June 2010

Opponents of network neutrality attending congressional telecom meetings spend more on lobbying

On June 25, two congressional committees held closed door discussions with 31 representatives from industry and activist groups to discuss writing a new broadband Internet policy, largely focused on whether and how to implement network neutrality rules, into the Telecommunications Act of 1996. While the meeting contained more proponents of net neutrality, opponents of implementing the policy hold a lop-sided advantage in lobbying spending and contributing to political campaigns.

In attendance were some of the major organizations on both sides of the debate. The biggest organizations in attendance in support of the legislation included Google, Microsoft, Amazon.com and two service providers breaking with their industry, DISH Network and Sprint. Opponents included AT&T, Verizon, National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Communications Workers of America and the US Telecom Association. A number of public interest and consumer groups were also present. According to data obtained from the Center for Responsive Politics, net neutrality opponents represented at the meeting combined for $19.7 million in lobbying in the first quarter of 2010. Supporters, on the other hand, only combined for $4.7 million in first quarter lobbying expenses. (Organizations with undefined, or unidentifiable, positions combined for just under $1 million.) The major campaign contributors opposed to net neutrality gave $6.9 million to political candidates from 2009-2010 while major contributors in support gave $2.2 million. Both sides of the debate sent lobbyists with previous government experience into the closed-door meetings with the committees. Eight of the 31 organization representatives present at the meeting previously worked in Congress. Five of those eight previously worked for one of the two committees holding the meeting.

Free Press Launches 'Corruption Road' to Track Telecom Industry Influence in Washington

Free Press has launched a new tool that illustrates the millions of dollars being funneled from the major phone and cable companies into Washington's economy of influence.

Free Press Campaign Director Timothy Karr said, "In Washington, money equals power, and with this tool, we can see how AT&T, Comcast and Verizon's money is being used to kill public interest policies like Net Neutrality. Ultimately, their goal is to turn Washington against the common sense idea that the FCC should have a role in preserving the open Internet, protecting consumers' rights and fostering universal access to broadband. If their misinformation campaign succeeds, the open and affordable Internet will be in serious danger."

The Battle for Broadband

[Commentary] The definitive battle for the future of the Internet is underway.

On June 17, the Federal Communications Commission moved to reclaim its authority over broadband Internet service; a federal court had overturned FCC action - using a weaker telecom rule - to prevent abusive practices by broadband providers. The FCC's move is also critical for the implementation of the National Broadband Plan, which Congress last year ordered the FCC to draft to address the growing disparities in broadband access, adoption, and affordability.

This future-of-broadband decision will be made by our government. Those who reduce this historic and complex decision to simple slogans - such as "Keep the government's hands off the Internet" - would perpetuate our dependency on the cable and telephone conglomerates, which used an act of government to gain control of broadband in 2002! Will our government rule this time in favor of Wall Street or Main Street? The answer to this question is in our hands.

National Congress of American Indians Shows Support for Network Neutrality

The National Congress of American Indians has adopted a resolution which reads, in part, "An engaged democracy relies on our ability as citizens to freely access information online to use that information to determine our own decisions in politics, health, education, environment and other important matters." The resolution supports the actions being taken by the Federal Communications Commission's oversight of Internet service providers.

Markey to Write Spectrum Bill

In a show of support for President Barack Obama's memorandum on making more spectrum available for commercial use, Rep Ed Markey (D-MA) will author a bill to give additional guidance in the release of the spectrum.

In a statement he said, "I will soon introduce a bill in Congress to free up 500 MHz of spectrum and look forward to working with the Administration on this issue, which is so vital to the future of our country."

US officials seize movie piracy websites

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials working with the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York seized assets from 15 bank, investment and advertising accounts, and executed residential search warrants in North Carolina, New Jersey, New York and Washington in a crackdown on movie piracy that involved seizing several websites that were offering downloads of pirated movies just hours after they appeared in theaters. The nine websites that were seized include TVShack.net, PlanetMoviez.com, ThePirateCity.org and Movies-Links.TV

Report translates redacted pieces of Chinese Internet policies

A report released on Tuesday translates for the first time redacted portions of China's Internet policy guide, the authors of the translation say.

The redacted portions are "most revelatory of the [government's] official ideological vision and plans for controlling the Internet," according to the report, published by Human Rights in China (HRIC), a group that advocates against China's censorship policies. According to the HRIC translation, one of the redacted portions discusses blocking harmful content from overseas. "We will perfect our system to monitor harmful information on the Internet, and strengthen the blocking of harmful information from outside China, to effectively prevent it from being disseminated in China through the Internet," it reads. Another redacted piece looks at how the government can use the Internet for propaganda purposes. "Government agencies at all levels and in all regions have gradually built mechanisms to guide public opinion through integrating the functions of propaganda departments and actual work departments, integrating online media and traditional media, and integrating major news websites and commercial websites," the paper says. The redacted lines also demonstrate the country's aspirations on cloud computing. "At present, there's a popular saying in the Internet industry: 'Whoever seized that cloud will control the future,' " a redacted portion states.

OMB guidance leaves tech industry with questions

The June 28 announcement from the Obama administration that it will halt $20 billion in high-risk technology projects has left the technology industry waiting for more details on how the change will impact companies currently working on federal contracts.

Facebook simplifies privacy controls for applications

On June 30, Facebook unveiled new controls designed to give users more control over how they share information with third-party applications.

The majority of Facebook users interact with third-party applications on the site, some of which require permission to capture a user's profile information. Additionally, many websites accept Facebook login information as validation to comment or post content. Spokesman Andrew Noyes said there are currently 550,000 active applications on the Facebook and more than a million websites integrated into the platform. The company's chief technology officer Bret Taylor announced the changes on the company's blog and said applications must now ask before accessing a user's private information. They must also specify which private content the application will access; profile information made public may still be accessed without notification. "These improvements reflect two core Facebook beliefs: first, your data belongs to you; second, it should be easy to control what you share," Taylor writes. "If at any point you ask a developer to remove the data you've granted them access to, we require that that they delete this information."

MMTC Slams FCC For EEO Inaction

The Minority Media and Telecom Council has asked the Federal Communications Commission to suspend its equal employment opportunity rules (EEO) rules for three months.

But far from thinking the FCC doesn't need such rules, the group is making the call to bring attention to what it says is 12 months of inaction and the need to revamp the FCC's EEO rules. "Nothing is lost by suspending it," says MMTC Executive Director David Honig, "since as configured now it isn't producing any benefits to the public or broadcasters." In a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Honig said that June 29 marked a year since the last EEO decision --three in fact -- but that even those had been "leveled against a diverse broadcaster for technical rule violations." He says the last time there was no EEO enforcement for a 12-month period was June 1968-June 1969. "The decline in EEO enforcement cannot be attributed to court decisions," said Honig. "Instead they are an indication that EEO has been a low priority at the Commission for far too long." He said the FCC should suspend enforcement so that it can "revitalize and reaffirm" its commitment.