American Enterprise Institute
Behind New York’s attempt to double-dip on broadband subsidies
The Federal Communications Commission faced criticism from Capitol Hill when a bipartisan letter from the New York delegation complained that the state has been unfairly excluded from participating in the agency’s new $20 billion broadband initiative. Sens.
The Rural Digital Opportunity Fund: Subsidizing Toyotas or Ferraris?
The problem with using speed alone in assessing the capabilities of broadband networks is that it represents only one product characteristic, and is not necessarily linked with the requirements of the applications commonly used by end consumers.
Scott Ganz: America’s mobile broadband consumers are getting a bargain (American Enterprise Institute)
Submitted by benton on Thu, 01/02/2020 - 11:27Roslyn Layton: The FTC’s privacy settlement with Facebook is just right (American Enterprise Institute)
Submitted by benton on Mon, 12/16/2019 - 06:28Bronwyn Howell: Fragmenting — and politicizing — the internet (American Enterprise Institute)
Submitted by benton on Fri, 12/13/2019 - 06:40Mark Jamison: Big Tech and the backwards logic of the neo-Brandeisians (American Enterprise Institute)
Submitted by benton on Tue, 12/10/2019 - 09:36Roslyn Layton: End-to-end encryption is politics, not privacy (American Enterprise Institute)
Submitted by benton on Fri, 12/06/2019 - 06:32Justice Thomas, preemption, and state net neutrality
In late October, the Supreme Court quietly declined to review Lipschultz v. Charter Advanced Services, an Eighth Circuit decision that preempted state regulation of fixed Voice-over-Internet-Protocol (VoIP) service. While concurring in the denial of certiorari, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately to challenge the underlying theory of federal preemption, noting that “it is doubtful whether a federal policy — let alone a policy of nonregulation — is" sufficient to establish conflict preemption.