July 2007

Lautenberg Introduces Community Broadband Act of 2007

LAUTENBERG INTRODUCES COMMUNITY BROADBAND ACT OF 2007
[SOURCE: Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg]

Public Voice Adds Edge to Debate

PUBLIC VOICE ADDS EDGE TO DEBATE
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Dan Balz and Anne E. Kornblut]

XM and Sirius Radio Propose Pricing

XM AND SIRIUS RADIO PROPOSE PRICING
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]

Tribune Sale at Issue as Newspaper Woes Mount

TRIBUNE SALE AT ISSUE AS NEWSPAPER WOES MOUNT
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: ]

Family Talks on a Sale of Dow Jones Are Called ‘Not Acrimonious’

FAMILY TALKS ON A SALE OF DOW JONES ARE CALLED 'NOT ACRIMONIOUS'
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Richard Perez-Pena]

Citadel's Closing in on ION

CITADEL'S CLOSING IN ON ION
[SOURCE: New York Post, AUTHOR: Zachery Kouwe]

What should be America's national broadband strategy?

Starting Tuesday, July 24 at 7pm EST on OpenLeft.com, Sen Dick Durbin (D-IL) will be engaging in a series of four nightly broadband policy discussions with the online community. During those four nights, he is looking for the best and brightest ideas on what Congress should do to promote and foster broadband. See http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=318

Benton's Communications-related Headlines For Tuesday July 24, 2007

To view Benton's Headlines feed in your RSS=20
Aggregator, paste=20
http://www.benton.org/index.php?q=3Dtaxonomy/term/6/all/feed into your read=
er.

INTERNET/BROADBAND
Broadband Baloney
Bandwidth wars

MEDIA & ELECTIONS
Public Voice Adds Edge to Debate

OWNERSHIP
XM and Sirius Radio Propose Pricing
Tribune Sale at Issue as Newspaper Woes Mount
Family Talks on a Sale of Dow Jones Are Called =91Not Acrimonious=92
Citadel's Closing in on ION

NEWS FROM CONGRESS
Dingell Seeks FCC Answers On Set-Tops, Spectrum Auctions
Lautenberg Introduces Community Broadband Act of 2007

QUICKLY -- Lawyers Get Court Approval for Pop-Up Ads on Internet

INTERNET/BROADBAND

BROADBAND BALONEY
[SOURCE: Wall Street Journal, AUTHOR: Robert McDowell]
[Commentary] Federal Communications Commission=20
Commissioner Robert McDowell writes that American=20
consumers are poised to reap a windfall of=20
benefits from a new wave of broadband deployment.=20
But you would never know it by the rhetoric of=20
those who would have us believe that the nation=20
is falling behind, indeed in free fall. Looming=20
over the horizon are heavy-handed government=20
mandates setting arbitrary standards, speeds and=20
build-out requirements that could favor some=20
technologies over others, raise prices and=20
degrade service. This would be a mistaken road to=20
take -- although it would hardly be the first=20
time in history that alarmists have ignored cold,=20
hard facts in pursuit of bad policy. When it=20
comes to broadband policy, let's put aside flawed=20
studies and rankings, and reject the road of=20
regulatory stagnation. In the next few years, we=20
will witness a tremendous explosion of=20
entrepreneurial brilliance in the broadband=20
market, if the government doesn't micromanage.=20
Belief in entrepreneurs and a light regulatory=20
touch is the right broadband policy for America.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118524094434875755.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
nion
(requires subscription)
* Are the numbers flawed? See=20
http://www.freepress.net/docs/shooting_the_messenger.pdf

BANDWIDTH WARS
[SOURCE: Financial Times, AUTHOR: Thomas Hazlett, George Mason University]
[Commentary] What's the real pay-off in the=20
transition to digital television? Spectrum=20
efficiency. What an analog television transmitter=20
can do using a standard television channel (6-8=20
MHz, depending on country) a digital station can=20
do four, five or six times. Viewer choice=20
increases =ADmulti-fold by flipping a technology=20
switch. Digital=92s cleaner use of airwaves also=20
accommodates new voice and data applications.=20
Given that vast frequency space was long ago set=20
aside for analog television, digitization frees=20
up abundant bandwidth for pretty amazing new=20
stuff. We have trekked to just the cusp of the=20
Wireless Age. But that day is delayed by go-slow=20
spectrum policies, accounted for by three=20
factors. First, regulators enjoy, and profit=20
from, control over valuable stuff. Given that no=20
agency official stands to lose salary or share=20
price by squandering socially valuable bandwidth,=20
state =93warehousing=94 of frequencies is endemic.=20
Second, market players are generally comfortable=20
with market stability. From the operators=92=20
perspective, cellular licence auctions do three=20
things =96 cost money, yield more spectrum for them=20
to use, yield more spectrum for their rivals to=20
use =96 and two of them are bad. Finally, there is=20
a great temptation for other political interests,=20
including those affiliated with tele=ADvision=20
broadcasters, to keep the spectrum subject to=20
political allocation. That yields power and=20
opportunity. The US performance on television=20
band reallocation is not visibly improved, but=20
the plodding elsewhere appears as bad or worse.=20
By making some progress to advance productive use=20
of the digital dividend, the Americans may=20
paradoxically stumble to a first-place finish in=20
an international race being run in slow motion.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/84e25588-3949-11dc-ab48-0000779fd2ac.html
(requires subscription)

MEDIA & ELECTIONS

PUBLIC VOICE ADDS EDGE TO DEBATE
[SOURCE: Washington Post, AUTHOR: Dan Balz and Anne E. Kornblut]
Democratic presidential candidates shared the=20
spotlight Monday night with ordinary citizens=20
from around the country in a two-hour debate that=20
featured sharp and sometimes witty video=20
questions and often equally sharp exchanges among=20
the candidates on issues ranging from Iraq and=20
health care to whether any of them can fix a=20
broken political system. The debate, co-sponsored=20
by CNN and YouTube, underscored the arrival of=20
the Internet as a force in politics. The=20
citizen-interrogators generated the most diverse=20
set of questions in any of the presidential=20
debates to date and challenged the candidates to=20
break out of the rhetoric of their campaign=20
speeches and to address sometimes uncomfortable=20
issues, such as race, gender, religion and their own vulnerabilities.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR200707...
2074.html
(requires registration)
* YouTube video debate actually worked
http://news.com.com/YouTube+video+debate+actually+worked/2100-1028_3-619...
5.html?tag=3Dhtml.alert.hed
* Via YouTube, public presses Democratic hopefuls
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070724/a_debate24.art.htm
* YouTube presidential debate blazes trail
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-debate24jul24,1,351...
3.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-frontpage
* Hi, I'm Tom In Washington, And My Question Is for CNN...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR200707...
2122.html
* Campaign mash-up, v. 1.0
[Commentay] In the end, the CNN/YouTube=20
presidential debate amounts to little more than=20
an interesting sort of town hall.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-et-ontv24jul24,1,39...
97.story?coll=3Dla-news-a_section

OWNERSHIP

XM AND SIRIUS RADIO PROPOSE PRICING
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Stephen Labaton]
Hoping to persuade skeptical regulators to=20
approve their proposed merger, the nation=92s two=20
satellite radio companies today announced=20
detailed plans to let consumers choose the=20
programs that make up their subscription package.=20
The companies, Sirius Satellite Radio and XM=20
Satellite Radio, said they would offer two=20
so-called =93=E0 la carte=94 pricing plans -- one of=20
which would enable consumers to purchase the best=20
of the premium services now offered by each=20
company, like professional football, baseball and=20
basketball -- for a monthly fee of $14.99. To=20
subscribe to the =93=E0 la carte=94 plans, consumers=20
would have to buy new radios. The companies said=20
they would also let listeners select rate plans=20
that would give them credit for adult stations=20
that they decide not to get as part of their=20
packages. The two companies now each offer their=20
services for $12.95 a month, with lower rates for=20
longer-term contracts. They have 14 million=20
subscribers. The announcement, coming the day=20
before the record closes in the proceeding at the=20
Federal Communications Commission, was an effort=20
to persuade the agency that the merger was in the public interest.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/23/business/23cnd-radio.html?_r=3D1&hp&oref=
=3Dslogin
(requires registration)
* XM, Sirius promise low cost packages, more choice
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSWNAS700820070723
* XM-Sirius in New Pitch for Merger
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/24-07232007-1381877.html
* Sirius, XM Radio Plan Packages Aimed at Pleasing Regulators
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118520370393574960.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
e_one
* XM, Sirius plan a la carte offerings
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/money/20070724/xmradio24.art.htm
* A nervous commentary on the XM/Sirius merger - from Toyota
Toyota Motor North America, which offers both XM=20
and Sirius satellite radio with its cars,=20
endorsed the proposed merger of the two services=20
in a statement filed with the Federal=20
Communications Commission. Maybe. Sort of.
http://www.lasarletter.net/drupal/node/438
* NPR Opposes XM/Sirius Merger
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6462230.html?rssid=3D193
* Karmazin Makes New XM-Sirius Price Offer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR200707...
1606.html
* Sirius, XM cite benefits if merger wins approval
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-radio24jul24,1,282874...
tory?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business

TRIBUNE SALE AT ISSUE AS NEWSPAPER WOES MOUNT
[SOURCE: Associated Press, AUTHOR: ]
Billionaire real estate investor Sam Zell was=20
viewed as a savior in some quarters last spring=20
when he swooped in to orchestrate an $8.2 billion=20
buyout offer for Tribune Co. amid tepid interest=20
for the ailing newspaper publisher. Now the=20
industry's accelerating decline has some Wall=20
Street experts wondering whether the deal for the=20
parent company of the Chicago Tribune, Los=20
Angeles Times and Chicago Cubs could fall apart.=20
And even if it goes through, the employee stock=20
ownership plan that will own most of the company=20
could face a debt burden even more onerous than=20
the one envisioned in April. Zell so far has put=20
up only $50 million in cash, and his ability to=20
walk away appears restricted to certain scenarios=20
which, according to those following the deal=20
closely, don't yet exist. But double-digit drops=20
in revenue and cash flow at the Los Angeles Times=20
as well as deteriorating results at other=20
newspapers have heightened speculation about the=20
potential for the transaction to collapse before=20
the planned closing late this year.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_con...
t_id=3D1003615487

FAMILY TALKS ON A SALE OF DOW JONES ARE CALLED 'NOT ACRIMONIOUS'
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Richard Perez-Pena]
In their last meeting before an expected vote on=20
selling to Rupert Murdoch=92s News Corporation, the=20
family that controls Dow Jones & Company, owner=20
of The Wall Street Journal, heard arguments for=20
and against the deal yesterday from family=20
members and advisers. Over the next several days,=20
the Bancroft family members will tell their=20
lawyers where they stand, and the lawyers will=20
tally the results. There was no debate only a=20
series of speeches. And as expected, the family=20
was deeply divided; people close to them said the vote was too close to cal=
l.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/business/media/24dow.html
(requires registration)
* New Opposition Arises to Dow Jones Deal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118522326046475319.html?mod=3Dtodays_us_...
e_one
* Owners of Dow Jones Convene to Vote on Bid
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR200707...
1594.html
* Murdoch seeks sale decision this week
http://www.latimes.com/business/printedition/la-fi-dowjones24jul24,1,214...
1.story?coll=3Dla-headlines-pe-business
* The Journal And the Mogul
[Commentary] Eugene Robinson doesn't see any=20
realistic choice for the Bancrofts but to take Rupert Murdoch's offer.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/23/AR200707...
1363.html

CITADEL'S CLOSING IN ON ION
[SOURCE: New York Post, AUTHOR: Zachery Kouwe]
Hedge fund Citadel Investment Group and NBC=20
Universal came a step closer to taking control of=20
broadcaster Ion Media Networks after a Delaware=20
judge quickly refused to hear an appeal from a=20
group of angry investors. The investors, who own=20
preferred stock in Ion, filed a lawsuit last=20
month seeking to stop a planned takeover by NBC=20
and Citadel, claiming it undervalues their stake.=20
Earlier this month, the Delaware Chancery Court=20
denied a motion by the investors, led by Gradient=20
Partners, to stop the takeover of Ion. The=20
investors have also filed a complaint with the=20
Federal Communications Commission claiming that=20
NBC is exercising too much influence over Ion=20
despite the fact that Citadel will own most of the company.
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07242007/business/citadels_closing_in_on_ion...
siness_zachery_kouwe.htm

NEWS FROM CONGRESS

DINGELL SEEKS FCC ANSWERS ON SET-TOPS, SPECTRUM AUCTIONS
[SOURCE: Broadcasting&Cable, AUTHOR: John Eggerton]
The House Telecommunications & Internet=20
Subcommittee will hold an FCC oversight hearing=20
July 24, with all the commissioners scheduled to=20
be in attendance. Saying he appreciated FCC=20
Chairman Kevin Martin's participation given=20
recent eye surgery that made it tough for him to=20
read, John Dingell (D-MI), chairman of the parent=20
Commerce Committee, still had a lot of questions=20
he wanted Martin to bone up on for the hearing on=20
subjects including 1) the set aside of some of=20
the 700mHz TV spectrum for an interoperable=20
public safety communications network and 2) cable=20
set-top waiver decisions earlier this month.
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6462132.html?rssid=3D193
* Google's Money Could Change Everything in Wireless Communications
http://www.consumersunion.org/blogs/hun/2007/07/googles_money_could_chan...
eve.html

LAUTENBERG INTRODUCES COMMUNITY BROADBAND ACT OF 2007
[SOURCE: Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg]
Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) introduced=20
legislation to help make broadband access=20
universal and affordable across the country. The=20
measure would promote economic development,=20
enhance public safety, and increase educational=20
opportunities by removing barriers that prevent=20
cities and towns from offering broadband services=20
to their residents. Sen. Lautenberg=92s measure =AD=20
known as the =93Community Broadband Act of 2007=94 =AD=20
stipulates that states cannot prohibit a=20
municipality from offering broadband to its=20
residents, and that a municipality that is a=20
provider cannot discriminate against private=20
competitors. The measure: 1) Sets forth that no=20
state regulation or requirement shall prevent a=20
public provider from offering broadband=20
services; 2) Prohibits a municipality from=20
discriminating against competing private=20
providers; 3) Requires a municipality offering=20
high-speed Internet services to comply with=20
Federal telecommunications law or regulation that=20
applies to all such providers; 4) Encourages=20
public-private partnerships and; 5) Provides the=20
public with notice and an opportunity to be heard=20
before a municipality provides broadband to the=20
public. The measure also is sponsored by Sens.=20
Gordon Smith (R-OR), John Kerry (D-MA), John=20
McCain (R-AZ), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), and Olympia Snowe (R-ME).
http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=3D279536
* Track the bill http://www.benton.org/?q=3Dnode/6649

QUICKLY

LAWYERS GET COURT APPROVAL FOR POP-UP ADS ON INTERNET
[SOURCE: New York Times, AUTHOR: Karen Donovan]
A federal judge in Syracuse has cleared the way=20
for lawyers in New York State to use pop-up ads=20
on the Internet, but did not answer the bigger=20
but more subtle issue of whether firms must label=20
newsletters and e-mail messages to clients as advertising.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/24/business/media/24legal.html
(requires registration)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Communications-related Headlines is a free online=20
news summary service provided by the Benton=20
Foundation (www.benton.org). Posted Monday=20
through Friday, this service provides updates on=20
important industry developments, policy issues,=20
and other related news events. While the=20
summaries are factually accurate, their often=20
informal tone does not always represent the tone=20
of the original articles. Headlines are compiled=20
by Kevin Taglang headlines( at )benton.org -- we welcome your comments.
--------------------------------------------------------------

See http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=318

by: Dick Durbin
Sun Jul 22, 2007 at 13:06:58 PM EDT

Today I'm writing to invite you to participate in an experiment -- an interactive approach to drafting legislation on one of the most significant public policy questions today: