-FI
Public and commercial broadcasters are asking the FCC to delay plans to let
wireless local area computer networks (known as Wi-Fi) and other unlicensed
communications devices operate on vacant TV channels. The FCC proposal
"would produce many detrimental and unintended consequences to America's
free, over-the-air television service but fails to present any meaningful
method for resolving such problems," the National Association of
Broadcasters wrote in comments filed with the FCC Tuesday. "The public
would be ill-served by its adoption." The Association for Public Television
Stations agrees with that assessment. Until broadcasters have picked their
permanent channels and real-world testing of the devices proves that there
will be no interference, introduction of the new service puts at risk the
billion-plus dollars that public stations have invested in construction of
digital television facilities. The Wi-Fi Alliance, an association that
certifies interoperability of wireless local area network products,
however, is eager for the FCC to move forward. It asked the Commission to
allow telecom companies great leeway in choosing which
interference-mitigation techniques they believe work the best rather than
forcing a particular method on the industry.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA484384.html?display=Breaking+...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

NCTA RAISES TV-INTERFERENCE CONCERNS
Allowing unlicensed wireless-Internet providers to share broadcast-TV
spectrum could disrupt cable-system access to TV stations that have
mandatory carriage rights, the National Cable & Telecommunications
Association said Tuesday. NCTA said the FCC's proposal, particularly in
urban areas, could foster so much congestion that "an electromagnetic
cloud" could emerge, "making it nearly impossible to identify a single
source of interference in the presence of many such sources." Each TV
market is allocated 402 megahertz of spectrum -- enough bandwidth to
accommodate 67 TV stations. But the average consumer has access to about
seven stations due to market conditions and interference issues that
require channel spacing among stations.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA484376.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)

NATION'S ADVOCATES PROPOSE WIRELESS CONSUMER PROTECTIONS
An organization of the nation's consumer utility advocates believes that
over 160 million wireless customers need to be protected from unscrupulous
advertising, poor service and anti-competitive practices. The National
Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates (NASUCA) unanimously passed
a resolution earlier this month at its annual meeting in Nashville,
Tennessee, calling for state and federal action to adopt and enforce
service quality and consumer protection standards for wireless companies.
NASUCA believes that the important areas that should be applied to all
wireless companies and made mandatory include: 1) Clear and uniform
disclosure of all rates and charges at the point where a consumer is
purchasing a service plan. Customers need to know up front about any
activation, airtime, roaming, long-distance and early termination fees; 2)
Providing customers with the full terms and conditions of service. This
information should include equipment return, cancellation and replacement
policies, contract extension guidelines and a method for agreeing or
declining inclusion in directory assistance listings; 3) Itemized billing
to clearly separate company-imposed charges from those fees and taxes
mandated or authorized by a federal, state or local government. Customers
need the ability to make educated decisions, including knowing which fees
are comparable; 4)Distribution of accurate calling area maps and disclosure
of coverage gaps; and 5) Details of how emergency 9-1-1 services are
accessed, including variations from customers' expectations from
traditional home telephone service.
[SOURCE: Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates]
http://www.nasuca.org/newsroom/PR-wireless%20resolution.doc

BRIGHT HOUSE SEEKING 'NAKED' DSL RULING
Cable companies are asking the FCC to direct every incumbent phone company
"to port numbers without delay and to offer 'naked' DSL, i.e., DSL on a
line without voice service also on it." Doing so would make it easier for
cable companies to sell their Internet telephone services to current phone
company customers. Verizon and BellSouth require customers of their DSL and
local-phone services to drop both if the customer just wants to change
local-phone providers and will not transfer customers' telephone numbers to
new phone providers until both local service and DSL are dropped.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA483829.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)

FCC SHOULD EMBRACE 'DYNAMIC DEREGULATION'
Randolph May, senior fellow with The Progress & Freedom Foundation, has
developed a new scorecard designed to measure whether the Commission is
acting in a deregulatory, pro-competitive manner. To act consistently with
the "Dynamic Deregulation Vision" (last seen on Batman), May set four
benchmarks for the FCC; it should: 1) finish freeing broadband facilities
from unbundling obligations, 2) remove local switching from the unbundling
requirements, 3) remove high capacity loops from the unbundling regime, and
4) take specific actions to ensure prompt implementation of its UNE decision.
[SOURCE: Progress and Freedom Foundation Press Release]
http://www.pff.org/news/news/2004/112904troscorecard.html

MEDIA POLICY

APTS APPLAUDS THE CONTINUED GROWTH IN FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR PUBLIC TELEVISION
In the Consolidated Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2005, funding for
public broadcasting grew by more than $11 million, with the most
significant increases coming in the form of federal support for digital
infrastructure. While advance funding for the Corporation for Public
Broadcasting remained steady at $400 million in FY 2007, pre-rescission
funding for the new satellite system to interconnect local stations was $40
million, up from $9.9 million the previous year. Congress allocating $40
million to CPB to support the digital transition of local stations, $21
million for the Public Telecommunications Facilities Program (PTFP), and
$10 million for public television stations serving rural populations to
build out their digital infrastructure. Congress also provided
pre-rescission funding levels of $23.5 million for Ready To Learn, an
increase of nearly $1 million, and $14.4 million for Ready To Teach, two
important educational programs that support curriculum-based content and
community-based outreach.
[SOURCE: Association of Public Television Stations Press Release]
http://www.apts.org/news/approps05.cfm

PBS DEAL WITH COMCAST SEEN AS MILITATING AGAINST MISSION AND VALUES
Public TV stations are mostly ambivalent about PBS's decision to lend its
name to a commercial children's channel being launched in partnership with
Comcast, HIT Entertainment and Sesame Workshop. Comcast and HIT would
invest $75 million in the channel, set for launch in fall 2005. PBS and
Sesame Workshop will put up no cash but will get 15% equity each for the
PBS brand, broadcast cross-promotion and goodwill. But some stations fear
the unabashedly commercial nature of the venture will give lawmakers on
Capitol Hill and in the states an excuse to drastically cut or even
eliminate funding for public broadcasting. PBS COO Wayne Godwin says some
producers were ready to take there shows to the new network with or without
PBS, but now PBS and Sesame Workshop are in position to shape the
programming philosophy of the new channel and have influence over the kinds
of commercials that will be show [Arthur juice box, anyone?]. Critics
include Citizens for Independent Public Broadcasting which warns that
commercialism "corrupts" PBS's mission.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Dinesh Kumar]
(Not available online)

FIGHTING FCC ON INDECENCY
Has the FCC, in its string of rulings this year, confined itself to the
powers defined by the Supreme Court in FCC vs. Pacifica (the 1978 case that
featured George Carlin and the prohibition of seven dirty words)?
Broadcasters believe the agency has exceeded its bounds. In Pacifica, the
court had reprimanded the Pacifica Foundation for allowing Carlin's riff to
play on its New York radio station during the afternoon when a young boy
was listening. The high court in a 5-to-4 vote affirmed the agency's power
to regulate indecent broadcasts. The court's majority emphasized "the
narrowness of our holding." Its dissenters expressed fear the court had set
broadcasting on a path toward airing "only what is fit for children." The
high court said broadcasting has limited free-speech protections only for
two reasons: It is "uniquely pervasive" because it reaches into homes, and
it is "uniquely accessible to children, even those too young to read."
There is little doubt the environment surrounding broadcasters has changed
since the ruling.
[SOURCE: MediaWeek.com, AUTHOR: Todd Shields]
http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
There's more on the recent indecency campaign at:
The Great Indecency Hoax
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/arts/28rich.html?oref=login
(requires registration)

TV EXECUTIVES URGE TAKING WIDER VIEW OF FAMILY FRIENDLY PROGRAMMING
The Association of National Advertisers (ANA), the Family Friendly
Programming Forum (FFPF), and the National Council for Families & TV held
the Family Friendly Programming Symposium on Tuesday at which broadcast
executives warned that care should be given when seeking programming with
family oriented appeal because the definition of family has changed. They
also noted that although many people say there needs to be more safe,
family programming on the air, when asked if they would watch it, the
answer is no.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Valerie Milano]
(Not available online)

ECHOSTAR SAYS IT CAN'T PROVIDE LOCAL EMERGENCY ALERTS
EchoStar said it can't receive, process and relay emergency alerts to the
550 Emergency Alert System (EAS) local areas. "The difficulties of
obtaining this capability are likely insurmountable," EchoStar said in
reply comments on the FCC's review of EAS. The company wouldn't specify the
costs of such a system, an EchoStar
spokesman said, saying only that the price in resources and bandwidth would
be "nearly inestimable."
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Tania Panczyk-Collins]
(Not available online)

LIBEL CASE COULD CHILL SPEECH ONLINE
Last week the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil
Liberties Union of Northern California (ACLU) filed a friend-of-the-court
brief in a case that could undermine a federal statute protecting the free
speech of bloggers, Internet service providers, and other individuals who
use the Internet to post content written by others. The case in question is
a libel suit filed against women's health advocate Illena Rosenthal after
she posted a controversial opinion piece on a Usenet news group. The piece
was written not by Rosenthal, but by Tim Bolen, a critic of plaintiff Terry
Polevoy. In their brief, EFF and the ACLU argue that Section 230 of the
federal telecommunications Act of 1996 protects Internet publishers from
being held liable for allegedly harmful comments written by others. Similar
attempts to eliminate the protections created by Section 230 have almost
universally been rejected, until a California Court of Appeals radically
reinterpreted the statute to allow lawsuits against non-authors. The case
is being reviewed by the California Supreme Court
[SOURCE: Electronic Frontier Foundation]
http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2004_11.php#002132

THE FIGHT FOR DOCU-DEMOCRACY
[Commentary] Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911 demonstrated that there is a
large global market for dissenting perspectives that can compete for
mainstream movie goers and attention. Beyond the proliferation and success
of compelling well made films there is a deeper meaning to this phenomenon
that directly impacts on the media and democracy fight. The docu-explosion
is part of the emergence of an oppositional culture responding to the
decline of quality in our media system, the uniformity of its approach to
news and information and growing distrust it has spawned.
[SOURCE: Mediachannel.org, AUTHOR: Danny Schechter]
http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/affalert293.shtml

WORTH A LISTEN?

DIGITAL GENERATIONS
Monday: A report on how some rural communities are installing their own
high-speed Internet connections. New research indicates that speed is the
determining factor in who uses the Internet.
Tuesday: Cell phones, PDAs, computers and MP3 players may seem a bit
confusing to the average adult but for kids born in the digital age, these
devices are second nature. A 13-year old and his family talk about what it
means to grow up as a part of the Net Generation.
[SOURCE: Morning Edition]
http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=3&prgDate=29-Nov-2004
http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=3&prgDate=30-Nov-2004

PAYOLA PERSISTS
In 1960, legendary disc jockey Alan Freed was indicted for accepting music
industry money in exchange for radio air time. The scandal sparked
anti-"payola" legislation, but loopholes have persisted. Last month, New
York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer launched an investigation into modern
forms of pay-for-play by the major record labels. Brooke speaks with New
Yorker columnist James Surowiecki about "spot buys" and the gaming of the
Billboard charts.
[SOURCE: On the Media]
http://www.onthemedia.org/stream/ram.py?file=raotm/otm112604c.ra
http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_112604_payola.html

FROM THE BLOGSPHERE

A LOCAL MEDIA REVOLUTION?
A new local news company called Pegasus News is aiming to reinvent local
market content and advertising, according to its Website. The company says
its beta test will take place in Dallas, Texas in late 2005 and eventually
launch in every top-25 U.S. market with a monopoly newspaper. "Within a
month of launch, the most broadly interesting and immediate content from
that site will be published in a daily tabloid print newspaper," the site
says. The core principles of Pegasus News are: 1) Local news and
information is aggressively, inherently, totally local, 2) Users have so
many choices of medium, that we cannot afford not to distribute content
through as many media as technologically possible, 3) Media is a
conversation, not a monologue, 4) Engaged consumers are better than paying
consumers, and 5) All products and services are as precise and precisely
priced as technology will allow.
http://blog.pegasusnews.com/
[SOURCE: CyberJournalist.net]
http://www.cyberjournalist.net/

Writer Says Media is Election's Big Loser: 21 Times
Mega bloggers and syndicated columnists said it. College students and
ranting professors said it. Bob Dole said it. The real loser, the big loser
in '04 was The Media.
[SOURCE: PressThink]
http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 11/30/04

Gutierrez Is Pick for Commerce Secretary
President Bush has nominated Carlos Gutierrez, Cuban-born chief executive=20
of the Kellogg cereal company, to replace Donald Evans as secretary of=20
commerce. The Post writes that the Commerce Department is a hodgepodge=20
agency that controls the Census Bureau, the National Oceanic and=20
Atmospheric Administration, the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the=20
National Institute of Standards and Technology (as well as the National=20
Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)). Many of those=20
agencies will probably be on the chopping block when Bush unveils his 2006=
=20
budget request in February.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Mike Allen and Jonathan Weisman]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19761-2004Nov29.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20689-2004Nov29.html
(requires registration)

MEDIA OWNERSHIP
Fox, Viacom/CBS, and GE/NBC Tell Supreme Court:
FCC Ownership Rules Violate Our First Amendment Rights!
Giants Rule the Media Sea
The Next Rebirth of the Media
FCC Sells 258 Stations in First FM Auction
The Future of Broadcast Network News

MORE MEDIA POLICY
FCC Pressed To Enforce Restrictions on Sirius and XM Radio
Consumer Advisory Committee Recommendations on Digital Television

TELECOM
Verizon, Philadelphia Discuss Deal on City's Wi-Fi Proposal
Bell Rivals Struggle to Connect
White Spaces Proposal Threatens Public Safety, APCO Says

QUICKLY -- Education technology; Nielsen, Univision declare truce;=20
Universal service;
Cingular, MetroPCS spectrum deal; Media in China

MEDIA OWNERSHIP

MEDIA GIANTS TELL SUPREME COURT: FCC OWNERSHIP RULES VIOLATE OUR FIRST=20
AMENDMENT RIGHTS!
[Commentary] Three of the country's most powerful media corporations have=20
asked the U.S. Supreme Court for a thirty-day extension as they consider=20
whether to submit arguments designed to eliminate media ownership=20
safeguards. It's clear that these giants are going apoplectic over the=20
decision by the Third Circuit US Court of Appeals last June, which sent=20
most of Michael Powell's conglomerate love letter back for agency review.=20
In a joint filing by Fox, NBC/Telemundo, and Viacom, the networks continue=
=20
their long-running disinformation campaign and abuse of the First=20
Amendment. In their November 19th petition, the gang of three tell the=20
Court that Congress was so "skeptical of the continuing need" for=20
media-ownership rules that "the 1996 Congress enacted Section 202(h) of the=
=20
Telecommunications Act, which directed the FCC to 'review=85all of its=20
ownership rules biennially,' to 'determine whether any of such rules are=20
necessary in the public interest as the result of competition,' and to=20
'repeal or modify any regulation it determines to be no longer in the=20
public interest.'" The 202(h) provision has been cited repeatedly by the=20
networks and other media moguls as the key legal rationale for all media=20
ownership rules to be swept away (except those they favor, of course). But=
=20
the networks didn't tell the Supreme Court that one of them had placed the=
=20
provision in the 1996 legislation as a "poison pill," designed to be a sort=
=20
of "Manchurian Candidate" legal provision that would help them in their=20
campaign to destroy media ownership safeguards.
[SOURCE: Center for Digital Democracy]
http://www.democraticmedia.org/news/washingtonwatch/SupremeCourt202.html

GIANTS RULE THE MEDIA SEA
Pulitzer's move to possibly put itself on the market is a sign that=20
newspapers remain attractive businesses, despite declining circulation and=
=20
stiff competition from television, the Internet and other sources of=20
information. But the move also suggests that the days of small, independent=
=20
media companies are numbered, experts say. Before the age of conglomerates,=
=20
when most media companies were privately owned, they answered to three=20
constituencies, said Brian Steffens, executive director of the National=20
Newspaper Association. "Your stakeholders were the owners, the readers and=
=20
the advertisers," he said. When the companies sold stock to the public,=20
they added a fourth constituency - shareholders. That group, Steffens said,=
=20
"has no vested interest in the product, other than monetary return."
[SOURCE: St Louis Post-Dispatch, AUTHOR: Christopher Carey]
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/newswatch/story/591AD5...
A99F7586256F59006D2BA5?OpenDocument&Headline=3DGiants+rule+the+media+sea+&hi=
ghlight=3D2%2Cpulitzer

THE NEXT REBIRTH OF THE MEDIA
[Commentary] The entire media landscape is undergoing basic, fundamental,=20
change. A decade from now, much of what we take for granted will be morphed=
=20
beyond recognition. With broadband Internet flowing in to your PC, personal=
=20
video recorder, iPod, even your cellphone, you will be able to access what=
=20
you like, when you like. Sound great? Maybe for you, but not for broadcast=
=20
TV affiliates who may face extinction as networks find it more economical=20
to distribute programming via the Internet. Without that programming, why=20
would you give any attention to the ex-ABC/CBS/Fox/NBC affiliate in your=20
area? You might, if they offered local programming, but, these days, that's=
=20
the last type of programming you'll get from many affiliates. How will=20
these stations survive? They will have to become local-content specialists,=
=20
with intensely local-news and current-affairs programming the heart of=20
their operations: From micro-coverage via C-SPAN-style narrowcasts of local=
=20
government, to real-time traffic updates, to aggressive development of all=
=20
manner of nonfiction programming, including weather, talk, sports, schools,=
=20
condo and civic association politics, consumer affairs, even local music=20
and arts. And, of course, they will have to compete with local newspapers=20
who are way ahead in this evolution. It's competition that might actually=20
end up leaving the public better informed and better served.
[SOURCE: Miami Herald, AUTHOR: Prof. Edward Wasserman, Washington and Lee=20
University]
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/opinion/10292032.htm?1c
(requires free registration)

FCC SELLS 258 STATIONS IN FIRST FM AUCTION
The FCC raised $147.4 million in the first-ever auction for FM 258 radio=20
licenses. Located in mainly rural areas, the licenses were purchased by new=
=20
entrants to broadcasting as well as some of the biggest conglomerates in=20
radio like Clear Channel (3 licenses in Iowa and Washington) and Cumulus (7=
=20
licenses, each in a different state). In 1997, Congress ordered the FCC to=
=20
issue TV and radio licenses through bidding rather than doling them out to=
=20
applicants the commission deemed most qualified, as it had previously done.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA483748.html?display=3DBreakin...
ws&referral=3DSUPP
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
See also FCC Press Release:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254665A1.doc

THE FUTURE OF BROADCAST NETWORK NEWS
Over the weekend, Newsday and the Chicago Tribune ran long stories=20
addressing the question "will broadcast TV network newscasts survive?" The=
=20
combined audience of the Big Three networks still draw a weekly audience=20
that dwarfs that of cable news networks. And they still produce big=20
profits. But their audience is aging, not very desirable to broadcast=20
advertisers and may not be replaced by younger people who are used to=20
getting news when and where they want to. One industry analyst asks, Why=20
call yourself a network, if you don't runs a news division?
http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/news/ny-fftv4054422nov28,0,6600874....
y
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/arts/chi-0411280353nov28,1,34354....
y

MORE MEDIA POLICY

FCC PRESSED TO ENFORCE RESTRICTIONS ON SIRIUS AND XM RADIO
With envelope-pushing air talent like Howard Stern and Opie & Anthony=20
flocking to the less-restricted refuge of satellite radio, could the FCC --=
=20
and indecency enforcement -- be far behind? Legal experts think pay=20
services have deeper First Amendment rights, but one broadcaster believes=20
the FCC has the power to regulate satellite radio programming. Saul Levine=
=20
of Mt. Wilson FM Broadcasters has told the FCC that the type of radio=20
service =93is not a relevant consideration=94 in the imposition of=
programming=20
or public-interest rules, nor is whether satellite radio operates as a=20
broadcast or subscription service. In fact, the FCC put satcasters on=20
notice in 1997 that it =93may adopt additional public-interest requirements=
=20
at a later date.=94 Bolstering his case is the fact that some spectrum that=
=20
satellite operators use was granted without an auction, placing it in the=20
province of the public airwaves. Since that slice of spectrum was borrowed,=
=20
not bought, it belongs to the people and, the argument goes, the FCC can=20
attach indecency regulations to it. Andrew Schwartzman of the Media Access=
=20
Project agrees that the FCC has the authority to apply the indecency=20
statute to satellite. But, he adds, =93to do it, they would have to change=
=20
their own current rules, and I'm not so sure they would do it on their own,=
=20
without pressure from Congress. =93The Communications Act defines=20
subscription service broadcasting differently than broadcasting,=94=20
Schwartzman says. =93The FCC has the power to change that. =85 (Whether it=
=20
would) hold up in court is another matter.=94
[SOURCE: Radio Ink]
http://www.radioink.com/HeadlineEntry.asp?hid=3D126024&pt=3Dtodaysnews

CONSUMER ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS ON DIGITAL TELEVISION
On November 19, the FCC's Consumer Advisory Committee (CAC) adopted a=20
number of recommendations for the Commission. Concerning the FCC's "DTV -=20
Get It!" campaign, the CAC recommended: 1) the Commission should convene a=
=20
high-profile panel on consumer concerns; 2) The Commission should strive to=
=20
make all of the DTV outreach materials and information, distributed=20
electronically or physically, accessible to people with disabilities,=20
speakers of other languages, and those with low literacy skills; 3) the FCC=
=20
should move to ensure closed-captioned and video-described DTV content; and=
=20
4) the FCC work to clarify a) financial issues in transitioning from analog=
=20
to digital TV, b) nomenclature confusion, c) emergency warnings and=20
emergency information, d) interference issues and cable reception of=20
off-air signals, e) accelerating the transition via equipment subsidies, f)=
=20
standards and variations consumers will experience as they receive DTV over=
=20
the air, via cable, via satellite and via the emerging VDSL=20
(Very-high-speed Digital Subscriber Line) and fiber-to-the-home (FTTH)=20
delivery of DTV by phone companies, and g) compatibility with recording=20
devices (Personal Video Recorders, DVD-Recorders, etc.) and display devices
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/cac/

TELECOM

VERIZON, PHILADELPHIA DISCUSS DEAL ON CITY'S WI-FI PROPOSAL
The Pennsylvania General Assembly passed legislation this month that could=
=20
make it illegal for municipalities to provide low-cost wireless Internet=20
access via the technology called Wi-Fi, or to provide other=20
telecommunications services. Gov. Edward G. Rendell has until the end of=20
today to sign or veto the pending legislation, which would require=20
municipalities to ask the local phone company for permission to offer such=
=20
services. If the phone company says it plans a similar offering, it would=20
have the power to deny the municipality and then have 14 months to offer it=
=20
themselves. These provisions are part of a much larger bill supported by=20
Verizon that gives phone companies in Pennsylvania large financial=20
incentives if they promise to deploy broadband networks. They are also part=
=20
of a larger trend by telecom providers to lobby legislators to stem=20
competition from the public sector. Verizon is negotiating a deal with=20
Philadelphia that would allow the city to proceed with a planned Wi-Fi=20
network, but watchdog groups say that although it is a good deal for=20
Philly, it is bad news for the rest of PA and cities across America.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Jesse Drucker at=
jesse.drucker( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110177460936386225,00.html?mod=3Dtoda...
s_marketplace
(requires subscription)

BELL RIVALS STRUGGLE TO CONNECT
Industry executives and investors say the biggest obstacle to success for=20
local telephone service competitors has been legal and regulatory=20
uncertainty. In the past eight years, rules for how local-phone competition=
=20
should work in a mostly deregulated world have been written by the Federal=
=20
Communications Commission three times and repeatedly rebuffed by the=20
courts. Now, as the FCC struggles to draft another set of rules, possibly=20
as soon as next month, congressional leaders are pushing a Telecom Act of=20
2005 that probably would further muddy the waters for those attempting to=20
plot successful strategies.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Anne Marie Squeo at=20
annemarie.squeo( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110177370537086201,00.html?mod=3Dtoda...
s_page_one
(requires subscription)

WHITE SPACES PROPOSAL THREATENS PUBLIC SAFETY, APCO SAYS
In comments in an FCC proceeding due today, the Association of=20
Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) asked the FCC to refrain from=
=20
allowing unlicensed
operations between TV channels in the 470-512 MHz band, citing a potential=
=20
risk to public safety. Many groups are expected to oppose the FCC proposal,=
=20
but Edmond Thomas, chief of the FCC Office of Engineering & Technology, has=
=20
said in recent speeches he continues to believe that the TV =93white spaces=
=94=20
can be safely used for wireless Internet and other unlicensed users. APCO=20
notes that some of the largest U.S. public safety agencies use the band,=20
which includes channels 14-20, for their principal portable and mobile=20
systems; the controls proposed by the Commission, APCO says, are=20
inadequate and would lead to =93destructive interference=94 with public=
safety.=20
The Wireless Internet Service Providers Association encouraged the FCC to=20
proceed with opening the unused TV channels to unlicensed users.=20
=93Operations in the TV channel spectrum below 700 MHz will allow users to=
=20
access the unlicensed signals regardless of the amount of arboreal foliage=
=20
along a transmission path,=94 the group
said. =93The impact of universal coverage on small, rural, economically=20
deprived communities will be measurable.=94
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Howard Buskirk, Tania=
Panczyk-Collins]
(Not available online)

QUICKLY

Ed funds up $1.4B, ed-tech off $200M
Though overall education funding will top $57 billion in fiscal year 2005,=
=20
ed-tech advocates are faulting the omnibus spending package for failing to=
=20
provide enough money to support the use of technology in the nation's=20
schools. The legislation has some $200 million less for the Enhancing=20
Education Through Technology (EETT) block-grant program, the primary source=
=20
of federal funding for school technology. Don Knezek, chief executive=20
officer of the International Society for Technology in Education=20
(ISTE), said the final cuts fly in the face of everything the federal=20
government has said with regard to its support of technology in schools. He=
=20
said the current administration has repeatedly tried to justify cuts to=20
smaller technology-specific education programs, such as the now defunct=20
Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology program and the Star=20
Schools program, by continuing to pump money into EETT and other No Child=20
Left behind-related initiatives. But as EETT and other tech-specific=20
education programs continue to suffer major hits, he said, questions abound=
=20
with regard to the federal government's true intentions.
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Corey Murray]
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=3D5388

New site highlights ed-tech research
The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA=20
http://www.setda.org/) has unveiled a new web site intended to highlight=20
nine federally funded studies currently under way in eight states -- all=20
charged with exploring the effects of educational technology on student=20
learning.
[SOURCE: eSchool News, AUTHOR: Corey Murray]
http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/showStoryts.cfm?ArticleID=3D5391

Doubts about school computer use
A new study done by Thomas Fuchs and Ludger Woessmann of the CESifo=20
economic research organization in Munich finds that students who use=20
computers often actually perform poorer than those who use them less often.
[SOURCE: BBC News]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4032737.stml

The Kids Are Online
Kids ages 2 to 11 viewed 106% more Web pages on average in October 2004=20
than two years before in October 2002, according to a Nielsen//NetRatings=20
report.
[SOURCE: eMarketer.com]
http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?1003151

Nielsen's Concessions End Fight With Univision
Univision Communications and Nielsen Media Research have dropped lawsuits=20
against each other over the rollout of Nielsen's controversial "personal=20
people meters," which critics said undercount the size of minority=20
television audiences.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Frank Ahrens]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20829-2004Nov29.html
(requires registration)
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/30/business/media/30adco.html
(requires registration)

FCC Acts To Reduce Backlog of Petitions on Universal Service Issues
The FCC dismissed a number of petitions for reconsideration filed in=20
response to the rules adopted concerning universal service.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-237A1.doc

Cingular, MetroPCS Agree To $230 Million Spectrum Deal
Cingular Wireless agreed to sell wireless spectrum in Dallas and Detroit to=
=20
MetroPCS in a deal valued at $230 million as part of the company's=20
regulatory obligations for its merger with AT&T Wireless Services.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110173867660985543,00.html?mod=3Dtoda...
s_money_and_investing
(requires subscription)

China Blocking Access to Google News Site - Watchdog
China is blocking access to the Web site Google News, media watchdog=20
Reporters Without Borders said on Tuesday, and accused the U.S.-based=20
company of being complicit by filtering its Chinese-language site.
[SOURCE: Reuters]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=3DDHMKFW5JGPL0ICRBAE...
A?type=3DinternetNews&storyID=3D6951891

Chinese Game Show Offers a Big Prize: A 15-Second Ad Slot
China can be both a centrally planned economy and a sometimes-crass=20
capitalist juggernaut. Both faces show up at the lurid "Economic Olympics,"=
=20
an annual televised event designed to sell advertising on China's state-run=
=20
TV network. During the event, the nation's businessmen bid to buy ad slots=
=20
for 2005 in front of a studio audience and in the process sometimes become=
=20
instant celebrities.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Geoffrey A. Fowler at=20
geoffrey.fowler( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110176504019385950,00.html?mod=3Dtoda...
s_page_one
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service=20
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through=20
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,=20
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are=20
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the=
=20
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang=20
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 11/29/04

Back to business in DC with comments due this week on broadcast localism
and unlicensed use of spectrum; forums on universal service and
intellectual property; and the Supreme Court considering cable modems and
media ownership rules. For these and other upcoming media policy events,
see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

MEDIA, ELECTIONS & GOVERNING
$1.6 Billion Spent on Political TV Ads in 2004
In a Sign of the Times, Ukrainian TV Interpreter Makes Bold On-Air Move
Anchor's Ouster Stirs Furor Over Berlusconi's Oversight of Media

MEDIA POLICY
Boxing Bill Has Congressional Telecom Work in Clinch
FCC Reiterates Tougher Smut Rules
In Battle Over Values, Will the Family PC Be the Next Target?
Comcast: FCC Should Ease Regulation
TV, Today and Tomorrow

TELECOM POLICY
FCC Warns SBC on Net Phones
Adelstein's Supporters Helped Win Renomination

QUICKLY TV Lobbying; Cingular to Sell Assets; Film Studios Win Suit Against
Web Site;
"Serious" Video Games; Europe Stalls ContentGuard Deal

MEDIA, ELECTIONS & GOVERNING

$1.6 BILLION SPENT ON POLITICAL TV ADS IN 2004
Candidates, parties and independent groups spent more than $1.6 billion on
television ads in 2004, a record for any campaign year and double the
amount spent in the 2000 presidential election. A total of 1,950,737
political spots aired this year on 615 stations in the nation's top 100
markets. At 30 seconds each, that would be the same as 677 solid days of
advertising. The deluge of ads swamped the meager campaign coverage that
most local stations offered this fall. According to the Lear Center Local
News Archive, in presidential battleground states, a half-hour of local
news averaged almost six minutes of campaign advertising, but only three
minutes of campaign news. Forty-five percent of all campaign stories were
about strategy or horserace, while only 29 percent focused on campaign
issues. Ad watch stories, which truth-check the political commercials, made
up less than one percent of campaign stories in the study's sample.
"Television air time is the number one cost center for candidates in
competitive races," said Meredith McGehee, president of the Alliance for
Better Campaigns. She characterized the heavy ad spending as "an enormous
election-year windfall for broadcasters, who receive free licenses to
operate on the publicly-owned airwaves."
[SOURCE: Alliance for Better Campaigns Press Release]
http://bettercampaigns.org/press/release.php?ReleaseID=65
See also:
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=6800

IN A SIGN OF THE TIMES, UKRAINIAN TV INTERPRETER MAKES BOLD ON-AIR MOVE
Ukraine's state TV channel wasn't broadcasting demonstrations by hundreds
of thousands of supporters of Viktor Yushchenko, the pro-Western candidate
who believes that the presidency was stolen from him through
government-sponsored fraud, so the channel's sign-language interpreter
adopted guerrilla tactics to break the information blockade. Conspiring
with her makeup artist, Ms. Dmytruk tied an orange ribbon inside her
sleeve. Orange is the color of Mr. Yushchenko's campaign, and of the
spreading protest movement that many Ukrainians now call the Orange
Revolution. Then after interpreting the news broadcast for the deaf on Nov.
25, Ms. Dmytruk bared her wrist. "Everything you have heard so far on the
news was a total lie," she says she told viewers in sign language.
"Yushchenko is our true president. Goodbye, you will probably never see me
here again." But a funny thing happened on her way to oblivion... she was
greeted with hugs from her shocked colleagues and even the station's
technicians and the staffs of the daily children's show and other
nonpolitical programs decided to join the strike over the coverage, some of
them inspired by Ms. Dmytruk's broadcast. A few hours later, the evening
newscast opened with a pledge to resist censorship in the future. Ms.
Dmytruk was also back on the air the next morning. Management at the two
other main television networks caved in the same day and allowed balanced
reporting. The break of the government's stranglehold over mass media
proved a turning point in Mr. Yushchenko's campaign to annul the official
results of the Nov. 21 election.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Yaroslav Trofimov
yaroslav.trofimov( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110168408811185171,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)
See also:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/international/29media.ready.html?oref=...

ANCHOR'S OUSTER STIRS FUROR OVER BERLUSCONI'S OVERSIGHT OF MEDIA
When he first started running for public office more than a decade ago,
Silvio Berlusconi, the billionaire media tycoon who became prime minister,
was often ribbed as Sua Emittenza -- "His Broadcastership." Allegations
that his vast television and publishing empire posed a serious conflict of
interest with running the country have followed him ever since. The latest
controversy surrounds the dismissal of one of Italy's most popular and
respected anchormen, Enrico Mentana, from the nightly newscast on the
Berlusconi-owned Channel 5. After 13 years, Mentana was taken off the air,
given other duties and replaced by the editor of Panorama, a
Berlusconi-owned magazine. Mentana's removal immediately raised concerns
that Berlusconi was acting to assure the media's bland obedience. Mentana
was known for independence and for occasionally airing reports critical of
the prime minister or his right-wing party.
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR:Tracy Wilkinson]
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-fg-media29nov29,1,4...
(requires registration)

MEDIA POLICY

BOXING BILL HAS CONGRESSIONAL TELECOM WORK IN CLINCH
The spectrum relocation trust fund, enhanced 911 (E-911), junk faxes, and
the universal service fund anti-Deficiency Act modification. All these
items are being held up because of boxing. No, I'm not being metaphorical.
The House has passed legislation dealing with all these issues, but the
Senate has not acted because Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain wants
ensure action on a bill designed to give boxers more protection and lessen
the influence of promoters. The House has considered, but not acted on, a
similar bill. Sources supportive of either Sen McCain or his House
counterpart, Rep Joe Barton (R-TX) used harsh rhetorical language to pin
blame on the other. Each source said the opposing politician's stubbornness
would lead to schools losing E-rate funding, safety lapses due to no E-911
funding and a dearth of spectrum for wireless services.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily 11/26, AUTHOR: Terry Lane]
(Not available online)

FCC REITERATES TOUGHER SMUT RULES
In a proposed fine against Beasley Broadcast Group's WQAM(AM) Miami, the
FCC took pains to reiterate its toughened indecency standards for radio and
TV. Beasley argued that the broadcast in question "makes use of 'innuendo
and double entendre' that would not have an 'inescapable and understandable
sexual or excretory import' to children, and cannot therefore give rise to
a finding of indecency." The FCC disagreed, saying they "clearly relay
sexual images that are patently offensive." Beasley also argued the
excerpts were short and out of context and that they did not violate the
community standards of Miami. The FCC countered that they were long enough,
were clearly intended to pander and titillate, and that they did violate a
"reasonable person" standard. The Commission wrote, "We reiterate our
recent statement that multiple serious violations of our indecency rule by
broadcasters may well lead to license revocation proceedings. We also
remind broadcasters that separate utterances within a single broadcast may
be considered separate violations for purposes of determining forfeitures
under our indecency rules."
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA483315?display=Breaking+News&...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

IN BATTLE OVER VALUES, WILL THE FAMILY PC BE THE NEXT TARGET?
[Commentary] If the country goes on a values campaign, how long will it
take for the Internet-enabled PC to become a target? Politicians,
especially conservative ones, regularly take on "Hollywood values" as
shorthand for a poisonous social force; that was part of the dynamic of the
recent political campaign. But they haven't yet in great numbers taken what
could be considered the next logical step: moving from the living room to
the den to do the same with the Internet and the computer. There was a
Senate Commerce Committee hearing in Washington this month about Internet
pornography at which witnesses made the case that the situation with erotic
material online was analogous to the worst sort of drug epidemic. Using the
language of addiction would make an anti-porn crusade a matter of public
health rather than public morals. Yet it's hard to see anything close to a
social consensus developing around that issue, the way there might be for
one involving ultraviolent video games. Right now, the U.S. television
networks are very busy looking over their shoulders as they decide the
sorts of things they should put on the air. It isn't hard to imagine a
similar kind of response occurring among people responsible for various
parts of the computer industry, even if they don't have anything like the
same sort of direct control over content that broadcasters do. The computer
and the Internet have established themselves as an integral part of many
homes; small wonder if some people will begin to wonder what is being let in.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Lee Gomes lee.gomes( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110168430408285177,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)

COMCAST: FCC SHOULD EASE REGULATION
With the Federal Communications Commission nearing release of its annual
pay-TV-competition report to Congress, Comcast is urging the agency to roll
back rules that the cable giant said are inconsistent with a competitive
pay TV market. Specifically, Comcast wants a rule that would totally
deregulate all cable systems in a state where direct-broadcast satellite
penetration exceeds 15%. Current rules require cable operators to prove
that an individual franchise area has 15% penetration by pay TV rivals.
Comcast's proposal would result in total cable deregulation in 41 states,
according to data the National Cable & Telecommunications Association
submitted to the FCC July 23. Comcast also urged the FCC to "initiate a
review" of its program-access rules, which require Comcast to sell its
satellite-delivered programming to EchoStar and DirecTV. The FCC, Comcast
said, should eliminate the rule prior to its October 2007 sunset, or at
least allow the company to withhold programming from EchoStar and DirecTV,
which are allowed to secure exclusive program rights with affiliated and
unaffiliated programmers and not sell those services to cable operators.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA483302.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)

TV, TODAY AND TOMORROW
BusinessWeek has a special report on digital television this week and
identifies three drivers for DTV adoption: broadband Internet, wireless
home networking, and high-definition broadcasting. Included in the package
of articles is a look at the "spectrum showdown." Broadcasters received
free electronic airwaves -- which are technically owned by the public and
controlled by the federal government -- for digital transmissions. In
return, they had to give back the airwaves they now use for their old
analog broadcasts, which had been doled out over several decades. But they
didn't have to return it until 85% of U.S. households receive digital
signals or the year 2006, whichever came later. Now patience is running out
for the broadcasters to turn in that valuable piece of the sky. The year
2006 is just around the corner, and carriers are now sending digital
signals that reach 85% of households in just about all of the nation's 210
TV markets (even though not all those households have digital-ready TVs).
The spectrum is very valuable to wireless technologies from cell phones to
wireless, high-speed Internet access. But regulators and lawmakers have
lacked the political will so far to boot the powerful broadcasters out of
their analog space.
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek]
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/tc_special/tc_04hdtv.htm

TELECOM POLICY

FCC WARNS SBC ON NET PHONES
The FCC told phone giant SBC Communications to make sure a new pricing plan
it is offering to Internet phone companies isn't a back-door attempt to
levy higher fees on an emerging technology, or the company could face an
investigation. In a statement released Friday, FCC Chairman Michael Powell
said it appears that a new tariff SBC last week said it would charge
doesn't necessarily raise questions because it's not mandatory and Internet
phone companies can continue to use lower-cost alternatives. But, he added,
"should we conclude that this tariff is being used to justify the
imposition of traditional tariffed access charges on [Internet phone]
providers or to discriminate against SBC's competitors, the commission will
take appropriate action including, but not limited to, initiating an
investigation."
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110150508756684437,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)
See also:
[SOURCE: C-Net|News.com, AUTHOR: Reuters]
http://news.com.com/FCC+is+watching+SBCs+VoIP+charge/2100-7352_3-5468448...
Statement by FCC Chairman Powell:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254681A1.doc

ADELSTEIN'S SUPPORTERS HELPED WIN RENOMINATION
The renomination of FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein to another FCC term
surprised many industry observers who thought his chance to stay on the FCC
ended with the defeat of his mentor, Senate Minority Leader Thomas Daschle
(D-SD). But apparently Daschle's defeat itself jump-started Adelstein's
stalled nomination. Commissioner Adelstein's strong focus on rural issues
helped him win the support of rural commercial interests and Republicans in
rural states around the country -- including John Thune (R-SD), the man who
defeated Daschle. Before the election, Adelstein's main foe appears to have
been President Bush's chief political adviser Karl Rove who did not want to
do anything that could appear to be a help for Daschle. Several sources
questioned why President Bush would re-appoint a commissioner who held
opposite views on several issues -- particularly media ownership -- but one
offered a well-known saying to describe Bush's rationale: "The devil you
know is better than the devil you don't." Several sources speculated that
while other candidates for the Democratic seat may have offered a change
from Adelstein on some fronts, the Administration still needed to find a
Democrat for the seat who would be supported by Senate Democrats. As one
industry source told us, once the political war of the elections ended,
both Republicans and Democrats had interests in putting the fighting aside
and moving nominees that both could agree on. Adelstein was just one of
the more than 170 nominees that the Senate agreed to.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily 11/29, AUTHOR: Terry Lane]
(Not available online)

QUICKLY

RETURNING TO THE GENRE HE STARTED
A look at the godfather of TV lobbying, Ben Goddard. In 1993, several chief
executives of health insurance companies approached Goddard and his partner
in media consulting, Rick Claussen. President Bill Clinton had just
proposed a sweeping health care program. If he got his way, one of the
executives told Goddard, "I'm out of business." Goddard suggested a radical
solution -- an advertisement nicknamed "Harry and Louise" after the
fictional couple that did all the talking. To the shock of many insiders,
it killed the president's initiative and launched a lobbying-by-television
wave. Goddard now says he foresees rapid growth in the already widely used
method. He also expects an increasing use of innovative formats, especially
via the Internet.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Jeffrey H. Birnbaum]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18417-2004Nov28.html
(requires registration)

CINGULAR TO SELL ASSETS TO ALLTEL AS PART OF AT&T WIRELESS DEAL
Alltel, the country's sixth-biggest cellular carrier with 8.2 million
subscribers, will buy licenses, network equipment and subscribers from
Cingular Wireless for $170 million to help Cingular meet federal
divestiture requirements as part of its purchase of AT&T. Roughly 200,000
customers will be transferred to Alltel as part of the deal which will need
approval by federal regulators.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Jesse Drucker jesse.drucker( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110147884694084250,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)

FILM STUDIOS WIN $24 MILLION AGAINST WEB SITE
Hollywood's major movie studios said they won a $23.8 million judgment
against a California company and its Malaysian owner for operating a Web
site that charged customers to download illegally copied movies.
[SOURCE: Reuters]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=H5TNDIUFKQ4G2CRBAE0C...

VIDEO GAMES TEACH MORE THAN HAND-EYE COORDINATION
Video games, often maligned as having little or no redeeming value, are
becoming a way for firefighters, soldiers, currency traders and college
administrators to hone their skills. See more about "serious games" at the
URL below.
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Andy Sullivan]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=CU1XBRYWMAJP0CRBAEKS...

EUROPE STALLS CONTENTGUARD DEAL
Since April, Microsoft and Time Warner have been trying to purchase
ContentGuard, a pioneer in digital rights management (DRM). But, in an
indication of just how important the world of digital rights has become,
the deal has been stalled while the European Commission considers whether
the purchase would give Microsoft a monopoly in the digital-rights
management market.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Victoria Shannon]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/29/technology/29newecon.html
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 11/23/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

TODAY'S QUESTION comes from our last story... yes, this may well be a false
choice, but would you trade peer-to-peer networks for tighter gun control?

MEDIA POLICY
Appeals Court Tells FCC to Say Why It Hasn't Acted on Must-Carry
FCC, Viacom Agree on Indecency Fine
More Indecent News
Children's Programming Obligations for Digital Television Broadcasters
Let the Market Decide

JOURNALISM
Dan Rather Stepping Away from Anchor Chair
Radio Liberty

INTERNET
E-Rate Program Issues New Funding Commitments
Bytes and Bullets

MEDIA POLICY

APPEALS COURT TELLS FCC TO SAY WHY IT HASN'T ACTED ON MUST-CARRY
The FCC must tell the U.S. Appeals Court in Washington, DC within 30 days
why it hasn't acted on DTV must-carry, the court ruled. The cable industry
immediately urged the FCC to respond by reaffirming decisions reached in
2001 that dual must-carry regulations would likely be unconstitutional. The
court ruling was in response to an action brought by Paxson Communications
which wants the FCC to resolve broadcasters' cable carriage rights for
their DTV signals. After the FCC responds, Paxson then will have 14 days to
respond, the court said in the brief order.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Anne Veigle]
(Not available online)
See more in B&C:
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482802?display=Breaking+News&...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

FCC, VIACOM AGREE ON INDECENCY FINE
On Tuesday, the FCC entered into a $3.5 million Consent Decree with Viacom
and certain of its subsidiaries to resolve investigations into whether
Viacom broadcast stations, as well as non-Viacom owned affiliates of the
CBS Television Network and UPN, had aired obscene, indecent, and/or profane
material in violation of the Communications Act and Commission rules. As
part of the agreement, Viacom admits that some of the material that it
broadcast was indecent. In addition to the $3.5 million payment to the
U.S. Treasury, Viacom has committed to implementing a company-wide
Compliance Plan aimed at preventing future violations. Communications Daily
reports that Viacom will install video and audio time delay controls at TV
and radio stations. Any future airing of indecent content will result in
suspension and an investigation of the employees responsible. Viacom said
it also intended to continue its efforts to encourage parents to use
ratings and V-chips tools to make informed
decisions on the programming their children watch. The Wall Street Journal
reports that the payment will cover five outstanding fines totaling
$440,500 involving radio programs. It also will settle numerous other
incidents under investigation by the FCC that could have led to millions of
dollars in additional penalties. Among them was an expected fine of nearly
$1.5 million related to shock jock Howard Stern's raunchy on-air antics, as
well as complaints involving television shows on CBS and UPN including
"Cold Case," "CSI" and the Victoria's Secret annual fashion show. The
Washington Post reports that the biggest fine covered in the settlement was
spurred by an August 2002 broadcast of the "Opie & Anthony Show" in which
the hosts, since fired and now employed by XM Satellite Radio, aired what
the FCC described as a "couple engaged in actual or simulated sexual
activity inside [New York's] St. Patrick's Cathedral while the program
hosts . . . discussed that activity on the air." Notably, the agreement
does not include last year's Super Bowl, Viacom will still fight that fine.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254596A1.doc
Order: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-268A1.doc
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Tania Panczyk-Collins]
(Not available online)
Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110124179578082178,00.html?mod=todays...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8977-2004Nov23.html
LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fi-viacom24nov24,1,101...

MORE INDECENT NEWS
The FCC had additional announcements concerning indecent broadcasts: 1) the
Commission issued a $55,000 Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture
against WQAM License Limited Partnership, a subsidiary of Beasley Broadcast
Group, Inc., for the willful broadcast of sexually explicit material over
Station WQAM(AM), Miami, Florida; 2) the FCC denied indecency complaints
against "Off Centre" episodes; 3) FCC denied indecency complaints against
"Coupling" episodes; and 4) FCC denied indecency complaints against "Keen
Eddie" episode.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
(http://www.fcc.gov)
WQAM: http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254172A1.doc
"Off Centre":
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254607A1.doc
"Coupling": http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254588A1.doc
"Keen Eddie":
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254583A1.doc

CHILDREN'S PROGRAMMING OBLIGATIONS FOR DIGITAL TELEVISION BROADCASTERS
Sure it was adopted September 9, but those new kidvid rules are now
available online. See the URL below. Broadcasting&Cable provides the
following on the Order. Starting in January 2006, promos for other shows
aired during kids' TV shows will count as advertisements unless the shows
promoted are educational/informational. The FCC says the new rules apply to
cable as well as broadcasting, analog as well as digital, and it would like
to apply them to DBS, too, though that is only a tentative conclusion.
Digital broadcasters who broadcast free video services must increase that
three-hour core minimum by one-half hour for every 1-28 hours of additional
free multicast content. That would work out to an additional three hours
for every new 24/7 channel it added. Half of that material can be repeats
of the core three hours, however. Although many of the changes don't kick
in until January 2006, the rules applying to the definition of core kids
programming kick in February 1, 2005.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-221A1.doc
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA483195.html?display=Breaking+...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

LET THE MARKET DECIDE
A short paper from CU on the advantages of a la carte pricing options for
cable TV. CU has been critical of the recently-released FCC report on a la
carte. As cable companies across the nation hike rates yet again -- in some
cases by double-digit increases -- the FCC, CU says, missed a prime
opportunity to help put a lid on higher cable bills by skewing its report
to Congress on the benefits of letting cable customers pick and pay only
for the channels they want. Consumers Union said an FCC analysis released
on cable a la carte is dramatically flawed because it studies a model not
advocated for by consumer groups. Specifically, it focuses primarily on a
mandatory a la carte system rather than the voluntary system Consumers
Union and other public interest groups have proposed. It also inflates the
cost by assuming that everyone would have to buy or rent a special cable
box, when consumer groups have said that the proposal should target digital
cable subscribers, who already pay for the box.
[SOURCE: Consumers Union]
http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/0901%20a%20la%20carte%20white%20paper.pdf
http://www.consumersunion.org/pub/core_telecom_and_utilities/001656.html...

JOURNALISM

DAN RATHER STEPPING AWAY FROM ANCHOR CHAIR
The National Guard story has done in Dan Rather, he will end his 24-year
run as CBS News anchor in March. Rather's departure could signal the rise
and influence of politically motivated Internet "bloggers," who
relentlessly attacked him and the documents that were used to back up his
60 Minutes story. Some political and media analysts have said the
"Memogate" scandal damaged CBS News' reputation, especially among viewers
in largely rural, conservative states -- the network's core audience. The
moves will leave ABC's Peter Jennings as the sole survivor among the
longtime anchors at the Big Three networks at a time when their clout and
influence -- and perhaps their news divisions -- are declining as more
Americans turn to other news sources. This dramatic decline was underscored
by a post-election poll conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People
& the Press. The survey found that more voters called cable TV their
primary source of campaign news rather than the broadcast networks.
[SOURCE: USAToday]
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20041124/1a_dancov24.art.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20041124/a_hype24.art.htm

RADIO LIBERTY
[Commentary] The media are once again not free in Russia, the hand of the
government is growing heavier, and anti-Americanism is rampant. So,
perhaps, Radio Liberty, the U.S.-funded Russian-language broadcaster, is
needed now more than ever. But there's consideration now to revamp the
service with shorter programs and a greater reliance on journalists based
in Moscow instead of in Prague. Radio Liberty's president, Thomas A. Dine,
says the changes will make the station more accessible to Russians
accustomed to an FM-radio format and will provide more news about Russia
itself. His opponents within the service argue that the move from Prague to
Moscow risks putting Radio Liberty editors under greater pressure from the
Russian government and will make the station indistinguishable from
hundreds of others in Russia. The Post urges Congress to monitor the
changes and concludes: The imposition of a one-size-fits-all plan to make
American broadcasters sound more like Russian broadcasters (or worse, more
like American pop music stations) wouldn't serve the causes of human
rights, public diplomacy or anything else.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: WP Editorial Staff]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8895-2004Nov23.html
(requires registration)

INTERNET

E-RATE PROGRAM ISSUES NEW FUNDING COMMITMENTS
The Schools and Libraries Division of the Universal Service Administrative
Company has approved $24.2 million in new funding for projects and services
and expects to issue additional funding letters by the end of the
month. The commitments will fund some of the applications and appeals
remaining from 2003 and prior funding years. USAC had issued $764 million
in commitment letters for funding year 2004 before new letters were
suspended in August. Letters to be sent near the end of November will be
for additional Funding Year 2004 commitments that have been approved for
funding and for which cash is available. Additional Funding Year 2004
commitments will be issued in the future as money is available.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254540A1.doc
The American Library Association is asking for support of legislation that
could fix the E-rate's accounting problems. See the Action Alert at:
http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/techinttele/erate/erate.htm

BYTES AND BULLETS
[Commentary] A federal court declared that the manufacturers of the most
popular forms of peer-to-peer (p2p) file-sharing technology are not liable
for copyright infringement committed by people using their technology and
Congress considered legislation to reverse the court's ruling. The goal is
to make it clear that p2p manufacturers are indeed liable for copyright
violations committed with their products. A recent proposal from the
Copyright Office purports to hold manufacturers responsible for
"technolog[ies]" that "cause" copyright "infringement," if those
technologies 1) rely on infringement for "commercial viability," 2) derive
"a predominant portion" of their revenue from infringement and 3) rely on
infringement to "attract individuals" to the technology. Lessig opposes the
legislation but asks, "if Congress passes this bill, on what principled
basis can it then refuse to hold gun manufacturers responsible for the
crimes committed with their technologies?"
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Lawrence Lessig, Stanford University]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8882-2004Nov23.html
(requires registration)
Also see how the record industry is now embracing file swapping.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/10261238.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 11/23/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

With over 80,000 comments filed in the FCC's Localism inquiry, the National
Association of Broadcasters has requested and received an extension on the
due date for Reply Comments. They are now due Monday, January 3, 2005 -- so
get reading!
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3657A1.doc

TELEVISION POLICY
Major Networks May Challenge Rationale of Media Ownership Regulation
Broadcasters, FCC Clash on DTV Plan
DTV-Deadline Push Crashes
TV Stations Slow to Invest in New Time Delay Tools
PTC, McCain Slam a la Carte Report
Congress Approves Funds for Public Broadcasting
Guard Story Not Political, Says Redstone

INTERNET
E-Rate Accounting Problem Awaits Action
Telecom Giants Oppose Cities On Web Access
Between Big Media and Brotherly Love
Growth of High-Speed Internet Disappoints Some Experts

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Senate Passes Scaled-Back Copyright Measure
Providing Videogames, Movies In a Family-Friendly Format

TELEVISION POLICY

MAJOR NETWORKS MAY CHALLENGE RATIONALE OF MEDIA OWNERSHIP REGULATION
NBC Universal, News Corp. and Viacom on Monday informed the United States
Supreme Court that they're seriously considering urging the high court to
overturn its landmark Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC decision -- the case
that established the bedrock legal rationale for subjecting broadcasters to
media ownership regulation and other special rules. In its 1969 Red Lion
decision, the high court said that the fact that broadcasters used a scarce
government resource to deliver their programming over the air justified
special Federal Communications Commission regulation of the industry in the
public interest.
[SOURCE: TVWeek, AUTHOR: Doug Halonen]
http://www.tvweek.com/news.cms?newsId=6779

BROADCASTERS, FCC CASH ON DTV PLAN
The trade press is abuzz with news that broadcasters are organizing a
coalition, led by NBC Universal, dedicated to derailing a Federal
Communications Commission plan that would likely terminate analog TV in the
United States Dec. 31, 2008. An official announcement on the creation of
the coalition is expected today and will include the National Association
of Broadcasters, ABC and CBS affiliate groups, minority and rural
representatives and some broadcast unions. It will go by the name Coalition
for a Smart Digital TV Transition. [The name "Coalition for Slowing the
Digital TV Transition to a Snail's Pace" was already taken.] The Coalition
of the (un)willing is taking their message to Congress given House Energy
and Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-TX) support for a Dec. 31,
2006 deadline for the transition to digital-only TV broadcasting. He
supports set-top subsidies to ensure that at least the poor continued to
have access to free TV could with funding coming from the auction of the
returned analog spectrum. The FCC is also considering a plan that would end
the transition by 2009 and is considering a December vote on that plan.
Putting the public first (as always) "[t]he Coalition is united in asking
the FCC not to act in December 2004, before the American public can weigh
in on its plan," the group told a gathering of key Hill staffers Monday.
B'casters Trying to Derail Ferree Plan
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA482700.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)
Broadcasters Push DTV-Decision Delay
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482314.html?display=Breaking+...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

DTV-DEADLINE PUSH CRASHES
The intelligence reform bill stalled in Congress this week, so that means
provisions that would set a hard date for the return of analog TV licenses
for channels 62 and higher. The bill could still move in December but
disputes about other provisions are holding it up. The spectrum would be
allocated by public safety officials; their lack of spectrum is seen as a
contributing factor to the difficulties of emergency workers on 9/11.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482315.html?display=Breaking+...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

TV STATIONS SLOW TO INVEST IN NEW TIME DELAY TOOLS
Despite recent profanity utterances during live broadcasts, which could
result in FCC indecency fines, many
TV stations are slow to adopt new technology that would automatically bleep
out indecent content, several technology
suppliers said. Smaller TV stations in particular are unprotected, largely
for financial reasons, they said. Radio stations, however, are adopting the
technology, mainly because of the view that FCC indecency enforcement comes
down harder on radio.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Tania Panczyk-Collins]
(Not available online)

PTC, McCAIN SLAM A LA CARTE REPORT
The Parents Television Council, claiming that cable television is flooded
with obscene and pornographic content, ripped a Federal Communications
Commission report that found that the per-channel sale of cable networks
would cause more harm than good, even for subscribers who want to block
indecent content. "The FCC's report on 'a la carte' was hopelessly
inadequate, as it barely mentioned the prime reason why so many people want
cable choice: Cable is completely awash in raunch," PTC executive director
Tim Winter said in a prepared statement. Because of the PTC's
dissatisfaction with the FCC's study, Winter said his group would ask the
agency to prepare a new report on indecent cable programming and demand
that the cable industry yield on the a la carte issue. The PTC released a
study last week that included excerpts from Comedy Central, MTV: Music
Television, E! Entertainment Television, Spike TV, TBS and FX that the
group said proved that basic "cable was awash in raunch" that had to be
stopped if a la carte were not an option.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA482272.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)

CONGRESS A[PPROVES FUNDS FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING
Over the weekend, the Congress approved the final FY 2005 omnibus
appropriations measure. It included $400 million for CPB in FY 2007; $39.7
million in digital transition funds for FY 2005; and $40 million in public
television interconnection funds for FY 2005. In addition to the CPB
accounts, the omnibus funded the following public broadcasting programs:
Ready to Learn -- $23.5 million for FY 2005; Ready to Teach -- $14.4
million for FY 2005; and Public Telecommunications Facilities Program
(Department of Commerce) -- $21 million for FY 2005. All FY 05 funding is
subject to an .83 percent across-the-board reduction, including CPB's
current year FY 2005 appropriation, approved in 2002. In addition, three
board members who were up for confirmation were also approved over the
weekend--Claudia Puig, Univision Radio; Gay Hart Gaines, Regent, board of
Mount Vernon; Ernest J. Wilson III, professor, University of Maryland.
Wilson was for a second term, the other two had been recess appointments.
[SOURCE: Corporation for Public Broadcasting Press Release]
http://www.cpb.org/programs/pr.php?prn=388
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482435.html?display=Breaking+...

GUARD STORY NOT POLITICAL, SAYS REDSTONE
Although he keeps a distance from the decisions of CBS News, Viacom
Chairman Sumner Redstone said he does not believe 60 Minutes' story about
President Bush's National Guard service was politically motivated. If it
were, he added, everyone would be fired. [So, come on all you
conservatives, its OK to watch my TV network news again.] He also commented
on the Monday Night Football fiasco saying the intro was inappropriate, but
not illegal.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482701.html?display=Breaking+...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

INTERNET

E-RATE ACCOUNTING PROBLEM AWAITS ACTION
The E-rate accounting problems have not been fixed yet by Congress and
could mean steep increases in consumers' long distance bills. For E-rate
recipients this could also mean shutting down existing services that might
not be receiving subsidies soon. The problem with the legislative fix
suggested during the lame-duck Congress is that it has now been scored by
the Congressional Budget Office with Congress estimating it would increase
the program's budget.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Terry Lane, Edie Herman]
(Not available online)

TELECOM GIANTS OPPOSE CITIES ON WEB ACCESS
Many cities have plans to turn their municipalities into vast Wi-Fi hot
spots with free or very low-cost wireless Internet connections. But, writes
Drucker, that's bad news for the large Bell telephone companies and cable
operators, who are looking to their digital-subscriber-line (DSL) and
cable-modem businesses for growth. Legislation awaiting the governor's
signature in Pennsylvania would make it illegal for any "political
subdivision" to provide to the public "for any compensation any
telecommunications services, including advanced and broadband services
within the service territory of a local exchange telecommunications company
operating under a network-modernization plan." Critics denounce this
legislative tactic, arguing that the U.S. lags behind other countries in
broadband Internet access because the phone and cable companies have been
slow to roll out the service in some areas. "We should be encouraging our
municipalities to take a major role in broadband, the way other countries
are doing," says James Baller, a big-hearted attorney in Washington, D.C.,
who represents local governments on telecommunications issues. The telecom
companies argue that it is unfair for them to have to compete against the
government. They say that the legislation enables them to improve service
to their customers by investing in their networks.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Jesse Drucker jesse.drucker( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110116864041881375,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)

BETWEEN BIG MEDIA AND BROTHERLY LOVE
[Commentary] Banish the notion that America's communications industry helps
nurture technological innovation that makes media more accessible to
average Americans. The reality today is that we live in an era where large
corporations work hand-in-hand with lobbyists and compliant legislators to
stifle any technology that returns control of our media system to the
public. The latest evidence lies hidden within proposed legislation that
would effectively kill efforts in Philadelphia to provide citywide wireless
access at little or no charge.
[SOURCE: MediaChannel.org, AUTHOR: Timothy Karr]
http://www.mediachannel.org/views/dissector/affalert292.shtml

GROWTH OF HIGH-SPEED INTERNET DISAPPOINTS SOME EXPERTS
Some coverage of the Department of Commerce report, A Nation Online:
Entering the Broadband Age. The number of Americans using fast Internet
connections doubled from 2001 through late 2003, still below some
expectations and especially low among minority groups and people in rural
areas. Only 1 in 7 blacks and fewer than 1 in 8 Hispanics lives in a
household with broadband service while one in four white Americans used
high-speed connections at home. In urban areas, 40.4% of households used
fast connections; only 24.7% of rural users did. Significant numbers of
rural residents said they couldn't subscribe to high-speed services because
none was available. Most Americans who did not use fast connections said
service was either too expensive or they did not need it.
[SOURCE: USAToday, AUTHOR: Ted Bridis, Associated Press]
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20041123/a_internet23.art.htm

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

SENATE PASSES SCALED-BACK COPYRIGHT MEASURE
The Senate has voted to outlaw several favorite techniques of people who
illegally copy and distribute movies -- secretly videotape movies when they
are shown in theaters AND hackers and industry insiders who distribute
music, movies or other copyrighted works before their official release
date. Left out were several more controversial measures that would
criminalize the actions of millions of U.S. Internet users who copy music
and movies for free over "peer to peer" networks like Kazaa. The bill also
shields "family friendly" services like ClearPlay that strip violent or
sexually explicit scenes from movies. Hollywood groups say such services
violate their copyrighted works by altering them without permission.
Gigi B. Sohn, president of Public Knowledge said, "Consumers won a major
victory when the Senate passed legislation removing the most egregious
elements of the omnibus copyright bill that had previously been under
consideration. We strongly support the version of the Family Movie Act,
included in the bill, which gives families more control over how they watch
movies and television, preserving the right to skip over commercials. The
bill will benefit consumers, both in their entertainment choices now, and
from the innovation in technology that will result in coming years."
[SOURCE: Reuters, AUTHOR: Andy Sullivan]
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=DZYT5QPY22MLICRBAEZS...
See also:
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482582?display=Breaking+News&...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)
http://www.publicknowledge.org/pressroom/pressrelease.2004-11-22.6500991518

PROVIDING VIDEOGAMES, MOVIES IN A FAMILY-FRIENDLY FORMAT
eGames and other small businesses have pursued their own niche --
family-friendly entertainment -- saying there's a rising demand for games
and movies without the profanity, sex and violence often featured in the
top sellers of large movie studios and videogame publishers. While eGames
develops original content, a handful of start-ups have found a market
offering family-friendly versions of Hollywood-produced entertainment.
Principle Solutions sells a filter, TVGuardian, which mutes objectionable
words in television programming and DVDs by reading the closed-captioning
signal for the hearing-impaired. CleanFlicks Media produces edited copies
of movies for rental and sale that cut what company President Allan Erb
deems unnecessary sex and violence, as well objectionable language. Film
studios and the Directors Guild of America are suing CleanFlicks and
several other firms that sell electronic filters, alleging copyright and
trademark infringement. CleanFlicks says there has been no violation of the law
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Peter Loftus peter.loftus( at )dowjones.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110117376262381535,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Benton's Communications-related Headlines for 11/22/04

For upcoming media policy events, see http://www.benton.org/calendar.htm

WASHINGTON DECISIONS
Senate Approves Adelstein; Congress Passes SHVIA
Congress Blocks Taxes On Internet Connections
FCC GOP Seat Up for Grabs?

TELEVISION
'Private Ryan' and Public Censorship
Many Who Voted for 'Values' Still Like Their Television Sin
TV Shows Discover New Setting: Wal-Mart
Report on Cable A La Carte Pricing Model
Local Cable Wins War, Loses Election

QUICKLY: Radio One Gets Bigger; FCC Underwriting Rules Questioned; Software
Defined Radio;
Broadband from a Power Outlet; Supreme Court to Discuss Modem Case

WASHINGTON DECISIONS

SENATE APPROVES ADELSTEIN; CONGRESS PASSES SHVIA
Late Saturday evening, FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein was approved
by the Senate for a new, full term at the Commission. The Satellite Home
Viewer Improvement Act (SHVIA) was passed by Congress as part of the
Omnibus Appropriations bill. The legislation will renew compulsory license
agreements for DBS providers and end EchoStar's two-dish business practice
in 18 months. SHVIA will create more opportunities for DBS providers to
deliver distant digital signals, while it will impose more conditions on
DBS to take local-to-local packages. The bill also creates some
restrictions on DBS delivery of distant digital signal delivery. Both
satellite industry and broadcast sources have said they got what they
wanted in the bill.
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Terry Lane]
(Not available online)
For more on SHVIA see
http://news.com.com/Congress+approves+satellite+transmission+bill/2100-1...

CONGRESS BLOCKS TAXES ON INTERNET CONNECTIONS
Congress on Friday blocked state and local governments from taxing
connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years.
The legislation extends a previous ban that expired in November 2003. It
applies to all types of Internet-access services from traditional dial-up
services to high-speed broadband lines from cable companies and Baby Bells.
The bill also blocks multiple state and local taxes from being imposed on
merchandise purchased over the Internet.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110088866979379431,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)
See also:
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20041122/int_news22_5b.art.htm

FCC GOP SEAT UP FOR GRABS?
Now that Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein will be back (see story above),
speculation has turned to Republican Kathleen Abernathy term at the FCC.
Her term ended in June, but she is entitled to remain on the Commission
through next year or until a replacement is confirmed. Although she hasn't
spoken publicly about the matter, it is widely believed that she is ready
to return to the private sector. Who could replace her? Rebecca Armendariz
Klein, the former chairwoman of the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC);
Earl Comstock, who represents Earthlink and Yahoo for Washington law firm
Sher & Blackwell -- he is a former aide to Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who
is the incoming chairman of the Commerce Committee; Michael Gallagher, head
of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, or
Janice Obuchowski, a telecommunications consultant.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Bill McConnell]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482076.html?display=The+Beat&...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

TELEVISION

'PRIVATE RYAN' AND PUBLIC CENSORSHIP
Under new FCC rules, context, quality and parental warnings repeated ad
nauseum no longer matter when considering indecency fines. When numerous
ABC affiliates refused to air Saving Private Ryan on Veterans Day, these
broadcasters vividly demonstrated that the chilling effect of the FCC's
newly expanded indecency regulations on appropriate, important and
educational speech on free over-the-air television is no scholarly
abstraction but is very real, costly and dangerous. The real Private Ryans
and his fellow veterans of World War II fought so that their children might
continue to enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution. Today, those
children -- and the broadcasters who serve them -- must continue that fight.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Jonathan Rintels & Peggy Charren,
Center for Creative Voices in Media]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482149?display=Opinion&referr...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

MANY WHO VOTED FOR 'VALUES' STILL LIKE THEIR TELEVISION SIN
We embrace values in a President, but, perhaps, not in our living rooms. In
interviews, representatives of the four big broadcast networks as well as
Hollywood production studios said the nightly television ratings bore
little relation to the message apparently sent by a significant percentage
of voters. The choices of viewers, whether in Los Angeles or Salt Lake
City, New York or Birmingham, Ala., are remarkably similar. And that means
the election will have little impact on which shows they decide to put on
television, these executives say.
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Bill Carter]
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/22/business/media/22tube.html
(requires registration)

TV SHOWS DISCOVER NEW SETTING: WAL-MART
Wal-Mart is one of the biggest spenders on television, plunking down more
than $500 million on network TV last year and almost $340 million so far
this year, according to Nielsen Monitor-Plus. On Viacom's CBS alone, the
chain spent $40.4 million on commercials in the first seven months of this
year. And although other brands spend big money for product placement
within TV programs, Wal-Mart has seen rough treatment of late in
Viacom/CBS' "Without a Trace," Fox's "King of the Hill" and Viacom/Comedy
Central's "South Park." "From PBS to 'South Park' -- it just shows you how
much a part of the culture we are," says Mona Williams, vice president of
communications for Wal-Mart.
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Ann Zimmerman ann.zimmerman( at )wsj.com &
Joe Flint joe.flint( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110107835818580311,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)

REPORT ON CABLE A LA CARTE PRICING MODEL
On Friday, the Media Bureau of the FCC released its report on the efficacy
of 'a la carte' pricing in the pay-television service industry. The Report
found that although an a la carte option would allow consumers to pay for
only the programming they choose, given current viewing practices, few
consumers would experience lower bills for multi-channel programming. The
Report also includes several policy recommendations that the Congress and
Commission should consider to enhance consumer choice, foster competition
and provide consumers with the tools to prevent objectionable programming
from entering their home. The Media Bureau Report found that an a la carte
regime would not produce the desired result of lower rates for most
pay-television households. The Report estimates that the impact on retail
rates of pure or mandatory a la carte sales indicates that only those
consumers who would purchase fewer than nine programming networks may see a
reduction in their monthly cable bill. Consumers who purchase at least
nine networks will likely face an increase in their monthly bills. The
average cable household watches approximately 17 channels, including
broadcast stations. If the average household purchased each of these
channels under an a la carte regime, it would likely face a monthly rate
increase under a la carte sales of between 14% and 30%.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254443A1.doc
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.pdf
See also:
* Allowing Cable-Channel Choice Would Raise Rates, Study Says
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Anne Marie Squeo
annemarie.squeo( at )wsj.com]
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB110088278769379364,00.html?mod=todays...
(requires subscription)
* Report May Slow a la carte Cable Push
USAToday: "It appears the industry has been successful once again in
distracting policymakers with a 'parade of horribles,' " said Senate
Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain, R-AZ. "I will continue working to
provide (consumers) with more choices and lower prices" either through
voluntary a la carte or more pay-TV competition.
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20041122/3b_cable_22.art.htm

LOCAL CABLE WINS WAR, LOSES ELECTION
Advertising spending on cable was up 14% in 2004. Several operators and
National Cable Communications (NCC), the local spot consortium owned by
Cox, Time Warner and Comcast, confirm that the industry generated about $70
million in political revenue at the national spot level. That's a drop in
the bucket compared with the more than $1 billion generated by broadcast
stations but about twice what cable generated four years ago. Operators'
biggest political disappointment occurred despite a massive effort to dent
what has long been a broadcast-industry windfall. NCC dedicated a sales
manager to the Bush-Kerry race. But neither side, particularly the Bush
camp, used much national spot cable until mid September. "They bought the
two most efficient places," TVB's Rohrs says. "Local broadcast and national
cable." Cost per thousand (CPM) on cable networks is much less than on
broadcast networks. On the other hand, he says, local broadcast CPMs are
more efficient than local cable, and there are more spots available.
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Kathy Haley ]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482078?display=Special+Report...
See also:
Boom and Gloom at News Channels
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: Alan Breznick]
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA482079?display=Special+Report...
(free access for Benton's Headlines subscribers)

QUICKLY

RADIO ONE MAKES ITS MOVE
Sixty-nine radio stations, cable TV network and, now, an Internet presence
-- BlackAmericaWeb.com -- and ownership rights to one of the nation's top
morning radio shows -- what Big Media giant is this? Radio One is the
nation's largest black-owned media company and has just purchased a
controlling stake in radio personality Tom Joyner's media company for $56
million.
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Krissah Williams]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3112-2004Nov21.html
(requires registration)

WUNC(FM) EXCISES 'REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS,' FEARING FCC RETRIBUTION
A public radio station in North Carolina decided to edit the underwriting
announcement because it included the term "reproductive rights," fearing a
fine from the FCC. The station's general manager conceded there's nothing
in the FCC guidelines that says stations can't use "reproductive rights."
The problem, she said, was that "the interpretation of the guidelines is
left up to stations, and the FCC does not tell us what we can and can't
say." There's no provision for stations to approach the FCC for a ruling in
advance, she said. "They won't do that for you. The only thing we can do is
come up with our own standards of what you think the interpretation would
be and abide by them." The GM and groups critical of the decision blamed
the FCC for having rules that are "very unclear and open to interpretation."
[SOURCE: Communications Daily, AUTHOR: Dinesh Kumar]
(Not available online)

FIRST SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO
The FCC announced Friday it has approved, for the first time, use of a
software defined radio (SDR) device in the United States. This new class of
equipment allows users to share limited airspace, increases flexibility and
reduces interference concerns. Software defined radios can change the
frequency range, modulation type or output power of a radio device without
making changes to hardware components. This programmable capacity permits
radios to be highly adaptable to changing needs, protocols and
environments. For questions regarding the SDR proceeding, contact Mr. Hugh
Van Tuyl at 202-418-7506. For questions regarding the certification of
SDRs or the Vanu applications, contact Mr. Joe Dichoso at 301-362-3024.
[SOURCE: Federal Communications Commission]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254463A1.doc

EASY BROADBAND -- AND SMARTER POWER
A look not just at the how but the why of broadband service delivered over
power lines. Sure it could make it easier for you to plug into a faster
Internet connection, but it can also provide power companies with ways to
better manage its core business.
[SOURCE: BusinessWeek, AUTHOR: Catherine Yang]
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2004/tc20041115_8797.htm

SUPREME COURT TO HEAR MODEM CASE
The Supreme Court will meet behind closed doors Dec. 3 to decide whether to
take the case that could expose cable-modem service to open-access
requirements. The court is scheduled to announce a decision Dec. 6. It
requires the votes of four of nine justices to docket a case for oral argument.
[SOURCE: Multichannel News, AUTHOR: Ted Hearn]
http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA481618.html?display=Breaking+News
(requires subscription)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online news summary service
provided by the Benton Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday through
Friday, this service provides updates on important industry developments,
policy issues, and other related news events. While the summaries are
factually accurate, their often informal tone does not always represent the
tone of the original articles. Headlines are compiled by Kevin Taglang
(headlines( at )benton.org) -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------