Originally published: December 6, 2011
Last updated: December 22, 2011 - 4:17am
The Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice defended the FCC's indecency enforcement policy and branded the broadcaster and creative community challenge to its enforcement regime as an "audacious attempt" to overturn Congress' judgment that kids should be protected from indecent material "on the public airwaves." That came in a reply brief from the Solicitor General to the Supreme Court on behalf of the Obama Administration and the FCC asking the court to reverse lower court decisions smacking down the FCC's indecency enforcement policy. The Solicitor General's office customarily handles Supreme Court appeals of agency decisions. The government says that if the court overturned the FCC's indecency enforcement authority, anything on cable or the Internet could show up on broadcasting in the middle of the day, and would give an absence of indecency regulation.
Links to Sources
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Related
- Supreme Court overturns indecency fines against Fox, ABC
- DOJ Warns Supremes of Potential Undermining of FCC Indecency Regulations
- Rep. Pickering Introduces Indecency Bill
- Television Challenges FCC Indecency Authority and Implementation
- Supreme Court Upholds 'Fleeting Expletive' Rule for Now
- MAP to Supremes: Pacifica Can Stand and FCC Indecency Enforcement Regime Still Fall
- Creative Voices: FCC Indecency Crackdown Harms Children
- FCC Defends Cussing Crackdown
- FCC Shouldn't Judge Indecency
- Fox Says FCC Profanity Policy Is Indefensible
- Chairman Walden: FCC Title II Move Would Disrupt Relationship With Congress
- Supreme Court Schedules June 23 Conference on TV Profanity Case
- Fox v. FCC: FCC Concentrates And Asks Again
- Today's Quote 08.16.07
- NRB Asks FCC To Appeal Indecency Decision To Supremes
Topics
Location
Ratings
Login to rate this headline.

